[00:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: webkit2gtk (eoan-proposed/main) [2.26.1-1 => 2.26.1-2] (desktop-core) (sync)
=== tacocat is now known as e[_]
=== e[_] is now known as c[_]
=== c[_] is now known as e[_]
[01:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted webkit2gtk [sync] (eoan-proposed) [2.26.1-2]
=== e[_] is now known as tacocat
[01:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debian-installer [source] (eoan-proposed) [20101020ubuntu591]
[01:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdm3 [source] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.1-1ubuntu1]
[01:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rygel [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.38.1-2ubuntu3]
[01:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-calendar [sync] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.1-1]
[01:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-initial-setup [source] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.1-1ubuntu1]
[01:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted texinfo [source] (eoan-proposed) [6.6.0.dfsg.1-2ubuntu2]
[01:32] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: "Lower optimization level on ppc64el" isn't a useful changelog.  Why?
[01:33] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: If it was just to make the symbols file love you, there are tools to merge symbols.
[01:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fswatch [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.14.0+repack-12ubuntu1]
[01:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libpeas [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.24.0-2ubuntu1]
[01:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted llvm-toolchain-9 [sync] (eoan-proposed) [1:9-2]
[01:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.0.3-0ubuntu1 => 3.0.4-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[01:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-games-app [sync] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.1-1]
[01:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libdazzle [sync] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.1-1]
[01:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted iputils [sync] (eoan-proposed) [3:20190709-2]
[01:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted blitz++ [sync] (eoan-proposed) [1:1.0.1+ds-6]
[03:44] <tjaalton> could the intel-* packages be accepted from the queue, thanks
[03:44] <tjaalton> besides being new upstream versions, they migrate off llvm8
[03:45] <tjaalton> well, compute-runtime does
[03:46] <tjaalton> which needs newer gmmlib, and the media drivers a rebuild against it
[05:56] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, do you have links to docs?
[05:58] <LocutusOfBorg> btw ppc64el has proven to be worse with -O3 wrt -O2 at least by looking at bugs and test failures...
[06:03] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, ifreg has regressed tests in a way I don't get... this is the reason for no change rebuild...
[06:03] <LocutusOfBorg> something in rules file I don't get
[07:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evince (eoan-proposed/main) [3.34.0-1 => 3.34.1-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[07:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: epiphany-browser (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.34.0-2 => 3.34.1-1] (desktop-extra) (sync)
[08:02] <Laney> mwhudson: whoopsie, didn't notice that, soz
[08:05] <Laney> thanks to vorlon for fixing that up
[08:13] <Laney> ah, and thanks ddstreet too
[08:43] <mwhudson> Laney: yeah vorlon took the more constructive approach vs my just whining
[08:44] <Laney> I assumed you couldn't commit :-)
[08:44] <Laney> not sure if that's true
[08:53] <LocutusOfBorg> https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-eoan/eoan/i386/i/iraf/20191008_062545_1cbac@/log.gz
[08:53] <LocutusOfBorg> any idea for this autopkgtest failure?
[08:53] <LocutusOfBorg> it doesn't even start the test...
[08:59] <LocutusOfBorg> autopkgtest [06:13:48]: ERROR: erroneous package: rules extract failed with exit code 1
[09:00] <LocutusOfBorg> this seems an infrastructure regression to me...
[09:02] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, see #ubuntu-devel earlier
[09:03] <Laney> yeah I retried it, hopefully is the same thing and will work now
[09:04] <Laney> is running this time
[09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kubuntu-wallpapers (eoan-proposed/universe) [19.10.1 => 19.10.2] (kubuntu)
[09:10] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks for retrying it
[09:10] <LocutusOfBorg> it would be nice when autopkgtest starts to print its checkout id, or version string, so we can bisect from the "last good run"
[09:10] <LocutusOfBorg> what do you think?
