[00:12] <cjwatson> You don't need to upload again to get it built.  A self-copy would do
[00:12] <cjwatson> (Probably too late now, but for next time0
[00:12] <cjwatson> )
[00:26] <vorlon> ah good point
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-m2r [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.2.1-3] (no packageset)
[06:38] <infinity> vorlon, mwhudson: Given it's how we generate buildd images, removing livecd-rootfs on i386 would be suboptimal. :P
[06:39] <vorlon> oh that too
[07:36] <mwhudson> infinity: details
[09:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbio-db-gff-perl [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.3-2] (no packageset)
[09:59] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, hello, can you please add virtualbox and virtualbox-hwe to i386 list exception? I think a virtualization system guest needs to be kept, right?
[10:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (bionic-proposed/main) [12.2.12-0ubuntu0.18.04.3 => 12.2.12-0ubuntu0.18.04.4] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[10:44] <LocutusOfBorg> can I ask any AA to review some phpunit reverse-deps that might be kicked out from focal, and are already out from testing?
[11:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flash-kernel (eoan-proposed/main) [3.98ubuntu5.1 => 3.98ubuntu5.2] (core)
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flash-kernel [source] (eoan-proposed) [3.98ubuntu5.2]
[12:34] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, is it possible to add virtualbox and virtualbox-hwe in the i386 exception list in your opinion?
[12:35] <LocutusOfBorg> we really need guest parts to emulate the old i386 virtual machines
[12:41] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, i really have no context to answer that, sorry
[12:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ilmbase [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-6] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ilmbase [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-6] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ilmbase [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-6] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ilmbase [i386] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-6] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ilmbase [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-6] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ilmbase [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-6] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openvswitch (bionic-proposed/main) [2.9.2-0ubuntu0.18.04.3 => 2.9.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (ubuntu-server)
[13:35] <cpaelzer> Laney: vorlon: I saw you yesterday talking about i386 autopkgtests failing
[13:35] <cpaelzer> was that resolved - atm I'm wondering why a PPA no more builds i386
[13:36] <cpaelzer> and I ask myself if this is part of the same overall big swicth that might be going on
[13:36] <cpaelzer> i386 is enabled in the PPA, package is Architecture: linux-any - but no (neither failed nor succeeded) i386 build at the PPA
[13:57] <Laney> cpaelzer: right, there's a whitelist now https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/packagesets/focal/i386-whitelist
[13:58] <cpaelzer> So I don't want/need an i386 of chrony (which I put to my PPA)
[13:58] <cpaelzer> but I'd want the tests to start on it :-)
[13:59] <cpaelzer> sil2100: that might be a bileto thing as that is what I used for this https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/3847
[13:59] <cpaelzer> is the drop of i386 known to need any changes there to "not wait on it"
[13:59] <cpaelzer> and vice versa Laney/vorlon did "normal" britney get changes to not ahve the same "waiting on i386 build"
[14:00] <Laney> it only looks for missing builds versus what is in the release
[14:00] <Laney> so once someone performs a mass removal of i386, will be good
[14:00] <cpaelzer> that sounds great, thanks for the info
[14:00] <cpaelzer> is there any sort of ETA for that
[14:00] <cpaelzer> today is thanksgiving so only about 50% will complain today :-)
[14:01] <Laney> that's going to be Steve, so I can't make any promises :(
[14:27] <sil2100> cpaelzer: yeah, I mean, I could drop i386 from the list of ADT arches, but I suppose once the removals happen it should be all better
[14:29] <cpaelzer> sil2100: thanks
[14:29] <cpaelzer> I can wait for the removal to be complete
[15:16] <seb128> sil2100, hey, did you see the ping aobut jsunit/bionic yesterday?
[15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: valgrind (eoan-proposed/main) [1:3.15.0-1ubuntu3 => 1:3.15.0-1ubuntu3.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: simplestreams (bionic-proposed/main) [0.1.0~bzr460-0ubuntu1 => 0.1.0~bzr460-0ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-server)
[15:29] <sil2100> seb128: ah, yes! On it now
[15:29] <seb128> sil2100, thanks!
[15:33] <sil2100> uh, ok, so I actually didn't know that someone actually released thunderbird
[15:33] <sil2100> I explicitly tagged the bugs to not be released without coordination, if I knew I would have acted on the jsunit yesterday already
[15:34] <sil2100> It's done now though o/
[15:34] <sil2100> Sorry for the hiccup
[15:34] <seb128> sil2100, np, thanks!
[15:34] <seb128> oSoMoN, ^
[15:39] <oSoMoN> thanks sil2100
[15:50] <sil2100> yw o/
[16:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-calculator (bionic-proposed/main) [1:3.28.2-1~ubuntu18.04.1 => 1:3.28.2-1~ubuntu18.04.2] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[16:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.13 => 3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.14] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[16:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.4-0ubuntu18.04.2 => 3.28.4-0ubuntu18.04.3] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nautilus (bionic-proposed/main) [1:3.26.4-0~ubuntu18.04.4 => 1:3.26.4-0~ubuntu18.04.5] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-rrcov [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4-9-1] (no packageset)
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-rrcov [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4-9-1] (no packageset)
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-rrcov [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4-9-1] (no packageset)
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-rrcov [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4-9-1] (no packageset)
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-rrcov [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4-9-1] (no packageset)
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qosmic [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2] (no packageset)
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qosmic [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2] (no packageset)
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qosmic [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2] (no packageset)
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qosmic [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2] (no packageset)
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qosmic [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2] (no packageset)
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ilmbase [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.3.0-6]
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ilmbase [armhf] (focal-proposed) [2.3.0-6]
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ilmbase [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [2.3.0-6]
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbio-db-gff-perl [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.7.3-2]
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qosmic [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.6.0-2]
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qosmic [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.6.0-2]
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qosmic [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.6.0-2]
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-rrcov [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.4-9-1]
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-rrcov [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.4-9-1]
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ilmbase [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2.3.0-6]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ilmbase [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2.3.0-6]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qosmic [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.6.0-2]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-rrcov [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.4-9-1]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-rrcov [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.4-9-1]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ilmbase [i386] (focal-proposed) [2.3.0-6]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qosmic [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.6.0-2]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-m2r [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.2.1-3]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-rrcov [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.4-9-1]
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbio-db-seqfeature-perl [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.3-2] (no packageset)
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbio-db-ace-perl [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.3-2] (no packageset)
[19:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbio-db-ace-perl [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.7.3-2]
[19:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbio-db-seqfeature-perl [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.7.3-2]
[20:36] <vorlon> 04:34 < LocutusOfBorg> we really need guest parts to emulate the old i386 virtual machines
[20:37] <vorlon> he's not around so I can't answer him directly, but fwiw the answer here is a definitive no
[20:37] <vorlon> there is no 32-bit kernel on focal, and no support for running a 32-bit host environment on focal, so no reason at all to have the 32-bit guest tools
[20:38] <vorlon> tumbleweed: hi, qa.ubuntuwire.com down?
[20:38] <vorlon> .org
[20:40] <infinity> vorlon: YEah, I was waiting for him to come back to say the same thing.
[21:59] <vorlon> tumbleweed: n/m I was apparently sending mistyped package names and making reverse-depends angry ;)
[22:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.23 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.24] (core)