| sarnold | Phruis: this is a good starting point https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/kernel/power | 00:23 |
|---|---|---|
| sarnold | Phruis: each architecture is also going to have arch-specific code too https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/arch/x86/power | 00:24 |
| xnox | infinity: thank you for your klibc upstream comments. | 00:50 |
| Phruis | sarnold, thanks | 02:00 |
| === seb128_ is now known as seb128 | ||
| seb128 | ddstreet, hey, do you plan another bionic/n-m SRU? I need to do one for a fix but I saw you have bug #1850267 in progress | 11:34 |
| ubottu | bug 1850267 in network-manager (Ubuntu Bionic) "autopkgtest 'nm' fails because it can't find dnsmasq" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1850267 | 11:34 |
| xnox | doko: thank you for removing the requested python2 django things | 11:42 |
| xnox | doko: i actually think there might be more to remove..... some of them smell like ex-Ubuntu1 team shipping things they use in production, which they don't anymore. | 11:43 |
| xnox | doko: btw, i think to migrate mailer & piston, i need AA to remove _binaries only_ of python-django-mailer python-django-piston3 | 11:45 |
| xnox | because they are now only python3-django-mailer and python3-django-piston3 | 11:46 |
| xnox | (dropped python2 packages) | 11:46 |
| doko | xnox: django-piston3 ftbs in -proposed | 11:52 |
| xnox | ah | 11:52 |
| xnox | doko: eh?! https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/django-piston3/0.3~rc2-3ubuntu9 | 11:53 |
| xnox | doko: it was in error an arch:any package, changed to arch:all package | 11:53 |
| xnox | so it claims to be "missing" on all arches | 11:53 |
| xnox | but it totally did build | 11:53 |
| doko | ahh, I see | 11:53 |
| xnox | i don't know what AA need to do when a package goes from arch:any to arch:all | 11:54 |
| doko | silly britney | 11:54 |
| xnox | doko: some of the packaging in these is beyond silly too. So never mind britney. | 11:54 |
| xnox | doko: but python-django-piston3 binary needs to be removed, which was arch;any and now is fully gone | 11:55 |
| xnox | doko: and that is the one that britney correctly complains about | 11:55 |
| xnox | (not the python3 one) | 11:55 |
| xnox | so actually it's complaining about the dropped arch:any python2 package | 11:56 |
| xnox | doko: django-ratelimit is actually miss-upload, and should be removed src from -proposed just like you already removed from release. | 11:56 |
| doko | . | 11:58 |
| gpiccoli | hi rbasak, can we discuss LP #1847924 when you have some minutes? Thanks! | 12:01 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1847924 in mdadm (Ubuntu Focal) "Introduce broken state parsing to mdadm" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1847924 | 12:01 |
| xnox | gpiccoli: my biggesst worry about that one is "degraded boot" however that also makes no sence in raid0 case =) | 12:05 |
| gpiccoli | hey xnox! Yeah, I don't think the patch could cause degraded boot, it could cause in worst case, for example, a failure in a parsing tool for raid0 status if that doesn't cope with broken state hehe | 12:06 |
| gpiccoli | in order to patch getting "triggered", raid0 must be already in a bad state | 12:07 |
| ddstreet | seb128 i don't have anything else for nm, feel free to take that bug, i'm pretty sure it only needs dnsmasq-base added to the test/control file Depends: for that test. thanks! | 12:26 |
| seb128 | ddstreet, thanks! | 12:27 |
| ahasenack | infinity: hi, there is no verification tag to flip in bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1849665 | 12:59 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1849665 in zfs-linux (Ubuntu Eoan) "zfs diff: Unable to determine path or stats for object " [Undecided,Fix committed] | 12:59 |
| ahasenack | I can of course add one, but did the script fail? | 12:59 |
| ahasenack | the sru script that adds the comment with instructions, I mean | 12:59 |
| === ricab is now known as ricab|lunch | ||
| rbasak | gpiccoli: o/ | 13:16 |
| gpiccoli | o/ rbasak | 13:17 |
| rbasak | Thank you for your reply in the bug | 13:17 |
| gpiccoli | You're welcome, thank you for the valid concerns! | 13:17 |
| rbasak | gpiccoli: so on the first point, I'd like the Regression Potential section to detail where regressions are most likely to occur in order to inform review and testing. | 13:18 |