[09:12] <Laney> it does
[09:12] <Laney> that is the very first line in the log
[09:13] <LocutusOfBorg> ok, thanks, it wasn't clear to me that it was the "gitlog"
[09:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kubuntu-wallpapers (disco-proposed/universe) [18.04.0 => 19.10.1~ubuntu19.04~ppa1] (kubuntu)
[09:16] <LocutusOfBorg> (I didn't find that commit on debian salsa repo, and I couldn't find references of the "git repository" for that checkout, so having the commit id is somewhat useless unless some more context is printed, at least from an external POV)
[09:17] <bluesabre> Laney: Would you mind ack'ing https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xubuntu-artwork/+bug/1846935 ? :)
[09:17] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1846935 in xubuntu-artwork (Ubuntu) "[UIFe] New wallpaper for Xubuntu 19.10" [Undecided,New]
[09:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kubuntu-meta (disco-proposed/universe) [1.383 => 1.386~ubuntu19.04~ppa1] (kubuntu)
[09:18] <Laney> hey bluesabre
[09:18] <bluesabre> hey! :D
[09:19] <Laney> done!
[09:19] <bluesabre> awesome
[09:19] <bluesabre> thanks a bunch!
[09:19] <RikMills> please reject kubuntu-meta. obviously should have been to a ppa
[09:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-music (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.32.1-1 => 3.32.2-1] (desktop-extra, ubuntugnome) (sync)
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xubuntu-artwork (eoan-proposed/universe) [19.10 => 19.10.1] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu)
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pbr (eoan-proposed/main) [5.1.1-0ubuntu2 => 5.1.1-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[09:33] <apw> RikMills, and i assume kubunty-wallpapers ?
[09:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected kubuntu-meta [source] (disco-proposed) [1.386~ubuntu19.04~ppa1]
[09:34] <RikMills> apw: nope, kubuntu-wallpapers is wanted for eoan
[09:34] <RikMills> thanks
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected kubuntu-wallpapers [source] (disco-proposed) [19.10.1~ubuntu19.04~ppa1]
[09:34] <apw> RikMills, the one in disco with ~ppa1 as its version
[09:35] <handsome_feng> Hi, Could some help to ack LP: #1843521 and LP: #1847101
[09:35] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1843521 in ubuntu-kylin-software-center (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Please upgrade ubuntu-kylin-software-center to 3.0.4" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1843521
[09:35] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1847101 in ubuntukylin-theme (Ubuntu) "[UIFe] Please upgrade ubuntukylin-theme to 1.8.3" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1847101
[09:35] <RikMills> apw: oh, yes.
[09:42]  * RikMills is having a bad morning
[09:44] <apw> RikMills, they happen, and yay for queues
[09:44] <Laney> yeah I once started a haskell transition by mistake
[09:44] <RikMills> indeed!
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server (eoan-proposed/main) [2:1.20.5+git20190820-0ubuntu3 => 2:1.20.5+git20191008-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, xorg)
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer
[09:50] <jamespage> apw: could you take a look at python-pbr - autopkgtests are currently blocking a python-defaults migration
[09:50] <jamespage> its a bit of a stop-gap fix until next cycle
[09:53] <apw> jamespage, nasty .. so it will be used and untested, fun
[09:54] <jamespage> apw: yeah I was a bit bemused as to how python-stestr without py2 support actually got into the release pocket
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-pbr [source] (eoan-proposed) [5.1.1-0ubuntu3]
[09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub-installer (eoan-proposed/main) [1.128ubuntu13 => 1.128ubuntu14] (core)
[10:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-data-server (eoan-proposed/main) [3.34.0-2 => 3.34.1-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub-installer [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.128ubuntu14]
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (eoan-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu9 => 2.04-1ubuntu10] (core)
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (eoan-proposed/main) [1.125 => 1.126] (core)
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: binutils (eoan-proposed/main) [2.32.90.20190929-0ubuntu2 => 2.33-1ubuntu1] (core)
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (eoan-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu591 => 20101020ubuntu592] (core)
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-suspend-button (eoan-proposed/universe) [0~git20180827-2 => 0~git20191005-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: u-boot (eoan-proposed/main) [2019.04+dfsg-2ubuntu3 => 2019.07+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (core)
[11:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted binutils [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.33-1ubuntu1]
[11:45] <seb128> could someone review the desktop updates in the queue? we would prefer to have the gnome point updates in earlier rather than later so they get a bit more testing
[11:45] <seb128> (e.g gnome-session nautilus network-manager etc)
[11:45] <seb128> apw, ^ you can help maybe? or unsure who else is doing queue reviews noaways?
