| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: joblib (focal-proposed/universe) [0.13.0-2 => 0.14.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 01:11 | |
| mwhudson | vorlon (or any other aa): can you look at my subvertpy and joblib uploads? | 01:11 |
|---|---|---|
| mwhudson | the latter more critically as it's blocking builds of other things | 01:12 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgetdata (focal-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-6build1 => 0.10.0-6build2] (no packageset) | 02:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: numpy-stl (focal-proposed/universe) [2.9.0-1build1 => 2.9.0-1build2] (no packageset) | 02:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libguestfs (focal-proposed/universe) [1:1.40.2-2ubuntu7 => 1:1.40.2-2ubuntu8] (no packageset) | 02:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hidapi-cffi (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1build1 => 0.2.2-1build2] (no packageset) | 02:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted joblib [source] (focal-proposed) [0.14.0-0ubuntu1] | 05:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-automaton (focal-proposed/main) [1.14.0-0ubuntu2 => 1.16.0-2] (ubuntu-server) (sync) | 05:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted subvertpy [source] (focal-proposed) [0.10.1-2ubuntu2] | 05:30 | |
| infinity | mwhudson: What makes you think your hidapi-cffi rebuild will be any different than the previous? | 05:31 |
| infinity | mwhudson: Actually, looking at what the build produces, seems that both rebuilds weren't needed? I don't see any py3 versioned deps or versioned modules. | 05:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected hidapi-cffi [source] (focal-proposed) [0.2.2-1build2] | 05:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libguestfs [source] (focal-proposed) [1:1.40.2-2ubuntu8] | 05:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libgetdata [source] (focal-proposed) [0.10.0-6build2] | 05:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted numpy-stl [source] (focal-proposed) [2.9.0-1build2] | 05:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sg3-utils (disco-proposed/main) [1.42-2ubuntu1 => 1.42-2ubuntu1.19.04.1] (core) | 05:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libdrm (bionic-proposed/main) [2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1] (core, xorg) | 07:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1024.25] | 07:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1006.10] | 07:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1028.31] | 07:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1028.31~16.04.1] | 07:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: llvm-toolchain-9 (bionic-proposed/primary) [1:9-2~ubuntu18.04.1] | 07:29 | |
| mitya57 | Hi! When is it planned to start auto-syncs from Debian? | 07:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libdrm [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.2] | 07:42 | |
| mitya57 | I wonder if I will manage to bootstrap Qt 5.12.5 in a PPA before that. | 07:43 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mitya57, considering how far migration is, I guess a day or two is still needed to finish rebuilds... | 08:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I don't know if they plan to land perl or it is "good enough" to open syncs | 08:32 |
| mwhudson | infinity: uh i don't remember, one of them had some check that only built 3.8 extensions if numpy was built or something | 08:45 |
| mitya57 | LocutusOfBorg: ok, two days is enough for me to bootstrap Qt, but the Qt transition itself will happen after the archive is open. | 08:45 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mitya57, but I'm not RT, so my answer might be not good | 08:47 |
| mitya57 | Ack | 08:47 |
| LocutusOfBorg | we still have lots of arm64 tests to run, and a few failures that looks bad enough for perl to migrate | 08:47 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I hope some more days will be used | 08:47 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu (focal-proposed/main) [19.0.1-1ubuntu1 => 19.1.0-1] (desktop-core) (sync) | 09:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-ati (focal-proposed/main) [1:19.0.1-1ubuntu1 => 1:19.1.0-1] (desktop-core, xorg) (sync) | 09:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-greenlet (focal-proposed/main) [0.4.15-2ubuntu1 => 0.4.15-2ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server) | 09:48 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | doko, ^^ this fixes python-gevent builds | 09:48 |
| LocutusOfBorg | debian bug report updated with fixed patch | 09:48 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libdata-stag-perl (focal-proposed/universe) [0.14-2 => 0.14-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 09:51 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | ^^ debian bug opened [11:57:12] <BTS> Opened #943319 in src:libdata-stag-perl 0.14-2 by Gianfranco Costamagna (locutusofborg) «libdata-stag-perl: please recommend libxml-libxml-perl». https://bugs.debian.org/943319 | 09:58 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 943319 in src:libdata-stag-perl "libdata-stag-perl: please recommend libxml-libxml-perl" [Normal,Open] | 09:58 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server (bionic-proposed/main) [2:1.19.6-1ubuntu4.3 => 2:1.19.6-1ubuntu4.4] (desktop-core, xorg) | 10:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-greenlet [source] (focal-proposed) [0.4.15-2ubuntu2] | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pygac (focal-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-3 => 1.1.0-3build1] (no packageset) | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyregion (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0-9 => 2.0-9build1] (no packageset) | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyscanfcs (focal-proposed/universe) [0.3.2+ds-2 => 0.3.2+ds-2build1] (no packageset) | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-cpl (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.4-2 => 0.7.4-2build1] (no packageset) | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: silx (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.0+dfsg-1 => 0.11.0+dfsg-1build1] (no packageset) | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: specutils (focal-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-1ubuntu1 => 0.5.2-1ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: uvloop (focal-proposed/main) [0.11.3+ds1-2 => 0.11.3+ds1-2build1] (ubuntu-server) | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: photutils (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7-1 => 0.7-1build1] (no packageset) | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyresample (focal-proposed/universe) [1.12.3-5 => 1.12.3-5build1] (no packageset) | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-drizzle (focal-proposed/universe) [1.13.1-2 => 1.13.1-2build1] (no packageset) | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sunpy (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-2 => 1.0.3-2build1] (no packageset) | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyraf (focal-proposed/universe) [2.1.15-2 => 2.1.15-2build1] (no packageset) | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: slixmpp (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4.2-1 => 1.4.2-1build1] (no