| rbasak | THat's documented at https://xdsports.uk/weight-belt | 13:18 |
| rbasak | Uh | 13:19 |
| rbasak | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure | 13:19 |
| rbasak | On the second point, I'm hoping to reduce the scope in worrying about the impact to consumers of mdadm | 13:19 |
| gpiccoli | hehe sure rbasak, I'll add the Regressions Potential! my bad not adding before | 13:20 |
| rbasak | Is it possible/correct to state that, if an array is not in the new failed state, the observable behaviour for a user of mdadm will be the same in all cases following the patch? | 13:20 |
| rbasak | s/the same/exactly identical/ | 13:20 |
| gpiccoli | rbasak, it should, but to be completely accurate with you, I'll check all states and a comment in the bug, showing it doesn't change (except for broken), or, if changes, how so | 13:21 |
| gpiccoli | *add a comment | 13:22 |
| rbasak | gpiccoli: that would be useful - thanks! | 13:22 |
| gpiccoli | Just to speed up things, | 13:22 |
| gpiccoli | what if it changes? | 13:22 |
| rbasak | With that knowledge we can reduce the scope of what we need to consider. | 13:22 |
| gpiccoli | ok - perfect | 13:22 |
| rbasak | If it changes then we need to consider what consumes that | 13:22 |
| rbasak | Eg. will we break some tool that parses mdadm output, such as monitoring tools? | 13:22 |
| gpiccoli | great, makes sense! | 13:22 |
| gpiccoli | after adding regression potential and such comment, I will ping you again, thanks a lot ! | 13:23 |
| rbasak | If the output is identical except in the new failed state, then that breakage would be limited to a failure that wasn't accounted for by the monitoring tool anyway, in which case arguably the new situation would be better anyway | 13:23 |
| * xnox ponders if X should have a "clear after timeout" or like "clear after one paste" for all of the copy&paste functionality. | 13:23 | |
| rbasak | I swear I pressed Ctrl-C, and that this happens to me more often than what would be explained by user error | 13:24 |
| rbasak | I suspect that Firefox has some condition when it doesn't actually copy. | 13:24 |
| gpiccoli | makes sense rbasak, thank you o/ | 13:25 |
| xnox | rbasak: i find that focus follows mouse interferes sometimes. I.e. copy only happens from a "focused" window. | 13:26 |
| rbasak | gpiccoli: oh, one more point. On User Impact, right now it sounds like a theoretical bug only. Could you detail why we need an SRU? Are users hitting the problem in practice, for example? | 13:28 |
| rbasak | It's OK if the answer is that it's theoretical but data loss is severe enough that you want to pre-emptively fix it. | 13:29 |
| rbasak | But I'd like that documented if so | 13:29 |
| gpiccoli | ok rbasak, thanks for the heads-up aboutthis | 13:29 |
| rbasak | xnox: I think it does have something to do with focus change, though in my case I'm using pretty much entirely GNOME defaults on this. | 13:30 |
| === fenris is now known as Guest81494 | ||
| slashd | teward, I have tested on focal with ipv6 disable using nginx '1.17.5-0ubuntu1', and everything went well to that regard. | 13:52 |
| seb128 | bdmurray, hey, can you get the rygel/eoan SRU moved to -updates now rather than waiting for the full week period? the bug it fixes is rather important and it got properly verified | 14:08 |
| xnox | coreycb: hey, can you please explain to me the manila-ui 0ubuntu2 upload which says "d/control: Ensure python3-django is << 2:2.2.4." ? | 14:12 |
| xnox | coreycb: is there like a >> 2:2.2.X version that is also good? I'm trying to do migration to 2.2.6 in focal now. | 14:12 |
| coreycb | xnox: hey, that should've been changed back to python3-django >= 1:1.11. it was an attempt that was later reverted but apparently not for manila-ui. | 14:16 |
| coreycb | xnox: upstream openstack should be getting 2.2.4 support this cycle | 14:17 |
| coreycb | xnox: bug 1842969 fyi. I'll fix that for manila-ui in focal and eoan though. | 14:18 |
| ubottu | bug 1842969 in python-django (Ubuntu) "python-django 2.2.4 not for eoan" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1842969 | 14:18 |
| xnox | coreycb: so it needs this cherrypick too https://github.com/openstack/manila-ui/commit/83a0e432fe475a263c2f5e5337511db96263c3b8.patch | 14:24 |
