[03:07] <ijohnson> zyga: when you get in can you take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1850720? thanks!
[03:07] <mup> Bug #1850720: installing snap with layout on /etc/ld.so.cache results in deleted mount <snapd:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1850720>
[06:28] <mborzecki> morning
[07:01] <zyga> ijohnson: done
[07:01] <zyga> hey mborzecki  :)
[07:01] <mborzecki> zyga: hey hey
[07:01] <zyga> mborzecki: I think I restored my sleep budget to normal state
[07:02] <mborzecki> a lot of red and a funch of stuck travis jobs?
[07:02] <zyga> mborzecki: must be Thursday ;)
[07:08] <zyga> mborzecki: I'll review the other PR today
[07:52] <mborzecki> pedronis: mvo: hey
[07:52] <mborzecki> mvo: fixed the typo in #7701 but the unit tests fail, want me to look into that?
[07:52] <mup> PR #7701: overlord: add kernel rollback accross reboots manager test and fixes <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7701>
[07:53] <mvo> hey mborzecki
[07:53] <mvo> mborzecki: oh, hm, hm
[07:53] <mvo> mborzecki: you are welcome to look
[07:53] <mborzecki> mvo:  this is what's failing there: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Hdzh8kbqF9/
[07:54] <mvo> mborzecki: oh, fun
[07:54] <mvo> mborzecki: /o\ yeah, I worked on the manager tests
[07:54] <mvo> mborzecki: but did not run the whole thing
[07:55] <mborzecki> mvo: haven't done much around reboots, but i can dive in and check what's happening there
[07:56] <mvo> mborzecki: is the parallel install and gadget all blocked? if so, yes, a look at this would be great
[07:57] <mborzecki> mvo: parallel installs is waiting for a review from zyga, jdstrand already +1'ed it
[07:57] <zyga> mborzecki: yep, on my plate today
[07:57] <zyga> mborzecki: I think it will land today
[07:58] <mborzecki> mvo:  and gadget remodel needs reviews ;) you're welcome to do a pass there
[07:58] <mborzecki> zyga: yeah, had to restart the tests
[07:58] <mvo> mborzecki: aha, nice. I will do have a look
[07:58] <mvo> mborzecki: cool, more eyes on the boot code are always good
[07:58] <mborzecki> and wanted to take a look into #7702, see hwther i can move some stuff over from #7193
[07:58] <mvo> mborzecki: I suspect its missing fixtures now
[07:58] <mup> PR #7702: tests: adding fedora 31 to google-unstable backend <Created by sergiocazzolato> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7702>
[07:58] <mup> PR #7193: [WIP] many: cgroupsv2 spread run <Created by bboozzoo> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7193>
[08:00] <pstolowski> morning
[08:12] <mvo> mborzecki: yeah, it looks like the mocks are now incomplete in the booted_test. I suspect its just a matter of adding Type: snap.TypeOS etc
[08:15] <zyga> wow, Tyler got mentioned on https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/insights/deep-dive-intel-analysis-speculative-behavior-swapgs-and-segment-registers
[08:17] <mborzecki> btw https://medium.com/nttlabs/cgroup-v2-596d035be4d7
[08:18] <mvo> mborzecki: yeah, its just a missing Type: snap.TypeBase for the snapsetup fixture
[08:18] <mvo> mborzecki: I push the (trivial) fix
[08:18] <mborzecki> mvo: ah ok :)
[08:19] <mvo> mborzecki: thank you still!
