-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: joblib (focal-proposed/universe) [0.13.0-2 => 0.14.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)01:11
mwhudsonvorlon (or any other aa): can you look at my subvertpy and joblib uploads?01:11
mwhudsonthe latter more critically as it's blocking builds of other things01:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgetdata (focal-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-6build1 => 0.10.0-6build2] (no packageset)02:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: numpy-stl (focal-proposed/universe) [2.9.0-1build1 => 2.9.0-1build2] (no packageset)02:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libguestfs (focal-proposed/universe) [1:1.40.2-2ubuntu7 => 1:1.40.2-2ubuntu8] (no packageset)02:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hidapi-cffi (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1build1 => 0.2.2-1build2] (no packageset)02:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted joblib [source] (focal-proposed) [0.14.0-0ubuntu1]05:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-automaton (focal-proposed/main) [1.14.0-0ubuntu2 => 1.16.0-2] (ubuntu-server) (sync)05:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted subvertpy [source] (focal-proposed) [0.10.1-2ubuntu2]05:30
infinitymwhudson: What makes you think your hidapi-cffi rebuild will be any different than the previous?05:31
infinitymwhudson: Actually, looking at what the build produces, seems that both rebuilds weren't needed?  I don't see any py3 versioned deps or versioned modules.05:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected hidapi-cffi [source] (focal-proposed) [0.2.2-1build2]05:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libguestfs [source] (focal-proposed) [1:1.40.2-2ubuntu8]05:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libgetdata [source] (focal-proposed) [0.10.0-6build2]05:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted numpy-stl [source] (focal-proposed) [2.9.0-1build2]05:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sg3-utils (disco-proposed/main) [1.42-2ubuntu1 => 1.42-2ubuntu1.19.04.1] (core)05:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libdrm (bionic-proposed/main) [2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1] (core, xorg)07:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1024.25]07:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1006.10]07:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1028.31]07:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1028.31~16.04.1]07:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: llvm-toolchain-9 (bionic-proposed/primary) [1:9-2~ubuntu18.04.1]07:29
mitya57Hi! When is it planned to start auto-syncs from Debian?07:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libdrm [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.2]07:42
mitya57I wonder if I will manage to bootstrap Qt 5.12.5 in a PPA before that.07:43
LocutusOfBorgmitya57, considering how far migration is, I guess a day or two is still needed to finish rebuilds...08:32
LocutusOfBorgI don't know if they plan to land perl or it is "good enough" to open syncs08:32
mwhudsoninfinity: uh i don't remember, one of them had some check that only built 3.8 extensions if numpy was built or something08:45
mitya57LocutusOfBorg: ok, two days is enough for me to bootstrap Qt, but the Qt transition itself will happen after the archive is open.08:45
LocutusOfBorgmitya57, but I'm not RT, so my answer might be not good08:47
LocutusOfBorgwe still have lots of arm64 tests to run, and a few failures that looks bad enough for perl to migrate08:47
LocutusOfBorgI hope some more days will be used08:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu (focal-proposed/main) [19.0.1-1ubuntu1 => 19.1.0-1] (desktop-core) (sync)09:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-ati (focal-proposed/main) [1:19.0.1-1ubuntu1 => 1:19.1.0-1] (desktop-core, xorg) (sync)09:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-greenlet (focal-proposed/main) [0.4.15-2ubuntu1 => 0.4.15-2ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)09:48
LocutusOfBorgdoko, ^^ this fixes python-gevent builds09:48
LocutusOfBorgdebian bug report updated with fixed patch09:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libdata-stag-perl (focal-proposed/universe) [0.14-2 => 0.14-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)09:51
LocutusOfBorg^^ debian bug opened [11:57:12] <BTS> Opened #943319 in src:libdata-stag-perl 0.14-2 by Gianfranco Costamagna (locutusofborg) «libdata-stag-perl: please recommend libxml-libxml-perl». https://bugs.debian.org/94331909:58
ubot5Debian bug 943319 in src:libdata-stag-perl "libdata-stag-perl: please recommend libxml-libxml-perl" [Normal,Open]09:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server (bionic-proposed/main) [2:1.19.6-1ubuntu4.3 => 2:1.19.6-1ubuntu4.4] (desktop-core, xorg)10:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-greenlet [source] (focal-proposed) [0.4.15-2ubuntu2]10:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pygac (focal-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-3 => 1.1.0-3build1] (no packageset)10:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyregion (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0-9 => 2.0-9build1] (no packageset)10:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyscanfcs (focal-proposed/universe) [0.3.2+ds-2 => 0.3.2+ds-2build1] (no packageset)10:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-cpl (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.4-2 => 0.7.4-2build1] (no packageset)10:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: silx (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.0+dfsg-1 => 0.11.0+dfsg-1build1] (no packageset)10:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: specutils (focal-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1ubuntu1 => 0.5.2-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)10:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: uvloop (focal-proposed/main) [0.11.3+ds1-2 => 0.11.3+ds1-2build1] (ubuntu-server)10:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: photutils (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7-1 => 0.7-1build1] (no packageset)10:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyresample (focal-proposed/universe) [1.12.3-5 => 1.12.3-5build1] (no packageset)10:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-drizzle (focal-proposed/universe) [1.13.1-2 => 1.13.1-2build1] (no packageset)10:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sunpy (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-2 => 1.0.3-2build1] (no packageset)10:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyraf (focal-proposed/universe) [2.1.15-2 => 2.1.15-2build1] (no packageset)10:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: slixmpp (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4.2-1 => 1.4.2-1build1] (no packageset)10:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pysynphot (focal-proposed/universe) [0.9.13+dfsg-1 => 0.9.13+dfsg-1build1] (no packageset)10:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted photutils [source] (focal-proposed) [0.7-1build1]10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyraf [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1.15-2build1]10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyresample [source] (focal-proposed) [1.12.3-5build1]10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pysynphot [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.13+dfsg-1build1]10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-drizzle [source] (focal-proposed) [1.13.1-2build1]10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted slixmpp [source] (focal-proposed) [1.4.2-1build1]10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sunpy [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.3-2build1]10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cron (focal-proposed/main) [3.0pl1-134ubuntu1 => 3.0pl1-135ubuntu1] (core)10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kmod (focal-proposed/main) [26-1ubuntu1 => 26-3ubuntu1] (core)10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pspp (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-2ubuntu2 => 1.2.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pygac [source] (focal-proposed) [1.1.0-3build1]10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyscanfcs [source] (focal-proposed) [0.3.2+ds-2build1]10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted silx [source] (focal-proposed) [0.11.0+dfsg-1build1]10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted uvloop [source] (focal-proposed) [0.11.3+ds1-2build1]10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: polkit-qt-1 (focal-proposed/universe) [0.112.0-6 => 0.112.0-7.1] (kubuntu) (sync)10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyregion [source] (focal-proposed) [2.0-9build1]10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted specutils [source] (focal-proposed) [0.5.2-1ubuntu2]10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-monasca-statsd (focal-proposed/universe) [1.10.1-0ubuntu2 => 1.11.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-cpl [source] (focal-proposed) [0.7.4-2build1]10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: csync2 (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0-8-g175a01c-4ubuntu2 => 2.0-22-gce67c55-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)10:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libdrm [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1]10:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libdrm (bionic-proposed/main) [2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.2] (core, xorg)10:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1048.51] (kernel)10:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1048.51]10:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fpylll (focal-proposed/universe) [0.4.1+ds1-5build1 => 0.4.1+ds1-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)10:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zbar (focal-proposed/universe) [0.23-1.1build1 => 0.23-1.2] (kubuntu) (sync)10:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (focal-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu9]10:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zbar [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.23-1.2]10:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fpylll [source] (focal-proposed) [0.4.1+ds1-5ubuntu1]10:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (eoan-proposed/main) [3.34.1-1ubuntu1 => 3.34.1+git20191022-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, desktop-extra)11:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-19.20~18.04.2] (kernel)11:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-19.20~18.04.2] (kernel)11:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-19.20~18.04.2] (kernel)11:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-19.20~18.04.2]11:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-19.20~18.04.2]11:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-19.20~18.04.2]11:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: astropy (focal-proposed/universe) [3.2.1-1build1 => 3.2.2-1] (kubuntu) (sync)11:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted astropy [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.2.2-1]11:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: astropy (focal-proposed/universe) [3.2.2-1 => 3.2.2-1build1] (kubuntu)12:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected astropy [source] (focal-proposed) [3.2.2-1build1]12:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: astropy (focal-proposed/universe) [3.2.2-1 => 3.2.2-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu)12:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: amp (focal-proposed/universe) [0.6.1-1 => 0.6.1-1build1] (no packageset)12:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dolfin (focal-proposed/universe) [2019.1.0-4 => 2019.1.0-4build1] (no packageset)12:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-aiohttp (focal-proposed/universe) [3.5.4-1 => 3.5.4-1build1] (no packageset)12:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bitshuffle (focal-proposed/universe) [0.3.5-1 => 0.3.5-1build1] (no packageset)12:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-biom-format (focal-proposed/universe) [2.1.7+dfsg-3ubuntu2 => 2.1.7+dfsg-3ubuntu3] (no packageset)12:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pysmbc (focal-proposed/universe) [ =>] (no packageset)12:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-cartopy (focal-proposed/universe) [0.17.0+dfsg-6 => 0.17.0+dfsg-6build1] (no packageset)12:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-geotiepoints (focal-proposed/universe) [1.1.8-1 => 1.1.8-1build1] (no packageset)12:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-skbio (focal-proposed/universe) [0.5.5-2 => 0.5.5-2build1] (no packageset)12:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yt (focal-proposed/universe) [3.5.0-1 => 3.5.0-1build1] (no