hpidcock | few test fixes for someone https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10916 https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10922 https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10923 | 02:38 |
---|---|---|
babbageclunk | hpidcock: approved the two quick ones! | 03:11 |
babbageclunk | still looking at the pregen certs one | 03:11 |
hpidcock | babbageclunk: danke | 03:11 |
babbageclunk | hpidcock: also approved the certs one | 04:18 |
hpidcock | thankyou! | 04:19 |
sahid | is someone can confirm me that juju is not using any code related to nova-network for the openstack provider? | 08:49 |
sahid | i checked the code and i think we are OK, but just wanted double check with you since nova-network will be completly rmeoved for the next release of nova | 08:50 |
timClicks | sahid: thank you for checking | 09:04 |
timClicks | sahid: if you are able, could you please ask on the discourse forum? | 09:05 |
timClicks | sahid: that way team members who are currently offline will have a chance to check | 09:05 |
sahid | timClicks: sure I will do that | 09:07 |
stickupkid | manadart, you got time for a CR https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10881 | 09:45 |
manadart | stickupkid: Yep. | 09:48 |
manadart | stickupkid: Done. | 10:01 |
stickupkid | manadart, need to fix the tests fyi | 10:01 |
manadart | Need a tick on a forward-merge: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10925 | 12:24 |
stickupkid | manadart, tick | 12:27 |
manadart | stickupkid: Ta. | 12:28 |
rick_h | morning party folks | 12:33 |
icey | /join #maas | 12:35 |
skay | I think juju deploy is installing a different version of the charm than the one in the local build directory. The version file and codetree-collect-info.yaml in the local charms dir have a different hash. | 13:39 |
skay | what could be causing that? | 13:40 |
rick_h | skay: reactive charm that needs to be deployed from the build dir? | 13:40 |
rick_h | or some missing path expectation? | 13:41 |
skay | rick_h: reactive charm that needs to be deployed from the build dir | 13:41 |
skay | the normal workflow uses mojo. the path to the charms dir is setup by mojo and the charms are collected there via a collect file in my spec. | 13:56 |
skay | while trying to figure this out I've also done it by factoring mojo out of the equation | 13:57 |
rick_h | nammn_de: so those are the old canonistack region urls | 14:17 |
rick_h | nammn_de: I've forwarded you the email on the new region, I'd suggest we update to use that | 14:17 |
rick_h | nammn_de: let me know if that'll work or not | 14:17 |
nammn_de | cool, can do that | 14:17 |
nammn_de | rick_h: should they work, if I try them locally over vpn? | 14:18 |
rick_h | nammn_de: but yea, I think we just had test data that's on old cloud endpoints and we have to update for the changes | 14:18 |
rick_h | nammn_de: yep, over vpn should be good | 14:18 |
nammn_de | rick_h: because of the yaml jenkins/I couldnt reach any of those endpoints afaict | 14:18 |
rick_h | nammn_de: yea, I think they're shut down | 14:19 |
rick_h | nammn_de: or moved | 14:19 |
rick_h | nammn_de: so have to update to the current ones | 14:19 |
nammn_de | rick_h: cool will update | 14:19 |
rick_h | achilleasa: if we can, anywhere we have some sort of interval we should be doing backoff if it might cause any sort of issue | 14:21 |
rick_h | achilleasa: just one of those lessons where debugging something bouncing and without the backoff it makes it hard to recover | 14:21 |
nammn_de | rick_h: and for manual-xenial-amd64, finfolk-vmaas and vsphere? They don't seem to work either | 14:21 |
rick_h | nammn_de: sounds like achilleasa sent you notes on vsphere, is that IP still correct? | 14:21 |
rick_h | nammn_de: and for the vmaas I'm not sure about. Have to check our infra, probably listed in cloud-city details somewhere. | 14:22 |
nammn_de | rick_h: yeah should be, I can use those as long as jenkins has intenrally the creds for them | 14:22 |
rick_h | nammn_de: in the end this is just to test you can add multiple clouds right? | 14:23 |
nammn_de | rick_h: yeah, I can just steal some from clouds.yaml or just remove some | 14:23 |
rick_h | nammn_de: so I like the canonistack as it has a couple of regions as well, but honestly we just need to verify a few clouds. Find a few that work and run with it. | 14:23 |
rick_h | nammn_de: exactly, I don't think we have to over do it | 14:23 |