packageset) | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pysynphot (focal-proposed/universe) [0.9.13+dfsg-1 => 0.9.13+dfsg-1build1] (no packageset) | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted photutils [source] (focal-proposed) [0.7-1build1] | 10:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyraf [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1.15-2build1] | 10:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyresample [source] (focal-proposed) [1.12.3-5build1] | 10:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pysynphot [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.13+dfsg-1build1] | 10:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-drizzle [source] (focal-proposed) [1.13.1-2build1] | 10:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted slixmpp [source] (focal-proposed) [1.4.2-1build1] | 10:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sunpy [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.3-2build1] | 10:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cron (focal-proposed/main) [3.0pl1-134ubuntu1 => 3.0pl1-135ubuntu1] (core) | 10:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kmod (focal-proposed/main) [26-1ubuntu1 => 26-3ubuntu1] (core) | 10:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pspp (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-2ubuntu2 => 1.2.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 10:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pygac [source] (focal-proposed) [1.1.0-3build1] | 10:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyscanfcs [source] (focal-proposed) [0.3.2+ds-2build1] | 10:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted silx [source] (focal-proposed) [0.11.0+dfsg-1build1] | 10:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted uvloop [source] (focal-proposed) [0.11.3+ds1-2build1] | 10:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: polkit-qt-1 (focal-proposed/universe) [0.112.0-6 => 0.112.0-7.1] (kubuntu) (sync) | 10:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyregion [source] (focal-proposed) [2.0-9build1] | 10:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted specutils [source] (focal-proposed) [0.5.2-1ubuntu2] | 10:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-monasca-statsd (focal-proposed/universe) [1.10.1-0ubuntu2 => 1.11.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 10:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-cpl [source] (focal-proposed) [0.7.4-2build1] | 10:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: csync2 (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0-8-g175a01c-4ubuntu2 => 2.0-22-gce67c55-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 10:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libdrm [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1] | 10:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libdrm (bionic-proposed/main) [2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 2.4.97-1ubuntu1~18.04.2] (core, xorg) | 10:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1048.51] (kernel) | 10:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1048.51] | 10:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fpylll (focal-proposed/universe) [0.4.1+ds1-5build1 => 0.4.1+ds1-5ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 10:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zbar (focal-proposed/universe) [0.23-1.1build1 => 0.23-1.2] (kubuntu) (sync) | 10:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (focal-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu9] | 10:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zbar [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.23-1.2] | 10:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fpylll [source] (focal-proposed) [0.4.1+ds1-5ubuntu1] | 10:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (eoan-proposed/main) [3.34.1-1ubuntu1 => 3.34.1+git20191022-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, desktop-extra) | 11:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-19.20~18.04.2] (kernel) | 11:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-19.20~18.04.2] (kernel) | 11:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-19.20~18.04.2] (kernel) | 11:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-19.20~18.04.2] | 11:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-19.20~18.04.2] | 11:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-19.20~18.04.2] | 11:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: astropy (focal-proposed/universe) [3.2.1-1build1 => 3.2.2-1] (kubuntu) (sync) | 11:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted astropy [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.2.2-1] | 11:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: astropy (focal-proposed/universe) [3.2.2-1 => 3.2.2-1build1] (kubuntu) | 12:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected astropy [source] (focal-proposed) [3.2.2-1build1] | 12:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: astropy (focal-proposed/universe) [3.2.2-1 => 3.2.2-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu) | 12:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: amp (focal-proposed/universe) [0.6.1-1 => 0.6.1-1build1] (no packageset) | 12:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dolfin (focal-proposed/universe) [2019.1.0-4 => 2019.1.0-4build1] (no packageset) | 12:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-aiohttp (focal-proposed/universe) [3.5.4-1 => 3.5.4-1build1] (no packageset) | 12:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bitshuffle (focal-proposed/universe) [0.3.5-1 => 0.3.5-1build1] (no packageset) | 12:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-biom-format (focal-proposed/universe) [2.1.7+dfsg-3ubuntu2 => 2.1.7+dfsg-3ubuntu3] (no packageset) | 12:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pysmbc (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.15.6-2 => 1.0.15.6-2build1] (no packageset) | 12:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-cartopy (focal-proposed/universe) [0.17.0+dfsg-6 => 0.17.0+dfsg-6build1] (no packageset) | 12:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-geotiepoints (focal-proposed/universe) [1.1.8-1 => 1.1.8-1build1] (no packageset) | 12:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-skbio (focal-proposed/universe) [0.5.5-2 => 0.5.5-2build1] (no packageset) | 12:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yt (focal-proposed/universe) [3.5.0-1 => 3.5.0-1build1] (no packageset) | 12:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-fabio (focal-proposed/universe) [0.9.0+dfsg-1 => 0.9.0+dfsg-1build1] (no packageset) | 12:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-thinc (focal-proposed/universe) [6.12.1-1 => 6.12.1-1build1] (no packageset) | 12:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pdal (focal-proposed/universe) [2.1.8+ds-2 => 2.1.8+ds-2build1] (no packageset) | 12:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted amp [source] (focal-proposed) [0.6.1-1build1] | 12:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bitshuffle [source] (focal-proposed) [0.3.5-1build1] | 12:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libdata-stag-perl [source] (focal-proposed) [0.14-2ubuntu1] | 12:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-aiohttp [source] (focal-proposed) [3.5.4-1build1] | 12:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-cartopy [source] (focal-proposed) [0.17.0+dfsg-6build1] | 12:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-geotiepoints [source] (focal-proposed) [1.1.8-1build1] | 12:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-skbio [source] (focal-proposed) [0.5.5-2build1] | 12:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yt [source] (focal-proposed) [3.5.0-1build1] | 12:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted astropy [source] (focal-proposed) [3.2.2-1ubuntu1] | 12:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pysmbc [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.15.6-2build1] | 12:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-fabio [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.0+dfsg-1build1] | 12:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-thinc [source] (focal-proposed) [6.12.1-1build1] | 12:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dolfin [source] (focal-proposed) [2019.1.0-4build1] | 12:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-pdal [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1.8+ds-2build1] | 12:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-biom-format [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1.7+dfsg-3ubuntu3] | 12:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 (focal-proposed/restricted) [430.50-0ubuntu2 => 430.50-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop) | 12:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 (bionic-proposed/restricted) [430.50-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 430.50-0ubuntu0.18.04.2] (no packageset) | 12:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 (focal-proposed/restricted) [435.21-0ubuntu2 => 435.21-0ubuntu3] (no packageset) | 13:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 (bionic-proposed/primary) [435.21-0ubuntu0.18.04.2] | 13:11 | |
| cascardo | rbasak: could you look/approve at makedumpfile at the SRU queues for disco and bionic, please? | 13:12 |
| rbasak | cascardo: you'll be first on the list, but I'm not planning on starting my SRU shift for another hour or two | 13:14 |
| cascardo | rbasak: that works fine, thanks a lot! | 13:15 |
| ahasenack | it looks like the test results in the excuses page isn't updating | 13:30 |
| ahasenack | for example, https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#libfcgi-perl | 13:30 |
| ahasenack | the apache2 arm64 regression is from 4 days ago | 13:30 |
| ahasenack | https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/arm64/a/apache2/20191019_003018_b9db3@/log.gz | 13:31 |
| ahasenack | and http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/apache2/focal/arm64 shows green runs | 13:31 |
| ahasenack | Laney: related to a cron job you uncommented the other day? | 13:31 |
| apw | rbasak, i am already looking at the makedumpfile ones | 13:48 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted makedumpfile [source] (disco-proposed) [1:1.6.5-1ubuntu1.3] | 13:57 | |
| rbasak | Thanks! | 14:00 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted makedumpfile [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:1.6.5-1ubuntu1~18.04.3] | 14:00 | |
| Laney | ahasenack: no, not related. I don't see any passes with that trigger. | 14:17 |
| ahasenack | hm | 14:17 |
| ahasenack | Laney: I clicked on the retry button, that is green, but the test result link in the excuses page still points at the result from the 19th | 14:18 |
| Laney | sorry, what is green? | 14:18 |
| ahasenack | maybe I clicked retry on the perl one, actually | 14:18 |
| ahasenack | Laney: yeah, it was perl, sorry, that is green now, and result is up-to-date | 14:19 |
| Laney | other people like v_orlon and LocutusOfBor_g have been doing retries for perl things as well | 14:19 |
| Laney | you might all want to coordinate together to avoid duplicating things | 14:19 |
| ahasenack | apache2 is in our list (server) | 14:20 |
| ahasenack | https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#ubuntu-server | 14:20 |
| Laney | sure | 14:20 |
| ahasenack | but I can hold off, specially since the archive is still closed, and I'm not sure what is going on | 14:20 |
| Laney | but if it's part of another migration then it makes sense to handle it with the folks coordinating that IMO | 14:20 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (eoan-proposed/partner) [1:20190910.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:20191009.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 14:21 | |
| vorlon | Laney: does this error look familiar to you? I don't see any reason it would fail to find libparams-classify-perl http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/b/bioperl/focal/s390x | 14:27 |
| Laney | vorlon: It seems like an unfortunate error when the same source package is specified twice | 14:36 |
| Laney | laney@nightingale> apt-cache showsrc glibc glibc >/dev/null ~ | 14:37 |
| Laney | W: Unable to locate package glibc | 14:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pasaffe (focal-proposed/universe) [0.51-0ubuntu1 => 0.54-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 14:43 | |
| vorlon | Laney: oh did I specify it twice? ok :) | 14:43 |
| vorlon | fixed, thanks | 14:43 |
| vorlon | (i.e. retriggered) | 14:43 |
| Laney | well, yes, but it's still a weird failure mode | 14:44 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 [source] (bionic-proposed) [435.21-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] | 14:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 [i386] (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [435.21-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [435.21-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [435.21-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] | 14:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 [i386] (bionic-proposed) [435.21-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] | 14:59 | |
| doko | Laney, vorlon: update_excuses shows "Test in progress (always failed)" for many packages, even for archs with empty queues | 15:28 |
| LocutusOfBorg | doko, it might be because of somebody rebooting the service when lots of tests were in the queue... | 15:31 |
| Laney | no | 15:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I retried already lots of "test running" that weren't running, but not for arm64, because queue is still ongoing | 15:32 |
| Laney | give an example? | 15:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | there was a lot of test in progress on s390x for example | 15:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | let me find two examples | 15:32 |
| doko | Laney: the ones triggered by numpy | 15:32 |
| Laney | restarting that machine I did does not cause tests to get lost | 15:32 |
| Laney | it'll be much easier to wait for the queue to finish | 15:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: astropy-healpix (focal-proposed/universe) [0.4-6 => 0.4-6build1] (no packageset) | 15:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyfai (focal-proposed/universe) [0.18.0+dfsg1-3 => 0.18.0+dfsg1-3build1] (no packageset) | 15:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: poezio (focal-proposed/universe) [0.12.1-3 => 0.12.1-3build1] (no packageset) | 15:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pymca (focal-proposed/universe) [5.5.1+dfsg-2 => 5.5.1+dfsg-2build1] (no packageset) | 15:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 [source] (bionic-proposed) [430.50-0ubuntu0.18.04.2] | 15:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted poezio [source] (focal-proposed) [0.12.1-3build1] | 15:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pymca [source] (focal-proposed) [5.5.1+dfsg-2build1] | 15:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted astropy-healpix [source] (focal-proposed) [0.4-6build1] | 15:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyfai [source] (focal-proposed) [0.18.0+dfsg1-3build1] | 15:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 [source] (bionic-proposed) [435.21-0ubuntu0.18.04.2] | 15:37 | |
