[00:11] <diddledan> popey: secret hidey holes, eh?!
[00:11] <diddledan> now I know where you're all badmouthing me ;-p
[08:21] <pieq> duflu, hi!
[08:22] <pieq> duflu, sorry I was quite busy today, just saw your comment on LP #1850766
[08:23] <pieq> duflu, do you know what would be a good step-by-step to know if the issue comes from PA or not?
[08:23] <pieq> duflu, maybe using pactl to extract some info before/after pairing a bluetooth headset...
[08:35] <duflu> pieq, sorry I don't know enough to be sure if it is bluez/pulseaudio/gnome-control-center. I guess if you can replicate a bug using pactl and bluetoothctl then it's not gnome-control-center
[08:36] <pieq> duflu, hm... true, but then I don't know how to replicate this with only pactl and bluetoothctl
[08:36] <pieq> I'll try
[08:36] <duflu> pieq, certainly bluetooth audio is a feature of PulseAudio, not BlueZ. So the next question is which one owns profile selection?
[08:36] <duflu> Oh that bug is not profile selection
[08:36] <pieq> duflu, I would assume it's PA
[08:36] <duflu> It's device selection
[08:37] <pieq> cause it's PA that selects a wired headphone when you plug it in
[08:37] <pieq> (I think...?)
[08:37] <duflu> Don't know
[08:38] <duflu> pieq, oh yes I do. Switch on connect is pulseaudio
[08:58] <marcustomlinson> morning desktoppers (those who are not on holiday)
[09:00] <duflu> morning marcustomlinson
[09:01] <Laney> yo de yo
[09:03] <Wimpress> Morning o/
[09:09] <marcustomlinson> hey Laney Wimpress
[09:09]  * Laney nods marcustomlinson Wimpress 
[09:09] <Laney> happy britain has exploded day
[09:12] <duflu> Hi Laney and Wimpress
[09:12] <Laney> yo duflu
[09:21]  * Wimpress surveys the landscape
[09:21] <Wimpress> No explosions here
[09:21] <Laney> happy the conservative party is finished day?
[09:21] <Laney> ah wait, not that one either
[09:21] <Wimpress> We can hope.
[09:24] <duflu> I like watching dramas on TV sometimes, but this one is supposedly real
[10:18]  * Laney stares at systemd
[10:18] <Laney> y u no enable my unit
[10:19] <Laney> https://paste.debian.net/1112568/
[10:22] <Laney> weird
[10:22] <Laney> it's the drop-in that breaks it
[11:12] <LuckyMan> testing 123
[11:44] <ricotz> marcustomlinson, hi :)
[11:45] <ricotz> marcustomlinson, I think "dh_strip -a --no-automatic-dbgsym" is not good for ubuntu?
[11:49] <marcustomlinson> ricotz: that should only happen if BUILD_DBGSYM_PACKAGES = y
[11:49] <ricotz> marcustomlinson, oh, did you turn off the dbgsym generation for your ppa`
[11:49] <ricotz> ?
[11:49] <ricotz> (I assumed this got broken)
[11:50] <ricotz> never mind
[11:51] <marcustomlinson> ricotz: yes it's off on my ppa
[11:52] <marcustomlinson> ricotz: no worries, I need you to nip at my heals now and then :P
[11:54] <marcustomlinson> oh and I meant BUILD_DBGSYM_PACKAGES != y earlier
[12:03] <ricotz> marcustomlinson, heh, will do ;)
[13:53] <Laney> GunnarHj: I notice you didn't backport the new tests for the GDBus fix - any particular reason?
[13:58] <Laney> (back after lunch)
[14:00] <GunnarHj> Laney: I did in eoan and disco, didn't I? The reason why I skipped it in bionic and xenial is that the test commit didn't apply. Don't think Meson was in use for tests in those releases.
[14:00] <GunnarHj> Laney: Also, FWIW, my impression is that the author of the fix doesn't insist on it; see the latest comment at https://bugs.debian.org/941018
[14:00] <GunnarHj> Laney: So, in short, I didn't know how to make the commit apply and/or was lazy...