rick_h | nammn_de: this was just easy for the original test. let's keep it easy as long as the test validation is still legit | 14:24 |
rick_h | skay: how did you take mojo out of the question? | 14:24 |
nammn_de | Just wanted to make sure that we align here and that. Yeah Didnt plan to add additional complexity. Will do | 14:24 |
skay | rick_h: I'll do this all again momentarily to make sure I remember it right. I didn't take as good of notes as I should have yesterday. but, from memory... | 14:26 |
skay | rick_h: locally to run things without mojo I have env variables set up for my charm repo. I build the charm from my clone. I have a bundle file that specifies the charm in the build directory and run `juju deploy` on that bundle | 14:28 |
skay | re mojo, I took different steps yesterday to make sure it wasn't somehow pulling from an old checkout. in the /path/to/mojo/workspace I removed spec/, build/, charms/. | 14:30 |
skay | rick_h: do you have more troubleshooting tips to try? | 14:31 |
achilleasa | rick_h: in that particular PR implementing a backoff inside the watcher will not be easy and I think might cause more problems than it actually solves (I have proposed a way to do it if we really really want to in the PR comments) | 14:35 |
rick_h | achilleasa: ok, it's something I'd really like jam's signoff on in that case | 14:37 |
rick_h | achilleasa: thanks for the notes | 14:37 |
rick_h | skay: version of Juju? | 14:37 |
skay | rick_h: 2.6.10-trusty-amd64 | 14:38 |
achilleasa | rick_h: yeap, not in a hurry to merge that one (still have to fix the agent test I was talking about) | 14:38 |
rick_h | achilleasa: +1 | 14:38 |
rick_h | skay: hmmm, we started with the effort to have the charm build process add a version file to note git/vcs info in a version file in the charm | 14:39 |
=== narindergupta is now known as narinderguptamac | ||
rick_h | skay: might check if that's there and match the sha up | 14:39 |
rick_h | skay: but not sure, lots of moving parts in this situation | 14:39 |
skay | rick_h: yeah, see above. they don't match. | 14:39 |
skay | rick_h: nor do hashes in the codetree yaml file | 14:39 |
pmatulis | can actions be run from within a charm's config file that is used during deploy? | 15:15 |
rick_h | pmatulis: no, charms don't have creds to call actions themselves | 15:15 |
rick_h | pmatulis: they're operator triggered | 15:16 |
pmatulis | rick_h, thank you sir | 15:16 |
rick_h | pmatulis: if the charm wants to share some code they can manage that internally and wire it up into the install hook and such | 15:16 |
rick_h | pmatulis: but that's just code at that point vs actions/not actions | 15:16 |
stickupkid | hml, CR https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10926 | 16:03 |
hml | stickupkid: any rush on this? | 16:04 |
stickupkid | hml, so this fixes the controller test in 2.7 | 16:05 |
stickupkid | hml, no rush | 16:05 |
stickupkid | hml, helps if i base it on the correct branch :| | 16:05 |
hml | stickupkid: trade ya: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10927. gave up on unit test, integration test proves fix | 16:33 |
stickupkid | hml, deal | 16:34 |
stickupkid | hml, should target 2.7 right though? | 16:34 |
hml | stickupkid: yes. oops | 16:34 |
hml | stickupkid: fixed | 16:35 |
stickupkid | hml, done | 16:38 |
timClicks | is it possible to use juju scp as the root user? I'm encountering a permissions (?) issue | 21:21 |
timClicks | ERROR exit status 1 (Please login as the user "NONE" rather than the user "root".) | 21:21 |
rick_h | timClicks: no, the ssh key is only on the ubuntu user | 21:25 |
rick_h | timClicks: you'd have to scp it there and then juju run to mv it | 21:26 |
timClicks | rick_h: okay, good to know | 21:26 |
rick_h | timClicks: what are you copying? worth it just to juju scp it to /tmp and then root has access? | 21:26 |
timClicks | i'm writing a relations tutorial and want to scp before/after versions of config files that have changed | 21:27 |
timClicks | i'll just do the work via juju run, rather than locally client-side | 21:27 |
rick_h | timClicks: ah yea, might just juju run --wait -- cat .... | 21:29 |
timClicks | fwiw we've just had a request for ipv6 support in the #cdk slack channel | 21:47 |
timClicks | part 1 of a new tutorial series on relations is up https://discourse.jujucharms.com/t/what-is-a-juju-relation-and-what-purpose-do-they-serve/2347 | 23:37 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!