[00:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-netscape-bookmark-parser [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[00:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phpmyadmin-sql-parser [amd64] (focal-proposed) [4.3.2-3]
[00:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phpmyadmin-shapefile [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.1-3]
[02:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: phpmyadmin [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [4:4.9.1+dfsg1-2] (no packageset)
[03:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phpmyadmin [amd64] (focal-proposed) [4:4.9.1+dfsg1-2]
[04:40] <vorlon> mitya57: hi, isn't qtbase5-dev meant to now depend on libgl-dev on armhf instead of libgles2-dev, now that qtbase5-gles-dev exists? (Debian bug #944548)
[04:40] <ubot5> Debian bug 944548 in src:visp "visp ftbfs on armel/armhf where it built before" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/944548
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla [amd64] (focal-proposed/multiverse) [418.87.01-2] (no packageset)
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/multiverse) [418.87.01-2] (no packageset)
[05:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla [i386] (focal-proposed/multiverse) [418.87.01-2] (no packageset)
[06:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla [amd64] (focal-proposed) [418.87.01-2]
[06:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [418.87.01-2]
[06:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla [i386] (focal-proposed) [418.87.01-2]
[07:09] <ginggs> vorlon: thanks
[12:05] <mitya57> vorlon: not yet. qtbase5-gles-dev does not cover all Qt submodules yet, and I don't think armhf hardware with desktop OpenGL exists.
[12:06] <mitya57> Also such a switch will break many packages (though it may fix some other, too).
=== mfo_ is now known as mfo
[19:50] <vorlon> mitya57: armhf with hardware accelerated desktop GL may not exist, but is that a reason to not make software available using llvmpipe?
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gsoap [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.8.91-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gsoap [i386] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.8.91-1] (no packageset)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gsoap [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.8.91-1] (no packageset)
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gsoap [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.8.91-1] (no packageset)
[23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gsoap [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.8.91-1] (no packageset)
[23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gsoap [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.8.91-1] (no packageset)
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gsoap [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2.8.91-1]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gsoap [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [2.8.91-1]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gsoap [armhf] (focal-proposed) [2.8.91-1]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gsoap [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.8.91-1]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gsoap [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2.8.91-1]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gsoap [i386] (focal-proposed) [2.8.91-1]