[11:48] <Laney> I've done a load, but usually towards the beginning and end of the day
[11:48] <Laney> didn't quite get through the whole queue yesterday
[11:51] <seb128> Laney, right, I know, and you are busy dealing with other days so would be nice if we had other reviewers :)
[11:51] <seb128> sil2100, ^
[11:52] <Laney> yeah, I guess more hands would be appreciated:-)
[11:52] <seb128> other things*
[12:03] <sil2100> I can take a look, I didn't do queue reviews today yet, only yesterday in the morning
[12:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unbound (eoan-proposed/main) [1.9.0-2 => 1.9.0-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[12:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-azure [sync] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-1002.2]
[12:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed-azure [sync] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-1002.2]
[12:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-azure [sync] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0.1002.19]
[12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted network-manager [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.20.4-2ubuntu1]
[12:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-oracle [sync] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0.1001.1]
[12:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed-oracle [sync] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-1001.1]
[12:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-oracle [sync] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-1001.1]
[12:17] <sil2100> Laney: uh, looking at the gnome-session upload - this looks like a new upstream version, so I wanted to check the NEWS file for changes and see if this needs an FFe, but apparently NEWS is removed in this version?
[12:18] <sil2100> Laney: do you know if that's intentional that the NEWS file is removed?
[12:19] <sil2100> Also, I mean, maybe I'm forgetting about something (like some standing FFe or something), but is there an FFe for this? Or does this only have bugfixes?
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-screensaver [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.0.9-0ubuntu1]
[12:22] <Laney> sil2100: it's only bugfixes
[12:22] <Laney> NEWS isn't deleted but upstream cleared out the old entries
[12:25] <Laney> I did put those in the debian/changelog for helpfulness
[12:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nautilus [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:3.34.1-1ubuntu1]
[12:28] <sil2100> Laney: ok, thanks, since I only saw '-'es in the NEWS file in the diff
[12:30] <sil2100> Laney: I trust you, just wanted to make sure since it's a bump from 3.33.92 to 3.34.1, so usually those are not only bugfix releases
[12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-indicators [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.7-0ubuntu1]
[12:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cups-filters [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.25.7-0ubuntu1]
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9 (eoan-proposed/main) [9.2.1-8ubuntu1 => 9.2.1-9ubuntu1] (core)
[12:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-control-center [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:3.34.1-1ubuntu1]
[12:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-session [source] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.1-1ubuntu1]
[12:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-9 [source] (eoan-proposed) [9.2.1-9ubuntu1]
[12:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted epiphany-browser [sync] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.1-1]
[12:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evince [sync] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.1-1]
[12:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxc [source] (eoan-proposed) [3.0.4-0ubuntu1]
[12:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-data-server [sync] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.1-1]
[12:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-music [sync] (eoan-proposed) [3.32.2-1]
[13:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: firefox (eoan-proposed/main) [69.0.2+build1-0ubuntu1 => 69.0.2+build1-0ubuntu2] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub-installer (eoan-proposed/main) [1.128ubuntu13 => 1.128ubuntu14] (core)
[13:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted u-boot [source] (eoan-proposed) [2019.07+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[13:17] <didrocks> Laney: grub-installer tested and uploaded there ^
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware-raspi2 (eoan-proposed/multiverse) [1.20190215-0ubuntu3 => 1.20190819-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[13:24] <sil2100> didrocks: is that the fix for the install failure?
[13:25] <didrocks> sil2100: yep, it will need a new ubiquity afterwards
[13:25] <didrocks> well, failure only when using ZFS
[13:25] <didrocks> or are you discussing another one?
