[10:43] * Chipaca brb [11:56] zyga, hey [11:56] I have the mount-ns test failing on bionic [11:57] I have a debug session opened [11:57] it fails with the latest changes on bionic [11:57] after I update the image [12:00] cachio: it's 4am in zyga-land [12:00] cachio: (he's in gmt-8) [12:01] Chipaca, ahhhh [12:01] Chipaca, I forgot :) [12:01] thanks for remember me that [12:02] cachio: you're the early bird, for once :) [12:02] heheheh [12:02] yesssss === ricab is now known as ricab|lunch === ricab|lunch is now known as ricab [14:09] popey: you around? [14:09] hello [14:10] popey: I'm going to a conference in a couple of weeks and they just asked me if I could take swag. Do you know who I could ask? [14:10] clan [14:10] popey: ok, thanks [14:14] np [14:19] hey oSoMoN, is there any way you can provide me access to old chromium snap versions? If you have access to 78.0.3904.70 as a snap so I can compare with the deb directly that would be great. (the snap currently is at 78.0.3904.97) [14:21] ijohnson, what do you need to test? [14:21] I'm looking at startup performance, and I want to rule out different chromium versions "acting differently" [14:22] but if you can say confidently that there's no real difference between those two versions I'm ok with that too [14:24] ijohnson, well the .97 snap is smaller than .70 by ~5MB, I trimmed down unused files, but I don't expect that would make a noticeable difference [14:24] (in startup time, that is) [14:25] oSoMoN: ok, so the only difference is in missing files? were those files being executed at all by the launcher script in .70? [14:26] no, they were unused files from stage packages [14:27] okay, great thanks for clarifying. I will continue with my tests just using the deb on disco vs the snap [14:30] ijohnson, cool, please share your results on bug #1847069 [14:30] Bug #1847069: [snap] Chromium snap starts slowly

[14:31] oSoMoN, sure I can provide info there too, I was firstly just going to post on the snapcraft forum though, as a followup to https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/squashfs-performance-effect-on-snap-startup-time/13920 [14:31] might be after vancouver though FYI [14:33] yeah, the forum is fine too [14:45] * cachio lunch [15:51] Chipaca: morning [15:51] I prepared some machines for you in case you needed that arm system [15:52] cachio: my laptop is not working (atta way to start a sprint) but open a bug with the logs please [15:53] It would help to know which packages changed [15:55] Chipaca: let me know if you still need hardware access and I’ll get you an account as soon as I can use my computer again [15:57] zyga: I don't need hardware access, thank you [15:57] zyga: not this month anyway [15:57] zyga: good morning! how's the jetlag? [15:59] Chipaca: terrible, I didn’t sleep at all [16:00] zyga: :-( [16:36] zyga, I'll do it [16:36] once I am back from the doctor [16:42] * cachio afk - doctor [16:56] * Chipaca afk [18:58] PR snapcraft#2796 opened: meta: ensure Snap's `assumes` is initialized as a set [20:29] PR snapcraft#2678 closed: cli: introduce --provider [23:16] PR snapd#7728 opened: cmd: implement snap run --explain [23:18] * zyga solicits feedback for snap run --explain https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/R9gNjltq/ [23:27] PR snapd#7729 opened: cmd: fix a pair of typos