[01:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: primus-vk [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3-3] (no packageset)
[01:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: primus-vk [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3-3] (no packageset)
[01:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: primus-vk [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3-3] (no packageset)
[01:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: primus-vk [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3-3] (no packageset)
[01:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: primus-vk [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3-3] (no packageset)
[01:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: primus-vk [i386] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3-3] (no packageset)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libixion [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [0.15.0-3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libixion [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [0.15.0-3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libixion [i386] (focal-proposed/main) [0.15.0-3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libixion [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [0.15.0-3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libixion [armhf] (focal-proposed/main) [0.15.0-3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libixion [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [0.15.0-3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[05:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mes [i386] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.20-2] (no packageset)
[05:59] <vorlon> cjwatson: thanks for the germinate MP review; rebased and resubmitted at https://code.launchpad.net/~vorlon/germinate/+git/germinate/+merge/375807
[06:27] <vorlon> infinity, cjwatson: do either of you want to sanity-check https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/i386.focal/i386+build-depends.sources ?
[06:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mes [i386] (focal-proposed) [0.20-2]
[06:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libixion [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.15.0-3]
[06:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libixion [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.15.0-3]
[06:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libixion [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.15.0-3]
[06:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted primus-vk [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.3-3]
[06:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted primus-vk [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.3-3]
[06:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted primus-vk [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.3-3]
[06:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libixion [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.15.0-3]
[06:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libixion [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.15.0-3]
[06:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted primus-vk [i386] (focal-proposed) [1.3-3]
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libixion [i386] (focal-proposed) [0.15.0-3]
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted primus-vk [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.3-3]
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted primus-vk [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.3-3]
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libixion [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.15.0-2]
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libixion [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.15.0-2]
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libixion [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.15.0-2]
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libixion [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.15.0-2]
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libixion [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.15.0-2]
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libixion [i386] (focal-proposed) [0.15.0-2]
[07:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdrm [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [2.4.100-3] (core, xorg)
[07:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdrm [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [2.4.100-3] (core, xorg)
[07:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdrm [i386] (focal-proposed/main) [2.4.100-3] (core, xorg)
[07:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdrm [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [2.4.100-3] (core, xorg)
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liborcus [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [0.15.3-2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[07:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liborcus [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [0.15.3-2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[07:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liborcus [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [0.15.3-2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[07:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liborcus [i386] (focal-proposed/main) [0.15.3-2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[07:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liborcus [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [0.15.3-2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[07:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liborcus [armhf] (focal-proposed/main) [0.15.3-2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[09:06] <cpaelzer> today someone around to accept strongswn in Focals new queue
[09:06] <cpaelzer> it only is a package rename, not really new things
[09:06] <cpaelzer> Debian followed our approach but with a different name
[09:15] <seb128> cpaelzer, done
[09:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted strongswan [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.8.1-1ubuntu1]
[09:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted strongswan [armhf] (focal-proposed) [5.8.1-1ubuntu1]
[09:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted strongswan [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [5.8.1-1ubuntu1]
[09:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted strongswan [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.8.1-1ubuntu1]
[09:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted strongswan [s390x] (focal-proposed) [5.8.1-1ubuntu1]
[09:16] <seb128> tjaalton, libdrm is in binNEW but failed build on armhf/64 due to dh_install fail-missing items, I'm waiting for all arches to build to accept the binaries
[09:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted strongswan [i386] (focal-proposed) [5.8.1-1ubuntu1]
[09:27] <tjaalton> seb128: ah right.. I need to fix that in debian first
[09:27] <tjaalton> bad brain
[09:28] <cpaelzer> thanks seb128
[09:28] <seb128> np!
[09:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glib2.0 [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.62.2-2~ubuntu19.10.1]
[10:14] <cpaelzer> bdmurray: assuming you are the "Brian" ment on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tpm2-tss/+bug/1841595/comments/16 could you please also subscribe foundations-bugs to tpm-udev for bug 1852347?
[10:15] <seb128> cpaelzer, he is :-)
[10:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qtbase-opensource-src [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.9.5+dfsg-0ubuntu2.4]
[10:17] <cpaelzer> at least this time I self-realized this was missed due to it being a special case
[10:17] <cpaelzer> not perfect but feels better than later being pointed t it
[10:27] <seb128> right
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-dada2 [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.14.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1065.75] (kernel)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-tasklib [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[11:58] <oSoMoN> sil2100, thunderbird 68.2.1 has been in {bionic,eoan}-proposed for two weeks and the SRU bugs are marked verified (bug #1850064 and bug #1847247, I've done quite some testing myself), would you mind letting them go to -updates?
[12:00] <oSoMoN> (alternatively, if we want to play it even safer, I could issue a call for testing on discourse.ubuntu.com to get more testing and feedback before we proceed)
[12:12] <sil2100> oSoMoN: hey! Is security fine with getting it into -security as well? Since IIRC this is the SRU that's from the security PPA, right?
