[00:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.4.13+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[00:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [i386] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.4.13+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[00:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.4.13+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[00:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.4.13+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
=== el is now known as thegoose
[02:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.4.13+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[03:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.4.13+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[05:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unclutter-xfixes [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.5-3] (no packageset)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unclutter-xfixes [i386] (focal-proposed/none) [1.5-3] (no packageset)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unclutter-xfixes [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/none) [1.5-3] (no packageset)
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unclutter-xfixes [arm64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.5-3] (no packageset)
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unclutter-xfixes [armhf] (focal-proposed/none) [1.5-3] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unclutter-xfixes [s390x] (focal-proposed/none) [1.5-3] (no packageset)
=== Ukikie is now known as Unit13
=== DalekSec is now known as WrathOfAchilles
[06:51] <RikMills> is anyone about who could quickly accept new qgis binaries please? part of qt transition
=== andrewc is now known as Guest28575
[09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libsoup2.4 [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [2.68.2-2] (core)
[09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libsoup2.4 [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [2.68.2-2] (core)
[09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libsoup2.4 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [2.68.2-2] (core)
[09:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libsoup2.4 [i386] (focal-proposed/main) [2.68.2-2] (core)
[09:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libsoup2.4 [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [2.68.2-2] (core)
[09:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libsoup2.4 [armhf] (focal-proposed/main) [2.68.2-2] (core)
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [amd64] (focal-proposed) [3.4.13+dfsg-1]
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [armhf] (focal-proposed) [3.4.13+dfsg-1]
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [3.4.13+dfsg-1]
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [arm64] (focal-proposed) [3.4.13+dfsg-1]
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [s390x] (focal-proposed) [3.4.13+dfsg-1]
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [i386] (focal-proposed) [3.4.13+dfsg-1]
[09:25] <apw> RikMills, ^
[09:26] <RikMills> apw: thank you :)
[09:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted unclutter-xfixes [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.5-3]
[09:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted unclutter-xfixes [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.5-3]
[09:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted unclutter-xfixes [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.5-3]
[09:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted unclutter-xfixes [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.5-3]
[09:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted unclutter-xfixes [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.5-3]
[09:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted unclutter-xfixes [i386] (focal-proposed) [1.5-3]
[09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libsoup2.4 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.68.2-2]
[09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libsoup2.4 [armhf] (focal-proposed) [2.68.2-2]
[09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libsoup2.4 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [2.68.2-2]
[09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libsoup2.4 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2.68.2-2]
[09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libsoup2.4 [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2.68.2-2]
[09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libsoup2.4 [i386] (focal-proposed) [2.68.2-2]
[10:04] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, please kick opencv out from proposed pocket, even gst-plugins-bad1.0 FTBFS because of it
[10:04] <LocutusOfBorg> we can't move forward with the big hint because of opencv
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1006.6] (core, kernel)
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1007.7] (core, kernel)
[10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-1006.6]
[10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-1007.7]
[11:03] <RikMills> apw: do you perhaps have a sec to cleanup old qgis binaries here? https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#qgis
[11:13] <apw> RikMills, looking
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (bionic-backports/universe) [202.1-1~ubuntu18.04.1 => 206-1~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (eoan-backports/universe) [202.1-1 => 206-1~ubuntu19.10.1] (no packageset)
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (disco-backports/universe) [202.1-1~ubuntu19.04.1 => 206-1~ubuntu19.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (disco-backports) [206-1~ubuntu19.04.1]
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (eoan-backports) [206-1~ubuntu19.10.1]
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (bionic-backports) [206-1~ubuntu18.04.1]
[11:57] <ddstreet> rbalint do you mind if i upload systemd to eoan, with the fixes you've already uploaded plus some more?  i'm going to upload to b/d as well adding more fixes onto my previous uploads still in those queues
[12:38] <rbalint> ddstreet, no problem, add them please
[12:38] <rbalint> ddstreet, is there any that should also be added to focal?