[13:28] <sil2100> didrocks: not sure, mwhudson in the morning mentioned he had a grub-install failure when testing eoan-desktop
[13:28] <sil2100> But I guess this could have been it
[13:28] <didrocks> I don't think this is related
[13:28] <didrocks> because it's not ZFS-related AFAIK
[13:29] <Laney> nah, that one turned out to be a bug in the change he was working on
[13:29] <sil2100> hm, ok, since he mentioned that #ubuntu-desktop was on it, oh well!
[13:29] <sil2100> Ah!
[13:29] <sil2100> Ok
[13:29] <Laney> the knowledge evolved over time
[13:30] <sil2100> Laney: you want to review the grub-installer one? It looks good to me though, since I guess udevinfo/udevadm wouldn't return any useful errors there anyway
[13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub-installer [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.128ubuntu14]
[13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.126]
[13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu10]
[13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kubuntu-wallpapers [source] (eoan-proposed) [19.10.2]
[13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xubuntu-artwork [source] (eoan-proposed) [19.10.1]
[13:40] <sil2100> Laney: btw. if you'd have a moment, we have a linux-firmware-raspi2 package in the eoan queue that I'd need someone to accept, it's for the pi4 ongoing enablement
[13:40] <sil2100> Laney: I don't want to self-approve that as I was the sponsor
[13:41] <sil2100> Laney: if you have no cycles then no worries, I'll poke vorlon later
[13:41] <Laney> ack, will do if I get some time shortly
[13:41] <sil2100> Thanks ;)
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1002.2] (core, kernel)
[13:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-1002.2]
[13:49] <tumbleweed>  /36
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (eoan-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu10 => 2.04-1ubuntu10] (core)
[14:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu10]
[14:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (eoan-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu10 => 2.04-1ubuntu10] (core)
[14:21]  * Laney eyes queuebot 
[14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted firefox [source] (eoan-proposed) [69.0.2+build1-0ubuntu2]
[14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unbound [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.9.0-2ubuntu1]
[14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware-raspi2 [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.20190819-0ubuntu1]
[14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server [source] (eoan-proposed) [2:1.20.5+git20191008-0ubuntu1]
[14:35] <coreycb> hi release team, can someone take a look at accepting the placement eoan upload for openstack? it includes a bug fix and sqlalchemy change that will enable us to successfully deploy the service.
[14:38] <sil2100> coreycb: o/
[14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu10]
[14:39] <sil2100> Laney: thanks for linux-firmware-raspi2 o/
[14:39] <coreycb> sil2100: o/
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted placement [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu2]
[14:39] <Laney> NOOOOOOOOOOOOoooo problemoooo
[14:39] <coreycb> sil2100: thanks :)
[14:42] <sil2100> yw!
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gvfs (eoan-proposed/main) [1.42.0-1ubuntu1 => 1.42.1-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core)
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-desktop3 (eoan-proposed/main) [3.34.0-2ubuntu1 => 3.34.1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kcov (eoan-proposed/universe) [36+dfsg-1build4 => 36+dfsg-1build5] (no packageset)
[15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: looking-glass (eoan-proposed/universe) [0+b1-1build6 => 0+b1-1build7] (no packageset)
[15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: naev (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.7.0-2build9 => 0.7.0-2build10] (no packageset)
[15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: oprofile (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-0ubuntu8 => 1.3.0-0ubuntu9] (no packageset)
[15:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8 (eoan-proposed/universe) [8.3.0-23ubuntu1 => 8.3.0-23ubuntu2] (core)
[15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7 (eoan-proposed/universe) [7.4.0-14ubuntu1 => 7.4.0-14ubuntu2] (core)
[15:26] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: so, feel free to upload with a changelog that explains why we're rebuilding it :)
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-snapshot (eoan-proposed/universe) [1:20191001-1ubuntu2 => 1:20191008-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (eoan-proposed/main) [19.10.15 => 19.10.16] (core)
[16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-desktop3 [source] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.1-1ubuntu1]
[16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gvfs [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.42.1-1ubuntu1]
[16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted looking-glass [source] (eoan-proposed) [0+b1-1build7]
[16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-suspend-button [sync] (eoan-proposed) [0~git20191005-1]
[16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted naev [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.7.0-2build10]
[16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kcov [source] (eoan-proposed) [36+dfsg-1build5]
[16:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apache2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.4.18-2ubuntu3.13 => 2.4.18-2ubuntu3.14] (ubuntu-server)
[16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted oprofile [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu9]
[16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (eoan-proposed) [19.10.16]
[16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debian-installer [source] (eoan-proposed) [20101020ubuntu592]
[16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7 [source] (eoan-proposed) [7.4.0-14ubuntu2]
[16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-8 [source] (eoan-proposed) [8.3.0-23ubuntu2]
[16:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-snapshot [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:20191008-1ubuntu1]
[16:54] <tsimonq2> Those two Lubuntu packages are targeted for this release. The last upload we may do is Calamares, prior to RC freeze.