packageset)12:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-fabio (focal-proposed/universe) [0.9.0+dfsg-1 => 0.9.0+dfsg-1build1] (no packageset)12:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-thinc (focal-proposed/universe) [6.12.1-1 => 6.12.1-1build1] (no packageset)12:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pdal (focal-proposed/universe) [2.1.8+ds-2 => 2.1.8+ds-2build1] (no packageset)12:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted amp [source] (focal-proposed) [0.6.1-1build1]12:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bitshuffle [source] (focal-proposed) [0.3.5-1build1]12:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libdata-stag-perl [source] (focal-proposed) [0.14-2ubuntu1]12:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-aiohttp [source] (focal-proposed) [3.5.4-1build1]12:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-cartopy [source] (focal-proposed) [0.17.0+dfsg-6build1]12:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-geotiepoints [source] (focal-proposed) [1.1.8-1build1]12:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-skbio [source] (focal-proposed) [0.5.5-2build1]12:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yt [source] (focal-proposed) [3.5.0-1build1]12:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted astropy [source] (focal-proposed) [3.2.2-1ubuntu1]12:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pysmbc [source] (focal-proposed) []12:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-fabio [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.0+dfsg-1build1]12:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-thinc [source] (focal-proposed) [6.12.1-1build1]12:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dolfin [source] (focal-proposed) [2019.1.0-4build1]12:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-pdal [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1.8+ds-2build1]12:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-biom-format [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1.7+dfsg-3ubuntu3]12:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 (focal-proposed/restricted) [430.50-0ubuntu2 => 430.50-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)12:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 (bionic-proposed/restricted) [430.50-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 430.50-0ubuntu0.18.04.2] (no packageset)12:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 (focal-proposed/restricted) [435.21-0ubuntu2 => 435.21-0ubuntu3] (no packageset)13:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 (bionic-proposed/primary) [435.21-0ubuntu0.18.04.2]13:11
cascardorbasak: could you look/approve at makedumpfile at the SRU queues for disco and bionic, please?13:12
rbasakcascardo: you'll be first on the list, but I'm not planning on starting my SRU shift for another hour or two13:14
cascardorbasak: that works fine, thanks a lot!13:15
ahasenackit looks like the test results in the excuses page isn't updating13:30
ahasenackfor example, https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#libfcgi-perl13:30
ahasenackthe apache2 arm64 regression is from 4 days ago13:30
ahasenackand http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/apache2/focal/arm64 shows green runs13:31
ahasenackLaney: related to a cron job you uncommented the other day?13:31
apwrbasak, i am already looking at the makedumpfile ones13:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted makedumpfile [source] (disco-proposed) [1:1.6.5-1ubuntu1.3]13:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted makedumpfile [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:1.6.5-1ubuntu1~18.04.3]14:00
Laneyahasenack: no, not related. I don't see any passes with that trigger.14:17
ahasenackLaney: I clicked on the retry button, that is green, but the test result link in the excuses page still points at the result from the 19th14:18
Laneysorry, what is green?14:18
ahasenackmaybe I clicked retry on the perl one, actually14:18
ahasenackLaney: yeah, it was perl, sorry, that is green now, and result is up-to-date14:19
Laneyother people like v_orlon and LocutusOfBor_g have been doing retries for perl things as well14:19
Laneyyou might all want to coordinate together to avoid duplicating things14:19
ahasenackapache2 is in our list (server)14:20
ahasenackbut I can hold off, specially since the archive is still closed, and I'm not sure what is going on14:20
Laneybut if it's part of another migration then it makes sense to handle it with the folks coordinating that IMO14:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (eoan-proposed/partner) [1:20190910.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:20191009.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)14:21
vorlonLaney: does this error look familiar to you?  I don't see any reason it would fail to find libparams-classify-perl http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/b/bioperl/focal/s390x14:27
Laneyvorlon: It seems like an unfortunate error when the same source package is specified twice14:36
Laneylaney@nightingale> apt-cache showsrc glibc glibc >/dev/null                                                                                                                                                                       ~14:37
LaneyW: Unable to locate package glibc14:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pasaffe (focal-proposed/universe) [0.51-0ubuntu1 => 0.54-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)14:43
vorlonLaney: oh did I specify it twice? ok :)14:43
vorlonfixed, thanks14:43
vorlon(i.e. retriggered)14:43
Laneywell, yes, but it's still a weird failure mode14:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 [source] (bionic-proposed) [435.21-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]14:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 [i386] (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [435.21-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)14:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [435.21-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)14:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [435.21-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]14:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 [i386] (bionic-proposed) [435.21-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]14:59
dokoLaney, vorlon: update_excuses shows "Test in progress (always failed)" for many packages, even for archs with empty queues15:28
LocutusOfBorgdoko, it might be because of somebody rebooting the service when lots of tests were in the queue...15:31