| tjaalton | tseliot: ^ both done | 15:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: reprozip (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.14-2build1 => 1.0.16-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 15:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted reprozip [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.16-0ubuntu1] | 15:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.32-1~ubuntu18.04.1 => 5.2.34-1~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset) | 15:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.32-dfsg-0~ubuntu18.04.1 => 5.2.34-dfsg-0~ubuntu18.04.1] (ubuntu-cloud) | 15:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.32-dfsg-0~ubuntu18.04.1 => 5.2.34-dfsg-0~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset) | 15:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.32-1~ubuntu18.04.2 => 5.2.34-1~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset) | 15:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: usagestats (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7-5 => 0.8-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 15:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted usagestats [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.8-1] | 16:00 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | I still don't get why kernel updates that breaks kernel modules aren't caught before publishing the kernel... | 16:00 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox-hwe/+bug/1847662 | 16:00 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1847662 in virtualbox-hwe (Ubuntu Bionic) "virtualbox-dkms fails to build with 18.04-hwe-edge kernel 5.3.0-12 [error: void value not ignored as it ought to be, from smp_call_function]" [Undecided,In progress] | 16:00 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, apw ^^ you discussed about a test matrix a while ago, but nobody is looking at it before releasing a kernel? | 16:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this one https://people.canonical.com/~kernel/status/adt-matrix/bionic-linux-meta-hwe.html | 16:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg | virtualbox-hwe and virtualbox are both shown as regressions...4 | 16:01 |
| vorlon | I do not look at any test matrices before releasing. I release kernels based on the tracking bugs having been marked as ready for release; it's the kernel team's responsibility to verify the results of testing before doing so | 16:02 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sil2100, ^^ if you could quickly have a look at the vbox for bionic, it should fix the dkms sadness | 16:02 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm trying to understand if we have a process flaw somewhere, not blaming people to be clear :) | 16:02 |
| LocutusOfBorg | getting some sort of automated bug report might help avoiding lots of troubles... I already get for devel series, just I don't get them for stable... | 16:03 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, -edges have a laxer check; is that one in -updates ? | 16:04 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yep | 16:04 |
| LocutusOfBorg | "virtualbox-dkms fails to build with 18.04-hwe-edge kernel 5.3.0-12 | 16:04 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so, like "if you use edge, your responsibility to fix bugs"? | 16:04 |
| apw | vorlon, that data in theory is taken into a account before we remove the block-proposed tags for those kernels; so you should not get asked to copy things which have not passed adt etc | 16:04 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seems legit, to be honest I receive less bugs when hwe-edge breaks dkms | 16:04 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, we want people to be able to test the bits of -edge which work while we work on the issues | 16:07 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, in principle dksm failures are a clear blocker for rolling foo -> foo-edge version | 16:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I don't get... kernel 5.3 is in hwe edge since 4 hours, but my bug report is open since 13 days | 16:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so maybe that bug report is not from an user but a kernel developer? | 16:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | in any case, please release the kernel together with vbox 5.2.34 so end user won't complain too much | 16:08 |
| xnox | apw: hm, it's hinted as good even though it isn't? can you explain what "hinted good" means? | 16:09 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: reprozip (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.16-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.16-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 16:09 | |
| apw | xnox, hinted good would mean someone looked at the logs and determined that it was a false negative (normally) | 16:10 |
| xnox | right | 16:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: astropy-regions (focal-proposed/universe) [0.4-1 => 0.4-1build1] (no packageset) | 16:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: reproject (focal-proposed/universe) [0.5-1 => 0.5-1build1] (no packageset) | 16:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gammapy (focal-proposed/universe) [0.13-1 => 0.13-1build1] (no packageset) | 16:11 | |
| xnox | LocutusOfBorg: it sounds that virtualbox-dkms needs to be fixed to be sensible and innert if the kernel one installs it against has newer module anyway. | 16:11 |
| xnox | Error! Module version 5.2.32_Ubuntu for vboxguest.ko | 16:11 |
| xnox | is not newer than what is already found in kernel 5.0.0-32-generic (6.0.6_KernelUbuntu). | 16:11 |
| xnox | LocutusOfBorg: thus it shouldn't fail to configure, and well, just be dead weight. | 16:12 |
| xnox | or like maybe kernel should autogenerate Breaks: virtualbox-dkms (<< version.shipped.in.this.kernel) | 16:12 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted astropy-regions [source] (focal-proposed) [0.4-1build1] | 16:12 | |
| xnox | such that if one installs hwe kernel, virtualbox-dkms is autoremoved. | 16:12 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted reproject [source] (focal-proposed) [0.5-1build1] | 16:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cdo (focal-proposed/universe) [1.9.7.1-4 => 1.9.8~rc2-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 16:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-microversion-parse (focal-proposed/main) [0.2.1-0ubuntu2 => 0.2.1-3] (ubuntu-server) (sync) | 16:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gammapy [source] (focal-proposed) [0.13-1build1] | 16:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-automaton (focal-proposed/main) [1.14.0-0ubuntu2 => 1.16.0-2] (ubuntu-server) (sync) | 16:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted reprozip [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.16-0ubuntu2] | 16:13 | |