[08:19] <zyga> mborzecki: lol
[08:19] <zyga> runc, the reference implementation of OCI Runtime Spec, gained the initial support for cgroup v2 just last month (PR: #2113). This is not ready for production, especially because it lacks the implementation for eBPF device controller
[08:19] <mup> PR #2113: interfaces/builtin: add i2c interface <Created by bergotorino> <Merged by chipaca> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/2113>
[08:19] <zyga> mborzecki: at least they have a PR open
[08:19] <mborzecki> zyga: yeah, heh
[08:19] <zyga> anyway, I think we are "state of the art" in the sense that the state is shit anyway
[08:20] <mborzecki> zyga: feels like switching the defaults in systemd is a bit premature, but it's fine that fedora did it, otherwise nobody would care to transition
[08:20] <zyga> yeah
[08:20] <zyga> I think it's just like that
[08:21] <zyga> you have to toggle the experimental feature
[08:21] <zyga> or it will never really work
[08:21] <zyga> free systems are the beta testers
[08:21] <zyga> (in fedora world)
[08:21] <mborzecki> haha, that sounds familiar tbh :)
[08:22] <zyga> TBH I find the whole runc/crun/podman/docker/moby stuff a terrible mess
[08:22] <zyga> as in, all the $$$ behind this wants to land grab
[08:22] <zyga> probably inevitable but feels like mud with leeches
[08:24] <mborzecki> zyga: you left out skopeo
[08:24] <zyga> I'm sure I did
[08:24] <zyga> it's a zoo of new things that do part of what docker did
[08:24] <zyga> all with quirky geeky names
[08:24] <zyga> oh well
[08:24] <mborzecki> xD
[08:25] <zyga> brb, cold today, need tea
[08:30] <pedronis> mvo: hi, I made a pass on 7701 (covering also the one is based on I think)
[08:30] <pedronis> s/made/did/
[08:30] <zyga> hey pedronis :)
[08:30]  * zyga is back with hot tea
[08:34] <pedronis> mvo: maybe close 7649 and keep only 7701? I find reasoning about both situations together easier
[08:34] <pedronis> 7649 is very small
[08:37] <mvo> pedronis: sure, happy to do that
[08:38] <mvo> pedronis: thank you! will look at the feedback now
[08:38] <mvo> fwiw 7651 needs a second review, it will unblock 7652
[08:40] <mup> PR snapd#7649 closed: overlord: fix TestRemodelSwitchToDifferentKernel for bootvars <Remodel 🚋> <Created by mvo5> <Closed by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7649>
[09:02] <pedronis> mborzecki: did another pass on #7665, looking good
[09:02] <mup> PR #7665:  devicestate: add support for gadget->gadget remodel  <Remodel 🚋> <Created by bboozzoo> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7665>
[09:02] <mborzecki> pedronis: thanks!
[09:05] <pedronis> mvo: I looked what that was, but it's my slots-per-plug stuff, I cannot do the 2nd review :)
[09:05] <pedronis> mvo: thx for the review
[09:07] <mvo> pedronis: haha, yes
[09:07] <mvo> pedronis: would love to unblock this today
[09:27] <mvo> pedronis: I updated the PR based on your feedback (7701)
[09:28] <pedronis> mvo: thx, will look in a bit
[09:55] <mvo> Chipaca: I updated 7624 a bit more based on your suggestions, would love to add some more tests, a second look would be great (just to doulbe check) and then your opinion if I should merge and or do some PRs with test improvements first
[09:55] <Chipaca> mvo: omw
[09:56] <mvo> Chipaca: no rush
[10:01] <mvo> mborzecki: you got some feedback on the remodel PR, more to come :)
[10:01] <mborzecki> mvo: ah ok, i'll wait with the fixes then
[10:02] <mvo> mborzecki: do the fixes, thats fine, I will not be able to look for at least 1h
[10:03]  * zyga -> walk 
[10:05] <Chipaca> mvo: any particular reason you went with syscall.SIGINT instead of os.Interrupt?
[10:05] <mvo> Chipaca: no reason, we use that elsewhere too
[10:06] <Chipaca> fair
[10:07] <Chipaca> drat, there's a chunk of functionality we should abstract somewhere neat
[10:07] <Chipaca> :)
[10:11] <Chipaca> mvo: looks good! i'll be building and testing it locally in a bit to see if i catch any other issues
[10:15] <mvo> Chipaca: this is why I said I'm not super happy yet :/ it feels ok but not great (yet)
[10:16] <Chipaca> mvo: maybe it's all that 'snap donwload'
[10:18] <Chipaca> siiigh
[10:20] <Chipaca> mvo: interrupting the download prints a spurious error message, at least in part because Download() isn't receiving a context form the command so it doesn't know it's been canceled
[10:20] <Chipaca> mvo: otoh the command could know it's canceled and ignore the error at that point
[10:20] <Chipaca> mvo: oto²h it's third-order nits at this point
[10:20] <Chipaca> mvo: oto³h it's the sort of polish we like
[10:21] <Chipaca> and they're ux regressions
[10:21] <Chipaca> the --direct version doesn't suffer from this
[10:22] <Chipaca> :-/
[10:22] <Chipaca> mvo: so
[10:22] <Chipaca> mvo: how about this
[10:22] <Chipaca> mvo: switch the defaults, land as is, work on the nits until they're where we want them, _then_ switch the defaults
[10:22] <mvo> Chipaca: nice one!