LocutusOfBorgI retried already lots of "test running" that weren't running, but not for arm64, because queue is still ongoing15:32
Laneygive an example?15:32
LocutusOfBorgthere was a lot of test in progress on s390x for example15:32
LocutusOfBorglet me find two examples15:32
dokoLaney: the ones triggered by numpy15:32
Laneyrestarting that machine I did does not cause tests to get lost15:32
Laneyit'll be much easier to wait for the queue to finish15:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: astropy-healpix (focal-proposed/universe) [0.4-6 => 0.4-6build1] (no packageset)15:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyfai (focal-proposed/universe) [0.18.0+dfsg1-3 => 0.18.0+dfsg1-3build1] (no packageset)15:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: poezio (focal-proposed/universe) [0.12.1-3 => 0.12.1-3build1] (no packageset)15:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pymca (focal-proposed/universe) [5.5.1+dfsg-2 => 5.5.1+dfsg-2build1] (no packageset)15:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 [source] (bionic-proposed) [430.50-0ubuntu0.18.04.2]15:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted poezio [source] (focal-proposed) [0.12.1-3build1]15:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pymca [source] (focal-proposed) [5.5.1+dfsg-2build1]15:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted astropy-healpix [source] (focal-proposed) [0.4-6build1]15:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyfai [source] (focal-proposed) [0.18.0+dfsg1-3build1]15:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 [source] (bionic-proposed) [435.21-0ubuntu0.18.04.2]15:37
tjaaltontseliot: ^ both done15:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: reprozip (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.14-2build1 => 1.0.16-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)15:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted reprozip [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.16-0ubuntu1]15:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.32-1~ubuntu18.04.1 => 5.2.34-1~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)15:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.32-dfsg-0~ubuntu18.04.1 => 5.2.34-dfsg-0~ubuntu18.04.1] (ubuntu-cloud)15:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.32-dfsg-0~ubuntu18.04.1 => 5.2.34-dfsg-0~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)15:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.32-1~ubuntu18.04.2 => 5.2.34-1~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)15:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: usagestats (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7-5 => 0.8-1] (no packageset) (sync)15:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted usagestats [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.8-1]16:00
LocutusOfBorgI still don't get why kernel updates that breaks kernel modules aren't caught before publishing the kernel...16:00
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1847662 in virtualbox-hwe (Ubuntu Bionic) "virtualbox-dkms fails to build with 18.04-hwe-edge kernel 5.3.0-12 [error: void value not ignored as it ought to be, from smp_call_function]" [Undecided,In progress]16:00
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, apw ^^ you discussed about a test matrix a while ago, but nobody is looking at it before releasing a kernel?16:01
LocutusOfBorgthis one https://people.canonical.com/~kernel/status/adt-matrix/bionic-linux-meta-hwe.html16:01
LocutusOfBorgvirtualbox-hwe and virtualbox are both shown as regressions...416:01
vorlonI do not look at any test matrices before releasing.  I release kernels based on the tracking bugs having been marked as ready for release; it's the kernel team's responsibility to verify the results of testing before doing so16:02
LocutusOfBorgsil2100, ^^ if you could quickly have a look at the vbox for bionic, it should fix the dkms sadness16:02
LocutusOfBorgI'm trying to understand if we have a process flaw somewhere, not blaming people to be clear :)16:02
LocutusOfBorggetting some sort of automated bug report might help avoiding lots of troubles... I already get for devel series, just I don't get them for stable...16:03
apwLocutusOfBorg, -edges have a laxer check; is that one in -updates ?16:04
LocutusOfBorg"virtualbox-dkms fails to build with 18.04-hwe-edge kernel 5.3.0-1216:04
LocutusOfBorgso, like "if you use edge, your responsibility to fix bugs"?16:04
apwvorlon, that data in theory is taken into a account before we remove the block-proposed tags for those kernels; so you should not get asked to copy things which have not passed adt etc16:04
LocutusOfBorgseems legit, to be honest I receive less bugs when hwe-edge breaks dkms16:04
apwLocutusOfBorg, we want people to be able to test the bits of -edge which work while we work on the issues16:07
apwLocutusOfBorg, in principle dksm failures are a clear blocker for rolling foo -> foo-edge version16:07
LocutusOfBorgI don't get... kernel 5.3 is in hwe edge since 4 hours, but my bug report is open since 13 days16:07
LocutusOfBorgso maybe that bug report is not from an user but a kernel developer?16:08
LocutusOfBorgin any case, please release the kernel together with vbox 5.2.34 so end user won't complain too much16:08
xnoxapw:  hm, it's hinted as good even though it isn't? can you explain what "hinted good" means?16:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: reprozip (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.16-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.16-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)16:09
apwxnox, hinted good would mean someone looked at the logs and determined that it was a false negative (normally)16:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: astropy-regions (focal-proposed/universe) [0.4-1 => 0.4-1build1] (no packageset)16:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: reproject (focal-proposed/universe) [0.5-1 => 0.5-1build1] (no packageset)16:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gammapy (focal-proposed/universe) [0.13-1 => 0.13-1build1] (no packageset)16:11
xnoxLocutusOfBorg:  it sounds that virtualbox-dkms needs to be fixed to be sensible and innert if the kernel one installs it against has newer module anyway.16:11
xnoxError! Module version 5.2.32_Ubuntu for vboxguest.ko16:11
xnoxis not newer than what is already found in kernel 5.0.0-32-generic (6.0.6_KernelUbuntu).16:11
xnoxLocutusOfBorg:  thus it shouldn't fail to configure, and well, just be dead weight.16:12