| xnox | coreycb: but otherwise it builds..... i have a package ready and can just upload it. | 14:24 |
| coreycb | xnox: ah, ok great. thanks just let me know when you do and i'll apply your debdiff to our master branch. | 14:25 |
| xnox | coreycb: ack. If even that, cause it will not be needed with any new/next upstream release. | 14:26 |
| xnox | coreycb: also less than 1:1.11 is pre-xenial, imho such a version constraint is a bit redundant. | 14:26 |
| coreycb | xnox: i think you meant greater than, and I agree that's redundant | 14:29 |
| xnox | yes and yes | 14:30 |
| xnox | coreycb: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/450008718/manila-ui_1%3A2.19.0-0ubuntu1_1%3A2.19.0-0ubuntu2.diff.gz if you must | 14:33 |
| === ricab|lunch is now known as ricab | ||
| coreycb | xnox: thanks | 14:34 |
| kanashiro | I git clone'd the python-tornado package using git-ubuntu and the content in ubuntu/devel branch is not the same in the archive (ubuntu/devel has 4.5.3-1 and in focal the version is 5.1.1-4ubuntu5 according to rmadison), did something go wrong here? | 15:06 |
| kanashiro | rbasak, ^ | 15:09 |
| rafaeldtinoco | kanashiro: has the migration failed ? | 15:11 |
| rafaeldtinoco | sometimes branch was updated, archive has the source package but it hasnt migrated yet due to excuses | 15:12 |
| rbasak | mwhudson: pandas import done (at 12:19) | 15:14 |
| rbasak | 2019-11-02 18:46:53|python-tornado|1572720413.91573|error|20 | 15:15 |
| rbasak | kanashiro: ^ looks like an import failure | 15:15 |
| rbasak | The cause is bug 1764814 | 15:16 |
| ubottu | bug 1764814 in usd-importer "awscli import fails: package_creator.display_name results in HTTP error 410: Gone" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1764814 | 15:16 |
| rbasak | I'm working on that now as it happens, but I don't expect the fix to land for a few days | 15:17 |
| rbasak | kanashiro: you can do the merge without git-ubuntu, but in your case I suggest moving on to another package for now | 15:18 |
| kanashiro | rbasak, ack, I'll move to the next then | 15:19 |
| bdmurray | seb128: Sure, that reminds me we noticed rygel uses a lot of memory during its postinst. We had to bump the automatic upgrade testing units memory allotment because it was hanging on rygel. | 15:34 |
| seb128 | bdmurray, how much? | 15:35 |
| seb128 | bdmurray, and thx :) | 15:35 |
| bdmurray | seb128: from 1G to 2G which while that is the recommended amount of RAM it was still surprising. | 15:38 |
| seb128 | bdmurray, thx for pointing it out, I will have a look, that seems buggy | 15:38 |
| bdmurray | seb128: Thanks - I forgot to fill a bug during the flurry of the release sprint. | 15:40 |
| Eickmeyer | Oof.. bug 1851346 hitting Ubuntu Studio like a nasty ton of bricks. | 15:40 |
| ubottu | bug 1851346 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu Studio 19.10 Installer Causes Wanted Programs to be Removed" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1851346 | 15:40 |
| Laney | does anyone know if it is possible to use the output of dh_listpackages in the clean target? I'm just getting all packages, probably because it doesn't know if it's doing arch, arch+indep, indep at that point, I guess | 15:45 |
| Laney | alternatively: how can I conditionally act in clean based on whether I'm building indep packages or not? | 15:45 |
| Laney | or maybe I need to do something else altogether | 15:53 |
| Laney | basically: dh-sequence-foo doesn't work in B-D-I and is documented as such, and I don't know how to manually pass the --with= properly for the clean target if I specify the real package in B-D-I instead | 15:54 |
| teward | slashd: good, then we know that works fine now. :) | 15:59 |
| slashd | teward, indeed | 16:06 |
| andrewsh | hi | 18:08 |
| andrewsh | can please someone look at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/685319? | 18:08 |
| andrewsh | at the moment there’s nobody to review and/or approve Slovak translations for a lot of things on Launchpad | 18:08 |
| andrewsh | I’d like to change that | 18:08 |
| cjwatson | andrewsh: Queued up but I can't look at it today as I have to finish up | 18:10 |
| andrewsh | thanks! | 18:10 |
| cjwatson | GunnarHj: ^- would be useful if you could verify that - I'm not totally sure on the conventions for the Ubuntu-specific vs. LP-wide translation teams | 18:11 |
| cjwatson | (if you can, of course) | 18:11 |