| xnox | LocutusOfBorg: apw: am I wrong about above suggestions? | 16:13 |
| infinity | xnox: virtualbox-dkms ships more modules than just the ones included in the kernel. | 16:15 |
| xnox | infinity: ah, but postinst borgs up on the first one which is younger than kernel one?! | 16:16 |
| infinity | xnox: But it's true that there's no sane way right now to express relationships between virtualbox-dkms, virtualbox-dkms-hwe, and linux, linux-hwe. | 16:16 |
| xnox | sounds akward | 16:16 |
| xnox | (cause i assume the extra modules, need to be matching the other ones) | 16:16 |
| * xnox slowly backs away | 16:16 | |
| infinity | They don't. But you want vbox-dkms-hwe or it probably won't build. :P | 16:16 |
| infinity | I think the more correct answer would be to bundle vbox-dkms and vbox-dkms-hwe in the same vbox-dkms package, with the dkms config file pointing at different code per kernel version. | 16:17 |
| infinity | Which is entirely doable. | 16:17 |
| infinity | Cause trying to express those relationships at the dpkg level in a way that would make apt do sensible things is Very Hard. | 16:18 |
| infinity | Wouldn't be hard if we only had one kernel flavour, maybe, but... | 16:19 |
| infinity | That ship's not only sailed, it's on its way to Mars. | 16:19 |
| apw | xnox, i cann | 16:26 |
| infinity | Or, if vendoring all of the source of one version into another is too icky, they could depend on each other, and each dkms.conf could be version-constrained, so you get old modules on old kernels and new on new. | 16:26 |
| infinity | That might be better. | 16:26 |
| * apw likes the apparent simplicity of the latter | 16:26 | |
| infinity | I have vbox-dkms installed here specifically to watch for dkms-ish breakage, but I don't run LTSes with multiple kernel tracks, so I don't see this pain first-hand. | 16:29 |
| LocutusOfBorg | shouldn't dkms just ignore kernel modules that are already builtin and provide only what is missing? | 16:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | isn't this an easier solution to the problem? | 16:32 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: Well, you still want to match hwe to hwe and ga to ga, no? | 16:38 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: Since you go out of your way to provide an hwe package that builds with hwe kernels. | 16:38 |
| LocutusOfBorg | infinity, I don't think they need to match anymore | 16:40 |
| LocutusOfBorg | there have been host/guest breaking changes in the past, but solved since version 5.1 IIRC | 16:40 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so, you can use the kernel module, or the vbox dkms one, as you wish, for host and guest | 16:40 |
| LocutusOfBorg | all the combinations should be fine now | 16:40 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this is why I say, we might build only host guest-dkms modules that are not in the kernel yet | 16:41 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: I'm not talking about combinations of vbox and modules, I'm talking about combinations of vbox-dkms and the kernel it's built for. Do you make sure non-dkms vbox builds okay for hwe kernels? | 16:41 |
| LocutusOfBorg | infinity, I usually don't install virtualbox-guest-dkms on my VM machines | 16:42 |
| infinity | Err, non-hwe dkms. | 16:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:20191009.1-0ubuntu1] | 16:42 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | infinity, you mean vbox-guest-dkms wrt vbox-guest-dkms-hwe | 16:42 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ? | 16:42 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: This was virtualbox-dkms, not guest-dkms. | 16:42 |
| infinity | Or xnox misspoke. | 16:43 |
| infinity | Which is possible. | 16:43 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (trusty-proposed/main) [10ubuntu0.14.04.4 => 19.6~ubuntu14.04.1] (no packageset) | 16:44 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | can you please rephrase your question? I didn't really get it | 16:44 |
| infinity | So maybe my arguments are all about vbox-dkms, but the vbox-guest-dkms case is indeed that we should just skip stuff that's builtin and newer. | 16:44 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vbox-dkms is not in the kernel | 16:44 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: Do you ensure that virtualbox-dkms (non-hwe) is buildable with hwe kernels? | 16:44 |
| infinity | Yes, I know. | 16:44 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yes, it gets similar fixes | 16:45 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and it is easy to test, I usually do it | 16:45 |
| infinity | Hrm. Okay. | 16:45 |
| infinity | Wouldn't it be easier to just restrict hwe to hwe and ga to ga, as I proposed above? | 16:46 |
| LocutusOfBorg | btw, the virtualbox-dkms autopkgtest is almost never failing | 16:46 |
| infinity | Then you'd have the same version combinations in play in, say, bionic and eoan. | 16:46 |
| infinity | (And that would also paper over the guest-already-built issue, but meh) | 16:46 |
| teward | SRU / AA team, can you reject https://launchpadlibrarian.net/447918271/carla_2.0.0-0ubuntu4+gitde67dcb_source.changes from Eoan proposed because it has a version conflict with Focal | 16:49 |
| teward | (cc Eickmeyer) | 16:49 |
| infinity | teward: Uhh, it does? | 16:50 |
| teward | infinity: Focal has -0ubuntu3 | 16:50 |
| teward | the upload to Eoan has -0ubuntu4+GITREV in it | 16:50 |
| infinity | teward: focal has a newer one in the queue. | 16:50 |
| teward | infinity: i didn't se that one in the pending queue | 16:50 |
| LocutusOfBorg | infinity, but virtualbox-guest-dkms-hwe is *exactly* the same as virtualbox-guest-dkms, just built with newer mesa foo | 16:50 |
| LocutusOfBorg | its a workaround for installability with newer xorg | 16:51 |
| infinity | teward: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=carla | 16:51 |
| teward | infinity: ah, there it is | 16:51 |
| teward | nevermind :) | 16:51 |
| teward | this is what happens when Eickmeyer asks me for an eyes-on look but doesn't tell me they uploaded to both Focal and Eoan and was only getting flak about Eoan | 16:51 |
| teward | :P | 16:51 |
| teward | *needs more coffee* | 16:51 |
| teward | sorry about noise :) | 16:51 |
| teward | infinity: do we have a tool to search all the queues for a given package and see if it's in it and report the info on it? | 16:59 |
| teward | i don't think we do, do we? | 16:59 |
| infinity | A for loop around 'queue'? | 16:59 |
| infinity | (in ubuntu-archive-tools) | 16:59 |
| teward | that'd do it | 17:00 |
| teward | ty infinity | 17:00 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (bionic-proposed/partner) [1:20190910.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 1:20191009.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset) | 17:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (xenial-proposed/partner) [1:20190910.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 1:20191009.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset) | 17:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (disco-proposed/partner) [1:20190910.1-0ubuntu0.19.04.1 => 1:20191009.1-0ubuntu0.19.04.1] (no packageset) | 17:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyscanfcs (focal-proposed/universe) [0.3.2+ds-2build1 => 0.3.5+ds-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 17:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: skimage (focal-proposed/universe) [0.14.2-2build1 => 0.14.2-3] (no packageset) (sync) | 17:03 | |