[12:18] <infinity> If it's has CVEs and is getting a USN, security should do the release.
[12:19] <infinity> Which is almost always the case for new Thunderbird versions, so I'd be shocked if it wasn't for this one.
[12:20] <sil2100> infinity: it was
[12:20] <sil2100> infinity: I mean...
[12:21] <sil2100> infinity: apparently the reason why it was supposed to go to -proposed was since security didn't have capacity to do full testing of it, so they wanted it to get some exposure via -proposed
[12:21] <sil2100> So my understanding was that it was supposed to go from proposed to -updates/-security
[12:21] <sil2100> But before I do that, I'd want them to sign off on that as well
[12:22] <infinity> sil2100: Sure, they often do security-proposed PPA to -proposed for extra testing, but then they're still the ones doing the release cause they have to publish the USN at the same time.
[12:22] <infinity> sil2100: The only general exception to that rule is the very non-standard kernel process.
[12:22] <sil2100> hmmm, that is true
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glib2.0 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.56.4-0ubuntu0.18.04.5]
[12:31] <oSoMoN> chrisccoulson, can you comment on that? ^
[12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted broadcom-sta [source] (bionic-proposed) [6.30.223.271-8ubuntu0.1]
[12:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bcmwl [source] (bionic-proposed) [6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu5~18.04.1]
[12:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted oss4 [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.2-build2010-5ubuntu3~18.04.2]
[13:00] <chrisccoulson> oSoMoN, sil2100 yeah, I think we can do the release. Are there not builds for xenial + disco too?
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwts [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.03.00-0ubuntu5]
[13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1065.75]
[13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (disco-proposed) [3:15.1.0-0ubuntu1.2]
[13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (bionic-proposed) [3:13.0.2-0ubuntu2]
[13:47] <oSoMoN> chrisccoulson, no builds for xenial and disco yet. I'll do xenial once bionic is done (i.e. next week), and as for disco I wasn't really planning on doing it, unless there are important security fixes that are not backported to the 60.9 series before disco is EOL
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cinder [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:12.0.9-0ubuntu1]
[13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:17.0.12-0ubuntu1]
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdrm [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.4.100-3]
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdrm [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [2.4.100-3]
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liborcus [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.15.3-2]
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liborcus [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.15.3-2]
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liborcus [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.15.3-2]
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-tasklib [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-1]
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdrm [i386] (focal-proposed) [2.4.100-3]
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liborcus [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.15.3-2]
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liborcus [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.15.3-2]
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdrm [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2.4.100-3]
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-bioc-dada2 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.14.0+dfsg-1]
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liborcus [i386] (focal-proposed) [0.15.3-2]
[15:24] <bdmurray> cpaelzer: There is only one Brian and it is I!
[15:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (eoan-proposed/main) [1:4.0+dfsg-0ubuntu9.1 => 1:4.0+dfsg-0ubuntu9.2] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[15:33] <cpaelzer> so the Monthy Python movie is about you then - didn't expect that
[15:33] <cpaelzer> #h
[15:33] <cpaelzer> -h
[15:33] <cpaelzer> arr
[15:34] <cpaelzer> bdmurray: thanks for subscribing
[15:43] <bdmurray> no problem!
[15:51] <ogra> brians monthly python movie ... sounds like a programming course ;)
[16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected backport-iwlwifi-dkms [source] (eoan-proposed) [7906-0ubuntu1.1]
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:20191113.1-0ubuntu0.19.10.1]
[18:07] <vorlon> I've confirmed that the r-cran-sf armhf SIGBUS is a regression in the new upstream version of r-cran-sf itself, going to try grabbing the previous upstream version and rebuilding that instead
[18:31] <vorlon> cjwatson: wrt resubmit: in this case there was also a rebase, so is resubmit appropriate or not?  IIRC the MP history does not look less muddled when rebasing than when resubmitting
[18:51] <cjwatson> vorlon: resubmit is not necessary nor IMO appropriate when rebasing
[18:51] <cjwatson> vorlon: resubmit is basically just for things like changing prerequisites or using a completely different target branch that you can't do otherwise
[18:53] <vorlon> cjwatson: ok
[19:50] <rbalint> bdmurray, could you please merge https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu-eoan/+merge/375432 and possibly release systemd for eoan?
[19:51] <rbalint> bdmurray, this also unblocks systemd upload to disco
[20:55] <mwhudson> omg did python3-defaults migrate??
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpsd [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.19-3] (kubuntu)
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpsd [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.19-3] (kubuntu)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpsd [i386] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.19-3] (kubuntu)
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpsd [i386] (focal-proposed) [3.19-3]
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpsd [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [3.19-3]
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpsd [s390x] (focal-proposed) [3.19-3]
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gpsd [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.19-3] (kubuntu)
[23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gpsd [amd64] (focal-proposed) [3.19-3]