[12:39] <rbalint> ddstreet, the one in focal-proposed has everything sru-d in my eoan upload
[12:40] <ddstreet> rbalint i think just 2, i'll open MR to focal
[12:43] <rbalint> ddstreet, in that case i suggest uploading the fixes to eoan with a higher version number to let sru team accept my previous upload in case the upload to focal with the missing fixes gets stuck in focal-proposed
[12:45] <rbalint> ddstreet, if they migrate easily then your eoan sru can replace mine in eoan-proposed easily
[13:07] <LocutusOfBorg> ping wrt opencv
[13:27] <xnox> vorlon:  i have requested IBM to port coroutine to s390x, there is a way to build a fallback coroutine but boost upstream claims that "s390x" is unsupported arch. Anyway, there is no native coroutine on s390x yet.
=== andrewc is now known as Guest89958
[15:01] <RikMills> yay. every bit of the Qt transition is a valid candidate. nothing is blocking any of it migrating as far as I can see, but britney refuses to consider it all together
[15:09] <vorlon> RikMills: aren't there still packages which depend on the new libproj which aren't candidates?
[15:12] <doko> https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/amd64/p/python-scipy/20191025_160523_3eedc@/log.gz
[15:12] <doko> is this already run on the big testers?
[15:13] <Laney> you can see that at the top of the log, the flavor argument
[15:13] <Laney> m1.large -> yes
[15:14] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: you say "even" gst-plugins-bad1.0 FTBFS with new opencv, but there are a number of things that seem to have not failed
[15:23] <RikMills> vorlon: damn. there is a library transition there. somehow I messed that :(
[15:23] <RikMills> missed
[15:24] <RikMills> though messed may also be appropriate
[15:24] <doko> Laney, vorlon: so what do you propose doing for the scipy timeout? now running the tests for 3.7 and 3.8
[15:29] <vorlon> doko: running the tests for 2 pythons gives a 4.5x increase in test time?
[15:30] <vorlon> doko: given the times in question, scipy appears to already be granted a longer test time, and is still hitting the limit
[15:30] <vorlon> does the test ever complete if run locally?
[15:31] <vorlon> note that's also 5h for running *just* the python3.8, it hasn't even gotten a chance to run for python3.7
[15:37] <RikMills> so Qt transition depends on the whole perl, rbase, octave transitions, and a few other things :/
[15:38] <RikMills> I'll come back in the new year ;)
[15:48] <vorlon> there isn't an ongoing perl transition
[15:50] <doko> there are tight dependencies
[15:51] <RikMills> yeah, I mean some things depend on the perl in proposed
[15:51] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, problem is that that transition can't move forward, it is ~30% done in Debian, and nobody is fixing/looking at failures yet, not even RC bugs
[15:52] <LocutusOfBorg> I would prefer to focus to something else, kicking out opencv is cheap
[15:52] <LocutusOfBorg> and requires only 3 rebuilds to pick the wrong one
[15:52] <LocutusOfBorg> sed s/wrong/old
[15:52] <vorlon> "only 3 rebuilds" - how many packages would need fixing for the new one?
[15:53] <LocutusOfBorg> for sure 17
[15:53] <LocutusOfBorg> but looks like 20-22
[15:56] <vorlon> ok, that's a solid argument then
[16:00] <LocutusOfBorg> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-opencv.html
[16:00] <LocutusOfBorg> this is something mostly good for us too, but our situation is even worse because something green in Debian is red in ubuntu (python and other sadness)
[16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python3.8 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.8.0-3~18.04] (no packageset)
[16:23] <bdmurray> infinity: focal should end up in meta-release-lts-development too right?
[16:26] <infinity> bdmurray: I can't picture the hideous whiteboard of doom, but I believe so...
[16:29] <bdmurray> the historical documents confirm our suspicions
[16:30] <infinity> "historical documents" == "commit history"?
[16:31] <bdmurray> indeed
[16:32] <cjwatson> only with more galaxy quest
[16:34] <vorlon> youuuu are our laaaaast hooooope
[16:47] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: opencv otb caffe slowmovideo darknet removed from focal-proposed
[17:34] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks vorlon <3
[17:54] <bdmurray> infinity, vorlon: I was gonna update the meta-release-development file but then I noticed something that'll shock you!
[17:54] <bdmurray> http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/focal/main/dist-upgrader-all/current/
[17:55] <infinity> bdmurray: Am I supposed to be shocked?
[17:55] <bdmurray> infinity: IDK I was just trying to write an attention grabbing headline
[17:56] <bdmurray> getting ready for a side gig
[17:56] <infinity> But also, WTF.
[17:58] <infinity> bdmurray: I have worse news for you.