xnoxor like maybe kernel should autogenerate Breaks: virtualbox-dkms (<< version.shipped.in.this.kernel)16:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted astropy-regions [source] (focal-proposed) [0.4-1build1]16:12
xnoxsuch that if one installs hwe kernel, virtualbox-dkms is autoremoved.16:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted reproject [source] (focal-proposed) [0.5-1build1]16:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cdo (focal-proposed/universe) [ => 1.9.8~rc2-1] (no packageset) (sync)16:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-microversion-parse (focal-proposed/main) [0.2.1-0ubuntu2 => 0.2.1-3] (ubuntu-server) (sync)16:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gammapy [source] (focal-proposed) [0.13-1build1]16:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-automaton (focal-proposed/main) [1.14.0-0ubuntu2 => 1.16.0-2] (ubuntu-server) (sync)16:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted reprozip [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.16-0ubuntu2]16:13
xnoxLocutusOfBorg:  apw: am I wrong about above suggestions?16:13
infinityxnox: virtualbox-dkms ships more modules than just the ones included in the kernel.16:15
xnoxinfinity:  ah, but postinst borgs up on the first one which is younger than kernel one?!16:16
infinityxnox: But it's true that there's no sane way right now to express relationships between virtualbox-dkms, virtualbox-dkms-hwe, and linux, linux-hwe.16:16
xnoxsounds akward16:16
xnox(cause i assume the extra modules, need to be matching the other ones)16:16
* xnox slowly backs away16:16
infinityThey don't.  But you want vbox-dkms-hwe or it probably won't build. :P16:16
infinityI think the more correct answer would be to bundle vbox-dkms and vbox-dkms-hwe in the same vbox-dkms package, with the dkms config file pointing at different code per kernel version.16:17
infinityWhich is entirely doable.16:17
infinityCause trying to express those relationships at the dpkg level in a way that would make apt do sensible things is Very Hard.16:18
infinityWouldn't be hard if we only had one kernel flavour, maybe, but...16:19
infinityThat ship's not only sailed, it's on its way to Mars.16:19
apwxnox, i cann16:26
infinityOr, if vendoring all of the source of one version into another is too icky, they could depend on each other, and each dkms.conf could be version-constrained, so you get old modules on old kernels and new on new.16:26
infinityThat might be better.16:26
* apw likes the apparent simplicity of the latter16:26
infinityI have vbox-dkms installed here specifically to watch for dkms-ish breakage, but I don't run LTSes with multiple kernel tracks, so I don't see this pain first-hand.16:29
LocutusOfBorgshouldn't dkms just ignore kernel modules that are already builtin and provide only what is missing?16:32
LocutusOfBorgisn't this an easier solution to the problem?16:32
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Well, you still want to match hwe to hwe and ga to ga, no?16:38
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Since you go out of your way to provide an hwe package that builds with hwe kernels.16:38
LocutusOfBorginfinity, I don't think they need to match anymore16:40
LocutusOfBorgthere have been host/guest breaking changes in the past, but solved since version 5.1 IIRC16:40
LocutusOfBorgso, you can use the kernel module, or the vbox dkms one, as you wish, for host and guest16:40
LocutusOfBorgall the combinations should be fine now16:40
LocutusOfBorgthis is why I say, we might build only host guest-dkms modules that are not in the kernel yet16:41
infinityLocutusOfBorg: I'm not talking about combinations of vbox and modules, I'm talking about combinations of vbox-dkms and the kernel it's built for.  Do you make sure non-dkms vbox builds okay for hwe kernels?16:41
LocutusOfBorginfinity, I usually don't install virtualbox-guest-dkms on my VM machines16:42
infinityErr, non-hwe dkms.16:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:20191009.1-0ubuntu1]16:42
LocutusOfBorginfinity, you mean vbox-guest-dkms wrt vbox-guest-dkms-hwe16:42
infinityLocutusOfBorg: This was virtualbox-dkms, not guest-dkms.16:42
infinityOr xnox misspoke.16:43
infinityWhich is possible.16:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (trusty-proposed/main) [10ubuntu0.14.04.4 => 19.6~ubuntu14.04.1] (no packageset)16:44
LocutusOfBorgcan you please rephrase your question? I didn't really get it16:44
infinitySo maybe my arguments are all about vbox-dkms, but the vbox-guest-dkms case is indeed that we should just skip stuff that's builtin and newer.16:44
LocutusOfBorgvbox-dkms is not in the kernel16:44
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Do you ensure that virtualbox-dkms (non-hwe) is buildable with hwe kernels?16:44
infinityYes, I know.16:44
LocutusOfBorgyes, it gets similar fixes16:45
LocutusOfBorgand it is easy to test, I usually do it16:45
infinityHrm.  Okay.16:45
infinityWouldn't it be easier to just restrict hwe to hwe and ga to ga, as I proposed above?16:46
LocutusOfBorgbtw, the virtualbox-dkms autopkgtest is almost never failing16:46
infinityThen you'd have the same version combinations in play in, say, bionic and eoan.16:46
infinity(And that would also paper over the guest-already-built issue, but meh)16:46
tewardSRU / AA team, can you reject https://launchpadlibrarian.net/447918271/carla_2.0.0-0ubuntu4+gitde67dcb_source.changes from Eoan proposed because it has a version conflict with Focal16:49
teward(cc Eickmeyer)16:49
infinityteward: Uhh, it does?16:50
tewardinfinity: Focal has -0ubuntu316:50
tewardthe upload to Eoan has -0ubuntu4+GITREV in it16:50
infinityteward: focal has a newer one in the queue.16:50
tewardinfinity: i didn't se that one in the pending queue16:50
LocutusOfBorginfinity, but virtualbox-guest-dkms-hwe is *exactly* the same as virtualbox-guest-dkms, just built with newer mesa foo16:50
LocutusOfBorgits a workaround for installability with newer xorg16:51
infinityteward: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=carla16:51
tewardinfinity: ah, there it is16:51
tewardnevermind :)16:51
tewardthis is what happens when Eickmeyer asks me for an eyes-on look but doesn't tell me they uploaded to both Focal and Eoan and was only getting flak about Eoan16:51
teward*needs more coffee*16:51
tewardsorry about noise :)16:51
tewardinfinity: do we have a tool to search all the queues for a given package and see if it's in it and report the info on it?16:59
tewardi don't think we do, do we?16:59
infinityA for loop around 'queue'?16:59
infinity(in ubuntu-archive-tools)16:59
tewardthat'd do it17:00
