[01:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plyvel [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.1.0-2]
[01:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plyvel [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.1.0-2]
[01:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plyvel [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.1.0-2]
[01:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plyvel [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.1.0-2]
[01:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plyvel [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.1.0-2]
[01:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plyvel [i386] (focal-proposed) [1.1.0-2]
[06:25] <vorlon> infinity: I don't personally see any reason for Foundations to take ownership of emacs if Desktop thinks it doesn't belong in main
[07:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu13 => 2.04-1ubuntu14] (core)
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu14 => 2.04-1ubuntu14] (core)
[09:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vala (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.44.9-0ubuntu1 => 0.44.11-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: strongswan (bionic-proposed/main) [5.6.2-1ubuntu2.4 => 5.6.2-1ubuntu2.5] (ubuntu-server)
[15:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: strongswan [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [5.8.1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: strongswan [i386] (focal-proposed/main) [5.8.1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: strongswan [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [5.8.1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: strongswan [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.8.1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: strongswan [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.8.1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: strongswan [armhf] (focal-proposed/main) [5.8.1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[16:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ktap (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.4+git20160427-1ubuntu3 => 0.4+git20160427-1ubuntu4] (no packageset)
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r8168 (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [8.045.08-2 => 8.045.08-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-71.80~16.04.1] (kernel)
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-71.80~16.04.1] (kernel)
[18:31] <Eickmeyer> Trying to figure out the best way to approach this in the Ubuntu Studio seed. Looks like we're seeding gvfs-fuse, which pulls-in fuse, but then something else is pulling-in fuse3.
[18:31] <Eickmeyer> fuse3 provides fuse, but also breaks fuse, causing our iso to fail to build.
[18:32] <Eickmeyer> So, 1) should we seed fuse3, and 2) if so, should that be in the same place as our gvfs-fuse reccommend?
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1007.8] (core, kernel)
[18:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu8.3]
[18:46] <infinity> Eickmeyer: fuse is in standard.
[18:47] <Eickmeyer> infinity: Yes, but then what is pullilng-in fuse3?
[18:47] <infinity> And looks like studio and kubuntu both have the fuse3/fuse problem due to sshfs.
[18:47] <Eickmeyer> Ahhhhh....
[18:47] <Eickmeyer> So, it's a problem that I can't direclty fix?
[18:48] <infinity> I think we might need to examine of standard needs to move on.  Or if those leaf deps can be relaxed.  The current situation seems suboptimal.
[18:51] <Eickmeyer> infinity: Agreed.
[18:52] <Eickmeyer> Also...
[18:53] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: It seems as though when you updated the Ubuntu Studio seed you updated ubuntustudio-meta but forgot to git push ubuntustudio-meta?
[18:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (disco-proposed) [2.20.10-0ubuntu27.4]
[18:55] <infinity> Wow, this fuse3/fuse mess is... A mess.
[18:56] <infinity> I think they were meant to be coninstallable, but someone seriourly doesn't understand dpkg control fields.  Maybe.
[18:56] <infinity> seriously, too.
[18:57] <infinity> Eickmeyer: I might be able to fix this in Ubuntu and forward to Debian, but need to investigate the actual interaction here before I can decide what flavour of crack the Debian maintainer was on, and how to treat.
[18:57] <infinity> But first, sushi time.
[18:57] <Eickmeyer> infinity: Fair enough. Sushi = GOOOD~
[18:57] <Eickmeyer> !
[18:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.20.9-0ubuntu7.10]
[19:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-71.80~16.04.1]
[19:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-71.80~16.04.1]
[20:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-flashback (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.34.0-1ubuntu1 => 3.34.0-1ubuntu1.1] (edubuntu)
[20:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle-5.0 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1008.13~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[20:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1007.8~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:04] <RikMills> infinity: thanks. I have been pondering the fuse/fuse3 thing for a couple of days. mostly waiting a short while in the hope debian fixed their own c**p before I kicked off. I pondered a couple of sub-optimal things to do this end, but decide not as it would mask the issue and so perhaps make a proper fix less likely soon
[21:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:4.0+dfsg-0ubuntu9.1]