| Unit193 | For the sake of py3, https://packages.qa.debian.org/c/calibre/news/20191025T011934Z.html might be great to grab, no? | 00:23 |
|---|---|---|
| === not_phunyguy is now known as phunyguy | ||
| cpaelzer | rafaeldtinoco: rbasak: I've had two MPs of which I said they are not important since they wait on Focal, now that it is open I'd appreciate a timely review if one of you could take a look | 06:25 |
| cpaelzer | https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+git/qemu/+merge/374446 | 06:25 |
| cpaelzer | https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+git/qemu/+merge/374447 | 06:25 |
| cpaelzer | well, now that we know Focal is open and no other fixes will be stacked let me combine them into one ... | 06:27 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: rafaeldtinoco: https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+git/qemu/+merge/374770 would be better | 06:42 |
| cpaelzer | and in a few minutes we also have proper up to date Focal test build builds in a PPA to try if you want | 06:42 |
| cpaelzer | also I'm still waiting for all 4 haproxy MPs reachable from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haproxy/+bug/1841936 | 06:53 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1841936 in haproxy (Ubuntu Focal) "Rebuild openssl 1.1.1 to pickup TLSv1.3 (bionic) and unbreak existing builds against 1.1.1 (dh key size)" [Medium,Triaged] | 06:53 |
| cpaelzer | Those are enough MPs to also tag you ahasenack :-) | 06:53 |
| cpaelzer | ^^ | 06:54 |
| cpaelzer | rafaeldtinoco: the second and third chapter have a lot of overlap | 07:11 |
| cpaelzer | not sure if you'd want to merge that into one | 07:11 |
| cpaelzer | rafaeldtinoco: you also have to add a huge disclaimer at the manual qemu-cmdline that this disables everything that libvirt would do in terms of feature control | 07:11 |
| cpaelzer | it is a (very) last resort effort to do it that way | 07:12 |
| cpaelzer | also e.g. mds-no can be set normally, I ask you to only use those in the cmdline examples which really don't work any other way | 07:12 |
| cpaelzer | page breaks before new chapters would also help readability | 07:13 |
| cpaelzer | Oh you meant this to be for bionic, that is why you consider mds missing | 07:14 |
| cpaelzer | still ahuge disclaimer please | 07:14 |
| cpaelzer | IIRC while mds-no was one of the complex arch_capability ones | 07:17 |
| cpaelzer | md-clear was a normal bit and can be used in Bionic | 07:17 |
| cpaelzer | TBH I'd not even tell people to use qemu commandline from libvirt xml, it just leads to so many bugs later on all too often | 07:18 |
| cpaelzer | but with a big disclaimer it might be ok | 07:18 |
| cpaelzer | overll the doc surely will help people, so I hope you get not only mine but also other feedback and then can publish it somewhere | 07:19 |
| === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| rafaeldtinoco | thx. yep I need to split what can be done on each version, like the msd-no. and will sure look for feedbacks. Greg's presentation today was all about that, impressive.. | 09:46 |
| rafaeldtinoco | I'll start doing merges today, and code reviews as the doc is finished and repo is opened. | 09:48 |
| rbasak | cpaelzer: I'm still cloning qemu :-/ | 10:17 |
| cpaelzer | hehe | 10:17 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: rafaeldtinoco: glad to see you both, please coordinate that not both of you clean qemu for too long :-) | 10:17 |
| rbasak | I'm getting an eventual 503 Service Unavailable trying to fetch your branch | 10:18 |
| rbasak | So I might move on and see if it's working later | 10:18 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: maybe do haproxy and let qemu for rafaeldtinoco ? | 10:19 |
| cpaelzer | that is smaller | 10:19 |
| cpaelzer | and you are involved from a second POV of the SRU team | 10:19 |
| rbasak | haproxy isn't cloning either right now | 10:19 |
| cpaelzer | oh, so it is LP in general | 10:19 |
| rbasak | I wonder if it's related to the archive opening | 10:20 |
| rbasak | The git-ubuntu importer is presumably very busy | 10:20 |
| rafaeldtinoco | I'm starting little later today, will catch up and sync with what's left (leave some reviews for me :) | 10:20 |
| cjwatson | rbasak: The git-ubuntu importer presumably always uses SSH though? | 10:42 |
| cjwatson | Or does it use HTTPS to pull? | 10:42 |
| rbasak | I'm not sure. I can look it up if you need? | 10:45 |
| cjwatson | Not especially | 10:45 |
| cjwatson | I should unpack what I said though: the 503s are because there's a lowish limit on concurrent HTTPS connections at the moment because there are some frequent events that amount to DDoS by HTTPS | 10:46 |
