[13:01] <doko> cyphermox, didrocks, cpaelzer, jamespage: MIR meeting?
[13:01] <jamespage> o/
[13:01] <jamespage> hello
[13:01] <joeubuntu> I'm joining for jdstrand doko.
[13:02] <didrocks> hey
[13:02] <cpaelzer> hiho
[13:03] <cpaelzer> jamespage: while we are here you might answer https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-ganesha/+bug/1843403/comments/4 ?
[13:04] <jamespage> my plan was to work the identified work items very early next cycle and then submit for full review
[13:04] <cpaelzer> perfect
[13:04] <cpaelzer> I'll quote that into the bug - or will you add it there?
[13:04] <jamespage> I can add it
[13:04] <cpaelzer> ok
[13:04] <cpaelzer> while we wait for cyphermox I think we should get this started ...
[13:04] <cpaelzer> #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status
[13:04] <meetingology> Meeting started Tue Oct  8 13:04:59 2019 UTC.  The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[13:04] <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
[13:05] <cpaelzer> #topic Review of previous action items
[13:05] <cpaelzer> I wasn't here last week, any actions defined there?
[13:05] <cpaelzer> we didn't have any meeting actions the week before ...
[13:05] <doko> joeubuntu: added you to the calendar, and removed jdstrand
[13:05] <doko> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg
[13:05] <doko> joeubuntu: any chance for the libheif review?
[13:06] <doko> I don't think so
[13:06] <joeubuntu> Sure, it 2nd in the queue right now doko
[13:06] <joeubuntu> Sorry, you mean to be pass. I am not sure. Seth it reviewing it.
[13:08] <cpaelzer> just after zsys :-)
[13:08] <cpaelzer> so didrocks can give heif a boost by passing zsys position int he queue :-)
[13:08] <didrocks> \o/
[13:09] <cpaelzer> doko: the good part is that both are above the "known to be needed for 19.10" line
[13:09] <cpaelzer> so Seth, joeubuntu and others are aware of the urgency I think
[13:10] <cpaelzer> joeubuntu: you might ask sarnold if there is any interim progres to report, if so he can share that on the bug
[13:10] <joeubuntu> libheif was moved out of the 19.10 queue by foundations, but then Brian asked that we add it back in last week, so we did.
[13:10] <cpaelzer> thanks
[13:10] <joeubuntu> cpaelzer will do
[13:10] <cpaelzer> going to new MIRs then
[13:10] <cpaelzer> #topic New MIRs
[13:10] <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
[13:11] <cpaelzer> the only one being https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-ganesha/+bug/1843403
[13:11] <cpaelzer> jamespage: just confirmed that he will work on the known tasks beofre review
[13:11] <cpaelzer> so I'll mark this incomplete
[13:11] <cpaelzer> once known todos are done it can be set back to new to show up again
[13:11] <cpaelzer> doen, no others in this queue this week
[13:11] <cpaelzer> #topic Incomplete bugs / questions
[13:11] <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
[13:12] <cpaelzer> didrocks: doko: libextutils-depends-perl and libextutils-pkgconfig-perl came in recently
[13:12] <cpaelzer> I have realized that was in main before
[13:13] <cpaelzer> so it would be a fast-pass case
[13:13] <cpaelzer> the uncertainty was about which Team would subscribe
[13:13] <cpaelzer> currently it seems none is
[13:13] <didrocks> yeah, seb128 and doko had some discussions on it
[13:13] <didrocks> but no conclusion it seems
[13:13] <cpaelzer> OTOH without knowing details I wonder how a pkgconfig kind of package can be a runtime dependency
[13:13] <doko> "discussions?"  I think it's escalated now to management
[13:14] <didrocks> doko: can you make sure they discuss this in the foundation/desktop sync?
[13:14] <didrocks> they already had one last week, but I didn't hear about the results
[13:14] <doko> didrocks: I asked for that before the last sync
[13:14] <didrocks> doko: if you need me to push on the desktop side for getting feedback as well, do not hesitate
[13:15] <didrocks> cpaelzer: yeah, same questionning on pkgconfig
[13:15] <cpaelzer> from changelog
[13:15] <cpaelzer>   9   * Reformat debian/control with "dh-make-perl --refresh".
[13:16] <cpaelzer> could that have been buggy and pulling it in by accident
[13:16] <cpaelzer> anyway it seems that needs sorting out between Desktop and Foundations
[13:16] <cpaelzer> given the short time before 19.10 I'd ask you all to keep bothering the people you need for this
[13:17] <cpaelzer> if one could prove the dependency isn't necesary this would resolve itslef :-)
[13:17] <cpaelzer> did you last week talk about https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/abootimg/+bug/1846208 ?
[13:18] <cpaelzer> it was opened on 1st october not sure it was visible to you last week already
[13:18] <doko> no idea, the comments sound like bikeshedding
[13:18] <cpaelzer> It seems like it was opened incomplete, is this waiting on something?
[13:18] <cpaelzer> xnox: are you around to comment?
[13:19] <cpaelzer> The rest of the list looks fine to me
[13:20] <cpaelzer> xnox: can still chime in later here or on the bug - until then we handle the bug as it is flagged "incomplete->no-action"
[13:20] <cpaelzer> #topic Any other business?
[13:20] <cpaelzer> we all hav eseen the jdstrand joeubuntu sarnold change in responsibility
[13:20] <cpaelzer> nothing on top from server teams side
[13:20] <cpaelzer> anything else?
[13:22] <cpaelzer> I'll take this as a lonely no :-)
[13:22] <cpaelzer> #endmeeting
[13:22] <meetingology> Meeting ended Tue Oct  8 13:22:53 2019 UTC.
[13:22] <meetingology> Minutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2019/ubuntu-meeting.2019-10-08-13.04.moin.txt
[13:23] <joeubuntu> bye all.
[13:23] <didrocks> doko: FYI, the between team sync didn't happen last week
[13:23] <didrocks> so, probably this one
[13:23] <didrocks> bye!
[13:23] <doko> bye
[16:03] <sarnold> l
[17:28] <xnox> ii
[17:31] <sarnold> :)