| infinity | vorlon: Are you still triggering perly tests, or have you taken a break? | 17:03 |
| vorlon | infinity: I'm done with all the necessary mass retriggers; the remainder I would only be triggering based on individual analysis | 17:03 |
| infinity | vorlon: Kay. I was going to retrigger bioperl with itself as a trigger added to your massive list, just didn't want duplicates. | 17:04 |
| infinity | (And then going down the list) | 17:04 |
| infinity | Honestly, I think given the freeziness of the archive, we could probably get away with just all-proposeding it all, but meh. | 17:04 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyscanfcs [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.3.5+ds-1] | 17:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted skimage [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.14.2-3] | 17:04 | |
| vorlon | infinity: bioperl is still falling back to all-proposed and then it's failing; I don't expect adding bioperl to the trigger will help. I can do another round of analysis of the pkgProblemResolver output | 17:05 |
| infinity | vorlon: Hrm? No, the problem with bioperl is it's running the old tests against the new package. | 17:06 |
| infinity | vorlon: The testsuite passes, but the test that looks for a file in @INC fails, cause that file's not there in the new version. | 17:07 |
| * infinity re-runs. | 17:08 | |
| infinity | vorlon: Oh, at least, that was the problem with the perl-triggered bioperl test. I see the bioperl-triggered one also hates life differently. Fun. | 17:11 |
| infinity | vorlon: Hrm. bioperl in unstable is intentionally held out with an RC bug. The right answer might be to punt from proposed and do a rebuild of the release pocket version instead. | 17:17 |
| infinity | Wait... bioperl doesn't need a rebuild at all. Now I'm even more confused. | 17:19 |
| vorlon | infinity: right, running old tests against the new package, which happens because of the apt pin being unresolvable and pulling all binaries from -proposed; so a correct if complicated trigger sidesteps the brokenness of bioperl in -proposed. But yeah I had yet to work out why bioperl was accepted in -proposed and if it was actually needed | 17:20 |
| infinity | Why is the new version being pulled into tests of the old one then? >:( | 17:20 |
| vorlon | because the autopkgtest apt pin fails | 17:20 |
| vorlon | and the fallback is to pull all binaries from -proposed, including bioperl | 17:20 |
| infinity | Okay, so just deleting the proposed one is the easiest thing for now. | 17:20 |
| infinity | I can copy it back later, or we can wait for another Debian upload to sync it (cause it looks like it might need a breaks/replace or something anyway) | 17:21 |
| infinity | Yeah, it'll need a B/R when libbio-perl-run or whatever it is is updated. | 17:21 |
| infinity | So I'll just pull it. | 17:21 |
| infinity | vorlon: Baleeted. Re-testing later might actually work. | 17:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1026.29] (no packageset) | 17:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1060.69] (kernel) | 17:26 | |
| vorlon | infinity: but also my latest trigger may have managed to be complete, so we'll see :) | 17:26 |
| infinity | vorlon: Hah. | 17:26 |
| infinity | vorlon: I'm still fine with deleting it on the basis that it's broken without the Breaks/Replaces, so all is well. | 17:27 |
| * vorlon nods | 17:27 | |
| infinity | perl transitions really highlight the need for some sort of magical trigger resolution in autopkgtest. | 17:28 |
| infinity | Given that perl packages almost always test green, but only after you figure out how to manually tell the system to DTRT. | 17:29 |
| vorlon | I don't think apt has a setting for "install from -proposed only exactly those packages you need in order to resolve the dependencies", does it? | 17:30 |
| teward | vorlon: i've had some success in the past running `apt -t VERSION-proposed install package` | 17:31 |
| teward | which might only install those deps | 17:31 |
| teward | but that's in a testbed system not autopkgtests, etc. | 17:31 |
| teward | might have to hack it around to make it really obey :/ | 17:31 |
| vorlon | that definitely does not have the semantics we're talking about, no | 17:32 |
| teward | i came in late :P | 17:32 |
| teward | i've been looking for such a setting/mechanism for some of my automated CI tests too, for things, and haven't found one. | 17:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: skimage (focal-proposed/universe) [0.14.2-3 => 0.14.2-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:32 | |
| teward | (someone should write such a setting!) | 17:32 |
| vorlon | the autopkgtest code to manage this is awful; and the fact that sometimes it falls back to installing everything from -proposed, but this isn't exposed in the UI, is also confusing | 17:33 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted skimage [source] (focal-proposed) [0.14.2-3ubuntu1] | 17:33 | |
| * infinity WTFs at command-not-found not command-not-finding on only armhf. | 17:39 | |
| infinity | vorlon, Laney: Would the world expload if the download-results cronjob was */1 or */2 instead of */5? | 17:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:20191009.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] | 17:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (disco-proposed) [1:20191009.1-0ubuntu0.19.04.1] | 17:41 | |
| infinity | I keep forgetting how to URL hack to find results I'm waiting on, and really, I don't think I should have to. :P | 17:41 |
| infinity | (I'm assuming that job also rebuilds the HTML, but maybe I'm wrong?) | 17:42 |
| vorlon | infinity: the job commonly takes >5m to finish, so I don't think that would make much difference | 17:42 |
| infinity | vorlon: Ahh, nevermind then. :( | 17:42 |
| infinity | We need to figure out a way to batch all that stuff up better somehow. | 17:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:20191009.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] | 17:42 | |
| infinity | That's the killer for britney runs too. | 17:43 |
| LocutusOfBorg | infinity, breaking only hwe kernels or similar doesn't solve the fact that guest-dkms aims to provide 4 kernel modules, but only one is now builtin in the hwe kernel itself | 17:56 |
| teward | infinity: ... stupid question but why're the ubuntu-archive-tools tools written in Py2? | 17:57 |
| teward | has nobody attempted a py3 port? | 17:57 |
| infinity | vorlon: libcpanplus-perl is fun. We ask apt to install recommends. It says "I dunno, that's hard", and doesn't. | 18:00 |
| infinity | teward: There's an MP for py3 that literally just changes the shebangs. I've not tested that this is sufficient. | 18:01 |
| teward | it won't be | 18:01 |
| teward | you have a LOT of NoLongerValid things in this. | 18:01 |