[10:22] <Chipaca> mvo: maybe even make the options hidden so we can play with them without breaking stuff
[10:24] <Chipaca> so don't add --direct, but add a hidden --indirect or something
[10:24] <Chipaca> mvo: it feels like it's a couple of PRs of refactorings to get the UX where we want it
[10:25] <Chipaca> that's my gut feeling about it, but my gut is full of shit
[10:25] <Chipaca> wait
[10:25] <Chipaca> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
[10:26] <Chipaca> mvo: disadvantage is that, because people are needing this functionality, they'll start using it even if it's hidden so we'd have to carry it forever
[10:26] <Chipaca> mvo: but OTOH having a hidden --indirect forever doesn't seem too onerous
[10:30] <mup> Bug #1574487 changed: possibly unclean shutdown <Snappy:Fix Released> <initramfs-tools-ubuntu-core (Ubuntu):Fix Committed> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1574487>
[10:31] <mup> Bug #1606574 changed: SSH Interface is missing <snapd-interface> <Snappy:Fix Released> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1606574>
[10:33] <zyga> Unexpected errand, 1.5 hrs
[10:34] <mup> Bug # changed: 1593450, 1613971, 1624829, 1637611
[10:37] <mup> Bug #1641631 changed: Raspberry Pi images do not support boot from USB <Snappy:Fix Released by alfonsosanchezbeato> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1641631>
[10:37] <mup> Bug #1642082 changed: Timestamp error when we try to sign a model assertion <snappy-docs> <Snappy:Fix Released by davidc3> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1642082>
[10:40] <mup> Bug #1646144 changed: ACLs to devices need to be supported in core  <Canonical System Image:Confirmed for pat-mcgowan> <Snappy:Fix Released by ogra> <ubuntu-core-meta (Ubuntu):Fix Committed by ogra> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1646144>
[10:40] <mup> Bug #1646333 changed: bind mounts related to content interface plugs remain stale on snap disconnect/connect or snap updates <Snappy:Fix Released> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1646333>
[10:43] <mup> Bug # changed: 1647169, 1654588, 1655711, 1656820, 1657751, 1659149
[10:46] <mup> Bug # changed: 1659724, 1659744, 1660865, 1673757, 1675054
[10:47] <Chipaca> somebody's having fun on their triage day
[10:49] <mup> Bug # changed: 1663177, 1671266, 1676244, 1680088, 1683368, 1705486, 1737427, 1743301
[10:52] <mup> Bug #1747794 changed: cannot resolve host name  with avahi interface  <Snappy:Fix Released> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1747794>
[10:52] <mup> Bug #1758849 changed: Snap not able to enable ssh after core upgrade  <Snappy:Fix Released> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1758849>
[11:01] <mborzecki> sorry for the spam
[11:05] <zyga> Errand almost done, grabbing some food now
[11:05] <zyga> mvo: I’ll make it up tomorrow
[11:05] <zyga> mborzecki: what is Ubuntu-core-meta?
[11:06] <Chipaca> mborzecki: don't be sorry! good stuff
[11:10] <mborzecki> zyga: no clue, better ask ogra
[11:12] <Chipaca> zyga: it's a meta package
[11:12] <zyga> I wonder if we could close some weird projects
[11:12] <zyga> Or disable them from bug reports at least
[11:14] <Chipaca> zyga: in particular it has nothing to do with us
[11:14] <Chipaca> ubuntu-core-meta is the source of ubuntu-core-libs
[11:15] <Chipaca> zyga: where are we getting dragged into it?