| cjwatson | And limiting concurrent connections makes it easier for the service to recover somewhat naturally most of the time without just faceplanting | 10:46 |
| rbasak | That makes sense, thanks | 10:47 |
| rbasak | cpaelzer: looks like haproxy for Focal needs rebasing onto proposed :-/ | 10:51 |
| rbasak | Does that change anything? | 10:51 |
| cpaelzer | no | 10:51 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: I already abandoned the focal MP | 10:51 |
| rbasak | Ah | 10:51 |
| cpaelzer | and updated the bug | 10:51 |
| cpaelzer | the sync relaces the Focal MP, but SRU MPs stay as-is | 10:52 |
| cpaelzer | +p | 10:52 |
| rbasak | Sorry I shouldn't have jumped straight to your branches | 10:52 |
| rbasak | cpaelzer: I don't see the fix in 2.0.8-1? src/ssl_sock.c appears unchanged. | 10:57 |
| cpaelzer | I was relying on what I found it tagged in the upstream branch - let me check the actual upload that we got synced | 10:57 |
| cpaelzer | $ git tag --contains d6de151248603b357565ae52fe92440e66c1177c | 10:58 |
| cpaelzer | v2.0.8 | 10:58 |
| cpaelzer | just to confirm why I have assumed it would be in there | 10:59 |
| rbasak | Suddenly I get the opposite answer to my query | 10:59 |
| rbasak | git diff pkg/ubuntu/eoan-devel pkg/ubuntu/focal-proposed -- src/ssl_sock.c | 10:59 |
| rbasak | This was previously giving me nothing, but now I see it | 10:59 |
| * rbasak is puzzled | 10:59 | |
| rbasak | Ah | 11:00 |
| cpaelzer | the fixes are in on my check to focal-proposed that I just did | 11:00 |
| rbasak | Apparently working directory matters for that | 11:00 |
| rbasak | My mistake, osrry | 11:00 |
| cpaelzer | np | 11:00 |
| rbasak | cpaelzer: haproxy (three branches) looks good. What's the plan with the bug reference and SRU information? | 11:51 |
| rbasak | Right now the bug reference doesn't trigger a Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed | 11:51 |
| rbasak | And the SRU information is for the previous no-change rebuild I think? | 11:51 |
| cpaelzer | SRU information is for both | 11:52 |
| cpaelzer | if you read the bug it has two templates now | 11:52 |
| cpaelzer | and the upload will be done with an -v to the last released version | 11:52 |
| rbasak | Ah | 11:52 |
| cpaelzer | that way it will trigger the updates excactly once | 11:52 |
| rbasak | OK | 11:52 |
| cpaelzer | but atm autopkgtest has so much to do, I'm not sure when the 2.0.8 sync will release anyway | 11:53 |
| cpaelzer | but then -proposed is enough (in terms of prereq) to get the SRUs uploaded | 11:54 |
| cpaelzer | so if you approved them I can go on | 11:54 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: I agree that the later ones which already had openssl need updated bug links | 11:55 |
| cpaelzer | consider that done | 11:55 |
| rbasak | Well you just convinced me that with a -v in the upload you don't need them? :-P | 11:56 |
| cpaelzer | which is correct for Bionic | 11:56 |
| cpaelzer | but D/E never had the openssl upload | 11:56 |
| rbasak | Ah | 11:56 |
| cpaelzer | there your feedback was correct | 11:56 |
| cpaelzer | I'm just proactively fixing your way to be green | 11:57 |
| cpaelzer | and the 2.0.8 would already be released if the opening of the sync wouldn't put that much pressure on autopkgtest | 11:59 |
| cpaelzer | things might need a while to settle there | 11:59 |
| rbasak | I think it's OK for you to mark Fix Committed for Focal and for me to then accept the SRUs. | 11:59 |
| cpaelzer | done | 12:00 |
| cpaelzer | now uploading | 12:00 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: all tagged and uplaoded, the MPs are marked approved and the bug on Focal "Fix Committed" | 12:03 |
| cpaelzer | thanks for the review | 12:03 |
| cpaelzer | thanks for the accept rbasak, that way I can do the tests right away later today | 12:14 |
| cpaelzer | giving it an hour or two to build and show up in proposed | 12:15 |
| TJ- | Is the expected output of "dpkg --verify" mostly made up of '?' aside from the MD5 check? Docs say it is using RPM format which would normally be '.' for a pass - can I assume that '?' means "this check not done on Debian" ? | 12:17 |
| ddstreet | xnox you mind if i merge mdadm, or are you working on it | 12:39 |
| rafaeldtinoco | xnox: mind taking a look at the following MR whenever you have some time (https://code.launchpad.net/~rafaeldtinoco/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+git/systemd/+merge/374027), pls ? systemd-networkd related. | 13:25 |
| === ricab is now known as ricab|lunch | ||
| ubuking | Hey! | 14:21 |
| === ricab|lunch is now known as ricab | ||
| === Wryhder is now known as Lucas_Gray | ||
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: postgresql-common 208 showed up, but needs a while to be syncable | 15:37 |
