/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2019/11/11/#snappy.txt

* Chipaca brb10:43
cachiozyga, hey11:56
cachioI have the mount-ns test failing on bionic11:56
cachioI have a debug session opened11:57
cachioit fails with the latest changes on bionic11:57
cachioafter I update the image11:57
Chipacacachio: it's 4am in zyga-land12:00
Chipacacachio: (he's in gmt-8)12:00
cachioChipaca, ahhhh12:01
cachioChipaca, I forgot :)12:01
cachiothanks for remember me that12:01
Chipacacachio: you're the early bird, for once :)12:02
cachioheheheh12:02
cachioyesssss12:02
=== ricab is now known as ricab|lunch
=== ricab|lunch is now known as ricab
Chipacapopey: you around?14:09
popeyhello14:09
Chipacapopey: I'm going to a conference in a couple of weeks and they just asked me if I could take swag. Do you know who I could ask?14:10
popeyclan14:10
Chipacapopey: ok, thanks14:10
popeynp14:14
ijohnsonhey oSoMoN, is there any way you can provide me access to old chromium snap versions? If you have access to 78.0.3904.70 as a snap so I can compare with the deb directly that would be great. (the snap currently is at 78.0.3904.97)14:19
oSoMoNijohnson, what do you need to test?14:21
ijohnsonI'm looking at startup performance, and I want to rule out different chromium versions "acting differently"14:21
ijohnsonbut if you can say confidently that there's no real difference between those two versions I'm ok with that too14:22
oSoMoNijohnson, well the .97 snap is smaller than .70 by ~5MB, I trimmed down unused files, but I don't expect that would make a noticeable difference14:24
oSoMoN(in startup time, that is)14:24
ijohnsonoSoMoN: ok, so the only difference is in missing files? were those files being executed at all by the launcher script in .70?14:25
oSoMoNno, they were unused files from stage packages14:26
ijohnsonokay, great thanks for clarifying. I will continue with my tests just using the deb on disco vs the snap14:27
oSoMoNijohnson, cool, please share your results on bug #184706914:30
mupBug #1847069: [snap] Chromium snap starts slowly <snap> <chromium-browser (Ubuntu):Confirmed> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1847069>14:30
ijohnsonoSoMoN, sure I can provide info there too, I was firstly just going to post on the snapcraft forum though, as a followup to https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/squashfs-performance-effect-on-snap-startup-time/1392014:31
ijohnsonmight be after vancouver though FYI14:31
oSoMoNyeah, the forum is fine too14:33
* cachio lunch14:45
zygaChipaca: morning15:51
zygaI prepared some machines for you in case you needed that arm system15:51
zygacachio: my laptop is not working (atta way to start a sprint) but open a bug with the logs please15:52
zygaIt would help to know which packages changed15:53
zygaChipaca: let me know if you still need hardware access and I’ll get you an account as soon as I can use my computer again15:55
Chipacazyga: I don't need hardware access, thank you15:57
Chipacazyga: not this month anyway15:57
Chipacazyga: good morning! how's the jetlag?15:57
zygaChipaca: terrible, I didn’t sleep at all15:59
Chipacazyga: :-(16:00
cachiozyga, I'll do it16:36
cachioonce I am back from the doctor16:36
* cachio afk - doctor16:42
* Chipaca afk16:56
mupPR snapcraft#2796 opened: meta: ensure Snap's `assumes` is initialized as a set <Created by cjp256> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2796>18:58
mupPR snapcraft#2678 closed: cli: introduce --provider <Created by cjp256> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2678>20:29
mupPR snapd#7728 opened: cmd: implement snap run --explain <Created by zyga> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7728>23:16
* zyga solicits feedback for snap run --explain https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/R9gNjltq/23:18
mupPR snapd#7729 opened: cmd: fix a pair of typos <Simple 😃> <Created by zyga> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7729>23:27

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!