tewardty infinity17:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (bionic-proposed/partner) [1:20190910.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 1:20191009.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)17:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (xenial-proposed/partner) [1:20190910.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 1:20191009.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset)17:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (disco-proposed/partner) [1:20190910.1-0ubuntu0.19.04.1 => 1:20191009.1-0ubuntu0.19.04.1] (no packageset)17:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyscanfcs (focal-proposed/universe) [0.3.2+ds-2build1 => 0.3.5+ds-1] (no packageset) (sync)17:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: skimage (focal-proposed/universe) [0.14.2-2build1 => 0.14.2-3] (no packageset) (sync)17:03
infinityvorlon: Are you still triggering perly tests, or have you taken a break?17:03
vorloninfinity: I'm done with all the necessary mass retriggers; the remainder I would only be triggering based on individual analysis17:03
infinityvorlon: Kay.  I was going to retrigger bioperl with itself as a trigger added to your massive list, just didn't want duplicates.17:04
infinity(And then going down the list)17:04
infinityHonestly, I think given the freeziness of the archive, we could probably get away with just all-proposeding it all, but meh.17:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyscanfcs [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.3.5+ds-1]17:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted skimage [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.14.2-3]17:04
vorloninfinity: bioperl is still falling back to all-proposed and then it's failing; I don't expect adding bioperl to the trigger will help.  I can do another round of analysis of the pkgProblemResolver output17:05
infinityvorlon: Hrm?  No, the problem with bioperl is it's running the old tests against the new package.17:06
infinityvorlon: The testsuite passes, but the test that looks for a file in @INC fails, cause that file's not there in the new version.17:07
* infinity re-runs.17:08
infinityvorlon: Oh, at least, that was the problem with the perl-triggered bioperl test.  I see the bioperl-triggered one also hates life differently.  Fun.17:11
infinityvorlon: Hrm.  bioperl in unstable is intentionally held out with an RC bug.  The right answer might be to punt from proposed and do a rebuild of the release pocket version instead.17:17
infinityWait... bioperl doesn't need a rebuild at all.  Now I'm even more confused.17:19
vorloninfinity: right, running old tests against the new package, which happens because of the apt pin being unresolvable and pulling all binaries from -proposed; so a correct if complicated trigger sidesteps the brokenness of bioperl in -proposed.  But yeah I had yet to work out why bioperl was accepted in -proposed and if it was actually needed17:20
infinityWhy is the new version being pulled into tests of the old one then? >:(17:20
vorlonbecause the autopkgtest apt pin fails17:20
vorlonand the fallback is to pull all binaries from -proposed, including bioperl17:20
infinityOkay, so just deleting the proposed one is the easiest thing for now.17:20
infinityI can copy it back later, or we can wait for another Debian upload to sync it (cause it looks like it might need a breaks/replace or something anyway)17:21
infinityYeah, it'll need a B/R when libbio-perl-run or whatever it is is updated.17:21
infinitySo I'll just pull it.17:21
infinityvorlon: Baleeted.  Re-testing later might actually work.17:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1026.29] (no packageset)17:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1060.69] (kernel)17:26
vorloninfinity: but also my latest trigger may have managed to be complete, so we'll see :)17:26
infinityvorlon: Hah.17:26
infinityvorlon: I'm still fine with deleting it on the basis that it's broken without the Breaks/Replaces, so all is well.17:27
* vorlon nods17:27
infinityperl transitions really highlight the need for some sort of magical trigger resolution in autopkgtest.17:28
infinityGiven that perl packages almost always test green, but only after you figure out how to manually tell the system to DTRT.17:29
vorlonI don't think apt has a setting for "install from -proposed only exactly those packages you need in order to resolve the dependencies", does it?17:30
tewardvorlon: i've had some success in the past running `apt -t VERSION-proposed install package`17:31
tewardwhich might only install those deps17:31
tewardbut that's in a testbed system not autopkgtests, etc.17:31
tewardmight have to hack it around to make it really obey :/17:31
vorlonthat definitely does not have the semantics we're talking about, no17:32
tewardi came in late :P17:32
tewardi've been looking for such a setting/mechanism for some of my automated CI tests too, for things, and haven't found one.17:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: skimage (focal-proposed/universe) [0.14.2-3 => 0.14.2-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)17:32
teward(someone should write such a setting!)17:32
vorlonthe autopkgtest code to manage this is awful; and the fact that sometimes it falls back to installing everything from -proposed, but this isn't exposed in the UI, is also confusing17:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted skimage [source] (focal-proposed) [0.14.2-3ubuntu1]17:33
* infinity WTFs at command-not-found not command-not-finding on only armhf.17:39
infinityvorlon, Laney: Would the world expload if the download-results cronjob was */1 or */2 instead of */5?17:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:20191009.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]17:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (disco-proposed) [1:20191009.1-0ubuntu0.19.04.1]17:41
infinityI keep forgetting how to URL hack to find results I'm waiting on, and really, I don't think I should have to. :P17:41
infinity(I'm assuming that job also rebuilds the HTML, but maybe I'm wrong?)17:42
vorloninfinity: the job commonly takes >5m to finish, so I don't think that would make much difference17:42
infinityvorlon: Ahh, nevermind then. :(17:42
infinityWe need to figure out a way to batch all that stuff up better somehow.17:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:20191009.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1]17:42
infinityThat's the killer for britney runs too.17:43
LocutusOfBorginfinity, breaking only hwe kernels or similar doesn't solve the fact that guest-dkms aims to provide 4 kernel modules, but only one is now builtin in the hwe kernel itself17:56