[17:58] <infinity> bdmurray: Someone/thing broke this long ago.
[17:58] <infinity> bdmurray: The last tarball uploaded/published in eoan was 19.10.12
[17:59] <infinity> bdmurray: Version in the release pocket is .15
[18:00]  * infinity diffs build logs from 12 to 13.
[18:03] <infinity> WTF.  The whole bit where it builds the tarball is just... Not there.
[18:06] <infinity> ... probably because of that sketchy binary-indep.
[18:08] <bdmurray> Well then I guess I'm the one in shock.
[18:16] <infinity> It's a miracle (and a bug) that this ever worked, I think.
[18:18] <Laney> ah the stages of debugging
[18:24] <infinity> bdmurray: This fixes it in a local test build: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/KVtfFdnjrx/
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python3.8 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.8.0-3~18.04]
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python3.8 [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [3.8.0-3~18.04]
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python3.8 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [3.8.0-3~18.04]
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python3.8 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [3.8.0-3~18.04]
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python3.8 [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [3.8.0-3~18.04]
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python3.8 [i386] (bionic-proposed) [3.8.0-3~18.04]
[18:25] <infinity> bdmurray: I'm going to grab lunch, but I'll upload a fix not unlike that to eoan/focal when I get back, unless you beat me to it, then I'll review yours instead. :P
[18:25] <vorlon> bdmurray: maybe this is why someone claimed LP: #1825655 still affected them after 1:19.10.15 was published :P
[18:25] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1825655 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "do-release-upgrade fails with "Your python3 install is corrupted" if /usr/bin/python points to /etc/alternatives/python" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1825655
[18:27] <bdmurray> vorlon: seems likely
[18:27] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: gst-plugins-bad1.0 does not appear to be building any more now than before
[18:32] <bdmurray> infinity: I've got a meeting so may not get to it
[18:52] <infinity> bdmurray: Alright, I'll clean it up and upload after I eat.
[19:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python2-scipy (focal-proposed/primary) [1.2.2-4ubuntu2]
[19:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python2-scipy [source] (focal-proposed) [1.2.2-4ubuntu2]
[20:07] <infinity> bdmurray: I'm tempted to -v1:19.10.12 this upload and force reverification of every bug fix since, as clearly no one tested the last three uploads to eoan. :/
[20:07] <infinity> bdmurray: OTOH, I don't really want to be on the hook for testing all those different upgrade scenarios. :P
[20:08] <infinity> bdmurray: Thoughts, feelings, lack of either?
[20:37] <bdmurray> infinity: let me have a look at the changes
[20:39] <bdmurray> infinity: nothing will have a test case etc, but doing spot verification of a couple of bugs would make sense
[20:47] <infinity> bdmurray: Okay, then have a big .changes... Coming to a queubot near you Any Day Now.
[20:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (eoan-proposed/main) [1:19.10.15.1 => 1:19.10.15.2] (core)
[20:56] <bdmurray> infinity: Great, thanks for sorting this out!
[21:07] <infinity> bdmurray: I'll verify my bug ASAP, I'll leave it to others who actually do upgrade verification stuff on the regular (*cough*) to spot-check the rest.
[21:32] <infinity> bdmurray: Care to review/accept, so I can go about verifying?
[21:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:19.10.15.2]
[22:43] <LocutusOfBorg>  /usr/include/c++/9/bits/c++0x_warning.h:32:2: error: #error This file requires compiler and library support for the ISO C++ 2011 standard. This support must be enabled with the -std=c++11 or -std=gnu++11 compiler options.
[22:44] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, ^^ nice to know... :/
[22:53] <mwhudson> oh right cloudpickle needs an upstream update and fingers crossing that it's rdeps won't object too much
[22:54] <mwhudson> oh wait debian did this for us
[22:55] <mwhudson> maybe it's just a matter of retrying the tests then...
[22:58] <mwhudson> i'll look at pyzmq next
[22:59] <mwhudson> (i think it just has some flaky tests maybe?)
[23:05] <infinity> bdmurray: Verified my bugfix.
[23:07] <infinity> bdmurray: If any of the fixes from >= .12 versions were vaguely RC (or, upgrade-critical), we might want to ponder turning it around quickly and changing meta-release to point at updates.
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added rust-uuid to i386-excludes in focal