[11:15] <Chipaca> hmmmm
[11:15]  * Chipaca reads what he wrote
[11:15] <Chipaca> ok, in the above, change 'us' or 'we' to 'snappy'
[11:15]  * Chipaca needs to work on that some more
[11:16] <Chipaca> ah, i just saw the bug
[11:17] <Chipaca> so snappy isn't involved at the project level, just that bug that affected it
[11:17] <Chipaca> ok
[11:31] <mup> PR snapd#7699 closed: release: 2.42.1 <Created by mvo5> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7699>
[11:55] <mup> PR snapd#7704 opened: snap: extract printInstallHint in cmd_download.go <Simple 😃> <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7704>
[11:58] <mup> PR snapd#7705 opened: o/devicestate: Handle preseed in firstboot [WIP] <Prebaking> <Created by stolowski> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7705>
[12:00] <pstolowski> pedronis: hey, i marked this ^ WIP because i had to push changes to parts that i intend to propose separately (and that miss tests right now), but i was impossible to avoid these bits
[12:01] <zyga> Chipaca: :D
[12:01]  * zyga is back from errand and lunch
[12:01] <zyga> and back to coding
[12:08] <zyga> mborzecki: btw, about those locks, we create locks 0600
[12:08] <zyga> so no catastrophy :)
[12:11] <Chipaca> zyga: https://i.imgur.com/HCe563J.jpg
[12:11]  * Chipaca goes for lunch
[12:11] <zyga> hmm
[12:11] <zyga> Chipaca: meouch!
[12:12] <mup> PR snapd#7193 closed: [WIP] many: cgroupsv2 spread run <Created by bboozzoo> <Closed by bboozzoo> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7193>
[12:20] <pedronis> Chipaca: thanks for the review, I tried to answer your questions, maybe you have further feedback on the first and last
[12:20] <Chipaca> pedronis: the .More() was to error if there was garbage after the json, fwiw
[12:21] <pedronis> Chipaca: we could, it's a bit more interesting if it was a network connection
[12:21] <Chipaca> joeubuntu: wait so you and joedborg _aren't_ the same person?
[12:21] <Chipaca> :)
[12:21] <Chipaca> true
[12:22] <joedborg> Not that I know of 😂
[12:22] <Chipaca> joeubuntu: i learned of joeubuntu leading the robotics team at the same time i saw your nick
[12:23] <joeubuntu> In the singularity all joes are unified in to one...
[12:29] <pedronis> Chipaca: would it be better if that label was inside an Options struct ?
[12:29] <pedronis> (I would do that change in one of the follow ups though)
[12:30] <Chipaca> pedronis: not until we know what we're doing :)
[12:31] <pedronis> ok
[12:32] <Chipaca> pedronis: found the bug in the completion pr (i'm having lunch so figured it was a good time to poke at it)
[12:32] <pedronis> ah, good
[12:33] <pedronis> Chipaca: the fun with labels happens here: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7658/files#diff-eb9825aa18d9bbbcc41ca31728af8157R75 in the later PR
[12:33] <mup> PR #7658: cmd/snap-preseed: add snap-preseed executable <Prebaking> <Created by stolowski> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7658>
[12:33] <pedronis> there's just a TODO for now there, it relates to your work (modes and modeenv etc)
[12:37] <Chipaca> pedronis: i think that's the link to the nil db pr, no the labels one :)
[12:39] <pedronis> Chipaca: oops
[12:40] <pedronis> https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7695/files#diff-0b649265c21137e8fd367d4a16607a82R409
[12:40] <mup> PR #7695: o/devicestate: the basics of Core 20 firstboot support with test <Created by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7695>
[12:40] <pedronis> Chipaca: ^
[12:42] <Chipaca> pedronis: ta
[12:42] <Chipaca> i'll get to that eventually (hoping for today!)
[13:06] <pedronis> Chipaca: any I have a chain with another 2 or 3 PRs on top of the ones there, so fill free to do a rename to OpenWithLabel next week
[13:06] <pedronis> s/any/anyway/
[13:24] <zyga> brb
[13:33] <Chipaca> pedronis: with the completion tweak we no longer offer 'interfaces'; is that ok?