| GunnarHj | cjwatson: I'm not a member of "Launchpad Translations Coordinators" (only "Ubuntu Translations Coordinators"). | 18:35 |
| GunnarHj | andrewsh: How come you are not a member of ~ubuntu-l10n-sk? I'm asking because normally there are local procedures in place to approve new translators. | 18:36 |
| ahasenack | rafaeldtinoco: around? | 18:51 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ahasenack: yep, just saw your update | 18:52 |
| rafaeldtinoco | will dput | 18:52 |
| ahasenack | rafaeldtinoco: when building the source packages for the corosync and pacemaker upload, | 18:52 |
| rafaeldtinoco | thx! | 18:52 |
| ahasenack | rafaeldtinoco: use the right -v option | 18:52 |
| ahasenack | or use git ubuntu build-source -v --sign --for-merge | 18:52 |
| ahasenack | "--for-merge" being the thing that adds the correct -v parameter | 18:52 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ah good to know | 18:52 |
| ahasenack | it should be the previous ubuntu version | 18:52 |
| ahasenack | so that the changes file includes the debian releases up until this merge | 18:52 |
| ahasenack | you can open the changes file to take a look | 18:53 |
| ahasenack | it must start with the first non-ubuntu version, and go all the way up to the version you are uploading | 18:53 |
| ahasenack | rafaeldtinoco: --for-merge also takes care of fetching the correct orig tarball in the case it's a new upstream version | 18:53 |
| ahasenack | and also passes the right options to dpkg-buildpackage to include the orig tarball in the upload in that case | 18:54 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ahasenack: i dont use the git ubuntu build-source | 18:54 |
| rafaeldtinoco | but I do use dpkg-buildpackage | 18:54 |
| ahasenack | that's why I'm saying all of this :) | 18:54 |
| rafaeldtinoco | u know the exact flags it does ? | 18:54 |
| ahasenack | rafaeldtinoco: check dpkg-genchanges, it's -sa for the orig tarball | 18:55 |
| rafaeldtinoco | -sa <- for the new upstream | 18:55 |
| rafaeldtinoco | right ? | 18:55 |
| ahasenack | yes, but you need to have it locally | 18:55 |
| rafaeldtinoco | yep I do | 18:55 |
| ahasenack | it won't generate the tarball for you, it will just include it in the upload | 18:55 |
| rafaeldtinoco | I have generated the source packages already | 18:55 |
| rafaeldtinoco | i was mostly concerned on the signing | 18:55 |
| rafaeldtinoco | you mentioned | 18:55 |
| ahasenack | and -v | 18:55 |
| rafaeldtinoco | I use dpkg-buildpackage -S -k$MYKEY -sa | 18:56 |
| ahasenack | you need -v | 18:56 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ok | 18:56 |
| ahasenack | also a parameter that makes its way to dpkg-genchanges (via dpkg-buildpackage) | 18:56 |
| ahasenack | rafaeldtinoco: for pacemaker, for example | 18:56 |
| ahasenack | rafaeldtinoco: you would use -v2.0.1-4ubuntu2 | 18:57 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ah gotcha | 18:57 |
| rafaeldtinoco | the previous one | 18:57 |
| ahasenack | rafaeldtinoco: then check the changes file, it should be listing 2.0.1-5 and 2.0.1-5ubuntu1 | 18:57 |
| rafaeldtinoco | cool let me give it a try | 18:57 |
| ahasenack | as these are "all the changes in that package since the last time it was uploaded to ubuntu" | 18:57 |
| ahasenack | including debian changes | 18:57 |
| ahasenack | so if 2.0.1-5 for example closed an ubuntu bug, launchpad would auto-close it, since that version (and the mention of the bug) is included in the changes file | 18:58 |
| ahasenack | rafaeldtinoco: pacemaker is not a new upstream release, so no -sa needed | 18:59 |
| rafaeldtinoco | yep, only corosync | 18:59 |
| ahasenack | yep | 18:59 |
| rafaeldtinoco | I realized that when doing the source package locally | 18:59 |
| rafaeldtinoco | it complains about the missing .tar.gz | 18:59 |
| rafaeldtinoco | then I get it | 18:59 |
| ahasenack | yes | 18:59 |
| ahasenack | I suggest pull-debian-source -d | 19:00 |
| rafaeldtinoco | https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/xoB688RL/ | 19:00 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ahasenack: yep, i use pull-lp and pull-debian | 19:00 |
| rafaeldtinoco | pls check the pastebin | 19:00 |
| rafaeldtinoco | for the signed changes | 19:00 |
| ahasenack | I don't know if pull-lp-source handles debs from debian, I guess it could, since they are also stored in lp | 19:00 |