| infinity | teward: As for "why", the answer is "history". | 18:01 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: Hrm? I didn't suggest breaking anything. | 18:02 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: I suggested that the dkms.conf for vbox*dkms should version-restrict to the GA kernel, and for vbox*dkms-hwe it should restrict to >> the GA kernel. | 18:03 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: Which would end up matching the versions also builtin, assuming you backport current stable to HWE at the same time (or before) the kernel does. | 18:04 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-gevent (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.7-1build2 => 1.3.7-1ubuntu1] (edubuntu) | 18:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-gevent [source] (focal-proposed) [1.3.7-1ubuntu1] | 18:05 | |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: Your libdata-stag-perl upload was entirely unnecessary. | 18:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | teward, the python binding used by ubuntu-archive-tools was python2 only... | 18:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | python3-ubuntutools is a new thing... | 18:09 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hidapi-cffi (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1build1 => 0.2.2-1build1] (no packageset) | 18:09 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | infinity, what is GA kernel? | 18:09 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: The release kernel. The non-HWE one. GA = General Availability, shorthand for "release time" in some software circles. | 18:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | oh... thanks | 18:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but as I said, there is no virtualbox-dkms-hwe package at all | 18:10 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: Were there other uploads you did like this one to add unnecessary extra recommends to perl modules? | 18:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | the virtualbox-hwe is only providing *guest*packages | 18:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | infinity, I only did one perl upload | 18:10 |
| infinity | Okay. I'm deleting it, FYI. | 18:11 |
| LocutusOfBorg | should I close the debian bug? | 18:11 |
| infinity | The bug isn't missing deps, it's missing test triggers which cause apt to give up installing recommends. | 18:11 |
| infinity | Yes, close the Debian bug. | 18:11 |
| infinity | Adding more recommends won't change the issue. | 18:11 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but the code is using a perl module that isn't recommended... | 18:11 |
| infinity | It's pulled in via other recommends just fine. Until apt says no because of goofy pinning. | 18:11 |
| infinity | If the code directly references the module, the recommends isn't wrong. It still won't fix this issue, though. | 18:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | infinity, https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=943319 | 18:12 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 943319 in src:libdata-stag-perl "libdata-stag-perl: please recommend libxml-perl" [Normal,Open] | 18:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | they looks like caring about the bug... | 18:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | should I really close it in your opinion? | 18:13 |
| infinity | Yes. And note that in the log you linked, it DOES try to install lixml-perl. | 18:14 |
| infinity | And then gives up. | 18:14 |
| infinity | Due to pinning. | 18:14 |
| infinity | Investigating (0) libxml-perl:amd64 < none -> 0.08-3 @un uN Ib > | 18:14 |
| infinity | Broken libxml-perl:amd64 Depends on libxml-parser-perl:amd64 < none | 2.44-4 @un uH > | 18:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yep, got it :D | 18:14 |
| infinity | Considering libxml-parser-perl:amd64 1 as a solution to libxml-perl:amd64 0 | 18:14 |
| infinity | Holding Back libxml-perl:amd64 rather than change libxml-parser-perl:amd64 | 18:14 |
| infinity | Done | 18:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | with the retitle it is now clear | 18:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | closed | 18:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hidapi-cffi (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1build1 => 0.2.2-1build3] (no packageset) | 18:15 | |
| infinity | doko: hidapi-cffi already had a python3.8 rebuild (that appeared to do nothing, cause there are no py3.x deps or versioned modules that I can see)... How is this one different? | 18:17 |
| doko | I just looked at mwhudson's notes ... | 18:18 |
| doko | ahh, that's a package which wants to run the tests on all archs, but really could be a binary all package | 18:20 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected hidapi-cffi [source] (focal-proposed) [0.2.2-1build1] | 18:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected hidapi-cffi [source] (focal-proposed) [0.2.2-1build3] | 18:21 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | is it possible to bump firewalld hint please? | 18:28 |
| LocutusOfBorg | pleeeeeeeease | 18:28 |
| LocutusOfBorg | at least we go back in sync with that | 18:29 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: Looking. | 18:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-libdiscid (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0-5build1 => 1.0-5ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 18:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-libdiscid [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0-5ubuntu1] | 18:34 | |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: Looks like it's exactly the same test failing so yeah, I can bump the hint but, also, it's exactly one test failing, could we maybe look into why? | 18:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pytango (focal-proposed/universe) [9.2.5-1build1 => 9.2.5-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 18:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pytango [source] (focal-proposed) [9.2.5-1ubuntu1] | 18:43 | |
| vorlon | infinity: still never got the bioperl trigger right, but your unpublish happened, so the last test result is clean ;) | 19:06 |
| vorlon | infinity: libsyntax-highlight-engine-kate-perl is similarly a "missing recommends because pinning" situation. Do we want to do a --all-proposed retry of the lot? | 19:13 |
| vorlon | runtests FAIL stderr: supported-versions: WARNING: Unknown Ubuntu release: 20.04 | 19:14 |
| vorlon | well aren't you special | 19:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (eoan-proposed/partner) [1:20191009.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:20191009.1-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 19:15 | |
| vorlon | infinity: perhaps you've already done this. perhaps you've also done it in a way that lies to the system and lists no requestor? | 19:17 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: veusz (focal-proposed/universe) [3.0.1-1ubuntu2 => 3.0.1-1ubuntu3] (no packageset) | 19:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted veusz [source] (focal-proposed) [3.0.1-1ubuntu3] | 19:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1026.29] | 19:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1060.69] | 19:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sunpy (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-2build1 => 1.0.3-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 19:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sunpy [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.3-2ubuntu1] | 19:38 | |
| infinity | vorlon: Oh, yeah, I've been triggering from snakefruit, so no requestor. I'm a bad nan. | 19:42 |
| infinity | Also a bad man. | 19:42 |
| infinity | vorlon: I wonder if there's an apt option to treat failure to install recommends the same as failure to install depends. | 19:45 |
| infinity | vorlon: That would make those auto-dep8-recommends passes fail in the apt bit, which would auto-trigger all-proposed. | 19:46 |