[13:33] <pedronis> Chipaca: it's been deprecated since a while
[13:33] <pedronis> but no strong opinion either way
[13:34] <Chipaca> pedronis: i think it's ok, i do need to fix a test though :)
[13:34] <Chipaca> very easy fix
[13:34] <pedronis> use connections instead
[13:34] <Chipaca> nah, the test is checking the completion of 'snap in<tab>'
[13:35] <pedronis> ah ok
[13:35] <Chipaca> :)
[13:35] <pedronis> we still do have interface
[13:35] <pedronis> singular
[13:36] <pstolowski> Chipaca: whom to thank for the nice pre-baking label icon ;)
[13:36] <Chipaca> yep, that's the fix
[13:36] <pstolowski> ?
[13:36] <Chipaca> pstolowski: not me!
[13:37] <Chipaca> not this time :-D
[13:37] <pstolowski> hmm
[13:38] <Chipaca> but whoever did it, thank you for using the actual 🍞 and not :bread:
[13:44] <pedronis> mborzecki: good suggestion in the systemd prebaking PR
[13:54] <mup> PR snapcraft#2786 opened: cli: add support for 'http-proxy' and 'https-proxy' parameters <Created by cjp256> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2786>
[13:56] <pedronis> pstolowski: will you have time to stay after the standup?
[13:57] <pstolowski> pedronis: yes, but i may need to drop for a while at around 4pm to pick my daughter from school
[13:57] <pedronis> pstolowski: ok, let's see what we can, I would like to go over the firstboot stuff with you live
[13:59] <pedronis> Chipaca: Q to your fix
[14:01] <Eighth_Doctor> popey: `snapd` is now in EPEL 8, so the website needs instructions for CentOS 8
[14:02] <Eighth_Doctor> the instructions should basically be the same as for CentOS 7
[14:03] <Eighth_Doctor> so I think only the notes about lack of availablity on RHEL 8 and CentOS 8 need to be removed
[14:06] <Eighth_Doctor> kyrofa: you might want to give me co-maintainership of squashfuse
[14:07] <Eighth_Doctor> you can do that by going to https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/squashfuse, logging in, going to the project settings, go to users & groups, and add "ngompa" as an admin
[14:14] <Chipaca> pedronis: running spread locally so can't push a fix for the typo, but made a suggestion there if you want to commit it
[14:15] <degville> Eighth_Doctor: I've been tracking the EPEL updates - I'll update the install docs.
[14:16] <Eighth_Doctor> degville: thanks
[14:16] <Eighth_Doctor> `snapd` just synced out to EPEL 8 this morning
[14:16] <degville> brilliant, thanks!
[14:59] <pedronis> Chipaca: I committed
[15:07] <Chipaca> nice OOM running spread locally
[15:19] <mup> PR snapd#7707 opened: snap: add TestDownloadDirectStoreHappy test <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7707>
[15:29] <zyga> re
[15:29] <zyga> family home now
[15:29] <zyga> back to work
[15:33] <roadmr> \o/
[15:33] <zyga> mvo, pstolowski, mborzecki: we will likely visit graves tomorrow as it's bound to rain all weekend here
[15:34]  * cachio lunch
[15:36] <mvo> has anyone figured out why the tests are unhappy?
[15:37] <Chipaca> mvo: because they hate us
[15:38] <Chipaca> mvo: i've just seen an error in prepare on centos, for example
[15:38] <Chipaca> + systemctl daemon-reload
[15:38] <Chipaca> Failed to execute operation: Connection reset by peer
[15:39] <Chipaca> and on restore, also on centos,
[15:39] <Chipaca> + systemctl daemon-reload
[15:39] <Chipaca> Failed to execute operation: Connection timed out
[15:39] <Chipaca> it's a fractal of WAT
[15:39] <Chipaca> a WATdelbrot curve
[15:44] <mvo> hrm, hrm, if its all centos I'm inclined to move it to unstable-systems until its fixed
[15:44] <mvo> kind of annoying that it blocks landing stuff
[15:44] <Chipaca> mvo: ah it is in unstable already
[15:44] <Chipaca> mvo: sorry
[15:44] <Chipaca> mvo: at least this particular centos is :)
[15:45]  * mvo nods
[15:45] <Chipaca> the task that says CentOS contains no CentOS
[15:47] <kyrofa> Eighth_Doctor, are you just looking to get squashfuse updated? Or is there a larger issue that I've missed?
