| wallyworld | babbageclunk: here's that forward port of 2.7 https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10945 | 01:50 |
|---|---|---|
| babbageclunk | wallyworld: oops - looking | 02:22 |
| babbageclunk | wallyworld: approved | 02:24 |
| wallyworld | ty | 02:32 |
| babbageclunk | quick review for a test fix backport: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10946 | 03:00 |
| wallyworld | is github shite for anyone else? | 03:04 |
| babbageclunk | yeah, pretty slow at the moment | 03:04 |
| wallyworld | slow af, also 500 errors | 03:05 |
| babbageclunk | haven't seen those | 03:05 |
| wallyworld | i can't really access it | 03:05 |
| babbageclunk | uh oh, failures in gating tests | 03:05 |
| wallyworld | for 2.7 though i think? | 03:06 |
| babbageclunk | oh right - are we not worrying about that? | 03:13 |
| wallyworld | well, hmmm. i would like to think we've made fixes moving forward and we won't necessariy backport every fix. but right now we'd not expect any or much divergence | 03:15 |
| wallyworld | so any failure now could or will probably affect develop also | 03:16 |
| babbageclunk | I'll see whether there have been any changes for the persistent-storage test in develop | 03:16 |
| babbageclunk | nope | 03:23 |
| babbageclunk | hpidcock: another easy review? https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10946 | 03:52 |
| hpidcock | babbageclunk: sure | 03:52 |
| timClicks | i should have called dibs | 03:53 |
| babbageclunk | you snost, you lost | 03:53 |
| hpidcock | babbageclunk: doneski | 03:55 |
| babbageclunk | hpidcock: merci beaucoup! | 03:56 |
| wallyworld | babbageclunk: +1 on your pr | 05:01 |
| babbageclunk | thanks | 05:01 |
| manadart | Need a tick on 0-conflict forward merge. Brings forward babbageclunk's test fix: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10948 | 08:22 |
| manadart | stickupkid: Morning. https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10948. | 08:23 |
| stickupkid | manadart, done | 08:24 |
| manadart | stickupkid: Ta. | 08:24 |
| manadart | stickupkid: Another one. https://github.com/CanonicalLtd/juju-qa-jenkins/pull/326 | 09:23 |
| nammn_de1 | morning manadart stickupkid i might need a look at this https://github.com/juju/description/pull/66 and this https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10943 | 09:25 |
| nammn_de1 | but timewise not important, as they are not ci | 09:25 |
| manadart | nammn_de1: OK. | 09:31 |
| nammn_de1 | manadart stickupkid ci fix https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10949 | 10:56 |
| nammn_de1 | small one | 10:56 |
| stickupkid | nammn_de1, i think juju is wrong here, I think maas, should have a default region | 10:58 |
| nammn_de1 | stickupkid: you mean juju should check the endpoint of maas during interactive adding? | 10:58 |
| manadart | nammn_de1 stickupkid: MAAS doesn't have regions in the Juju sense. A MAAS region controller is the cloud (endpoint). The default region is "". A MAAS Rack controller is an availability zone. | 11:08 |
| stickupkid | nammn_de1, approved, let's improve this test - OR we can move it to the integration tests | 11:08 |
| stickupkid | nammn_de1, manadart it does have a region in terms of a "client-cloud-region" | 11:08 |
| stickupkid | manadart, i.e. "default" is just the only one... | 11:09 |
| manadart | stickupkid: Since you reviewed the first one :) https://github.com/CanonicalLtd/juju-qa-jenkins/pull/327 | 12:53 |
| manadart | stickupkid: Hold up. I will add something to that patch. | 12:55 |
| === Beret- is now known as Beret | ||
| manadart | stickupkid: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10951 | 15:50 |
| stickupkid | manadart, does it? | 15:52 |
| stickupkid | manadart, when i use juju switch with no argument it works, is this without a bootstrap? | 15:52 |
| stickupkid | ah, yes, that's right | 15:54 |
| * manadart nods. | 15:54 | |
| nammn_de1 | backport to make it pass 2.7 as well https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10952 | 16:29 |
| nammn_de1 | anyone pointers to make the `integration caas test ` run locally? Im trying it with `python3 ./assess caas_deploy_charms --caas-provider="microk8s"` | 17:18 |
| dosaboy | hi all, i have an issue i wanted to ask about before raising a bug, | 22:27 |
| dosaboy | ive deployed k8s using the ost provider | 22:27 |
| dosaboy | kubernetes-master says it has port 6443/tcp open | 22:27 |
| dosaboy | yet none of the security groups have that port open | 22:27 |
| dosaboy | is this a know issue? am i missing something? | 22:28 |
| dosaboy | ill raise a bug tomorrow with more data | 22:28 |
| babbageclunk | dosaboy: have you exposed kubernetes-master? | 23:52 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!