tewardinfinity: ... stupid question but why're the ubuntu-archive-tools tools written in Py2?17:57
tewardhas nobody attempted a py3 port?17:57
infinityvorlon: libcpanplus-perl is fun.  We ask apt to install recommends.  It says "I dunno, that's hard", and doesn't.18:00
infinityteward: There's an MP for py3 that literally just changes the shebangs.  I've not tested that this is sufficient.18:01
tewardit won't be18:01
tewardyou have a LOT of NoLongerValid things in this.18:01
infinityteward: As for "why", the answer is "history".18:01
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Hrm?  I didn't suggest breaking anything.18:02
infinityLocutusOfBorg: I suggested that the dkms.conf for vbox*dkms should version-restrict to the GA kernel, and for vbox*dkms-hwe it should restrict to >> the GA kernel.18:03
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Which would end up matching the versions also builtin, assuming you backport current stable to HWE at the same time (or before) the kernel does.18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-gevent (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.7-1build2 => 1.3.7-1ubuntu1] (edubuntu)18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-gevent [source] (focal-proposed) [1.3.7-1ubuntu1]18:05
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Your libdata-stag-perl upload was entirely unnecessary.18:07
LocutusOfBorgteward, the python binding used by ubuntu-archive-tools was python2 only...18:08
LocutusOfBorgpython3-ubuntutools is a new thing...18:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hidapi-cffi (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1build1 => 0.2.2-1build1] (no packageset)18:09
LocutusOfBorginfinity, what is GA kernel?18:09
infinityLocutusOfBorg: The release kernel.  The non-HWE one.  GA = General Availability, shorthand for "release time" in some software circles.18:09
LocutusOfBorgoh... thanks18:10
LocutusOfBorgbut as I said, there is no virtualbox-dkms-hwe package at all18:10
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Were there other uploads you did like this one to add unnecessary extra recommends to perl modules?18:10
LocutusOfBorgthe virtualbox-hwe is only providing *guest*packages18:10
LocutusOfBorginfinity, I only did one perl upload18:10
infinityOkay.  I'm deleting it, FYI.18:11
LocutusOfBorgshould I close the debian bug?18:11
infinityThe bug isn't missing deps, it's missing test triggers which cause apt to give up installing recommends.18:11
infinityYes, close the Debian bug.18:11
infinityAdding more recommends won't change the issue.18:11
LocutusOfBorgbut the code is using a perl module that isn't recommended...18:11
infinityIt's pulled in via other recommends just fine.  Until apt says no because of goofy pinning.18:11
infinityIf the code directly references the module, the recommends isn't wrong.  It still won't fix this issue, though.18:12
LocutusOfBorginfinity, https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=94331918:12
ubot5Debian bug 943319 in src:libdata-stag-perl "libdata-stag-perl: please recommend libxml-perl" [Normal,Open]18:12
LocutusOfBorgthey looks like caring about the bug...18:12
LocutusOfBorgshould I really close it in your opinion?18:13
infinityYes.  And note that in the log you linked, it DOES try to install lixml-perl.18:14
infinityAnd then gives up.18:14
infinityDue to pinning.18:14
infinityInvestigating (0) libxml-perl:amd64 < none -> 0.08-3 @un uN Ib >18:14
infinityBroken libxml-perl:amd64 Depends on libxml-parser-perl:amd64 < none | 2.44-4 @un uH >18:14
LocutusOfBorgyep, got it :D18:14
infinity  Considering libxml-parser-perl:amd64 1 as a solution to libxml-perl:amd64 018:14
infinity  Holding Back libxml-perl:amd64 rather than change libxml-parser-perl:amd6418:14
LocutusOfBorgwith the retitle it is now clear18:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hidapi-cffi (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1build1 => 0.2.2-1build3] (no packageset)18:15
infinitydoko: hidapi-cffi already had a python3.8 rebuild (that appeared to do nothing, cause there are no py3.x deps or versioned modules that I can see)... How is this one different?18:17
dokoI just looked at mwhudson's notes ...18:18
dokoahh, that's a package which wants to run the tests on all archs, but really could be a binary all package18:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected hidapi-cffi [source] (focal-proposed) [0.2.2-1build1]18:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected hidapi-cffi [source] (focal-proposed) [0.2.2-1build3]18:21
LocutusOfBorgis it possible to bump firewalld hint please?18:28
LocutusOfBorgat least we go back in sync with that18:29
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Looking.18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-libdiscid (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0-5build1 => 1.0-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)18:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-libdiscid [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0-5ubuntu1]18:34
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Looks like it's exactly the same test failing so yeah, I can bump the hint but, also, it's exactly one test failing, could we maybe look into why?18:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pytango (focal-proposed/universe) [9.2.5-1build1 => 9.2.5-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)18:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pytango [source] (focal-proposed) [9.2.5-1ubuntu1]18:43
vorloninfinity: still never got the bioperl trigger right, but your unpublish happened, so the last test result is clean ;)19:06
vorloninfinity: libsyntax-highlight-engine-kate-perl is similarly a "missing recommends because pinning" situation.  Do we want to do a --all-proposed retry of the lot?19:13
vorlonruntests             FAIL stderr: supported-versions: WARNING: Unknown Ubuntu release: 20.0419:14
vorlonwell aren't you special19:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (eoan-proposed/partner) [1:20191009.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:20191009.1-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)19:15
vorloninfinity: perhaps you've already done this. perhaps you've also done it in a way that lies to the system and lists no requestor?19:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: veusz (focal-proposed/universe) [3.0.1-1ubuntu2 => 3.0.1-1ubuntu3] (no packageset)19:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted veusz [source] (focal-proposed) [3.0.1-1ubuntu3]19:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1026.29]19:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1060.69]19:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sunpy (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-2build1 => 1.0.3-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)19:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sunpy [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.3-2ubuntu1]19:38