[15:50] <Chipaca> error: Get https://fastly.cdn.snapcraft.io/download-origin/fastly/b8X2psL1ryVrPt5WEmpYiqfr5emixTd7_1797.snap?token=1572548400_b95c66d9e68375e958b164a800f1b618a0e69653: x509: certificate signed by unknown authority (possibly because of "crypto/rsa: verification error" while trying to verify candidate authority certificate "GlobalSign CloudSSL CA - SHA256 - G3")
[15:50] <Chipaca> mvo: ^
[15:51] <Chipaca> mvo: that might have something to do with the red
[15:56] <mvo> Chipaca: *grumpf* not cool
[15:59] <zyga> wahaat?
[15:59] <zyga> SSL is such a shitshow
[16:00] <zyga> ijohnson: did my response to the bug related to ldcache make sense?
[16:01] <ijohnson> zyga: yes sorry for not responding in the bug, but I was able to work around it by having ldconfig work on some other file, then I just copy that file to what's bind-mounted so it never calls unlink on the file
[16:02] <ijohnson> it is unfortunate that there's not much better we can do about that though
[16:02] <zyga> ijohnson: I suggested a workaround
[16:02] <zyga> ijohnson: a symlink would make it easier
[16:02] <ijohnson> ehh not quite
[16:02] <ijohnson> I tried the symlink but it still has problems
[16:02] <zyga> no? is the code sensitive to symlinks?
[16:02] <zyga> I see, well worth a try
[16:02] <zyga> I think it will be nicer
[16:03] <zyga> once we have /etc tmpfs
[16:03] <ijohnson> I don't remember the issue with symlink, but I tried it and it didn't work for some reason
[16:03] <zyga> or not tmpfs
[16:03] <zyga> just a /var/lib/snapd/.../etc
[16:03] <ijohnson> perhaps it was not an issue with the symlink directly, but anyways I have a workaround
[16:03] <Eighth_Doctor> kyrofa: 1. squashfuse needs to be updated, it needs to be introduced to epel8, and squashfuse binary needs to be replaced with a symlink to squashfuse_ll binary
[16:08] <zyga> mborzecki: I have some ideas on how to solve the lock issue
[16:08] <kyrofa> (1) is a known issue, but squashfuse_ll is news to me. Can you give me some background?
[16:09] <zyga> mborzecki: the inhibit files can be locks
[16:09] <zyga> mborzecki: held by snapd
[16:09] <zyga> mborzecki: and unlocked by snapd
[16:10] <zyga> mborzecki: and snap run, if the files are present, try to grab a shared lock
[16:10] <zyga> mborzecki: while snapd holds an exclusive lock
[16:10] <zyga> mborzecki: I need to think how to create an inhibition file in a way that is race free
[16:11] <zyga> mborzecki: but I think it can be done by allowing snapd to check for ability to grab the exclusive lock
[16:11] <zyga> mborzecki: so if the lock is held by snap run already
[16:11] <mup> PR snapd#7708 opened: parts/plugins: don't xz-compress a deb we're going to discard <Created by chipaca> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7708>
[16:11] <zyga> mborzecki: we will know in snapd
[16:11] <zyga> mborzecki: anyway, enjoy your evening
[16:11] <mborzecki> zyga: we probably need to draw/write this down
[16:11] <zyga> mborzecki: yeah, I'll write it down in the doc
[16:21] <Chipaca> zyga: you still here?
[16:22] <Chipaca> zyga: i think something's change such that google:ubuntu-18.04-64:tests/main/snap-seccomp-syscalls  fails
[16:23] <Chipaca> zyga: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/FGp43JqGGJ/
[16:23] <Chipaca> or maybe that's an mvo ^ not sure
[16:23] <Chipaca> looks like we got a bunch of new syscalls
[16:23] <mvo> Chipaca: meh, ok
[16:23] <Chipaca> most around time64
[16:24] <Chipaca> mvo: so that's probably why a lot of things are red
[16:24] <Chipaca> there's also a fsconfig/fsmount/fsopen/fspick thing we might be interested in :)
[16:25] <Chipaca> read more about 'em here: https://lwn.net/Articles/759499/
[16:25] <mvo> Chipaca: hm, thats on 18.04?