[16:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-artwork (eoan-proposed/universe) [19.10.1 => 19.10.2] (lubuntu)
[16:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxqt-globalkeys (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.14.1-0ubuntu4 => 0.14.1+git20190923-0ubuntu1] (lubuntu)
[16:54] <tsimonq2> If you have any questions, please let me know.
[16:55] <infinity> tsimonq2: Why are they called apartments if they're all stuck together?
[16:58] <Odd_Bloke> You're only ment to get a part of the building.
[16:58] <doko> the apport and crash autopkg tests need to be overridden. no kernel anymore on i386
[16:59] <doko> apw, vorlon: ^^^ and probably more that we don't know about
[17:04] <tsimonq2> infinity: Huh? :)
[17:06] <ginggs> tsimonq2: you said "any questions"
[17:07] <infinity> ^
[17:15] <vorlon> doko: hints added for crash and apport, thanks
[17:20] <tsimonq2> infinity: They're distinct units sold separately. As one they are an apartment complex. Just like halloween candy. :P
[17:23] <infinity> Just... Like... Halloween candy?
[17:23] <infinity> That took a turn I wasn't expecting.
[17:26] <tsimonq2> As in, many distinct units picked separately. Some are those crappy carmel hard candies and others are a bag of Skittles.
[17:26] <tsimonq2> (carmel vs caramel is a Wisconsinism, fight me)
[17:26] <xnox> twiddle thumbs
[17:35] <infinity> Laney, vorlon: Do the amd64 and i386 autopkgtest guests use the same base VM spec, or did we have CPUs clamped differently for i386?
[17:36] <infinity> (trying to figure out how, with the same kernel amd64 booted, a few 64-bit glibc tests would fail only on "i386" autopkgtest)
[17:36] <infinity> s/kernel amd64/amd64 kernel/
[17:37] <doko> that's x32. was that ever enabled in i386 kernels?
[17:37] <infinity> doko: No, but it's enabled in amd64 kernels, which we now boot with.
[17:37] <doko> exactly
[17:38] <infinity> doko: My point is that the very same tests pass on the amd64-x32 build, and barring a binutils or gcc code generation bug that only exists with i386 userspace (unlikely), something else is goofy. :)
[17:38] <doko> and the tests didn't run when the kernel doesn't support that personality
[17:38] <infinity> doko: Not that any of this should block the world (and it won't), I'm just curious why.
[17:38] <doko> ahh, I see
[17:42] <infinity> I'll badtest i386 for now, and do some skipping in the next upload.
[17:42] <doko> ta
[17:42] <infinity> Undecided if I skip entirely, like it used to, or just take this as a new baseline (which seems clean except for those 4 tests, but also, who would install those packages ever anyway so do I care?)
[17:46] <infinity> Wait.  lp_buildd has always built on amd64 kernels, runs the x32 tests, and those tests pass.  So yeah, I'm very suspicious of the i386 autopkgtest VMs.
[17:46] <infinity> But maybe also slightly suspicious of the current archive state now. :)
[17:46]  * infinity will try a test build in a PPA with proposed on.
