[03:20] <wallyworld> hpidcock: here's that huge PR for rc6 https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10937
[03:20] <hpidcock> on it
[03:20] <hpidcock> uh
[03:20] <hpidcock> this is too big
[03:23] <wallyworld> ty
[03:23] <hpidcock> np
[10:26] <parlos> Good Morning Juju!
=== parlos_ is now known as parlos
[12:27] <rick_h> morning Juju party people
[12:35] <parlos__> Good Afternoon rick_h
[12:39] <achilleasa> manadart: what do you make of this? https://github.com/juju/juju/blob/develop/provider/maas/maas2_environ_whitebox_test.go#L926-L939
[12:42] <achilleasa> rick_h: ^^^ is this example realistic?
[12:47] <parlos__> If a 'bug' is discovered in a charm, where should that be reported?
[12:48] <rick_h> achilleasa:  thinking, trying to make sense of it. it is that the device has multiple nics, and the children are possibly bridged addresses or something?
[12:49] <rick_h> parlos__:  charm show cs:xxxx bugs-url is the best start
[12:49] <rick_h> parlos__:  or look for the bugs url link on the jaas.ai/xxxxx page
[12:54] <manadart> achilleasa: I am up against the limits of my networking knowledge, but I can't see how this can happen. Particularly as the VLAN is on the interface = same for all links...
[12:55] <parlos__> rick_h thanks.
[12:56] <achilleasa> rick_h: manadart I have no idea; strong my maas-fu is not :D
[12:57] <achilleasa> according to the implementation the last address wins there
[12:59] <manadart> achilleasa: You can have multiple subnets on a VLAN, but everything I am reading discourages it.
[13:00] <parlos__> Have a nice day!
[13:06] <manadart> achilleasa: And Netplan appears not to support virtual interfaces: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nplan/+bug/1743200
[13:06] <mup> Bug #1743200: No support for interface labels <netplan:New> <nplan (Ubuntu):Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1743200>
=== dannf` is now known as dannf
[14:13] <achilleasa> manadart: can you take a look at https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10942?
[14:14] <manadart> achilleasa: Yep.
[15:19] <nammn_de> manadart: can you take a quick/first look into that to see whether I am going in the right direction? https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10943/files Next step would be to add those to the import step as well
[15:19] <manadart> nammn_de: Looking.
=== Trefex is now known as Trefex_
=== Trefex_ is now known as Trefex
[15:46] <nammn_de> while at it, I would put the export step into another PR after this one got through
[15:47] <nammn_de> the corresponding description PR https://github.com/juju/description/pull/66
[16:39] <nammn_de> manadart: thanks! I incorporated your review. description and juju/juju should be ready to be reviewed for real