[10:43]  * Chipaca brb
[11:56] <cachio> zyga, hey
[11:56] <cachio> I have the mount-ns test failing on bionic
[11:57] <cachio> I have a debug session opened
[11:57] <cachio> it fails with the latest changes on bionic
[11:57] <cachio> after I update the image
[12:00] <Chipaca> cachio: it's 4am in zyga-land
[12:00] <Chipaca> cachio: (he's in gmt-8)
[12:01] <cachio> Chipaca, ahhhh
[12:01] <cachio> Chipaca, I forgot :)
[12:01] <cachio> thanks for remember me that
[12:02] <Chipaca> cachio: you're the early bird, for once :)
[12:02] <cachio> heheheh
[12:02] <cachio> yesssss
[14:09] <Chipaca> popey: you around?
[14:09] <popey> hello
[14:10] <Chipaca> popey: I'm going to a conference in a couple of weeks and they just asked me if I could take swag. Do you know who I could ask?
[14:10] <popey> clan
[14:10] <Chipaca> popey: ok, thanks
[14:14] <popey> np
[14:19] <ijohnson> hey oSoMoN, is there any way you can provide me access to old chromium snap versions? If you have access to 78.0.3904.70 as a snap so I can compare with the deb directly that would be great. (the snap currently is at 78.0.3904.97)
[14:21] <oSoMoN> ijohnson, what do you need to test?
[14:21] <ijohnson> I'm looking at startup performance, and I want to rule out different chromium versions "acting differently"
[14:22] <ijohnson> but if you can say confidently that there's no real difference between those two versions I'm ok with that too
[14:24] <oSoMoN> ijohnson, well the .97 snap is smaller than .70 by ~5MB, I trimmed down unused files, but I don't expect that would make a noticeable difference
[14:24] <oSoMoN> (in startup time, that is)
[14:25] <ijohnson> oSoMoN: ok, so the only difference is in missing files? were those files being executed at all by the launcher script in .70?
[14:26] <oSoMoN> no, they were unused files from stage packages
[14:27] <ijohnson> okay, great thanks for clarifying. I will continue with my tests just using the deb on disco vs the snap
[14:30] <oSoMoN> ijohnson, cool, please share your results on bug #1847069
[14:30] <mup> Bug #1847069: [snap] Chromium snap starts slowly <snap> <chromium-browser (Ubuntu):Confirmed> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1847069>
[14:31] <ijohnson> oSoMoN, sure I can provide info there too, I was firstly just going to post on the snapcraft forum though, as a followup to https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/squashfs-performance-effect-on-snap-startup-time/13920
[14:31] <ijohnson> might be after vancouver though FYI
[14:33] <oSoMoN> yeah, the forum is fine too
[14:45]  * cachio lunch
[15:51] <zyga> Chipaca: morning
[15:51] <zyga> I prepared some machines for you in case you needed that arm system
[15:52] <zyga> cachio: my laptop is not working (atta way to start a sprint) but open a bug with the logs please
[15:53] <zyga> It would help to know which packages changed
[15:55] <zyga> Chipaca: let me know if you still need hardware access and I’ll get you an account as soon as I can use my computer again
[15:57] <Chipaca> zyga: I don't need hardware access, thank you
[15:57] <Chipaca> zyga: not this month anyway
[15:57] <Chipaca> zyga: good morning! how's the jetlag?
[15:59] <zyga> Chipaca: terrible, I didn’t sleep at all
[16:00] <Chipaca> zyga: :-(
[16:36] <cachio> zyga, I'll do it
[16:36] <cachio> once I am back from the doctor
[16:42]  * cachio afk - doctor
[16:56]  * Chipaca afk
[18:58] <mup> PR snapcraft#2796 opened: meta: ensure Snap's `assumes` is initialized as a set <Created by cjp256> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2796>
[20:29] <mup> PR snapcraft#2678 closed: cli: introduce --provider <Created by cjp256> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2678>
[23:16] <mup> PR snapd#7728 opened: cmd: implement snap run --explain <Created by zyga> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7728>
[23:18]  * zyga solicits feedback for snap run --explain https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/R9gNjltq/
[23:27] <mup> PR snapd#7729 opened: cmd: fix a pair of typos <Simple 😃> <Created by zyga> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7729>