[10:27] <tomreyn> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13925
[10:28] <tomreyn> ^ is this something which can be fixed?
[10:28] <tomreyn> uottu failing to parse the bugzilla xml that is
[21:25] <Unit193> krytarik: ↑ This fails on ubot93 too.
[21:30] <dax> ubot93 is the one with all the shiny new stuff right
[21:37] <Unit193> Yeah.
[21:38] <Unit193> This is just the specific bug though, not bugzilla in general.  https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13920
[21:38] <Unit193> ...Ooooor not.
[21:38] <tomreyn> :)
[21:39] <Unit193> (It works with other bugzillas)
[21:41] <tomreyn> i pushed the pade and DTD through an xml validator, and it was ok with it
[21:42] <tomreyn> (but i'm not sure whether the validator was a good one)
[21:42] <Unit193> Yeah, but in the bug I linked, the xml isn't even 100 lines long.
[21:46] <Unit193> tomreyn: Try: wget -O samba.xml "https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13920&ctype=xml" -U "Mozilla/5.0 (Compatible; Supybot 2019.09.08)"
[21:47] <Unit193> So, we could lie about user agent, but that's samba doing weird stuff.
[22:11] <tomreyn> hmm, samba doing weird things, thats entirely new!
[22:12] <dax> lol
[22:14] <tomreyn> looks like they don't like your robot
[22:15] <Unit193> I'd suspect that it's more "we don't account for it", but yes it could be specific.  I doubt there's enough supybot/limnoria hits to make any worthwhile hit though.
[22:17] <tomreyn> yes, it's more likely to be not just about *your* supybot but all supybots
[22:23] <Unit193> I'd question if it was supybot and more 'bot' :P
[22:23] <dax> easy enough to test :3
[22:24] <dax> it does indeed appear to be /bot/
[22:24] <Unit193> Haha, that's awesome.
[22:31] <tomreyn> so what's the new UA, "Mozilla/5.0 (Compatible; Samba rocks! 1.0)"?
[22:31] <Unit193> ...That might not have been what I changed!
[22:31] <tomreyn> *might*
[22:32] <Unit193> 'Mozilla/5.0 (Compatible; Limnoria %s)' % version  Since ubot93 uses Limnoria, it isn't lying.  I would still maintain this is a Samba bug though.
[22:32] <dax> how do i make ubot93 tell me what limnoria it uses
[22:33] <dax> i tried msging it @version but it got confused
[22:33] <Unit193> It has defaultignore and you don't have an account.
[22:33] <dax> ah
[22:33] <Unit193> `version
[22:34] <dax> what is this "python 3" you talk about
[22:34] <dax> also, nice
[22:34] <Unit193> It will run the latest release of Limnoria, that's part of the reason it restarts more than ubottu. (Drone does as well, fwiw.)
[22:35] <tomreyn> so then: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13920
[22:35] <tomreyn> oh, wrong bot
[22:36] <Unit193> Sorry, this doesn't really help you.  ubot93 is only in some stranger channels.  #lubuntu-devel, #ubuntu-google, etc.
[22:36] <tomreyn> well, maybe ubottu will become a limnoria some dday as well
[22:37] <tomreyn> and until then it could say "Mozilla/5.0 (Compatible; Soon to be upgraded to Limnoria 2019.09.08)"
[22:38] <tomreyn> not a lie!
[22:38] <Unit193> I don't think it will be, soon anyway.  FWIW, I don't have any access to ubottu and most of the clones.
[22:39] <dax> i know i've asked you this like four times, but what are the technical blockers for switching these days
[22:39] <dax> i keep forgetting the answer
[22:40] <tomreyn> thanks for trying to help there. i'll catch some sleep, ttyl (when i'll read up on this answer, too).
[22:40] <Unit193> Basically, 1. Maintainer time.  2. ubottu.com runs Xenial or Trusty.  3. Bantracker isn't ported to Py3.
[22:40] <Unit193> tomreyn: G'night.
[22:41] <tomreyn> thanks. and it runs trusty.
[22:42] <dax> Unit193: assuming bantracker isn't gonna get a py3 port, which is a pretty decent assumption at this point, i guess we move to chantracker?
[22:42] <Unit193> That's what I'm afraid of, yeah.
[22:43] <dax> i guess it's good that #ubuntu's banlist size has gone down a lot the last couple of years
[22:47] <Unit193> Mind if I drop you a link in PM to perhaps answer some questions regarding progress?
[22:47] <dax> go for it
[22:50] <Unit193> ChanTracker also has quite a lot of the channel history, so wouldn't be quite from scratch.  It doesn't have a webUI though.
[22:50] <dax> kinda wondering whether BT is overkill these days, but i've never really had views on BT that align with the rest of the irc team so i wouldn't be the right person to offer opinions on that
[22:51] <dax> (e.g. i was perfectly happy during the time we used eir)
[22:51] <Unit193> I don't like eir. :3