[00:43] ! [00:44] ~ [07:43] RAOF, thanks! === enaut[m] is now known as Guest20711 === ricab_ is now known as ricab === ricab_ is now known as ricab [12:29] I am checking lm-sensors package before do the merge of the latest version we have in Debian and I am not sure if I agree with the delta we carry in this package. It basically replaces a "Breaks" with a "Conflicts" in debian/control with the justification that "Breaks" shouldn't be used without version [12:29] however, this is not mandatory and "Breaks" is preferable most of the times [12:30] could someone take a look and give me a second opinion on this? [12:32] What is the semantic purpose of the Breaks or Conflicts relationship here? [12:33] I found https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lm-sensors/commit/?id=a7a21eead36e463e665bea74cd98ab400014c229 [12:33] libsensors4 last existed in Bionic [12:34] https://bugs.debian.org/915873 [12:34] Debian bug 915873 in libsensors-config "libsensors-config: removal of libsensors-config makes files disappear from libsensors4" [Serious,Fixed] [12:34] cjwatson, you were faster than me :) [12:36] It does seem to me that this should probably be spelled Breaks, but Conflicts+Replaces is special and so are configuration files. I'd suggest specifically asking infinity (who made this change) for the background [12:41] cjwatson, thanks for taking a look, let's see infinity's feedback === ricab is now known as ricab|lunch [13:57] * rafaeldtinoco created a ubuntu-server-ha project and ~ubuntu-server-ha team -> subscribed all HA related packages. feel free to subscribe ubuntu-server-ha to any HA related bugs [13:59] and sorry for the noise on ubuntu-server as many of those bugs were also ubuntu-server subscribed === ricab|lunch is now known as ricab [16:16] dannf: o/ [16:16] rbasak: hey [16:17] dannf: in your Bionic upload of gdb, shouldn't the changelog message say "Fix breakpoints in 32-bit programs" or something? [16:17] That's what's really being fixed, right? [16:18] rbasak: i suspect it goes beyond breakpoints, but i'd be fine w/ mentioning that explicitly [16:18] dannf: if it's quick for you to fix up please. [16:19] Just that users reporting affected are holding on the package and it seems appropriate to tell them their bug is being fixed :) [16:19] (and the bug description referenced doesn't match the current description) [16:19] rbasak: ack [16:26] rbasak: done - thx for the feedback! [16:28] Perfect - thank you! [16:39] mwhudson: hi. will there be eoan docker images any time in next week? [17:19] jbicha: https://lists.debian.org/debian-gtk-gnome/2019/10/msg00001.html is this agreed upon in Debian? [19:06] mdeslaur: One comment about the php issue with mysql: One reason to have used skip-grant-tables would have been if php has|had any tests that actually tried to connect remotely, since by default mysql will only create a root@localhose user. [19:06] (5.7+) [19:08] Skuggen: yeah, I'm not sure since the php mysql tests don't seem to actually run [19:08] I'll have to investigate...I did remove skip-grant-tables, and that made it build [19:08] thanks for the hint [20:11] infinity, did you see our discussion earlier here about lm-sensors? If it's possible I'd like to know why do we need Conflicts instead of Breaks here https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lm-sensors/commit/?id=a7a21eead36e463e665bea74cd98ab400014c229 [20:16] kanashiro: Conflicts/Replaces means "remove A to install B", Breaks/Replaces means "files in B overwrite files in A". The latter should be versioned, the former not. What you wanted was the former. [20:19] kanashiro: If what was actually intended was to overwrite files, then it should have been versioned with the version when the file moved. I didn't look at history deeply to decide that when I made the fix, I was just fixing the case where our frontends (like update-manager) refused to perform the upgrade because an unversioned Breaks pretty much *is* a Conflict, but it won't do the swap without Conflicts/Replaces being in play. [20:22] infinity, okay, so this delta fixes an upgrade issue you faced, that's enough for me [20:22] thanks for the reply [20:23] kanashiro: Okay, looking at the original Debian report that caused this, yes, it should have been a Conflict. It would have been a (versioned) Breaks if a newer version of libsensors4 existed that didn't ship the file, but that's not a thing. [20:24] kanashiro: Anyhow, we only need this delta through the release of 20.04 (to keep things smooth from 18.04), then it can go bye-bye. So adding a comment like that in debian/control above the Conflicts line might be a helpful hint to future mergers. [20:25] infinity, good point, will add this comment for future merges [20:33] RikMills: do you mean focal? there have been eoan images for a while [20:34] mwhudson: yeah, I do. still easy to make that mistake! [20:35] hm no images at https://partner-images.canonical.com/core/ yet [22:38] doko: please be more specific with your question [22:40] pygtk may be dropped from Debian Testing by the end of this year [23:03] mitya57: would you like to rebuild gnome-panel and gnome-applets for https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/libgweather.html ? [23:40] RikMills: https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/6888