| cpaelzer | as I said in my mail, maybe you could kick the sync at your EOD | 15:37 |
| cpaelzer | then it should be available for a sync I'd hope | 15:37 |
| marcustomlinson | slashd: hey, have I been granted PPU for LibreOffice yet? I noticed I'm still not allowed to trigger autopkgtests against LibreOffice in a PPA | 15:45 |
| marcustomlinson | "You submitted an invalid request: You are not allowed to upload libreoffice or libreoffice to Ubuntu, thus you are not allowed to use this service." | 15:45 |
| cpaelzer | marcustomlinson: IIRC that is an action that only core-dev's can do atm | 15:47 |
| cpaelzer | I think it lacks an ACL finer than that | 15:47 |
| marcustomlinson | :( | 15:47 |
| cjwatson | marcustomlinson: I think cpaelzer is mistaken | 15:49 |
| cjwatson | bileto uses archive.checkUpload to determine whether the requester can upload | 15:49 |
| marcustomlinson | sounds promising cjwatson thanks | 15:50 |
| seb128 | if you can upload I think you should be able to trigger tests | 15:50 |
| cjwatson | Indeed. I checked and marcustomlinson hasn't yet been granted any kind of PPU | 15:51 |
| marcustomlinson | cjwatson: that would make sense yeah. slashd was gonna do that for me, I just suspect he hasn't gotten around to it yet. | 15:51 |
| slashd | marcustomlinson, I thought it was sil2100 task, I'll get back to you soon. Sorry for the delay. | 15:52 |
| seb128 | marcustomlinson, just share retry urls on #ubuntu-desktop meanwhile if needed (or sent in query, I'm happy to click on those for you) | 15:52 |
| Laney | It needs to be done by a member of the TB | 15:52 |
| marcustomlinson | slashd: ah sorry, you did the team additions, cyphermox was gonna do the PPU | 15:53 |
| marcustomlinson | thanks seb128, I don't actually need one at this moment, was just giving it a test | 15:54 |
| slashd | marcustomlinson, I'll figure this out with the other member of the dmb and get back to you soon. | 15:54 |
| marcustomlinson | thanks slashd, sorry for bugging you (the wrong person) | 15:54 |
| slashd | marcustomlinson, not problem at all, it's dmb matter so all good | 15:55 |
| Laney | Not really happy with testing access by trying to create unnecessary jobs | 15:55 |
| Laney | We are slammed at the minute and libreoffice isn't exactly trivial | 15:55 |
| marcustomlinson | Laney: well I don't NEED to test is what I'm saying, as I can for amd64 locally first | 15:56 |
| Laney | Great, that's what everyone should be doing :> | 16:00 |
| cjwatson | Also you can test for access using edit-acl (lp:ubuntu-archive-tools) | 16:02 |
| cjwatson | edit-acl -p marcustomlinson query | 16:02 |
| marcustomlinson | cjwatson: useful thanks :) | 16:04 |
| sil2100 | slashd: I thought only the PPU package addition for Gunnar was my action item? | 16:24 |
| sil2100 | Did I forget something? | 16:24 |
| sil2100 | uh! | 16:24 |
| slashd | sil2100, it's cyphermox's action | 16:27 |
| rbasak | bryce: https://code.launchpad.net/~racb/usd-importer/+git/usd-importer/+ref/importer-add-tests | 17:24 |
| rbasak | More refactoring and cleanups to come, but that should give you an idea of what's coming. | 17:25 |
| rbasak | You'll want to spend some time understanding the structure | 17:25 |
| rbasak | Diff against master please - the individual commits probably won't be helpful | 17:25 |
| === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand | ||
| cyphermox | marcustomlinson: PPU is done. | 20:12 |
| sdk | <jbicha "sdk: there are alternate depende"> That's what I tought but what would be the rationale behing installing the whole ubuntu desktop when apt installing xorg on a netinst? I mean wouldn't it be better to move those dependencies in "suggested packages" insteand of "recommended"? | 20:39 |
| sdk | <JanC "you can also use --no-install-re"> Thanks but that's exactly what I tried to avoid since I'll need to install each packages I need individually. | 20:40 |
| === Wryhder is now known as Lucas_Gray | ||
| RAOF | <sdk "That's what I tought but what wo"> There's no difference in the dependencies between netinst and other install methods; they're backed by the same archive. The solution suggested - `apt install xorg gnome-shell-` should get you xorg without gnome-shell. Check if that set of packages is what you're after. If not, repeat, excluding another likely-looking package with `$PACKAGE-` on the end, until the set of packages is | 22:32 |
| RAOF | to your liking. | 22:32 |
| sdk | RAOF: Well, I'll try that solution even if there's a wall of packages to check. I guess I'll have some fun --dry-run'ing a few times until I find all the packages I need to exclude XD. | 22:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!