=== pieq__ is now known as pieq
=== acheronuk is now known as RikMills
popeytseliot: good morning - bug 1846995 hit me when going 19.04 to 19.10 - Seems dkms problems with the kernel in 19.1008:21
ubottubug 1846995 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 (Ubuntu) "package nvidia-dkms-390 390.129-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: installed nvidia-dkms-390 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/184699508:21
=== pieq_ is now known as pieq
tseliotpopey, good morning to you. Let me have a look09:45
rbasakwaveform: o/09:46
waveformrbasak, hi!09:46
rbasakwaveform: how's u-boot looking?09:46
waveformrbasak, good - fixed up the CM3 issue and retested everything (2, 3, 3+, 4, CM3, CM3+ on armhf and arm64) over the weekend. Just finishing off the last couple of bits from your review at the mo, though I might prod you with a couple of questions in a bit09:47
rbasakGreat, thanks!09:48
* rbasak is just planning his week09:48
tseliotpopey, I know where the problem lies. It's the new compiler flags. I am not sure why this isn't fixed in the kernel. sforshee ^^09:48
popeytseliot: thanks. is there a workaround? I'm kinda stick mid-upgrade now.10:16
tseliotpopey, yes, set gcc-8 as your compiler ("sudo ln -fs gcc-8 /usr/bin/gcc"), and try again10:18
popeytseliot: thanks, will try that10:19
popeytseliot: that worked, thank you!10:22
LocutusOfBorgis syncpackage broken?11:54
LocutusOfBorgsyncpackage -f fswatch returns11:54
LocutusOfBorg  ubuntutools.archive.DownloadError: Signature on fswatch_1.14.0+repack-12.dsc could not be verified11:54
LocutusOfBorgnot sure if LP is to blame or something else is broken...11:54
seb128LocutusOfBorg, I think the script is buggy in eoan, I've hit that issue, it works on other Ubuntu series still iirc, I ended up hacking the .py locally to skip the verification or using my other laptop on bionic...11:56
LocutusOfBorgseb128, I'm using bionic, but my ubuntu dev tools is updated...12:08
LocutusOfBorgmapreri, ^^12:08
RikMillstseliot: is this known? https://www.reddit.com/r/Ubuntu/comments/deij1t/errors_when_i_tried_to_upgrade_to_ubuntu_1910/12:18
RikMillstseliot: I guess the upgraders are hitting this LP: #184577212:31
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1845772 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 (Ubuntu) "package nvidia-dkms-430 430.50-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: installed nvidia-dkms-430 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/184577212:31
=== ricab is now known as ricab|lunch
jibelRikMills, it's a stock disco upgraded to eoan with nvidia drivers?13:11
RikMillsjibel: just went to ask and they have deleted their post. I'll try an upgrade later to see if I can hit it13:13
jibelRikMills, k, keep me posted13:15
tseliotRikMills, the bug report shows that the module failed to build. I suspect it's because of the new flags in gcc 913:38
RikMillstseliot: I just reproduced it in a disco -> eoan test upgrade13:42
tseliotRikMills, can upload your make.log to the bug report, please?13:42
tseliote.g. /var/lib/dkms/nvidia/430.50/build/make.log (it depends on the driver you're using)13:43
RikMillstseliot: will do.13:43
RikMillsmake.log added13:54
* tseliot looking14:00
tseliotRikMills, it's definitely LP: #183096114:07
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1830961 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 (Ubuntu) "Kernels & kernel drivers fail to build with gcc-9 [error: ‘-mindirect-branch’ and ‘-fcf-protection’ are not compatible]" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/183096114:07
RikMillstseliot: thanks :)14:07
RikMillsso jist of that is we need the kdernel fix backported to 19.04 before 19.10 gets released?14:09
RikMillsumm. yep14:11
=== ricab|lunch is now known as ricab
waveformrbasak, fyi - I've just replied on the ticket to all the review points and I'm currently testing an updated version of the package15:56
repzhi there, does anybody know if it's possible to retrieve CI / build steps for a package on launchpad ?18:13
repzI can only retrieve the buildlog18:13
sarnoldwhat is missing from the build log?18:17
repzbuildlog is 'only' the output of the build18:19
repznot compilation steps18:19
repzor I am missing something18:19
sarnoldrepz: well, which build log are you looking at now and what information is it missing that you expected to find?18:22
repzI am looking for zsh build log but I am seeing that everything is packed through a specific builder, I thought there would be a 'simple' CI file. (I am discovering the official package building process atm).18:25
sarnoldrepz: are you looking for autopkgtest results? eg http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/zsh18:27
repzno, basically I wanted to compile zsh to get latest version and I wanted to check how it's being officially packed first18:28
sarnoldaha; if you have the deb-src lines in your apt sources configured correctly, "apt source zsh" will download the files needed to build it yourself18:31
repzoh thanks but im not sure as of what to do next neither where it's been downloaded ?18:36
repzok in current directory18:36
ubottucyphermox, jbicha, micahg, rbasak, sil2100, slashd, tsimonq2: DMB ping.18:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!