[00:40] -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [T54: Properly implement different wallpapers for different monitors] hmollercl (Hans P. Möller) commented on the task: https://phab.lubuntu.me/T54#2717 [01:40] The version of quassel we ship by default is messed up. [01:41] Can't connect to quassel-core [01:41] Can only directly connect to irc network. There's no option of connecting to a core. [01:42] We get a welcome dialogue box which takes details and connects to irc networks only. [01:44] But I actually ran it from a persistent usb. The usb is a bit slow. That dialogue box opened a bit late than quassel opened. Now, before opening of that dialogue box, there was an option to connect to a quassel-core. It disappeared the moment the welcome screen appeared. [01:44] Someone verify. [01:45] If we are shipping an irc client, I suggest hexchat. Quassel which cannot connect to a core is just useless. The user will have to install quassel-client separately. Seems redundant. [01:46] @kc2bez uses quassel. Can confirm imo. [02:02] Just Installed hexchat to compare usage. Hexchat is clearly lighter than quassel. [02:03] Connected yo same network, same user same channel #lubuntu [02:03] Minimised. [02:03] Hexchat 9MB [02:03] Quassel 23MB [02:03] Telling from qps. [02:04] @tsimonq2 wxl: what say? [02:04] hexchat is not Qt driven [02:04] Quassel is last i checked [02:04] and that's heavier. [02:04] 🤷🏻‍♂️ [02:05] Even tho hexchat isn't qt driven. It's lighter. Also, the quassel core issue I pointed. [02:06] And don't know why, in the quassel we ship, the default network, named "Lubuntu IRC" tries to connect to ubuntu servers buy on port 8001. [02:06] It should be 6697/6667 na? [02:07] I've tested the default many times (ISO QA-testing) & connected fine to #lubuntu; usually pm myself on this box; so it works (I have no idea about port) [02:09] Didn't connect on 8001 on my system coz sophos I assume but default is 6667 only right? [02:11] Idea: to make it super lite, we give an executable which points to kiwirc in browser. It's not fully capable as compared to a client but does the job and uses already installed good ol Firefox. What say? [02:15] It's bit of a strech but hey! Less resources used. [13:21] The_LoudSpeaker: I use quassel. I uninstall the monolithic application and install quassel-client. I have a separate Ubuntu server that just runs quassel-core. Here is the quassel wiki page to get you started: https://bugs.quassel-irc.org/projects/quassel-irc/wiki [17:17] @kc2bez [ The_LoudSpeaker: I use quassel. I uninstall the monolithic application …], I also use quassel only. Can't connect to my quassel core using the default client that we ship. Wanted you to confirm if you can. [17:21] No, you can't connect to a core with the client we ship, quassel client is a separate package. [17:45] @kc2bez [ No, you can't connect to a core with the client we ship, quassel client …], We should ship the combined core-client that quassel provides or not ship it at all imo. [17:46] Honestly hexchat is better than what we ship currently and it's light also. [17:47] The client we ship works without the core, it is all together as one. [17:48] Hexchat is lighter. [17:49] ok [17:53] @kc2bez [ The client we ship works without the core, it is all together as one.], Even if its all together one, it's tweaked to not connect to other core. We should remove that tweak atleast. [18:13] It isn't tweaked, they are 2 separate applications for 2 different purposes. It is all explained on the quassel wiki page. [18:14] As far as an alternative IRC client that is lighter it would be best if it was a qt application. [18:21] @kc2bez [ It isn't tweaked, they are 2 separate applications for 2 different purp …], I see. I will have to take a look. [18:22] @kc2bez [ As far as an alternative IRC client that is lighter it would be best if …], H [18:22] @kc2bez [ As far as an alternative IRC client that is lighter it would be best if …], Hexchat can be ported? [18:29] https://github.com/kvirc/KVIrc