[14:49] <hellsworth> morning desktoppers
[15:02] <davidkrauser> I've noticed on 19.10 with X11 fractional scaling set to 1.25x, the pointer duplicates itself when I login to a new session. The original pointer sticks on the screen at 1x size, and I get a new pointer to use that's scaled for the 1.25x session. Has anyone else seen this behavior?
[15:02] <davidkrauser> I tried grabbing a regular screenshot, but the stuck pointer doesn't show up in the resulting image. So here's a less helpful image taken with my phone:
[15:02] <davidkrauser> https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/O6XIFkAt/two-pointers.jpg
[15:03] <davidkrauser> the right pointer moves with my mouse, the other is stationary
[15:04] <davidkrauser> if I disable/re-enable fractional scaling in the session, the second pointer disappears
[15:08] <hellsworth> davidkrauser: do you mind to file a bug about that? that way your testing isnt lost in irc
[15:11] <davidkrauser>  hellsworth: definitely. Which project should I file it against?
[15:11] <hellsworth> i think that's mutter
[15:12] <hellsworth> we can always chage the project too if needbe
[15:12] <davidkrauser> hellsworth: +1, thank you
[15:14] <hellsworth> np thanks for the testing and bug report!
[15:14] <davidkrauser> np
[15:48] <davidkrauser> bug opened: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/904
[15:48] <gitbot> GNOME issue 904 in mutter "Duplicate mouse pointer with X11 fractional scaling" [Opened]
[16:35] <Wimpress> Afternoon hellsworth o/
[16:38] <hellsworth> hi Wimpress :)
[16:38] <marcustomlinson> davidkrauser: oh I think hellsworth meant https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+filebug :)
[16:57] <diddledan> making progress on a gnome-boxes snap
[16:57] <diddledan> nearly got it compiled
[17:01] <GunnarHj> Laney: I'm making an attempt to include the tests in bionic too. Let's see if it builds...
[17:07] <Laney> GunnarHj: I'm trying, don't worry about it
[17:07] <Laney> Looks like it requires some minor Makefile.am changes but nothing too drastic
[17:08] <GunnarHj> Laney: I already did it in bionic, but please do it in xenial if you know how.
[17:14] <davidkrauser> thanks, marcustomlinson, I'll move my content over there :-)
[17:16] <marcustomlinson> davidkrauser: thank _you_ :)
[17:19] <hellsworth> davidkrauser: so sorry for the confusion. i should have been more clear to file an ubuntu bug. thanks for being flexible :)
[17:22] <davidkrauser> hellsworth: not your fault. This page led me astray: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter
[17:24] <GunnarHj> Laney: Well, it built, but the new tests seem not to be included. So it would be great if you could handle bionic too, if you think they should be there.
[17:26] <GunnarHj> Laney: In bionic it's gio/tests/meson.build, but the upstream code is slightly different compared to later versions.
[17:29] <davidkrauser> hellsworth: it looks like there's a wayland specifc bug already open that could be the same: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/1841894
[17:29] <davidkrauser> I'm seeing this on X11, though. Should I open a new bug, or add to the existing?
[17:34] <hellsworth> davidkrauser: you're only seeing it on x11? or x11 as well as wayland?
[17:35] <davidkrauser> haven't tried wayland
[17:35] <hellsworth> if you're only seeing it on x11, try to just modify the bug you opened to say x11 instead of wayland
[17:35] <davidkrauser> only on X11
[17:35] <hellsworth> yeah jsut modify the current bug if you can
[17:49] <davidkrauser> updated here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/1841894
[17:49] <davidkrauser> thanks for the pointers
[18:03] <Laney> GunnarHj: ok, the test works on bionic but not xenial (it hangs), so you should make extra sure that the actual fix works there I think
[18:03] <Laney> going to upload now
[18:05] <GunnarHj> Laney: My thought is to verify explicitly in all versions, but sure, some extra attention is motivated in xenial then. Thanks!