[16:26] <Chipaca> they look like a change in the right direction, aiui, given some of our woes
[16:26] <Chipaca> mvo: ye
[16:28] <Chipaca> so i suspect this is a blocker, righ tnow
[16:29] <mvo> Chipaca: I can fix this probably
[16:29] <zyga> Chipaca: yes I'm here
[16:29] <zyga> Chipaca: looking now
[16:29] <Chipaca> p > 0.9?
[16:29] <zyga> oh
[16:29] <zyga> lots new
[16:29] <mvo> Chipaca: yeah
[16:30] <zyga> we have some problems
[16:30] <zyga> clone3 :/
[16:30] <zyga> it may bite us
[16:30] <zyga> as soon as glibc uses it
[16:30] <zyga> and we respond with EPERM
[16:30] <zyga> and glibc doesn't use older clone
[16:31] <zyga> Chipaca: 180.04 though is very surprising
[16:31] <zyga> Chipaca: is this new seccomp in 18.04
[16:31] <zyga> ?
[16:31] <zyga> jdstrand: ^ do you know if we have a backported libseccomp in 18.04
[16:31] <Chipaca> zyga: this is in 18.04, as above
[16:31] <zyga> jdstrand: or a new kernel and libseccomp now reports new syscalls it knew about
[16:31] <Chipaca> zyga: ie this is failing google:ubuntu-18.04-64:tests/main/snap-seccomp-syscalls
[16:32] <zyga> Chipaca: I'll park my work and look
[16:45] <pstolowski> pedronis: +1 on #7694
[16:45] <mup> PR #7694: many: load/consume Core 20 seeds (aka recovery systems) <Created by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7694>
[16:48] <zyga> Chipaca: testing locally
[16:48] <zyga> I'll send a PR soon
[16:48] <zyga> brb
[16:50] <Chipaca> zyga: FWIW 4.15.0-47-generic landed in 18.04 recently
[16:51] <Chipaca> zyga: no seccomp update since august afaik
[16:51] <Chipaca> (that's according to the dpkg.log in this kvm 1804, fwiw)
[16:52] <pedronis> pstolowski: thanks, tried to answer your question
[16:53] <mup> PR snapd#7694 closed: many: load/consume Core 20 seeds (aka recovery systems) <Created by pedronis> <Merged by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7694>
[16:55] <pedronis> Chipaca: pstolowski: I'm going now to rebase the two follow ups
[16:55] <Chipaca> pedronis: thank you
[16:55] <pstolowski> great
[16:59] <pedronis> Chipaca: pstolowski: mvo: I rebased #7695 (firstboot stuff) and #7696 (prepare image stuff) and they are ready for review
[16:59] <mup> PR #7695: o/devicestate: the basics of Core 20 firstboot support with test <Created by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7695>
[16:59] <mup> PR #7696: cmd/snap,image: initial support for Core 20 in prepare-image with test <Created by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7696>
[17:00] <pedronis> hopefully that latter doesn't break spread tests
[17:02] <jdstrand> Chipaca, zyga: I need to step away in a minute, but did the gke kernel get an update? (I didn't look at the failure either)
[17:02] <pstolowski> pedronis: ty
[17:03] <Chipaca> jdstrand: plain ol' 18.04 at least did
[17:03] <jdstrand> Chipaca: I have like 3 minutes. can you give a url so I can see the failure?