[17:50] <doko> vorlon, infinity: please override the python-fakeredis autopkg test. it's a missing python3-lupa binary on ppc64el in the release pocket, so no regression
[17:52] <infinity> But that's been missing for years, and the failure started this month?
[17:54] <xnox> infinity:  please RM debian-installer on i386 from eoan release https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1845714
[17:54] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1845714 in debian-installer (Ubuntu) "Drop i386 build for 19.10" [Undecided,In progress]
[17:55] <xnox> infinity:  unless we wanna build i386 d-i with an amd64 kernel?! /me is not sure that anna knows how to use multiarch
[17:55] <infinity> xnox: That'll require some manual archive surgery, I'll get there in a bit.
[17:55] <infinity> xnox: And no, we don't want i386 installers.
[17:56] <xnox> infinity:  urgh, ok. Not sure if removing just the debian-installer-udeb will be enough for britney to migrate the new kernel & the new d-i over, before removing the rest of it
[17:57]  * xnox ponders if i386 builders should start using 'noudeb' build-profile
[17:57] <infinity> Laney: Something broke in autopkgtest-satdep, I think?  It seems to be installing build-deps when not asked to.
[17:58] <infinity> xnox: Britney knows nothing about random junk on disk, just debian packages in Packages files.
[17:58] <infinity> xnox: So removing the one NBS package will migrate it.
[17:58] <infinity> xnox: But also, pretty sure said migration isn't OMG NEXT SEVEN MINUTES urgent, so patience. :P
[17:59] <xnox> infinity:  nah, not urgent
[17:59] <infinity> xnox: And no, there's no harm in udebs existing on i386, changing how things build on one arch is silly.
[18:00]  * doko welcomes the extensive testiing for this decision after feature freeze
[18:08] <RikMills> can someone poke this to retry? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/19.10.16/+build/17864517
[18:08] <RikMills> I have had a few PPA buidls fail like that without a log in the few hrs
[18:09] <infinity> RikMills: Done.
[18:10] <RikMills> thanks!
[18:10] <infinity> Laney: Nevermind the comment about autopkgtest, was looking at the wrong control file, but am now differently confused. :)
[18:38] <vorlon> infinity: afaik they're the same base vm spec
[19:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: urdfdom (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-2build2 => 1.0.0-2ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[19:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: urdfdom-headers (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1 => 1.0.0-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[20:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (eoan-proposed/main) [1.182 => 1.183] (core, kernel)
[20:13] <vorlon> interesting that a subset of dkms modules now fail autopkgtests with i386 userspace and amd64 kernel
[20:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (disco-proposed/main) [1.178.4 => 1.178.5] (core, kernel)
[20:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (bionic-proposed/main) [1.173.10 => 1.173.11] (core, kernel)
[20:39] <fossfreedom> Hi all - just looking at the Ubuntu Budgie eoan manifest file - it says "linux-image-4.15.0-1018-oracle	4.15.0-1018.20" is installed.  Anyone know why this kernel is installed on our ISO?
[20:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (eoan-proposed/main) [242-7ubuntu1 => 242-7ubuntu2] (core)
[20:54] <infinity> fossfreedom: Don't know off the top of my head, but I can investigate.
[20:55] <infinity> * Chose linux-image-4.15.0-1018-oracle out of zfs-modules to satisfy zfsutils-linux
[20:56] <infinity> Exciting.
[20:56] <apw> o.O
[20:56] <infinity> Ubuntu has the same breakage.
[20:57] <infinity> I assume anyone who added zfsutils-linux to their meta (which they really shouldn't be) has this issue.
[20:58] <infinity> That said, it's also clearly an apt resolver bug, since we're install linux-image in the same pass, so it shouldn't need to pick up ANOTHER linux-image to satisfy that.
[20:58] <apw> doh apt ... just doh
[21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sylpheed (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.5.1-1ubuntu4 => 3.5.1-1ubuntu5] (no packageset)
[21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-gopkg-lxc-go-lxc.v2 (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20181101.0aadfc3-1ubuntu1 => 0.0~git20190625.f4822c6-0ubuntu1] (edubuntu)
[21:04] <infinity> Hrm, actually, I can't reproduce that in a chroot.  I wonder if it's livecd-rootfs's task expansion doing something very silly.