| infinity | vorlon: Okay, I think everything <= lintian should be good now. Will check >= lintian after I lunch a bit. | 20:18 |
| infinity | Err, <<, not <= | 20:18 |
| mwhudson | good morning | 20:19 |
| teward | um... anyone know how to get past an issue (daily) with "Release file for [mirror]/ubuntu/dists/focal/InRelease is not valid yet (invalid for another 2h7m11s) Updates will not be applied"? | 20:26 |
| teward | looked at it, it seems like it SHOULD be valid by timestamp | 20:26 |
| teward | (testing the dailies right now for Lubuntu and can't even apt update) | 20:27 |
| Bashing-om | teward: dumb thought from me: system time is correct? | 20:29 |
| teward | its a VM and has time set to etc/utc, time LOOKS right let me do some tests | 20:29 |
| teward | ... WOW okay so it looks like this is a problem with how it was parsing the system time (it's in a VM). I'll have to dig into that one, interesting little bug... | 20:30 |
| teward | manually set the time and timezone and it's working now | 20:30 |
| teward | it's almost like it's ignoring RTCClock | 20:30 |
| teward | i'll dig later | 20:31 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-msgpack (focal-proposed/main) [0.5.6-1build3 => 0.5.6-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 20:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-msgpack [source] (focal-proposed) [0.5.6-1ubuntu1] | 20:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:20191009.1-0ubuntu2] | 21:00 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | infinity, in my merge request for the hint I think I explained why | 21:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | the failure is actually a regression in nftables, that is already worked on by upstream | 21:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | the -2 nftables upload fixed 3 out of 4 failures | 21:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | we still have one left (I already proposed to use firewalld as nftables personal regression testsuite since it catches a lot of regressions!) | 21:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | infinity, btw you (IIRC) dropped alt-ergo permanent hint on armhf... can you please restore it (NBS) | 21:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://code.launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/373867 | 21:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-apt (focal-proposed/main) [1.9.0ubuntu2 => 1.9.0ubuntu3] (core) | 21:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-apt [source] (focal-proposed) [1.9.0ubuntu3] | 21:25 | |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: I did? | 21:26 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sorry, vorlon did | 21:28 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Restore alt-ergo hint, dropped by mistake on | 21:28 |
| LocutusOfBorg | revno: 3795 | 21:28 |
| LocutusOfBorg | committer: Steve Langasek <steve.langasek@canonical.com> | 21:28 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/britney/hints-ubuntu/revision/3795 | 21:28 |
| LocutusOfBorg | it was probably a mistake I would say... | 21:28 |
| infinity | He probably dropped it cause the syntax was wrong, assuming that it couldn't possibly have ever worked. :P | 21:29 |
| LocutusOfBorg | it did work... | 21:29 |
| LocutusOfBorg | don't ask me why, but I'm pretty sure it worked | 21:30 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: Anyhow, hint restored. | 21:31 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I wish with the "all" keyword :) lovely thanks | 21:32 |
| doko | infinity, vorlon: please update the hint to the new version of python-scipy | 21:33 |
| infinity | doko: Done. | 21:35 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lintian (focal-proposed/main) [2.28.0 => 2.29.0] (core) (sync) | 21:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lintian [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.29.0] | 21:46 | |
| infinity | Did we need another lintian? | 21:48 |
| LocutusOfBorg | according to libclone-perl yes... | 21:49 |
| infinity | That was testing 2.22.0 | 21:50 |
| infinity | I was already re-running tests for 2.28.0 | 21:50 |
| infinity | Oh well. | 21:50 |
| LocutusOfBorg | 2.29 mentions a python fix... maybe the person who syncd it needed it | 21:50 |
| infinity | The person was doko, so maybe. | 21:50 |
| doko | sorry, yes | 21:53 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: so what is triggering the alt-ergo autopkgtests on armhf given that it builds only arch-dep packages and there is no armhf binary? | 21:53 |
| infinity | vorlon: Huh. perl's failure to pass its own tests is a total mystery to me. That version passes in unstable, but fails the same way in testing and focal-proposed. Diffing artifacts between testing and unstable shows no diffefrences other than a slightly newer python and slightly newer gcc, both of which we have. | 21:59 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, please don't ask me, I don't know... I'm just trying to make the package migrate | 22:03 |
| LocutusOfBorg | After this operation, 4,133 kB of additional disk space will be used. | 22:11 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Get:1 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu eoan/universe armhf alt-ergo armhf 1.30+dfsg1-2 [1,283 kB] | 22:11 |
| LocutusOfBorg | interesting... | 22:11 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, maybe the old cruft package has been around in eoan for a while? | 22:11 |
| LocutusOfBorg | rmadison doesn't show it | 22:11 |
| infinity | Oh, that's fun. | 22:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm thinking to just no change rebuild it, just to see what happens | 22:12 |
| infinity | Huh? | 22:12 |
| infinity | No. | 22:12 |
| infinity | Don't. | 22:13 |
| infinity | That's not even the source version in eoan. What on earth do you think a rebuild would do? | 22:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | oh... got it | 22:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | 2019-07-30 14:03:18 CESTSupersededEoanreleaseuniversemath1.30+dfsg1-2 | 22:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | eoan had for a little time the old version on armhf... | 22:14 |
| infinity | Anyhow, that weird oops doesn't appear to have duplicated itself to focal. | 22:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so, a no change rebuild should not even start for armhf the autopkgtests | 22:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so, it should not "need" the hint... | 22:14 |
| infinity | I mean, it needs the hint currently. | 22:15 |
| infinity | But yes, maybe not once this version migrates. | 22:15 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this version migrated some seconds ago | 22:15 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this is why I was thinking to no-change rebuild and see what happens | 22:15 |
| infinity | Yeah, please don't? | 22:16 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ok so I remove the directory | 22:19 |
| infinity | the... what? | 22:20 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I had the dput of the no change rebuild ready to go, and I dropped it :) | 22:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Laney, can you please look at boost1.67 autopkgtests on arm64? they all look test in progress... (maybe this is something like what doko mentioned some hours ago) | 23:26 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!