[17:04] <Chipaca> jdstrand: the failure is in https://api.travis-ci.org/v3/job/605555475/log.txt the diff expected vs found syscalls is https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/FGp43JqGGJ/
[17:05] <Chipaca> jdstrand: dunno if you saw zyga say he's got a fix that he's testing locally
[17:05] <Chipaca> i assume you did and you're wanting to look at what the new syscalls are to be in the loop, but thought i'd mention it just in case :)
[17:06] <mborzecki> Chipaca: zyga: we need to update the list of syscalls in cmd/snap-seccomp/syscalls/syscalls.go, apparently upstream was updated
[17:06] <jdstrand> Chipaca: I was curious, yes. also curious cause this shouldn't have happened unless the kernel changed iirc how the test was written
[17:07] <jdstrand> but I may be forgetting the test
[17:07] <jdstrand> oh, 3 minutes up. back in a little while
[17:09] <mvo> pedronis: \o/
[17:20] <jdstrand> Chipaca: thanks for all the info btw
[17:20]  * jdstrand is now really gone
[17:21] <mborzecki> Chipaca: zyga: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7709
[17:21] <mup> PR #7709: cmd/snap-seccomp/syscalls: update the list of known syscalls <Simple 😃> <Created by bboozzoo> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7709>
[17:21] <mup> PR snapd#7709 opened: cmd/snap-seccomp/syscalls: update the list of known syscalls <Simple 😃> <Created by bboozzoo> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7709>
[17:24] <jdstrand> oh right, we git clone libseccomp and go from there. nothing to do with the host
[17:24] <jdstrand> mborzecki: thanks
[17:24] <jdstrand> ok, really, really gone
[17:25] <mup> PR snapd#7710 opened: snap-seccomp: add new syscalls after libseccomp update <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7710>
[17:27] <mup> PR snapcraft#2775 closed: remote-build: add clean flag <Created by cjp256> <Closed by cjp256> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2775>
[17:31] <kenvandine> jdstrand: any thoughts on bug 1661626
[17:31] <mup> Bug #1661626: GSettings/dconf reports incorrect values on setting change under confinement <desktop> <snapd:Triaged by marcustomlinson> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1661626>
[17:38] <mup> PR snapd#7710 closed: snap-seccomp: add new syscalls after libseccomp update <Created by mvo5> <Closed by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7710>
[18:10] <zyga> AFK with kids now
[18:24] <cachio> zyga, hey
[18:24] <cachio> zyga, snap-seccomp-syscalls test is failing and reading the comments in the test it sayts
[18:25] <cachio> # both lists should be identical, otherwise we need an update in snap-seccomp
[18:25] <cachio> any idea on how to update snap-seccomp?
[18:27] <Chipaca> cachio: PR already up
[18:27] <cachio> Chipaca, nice, thanks
[18:27] <Chipaca> cachio: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7709
[18:27] <mup> PR #7709: cmd/snap-seccomp/syscalls: update the list of known syscalls <Simple 😃> <Created by bboozzoo> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7709>
[18:28] <cachio> Chipaca, I'll merge it once the tests pass
[18:28] <cachio> it has 2 +1
[18:28] <Chipaca> cachio: only if i don't merge it first :-p
[18:30] <cachio> hhehee
[18:38] <zyga> I’m upstairs with now sleeping Lucy
[18:39] <zyga> Maciek made the same patch but found the upstream commit so kudos to that
[18:39] <zyga> Let’s mere it
[18:40]  * pstolowski afk
[18:57] <Chipaca> zyga: just got my first trick-or-treaters *ever*
[18:57] <Chipaca> and, i must admit i did not tell them to go away
[19:01] <noise][> nice, did you give them snapcraft stickers or… ?
[19:15] <Chipaca> noise][: i gave them support tickets that were older than they were
[19:15] <Chipaca> nah, i panicked and gave them some m&ms
[19:16] <Chipaca> i've been in this house 3? maybe 4 years and this is the first time they've knocked
[19:19] <noise][> m&ms was the right call
[19:46] <mup> PR snapcraft#2787 opened: Safe grade <Created by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2787>
[19:52] <mup> PR snapd#7711 opened: seed: test and improve Core 20 seed handling errors <Created by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7711>
[20:01] <mup> PR snapd#7712 opened: seed: support in Core 20 seeds local unasserted snaps for model snaps <Created by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7712>
[21:03]  * cachio EoD
[21:16] <mup> PR snapd#7713 opened:  seed: Core 20 seeds channel overrides support for grade dangerous <Created by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7713>
[23:28] <mup> PR snapd#7709 closed: cmd/snap-seccomp/syscalls: update the list of known syscalls <Simple 😃> <Created by bboozzoo> <Merged by chipaca> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7709>