[21:04] <infinity> But it shouldn't be...
[21:06] <infinity> Oh, hah.
[21:06] <infinity> Yes, it's the task expansion, but only because germinate's a derp.
[21:06] <infinity> And put that kernel in all the desktop tasks that asked for it.
[21:06] <infinity> Task: ubuntu-desktop-minimal, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-mate-core, ubuntu-mate-desktop, ubuntu-budgie-desktop
[21:07] <vorlon> coreycb: are you on top of the nova autopkgtest failure on amd64?
[21:08] <infinity> apw: Other than a few bespoke armhf kernels (and armhf generic), do we ship anything *without* ZFS anymore?
[21:08] <infinity> apw: Maybe it's time to drop the dependency entirely and just assume people have ZFS modules.
[21:08] <infinity> Which is a lie on our one remaining 32-bit arch, but oh well?
[21:09] <coreycb> vorlon: yes more or  less just haven't gotten to it yet
[21:09] <vorlon> ok
[21:09] <coreycb> thanks
[21:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sylpheed [source] (eoan-proposed) [3.5.1-1ubuntu5]
[21:10] <vorlon> infinity: if anything we should resolve the lie on the remaining 32-bit arch by making the package unavailable, not uninstallable but broken?
[21:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sylpheed (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.5.1-1ubuntu3 => 3.5.1-1ubuntu3.18.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sylpheed (disco-proposed/universe) [3.5.1-1ubuntu3 => 3.5.1-1ubuntu3.19.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:11] <infinity> vorlon: Perhaps, yeah.  I tihnk the argument in the past for building it had something to do with being able to run 32-on-64 systems, or maybe being able to manipulate filesystems to a limited extent in userspace without kernel drivers or a combination of both.
[21:12] <infinity> vorlon: But I honestly don't think anyone would expect zfsutils on armhf either, so I'd be fine with dropping it and dropping the modules|dkms deps.
[21:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libssh (eoan-proposed/main) [0.9.0-1 => 0.9.0-1ubuntu1] (core)
[21:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxqt-globalkeys [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.14.1+git20190923-0ubuntu1]
[21:17] <vorlon> tsimonq2: new binary packages from lubuntu-artwork the week before release, WHAT COULD GO WRONG
[21:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libssh [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.9.0-1ubuntu1]
[21:29] <mwhudson> how many years until we can get away with just shipping an arm64 kernel?
[21:29] <mwhudson> (lots and lots, sadly)
[21:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (eoan-proposed/main) [0.8.1-1ubuntu12 => 0.8.1-1ubuntu13] (core)
[21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.8.1-1ubuntu13]
[21:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lubuntu-artwork [source] (eoan-proposed) [19.10.2]
[21:52] <xnox> mwhudson:  sadly armhw is not advanced enough to be affected by sometime like zombieload to accelerate its depreciation
[21:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apache2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.4.18-2ubuntu3.14]
[21:59] <tsimonq2> vorlon: ikr :P
[22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (eoan-proposed/main) [2.615 => 2.617] (desktop-core)
[22:03] <xnox> mwhudson:  infinity: ^
[22:03] <xnox> with tags pushed
[22:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.525.30 => 2.525.31] (desktop-core)
[22:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.408.54 => 2.408.55] (desktop-core)
[22:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (disco-proposed/main) [2.578.8 => 2.578.9] (desktop-core)
[22:09] <infinity> rcj: ^
[22:11] <rcj> infinity: Thanks!
[22:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.617]
[22:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-kylin-software-center (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.6.8 => 3.0.4] (ubuntukylin)
[22:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntukylin-wallpapers (eoan-proposed/universe) [19.04.0 => 19.10.0] (ubuntukylin)
[22:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukwm (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.1.11-1build1 => 1.1.13-0ubuntu1] (ubuntukylin)
[22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-greeter (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.1.9-1 => 1.1.10-0ubuntu1] (ubuntukylin)