infinityvorlon: Oh, yeah, I've been triggering from snakefruit, so no requestor.  I'm a bad nan.19:42
infinityAlso a bad man.19:42
infinityvorlon: I wonder if there's an apt option to treat failure to install recommends the same as failure to install depends.19:45
infinityvorlon: That would make those auto-dep8-recommends passes fail in the apt bit, which would auto-trigger all-proposed.19:46
infinityvorlon: Okay, I think everything <= lintian should be good now.  Will check >= lintian after I lunch a bit.20:18
infinityErr, <<, not <=20:18
mwhudsongood morning20:19
tewardum... anyone know how to get past an issue (daily) with "Release file for [mirror]/ubuntu/dists/focal/InRelease is not valid yet (invalid for another 2h7m11s) Updates will not be applied"?20:26
tewardlooked at it, it seems like it SHOULD be valid by timestamp20:26
teward(testing the dailies right now for Lubuntu and can't even apt update)20:27
Bashing-omteward: dumb thought from me: system time is correct?20:29
tewardits a VM and has time set to etc/utc, time LOOKS right let me do some tests20:29
teward... WOW okay so it looks like this is a problem with how it was parsing the system time (it's in a VM).  I'll have to dig into that one, interesting little bug...20:30
tewardmanually set the time and timezone and it's working now20:30
tewardit's almost like it's ignoring RTCClock20:30
tewardi'll dig later20:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-msgpack (focal-proposed/main) [0.5.6-1build3 => 0.5.6-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)20:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-msgpack [source] (focal-proposed) [0.5.6-1ubuntu1]20:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:20191009.1-0ubuntu2]21:00
LocutusOfBorginfinity, in my merge request for the hint I think I explained why21:07
LocutusOfBorgthe failure is actually a regression in nftables, that is already worked on by upstream21:07
LocutusOfBorgthe -2 nftables upload fixed 3 out of 4 failures21:07
LocutusOfBorgwe still have one left (I already proposed to use firewalld as nftables personal regression testsuite since it catches a lot of regressions!)21:08
LocutusOfBorginfinity, btw you (IIRC) dropped alt-ergo permanent hint on armhf... can you please restore it (NBS)21:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-apt (focal-proposed/main) [1.9.0ubuntu2 => 1.9.0ubuntu3] (core)21:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-apt [source] (focal-proposed) [1.9.0ubuntu3]21:25
infinityLocutusOfBorg: I did?21:26
LocutusOfBorgsorry, vorlon did21:28
LocutusOfBorg    Restore alt-ergo hint, dropped by mistake on21:28
LocutusOfBorg    revno: 379521:28
LocutusOfBorg    committer: Steve Langasek <steve.langasek@canonical.com>21:28
LocutusOfBorgit was probably a mistake I would say...21:28
infinityHe probably dropped it cause the syntax was wrong, assuming that it couldn't possibly have ever worked. :P21:29
LocutusOfBorgit did work...21:29
LocutusOfBorgdon't ask me why, but I'm pretty sure it worked21:30
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Anyhow, hint restored.21:31
LocutusOfBorgI wish with the "all" keyword :) lovely thanks21:32
dokoinfinity, vorlon: please update the hint to the new version of python-scipy21:33
infinitydoko: Done.21:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lintian (focal-proposed/main) [2.28.0 => 2.29.0] (core) (sync)21:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lintian [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.29.0]21:46
infinityDid we need another lintian?21:48
LocutusOfBorgaccording to libclone-perl yes...21:49
infinityThat was testing 2.22.021:50
infinityI was already re-running tests for 2.28.021:50
infinityOh well.21:50
LocutusOfBorg2.29 mentions a python fix... maybe the person who syncd it needed it21:50
infinityThe person was doko, so maybe.21:50
dokosorry, yes21:53
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: so what is triggering the alt-ergo autopkgtests on armhf given that it builds only arch-dep packages and there is no armhf binary?21:53
infinityvorlon: Huh.  perl's failure to pass its own tests is a total mystery to me.  That version passes in unstable, but fails the same way in testing and focal-proposed.  Diffing artifacts between testing and unstable shows no diffefrences other than a slightly newer python and slightly newer gcc, both of which we have.21:59
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, please don't ask me, I don't know... I'm just trying to make the package migrate22:03
LocutusOfBorgAfter this operation, 4,133 kB of additional disk space will be used.22:11
LocutusOfBorgGet:1 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu eoan/universe armhf alt-ergo armhf 1.30+dfsg1-2 [1,283 kB]22:11
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, maybe the old cruft package has been around in eoan for a while?22:11
LocutusOfBorgrmadison doesn't show it22:11
infinityOh, that's fun.22:12
LocutusOfBorgI'm thinking to just no change rebuild it, just to see what happens22:12
infinityThat's not even the source version in eoan.  What on earth do you think a rebuild would do?22:13
LocutusOfBorgoh... got it22:14
LocutusOfBorg 2019-07-30 14:03:18 CESTSupersededEoanreleaseuniversemath1.30+dfsg1-222:14
LocutusOfBorgeoan had for a little time the old version on armhf...22:14
infinityAnyhow, that weird oops doesn't appear to have duplicated itself to focal.22:14
LocutusOfBorgso, a no change rebuild should not even start for armhf the autopkgtests22:14
LocutusOfBorgso, it should not "need" the hint...22:14
infinityI mean, it needs the hint currently.22:15
infinityBut yes, maybe not once this version migrates.22:15
LocutusOfBorgthis version migrated some seconds ago22:15
LocutusOfBorgthis is why I was thinking to no-change rebuild and see what happens22:15
infinityYeah, please don't?22:16
LocutusOfBorgok so I remove the directory22:19
infinitythe... what?22:20
LocutusOfBorgI had the dput of the no change rebuild ready to go, and I dropped it :)22:21
LocutusOfBorgLaney, can you please look at boost1.67 autopkgtests on arm64? they all look test in progress... (maybe this is something like what doko mentioned some hours ago)23:26

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!