| rafaeldtinoco | if looks good | 19:00 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ahasenack: the version ddstreet did | 19:00 |
| rafaeldtinoco | supports debian and ubuntu iirc | 19:01 |
| rafaeldtinoco | but not sure if it was merged or not | 19:01 |
| ahasenack | rafaeldtinoco: hm, that changes is incorrect | 19:01 |
| ahasenack | rafaeldtinoco: where are the changelog changes we talked about yesterday? | 19:01 |
| rafaeldtinoco | oh wait | 19:01 |
| ahasenack | Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed: 1828228 <-- it's fixing that bug again, for example | 19:01 |
| ddstreet | rafaeldtinoco not yet, sorry, it's on my todo list | 19:01 |
| ddstreet | you can use ppa:ddstreet/ubuntu-dev-tools if you want | 19:01 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ahasenack: its wrong indeed, and it wasnt | 19:02 |
| rafaeldtinoco | i wonder if my cron did something to my local branch | 19:02 |
| rafaeldtinoco | let me fix that andreas | 19:02 |
| ahasenack | it's your first dput, be careful :) | 19:02 |
| rafaeldtinoco | yep yep | 19:02 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ddstreet: were your changes accepted ? | 19:02 |
| rafaeldtinoco | from that time... or not yet ? | 19:02 |
| rafaeldtinoco | its been what ? 2 years :P | 19:02 |
| ddstreet | rafaeldtinoco well...i gave up after over a year | 19:02 |
| rafaeldtinoco | lol | 19:02 |
| rafaeldtinoco | i remember there was some cool features | 19:02 |
| rafaeldtinoco | to download previous versions | 19:03 |
| ddstreet | but i am not painstakingly rebasing and splitting things up so i can open multiple merge requests to get it added | 19:03 |
| rafaeldtinoco | gotcha | 19:03 |
| ddstreet | it just is quite time-intensive since my code is really, really far from what's in git | 19:03 |
| ddstreet | yeah, you can even download deleted pkgs or from -security ppa | 19:03 |
| ddstreet | i'm going to add pulling from upload queues when i have a minute also | 19:04 |
| ddstreet | sorry i meant 'now ...rebasing' above, 'not' was a typo | 19:04 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ahasenack: wow, i was in the wrong computer | 19:04 |
| ahasenack | dude | 19:05 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ahasenack: #) that is the bad thing about having 2 or 3 computers | 19:05 |
| rafaeldtinoco | lol | 19:05 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ill delete my local branches from the one | 19:05 |
| rafaeldtinoco | im not using for this never to happen again | 19:05 |
| * rafaeldtinoco fear | 19:05 | |
| ahasenack | double check the hash that was approved in the mp | 19:05 |
| ahasenack | otherwise the upload tag is useless | 19:05 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ddstreet: ill play with it | 19:05 |
| rafaeldtinoco | maybe i can help you out with the merges/split | 19:05 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ahasenack: it would not upload | 19:06 |
| rafaeldtinoco | relax | 19:06 |
| rafaeldtinoco | i would not force things for sure | 19:06 |
| rafaeldtinoco | but i wont have any "git ubuntu" local branches | 19:06 |
| rafaeldtinoco | in the machine I dont use for coding | 19:06 |
| rafaeldtinoco | that is a good thing to be done = ) | 19:06 |
| ddstreet | rafaeldtinoco thnx, and my git for it is https://code.launchpad.net/~ddstreet/ubuntu-dev-tools/+git/ubuntu-dev-tools, mostly in the 'work' and 'work_cp*' branches | 19:07 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ddstreet: i can see you rebasing things :o) | 19:07 |
| rafaeldtinoco | rebase-orig rebase-orig | 19:07 |
| rafaeldtinoco | lol | 19:07 |
| infinity | vorlon, mdeslaur, kees, stgraber: TB? | 20:03 |
| marcoagpinto | infinity: Thunderbird? | 20:05 |
| marcoagpinto | :p | 20:05 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ahasenack: ping | 20:35 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ahasenack: sorry got preempt here | 20:35 |
| rafaeldtinoco | https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/7OqGRPY7/ | 20:35 |
| rafaeldtinoco | just checking one more time before the 1st | 20:35 |
| rafaeldtinoco | then it will be smoother =) | 20:35 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ok, looks good, double checked, moving on | 20:38 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!