[05:38] <jibel> good morning everyone
[05:47] <duflu> Morning jibel
[06:08] <jibel> Hi duflu
[06:38] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers
[06:38] <duflu> Hi oSoMoN
[06:50] <oSoMoN> hey duflu
[07:03] <didrocks> good morning
[07:03] <duflu> Morning didrocks
[07:04] <oSoMoN> salut didrocks
[07:07] <didrocks> hey duflu, oSoMoN
[08:02] <marcustomlinson> morning duflu jibel didrocks oSoMoN
[08:02] <didrocks> hey marcustomlinson
[08:03] <duflu> Hi marcustomlinson
[08:04] <marcustomlinson> duflu: welcome back :)
[08:04] <marcustomlinson> how was the time off?
[08:04] <duflu> marcustomlinson, thanks. Bumpy start as someone severed a fibre link yesterday and I went offline
[08:04] <duflu> marcustomlinson, vacation was good. I forgot what work was
[08:05] <marcustomlinson> haha yeah, know the feeling :P
[08:05] <marcustomlinson> you need a holiday from your holiday
[08:29] <seb128> gooood morning desktopers!
[08:30] <didrocks> hey seb128
[08:31] <duflu> Morning seb128
[08:31] <seb128> lut didrocks, how duflu, how are you today?
[08:32] <duflu> seb128, going OK. You?
[08:32] <didrocks> I'm good, thanks, you?
[08:33] <seb128> I just blocked my back while dropping the kid :-/ But otherwise I'm good...
[08:34] <ricotz> good morning desktopers :)
[08:35]  * duflu wonders if "dropping the kid" is worse than hurting your back, or you mean something less dramatic than dropping
[08:36] <seb128> lol
[08:36] <seb128> I meant leaving him at the daycare
[08:36] <duflu> Yeah OK
[08:36] <duflu> Morning ricotz
[08:36] <seb128> I blocked my back while getting him out of the stroller
[08:39] <duflu> I didn't do enough pilates when on holiday and ended up in extra pain. Had to fashion lumbar support out of an inflight magazine at one point
[08:39] <marcustomlinson> morning seb128 and ricotz
[08:40] <seb128> hey marcustomlinson, how are you?
[08:40] <seb128> duflu, :-(
[08:40] <marcustomlinson> seb128: good thanks!
[09:00] <duflu> jamesh, your pulseaudio branches snap-policy-* are now clones of the main branches. Can I remove them?
[09:00] <duflu> Or vice versa
[09:04] <jamesh> duflu: sure. I can do it if you want.
[09:04] <duflu> jamesh, I have it open so will do it
[09:04] <jamesh> duflu: thanks
[09:05] <duflu> I also added tags
[09:05] <oSoMoN> good morning marcustomlinson, seb128, ricotz
[09:06] <seb128> lut oSoMoN, comment va aujourd'hui ?
[09:06] <seb128> hey jamesh, one day later but weekly summary post? ;)
[09:07] <jamesh> duflu: when I was preparing those updates, I couldn't get git-buildpackage to work, with it complaining about local changes in the tree.  Has it ever worked for you with that repo?
[09:07] <jamesh> seb128: I'll sort it out.
[09:07] <seb128> jamesh, thx
[09:07] <seb128> oSoMoN, I see that a retry make firefox/armhf happy :)
[09:08] <duflu> jamesh, no idea. I don't use such things because the branch is a proper full branch that's traditionally packagable
[09:08] <oSoMoN> seb128, ça va, merci!
[09:08] <duflu> with debuilt
[09:08] <duflu> with debuild
[09:08] <oSoMoN> seb128, yeah, it seems that the armhf failures are more likely to happen when the autopkgtest infrastructure is under load
[09:08] <jamesh> duflu: sure, but that's generally what a GBP repo looks like too
[09:08] <jamesh> IIRC, the upstream debian repo is GBP buildable
[09:09] <seb128> oSoMoN, looks like firefox has migrated now :-)
[09:09] <duflu> I try to avoid any extraneous tooling but if you want to add support for that you are free to commit to the branches
[09:09] <oSoMoN> seb128, I have a bug open and I'll keep investigating, but until then I'll use the "retry when not under load" strategy
[09:09] <seb128> oSoMoN, sounds fine :)
[09:09] <seb128> thx
[09:09] <seb128> on that note, changing location, brb
[09:29] <Wimpress> Good morning desktoppers o/
[09:29] <oSoMoN> good morning Wimpress
[09:29] <didrocks> hey Wimpress
[09:34] <marcustomlinson> hey jamesh and Wimpress
[09:41] <duflu> Morning Wimpress
[12:58] <jdstrand> kenvandine: hey, does this look weird to you: https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/DP28b3MVzF/
[13:00] <kenvandine> jdstrand: I think installing flatpak itself adds it's dirs to XDG_DATA_DIRS
[13:04] <jdstrand> ok, I guess that is enough for me to investigate
[13:05] <jdstrand> kenvandine: I can't think of a reason where we would reasonably allow that, can you?
[13:05] <kenvandine> We shouldn't want that, no
[13:37] <marcustomlinson> kenvandine: could you add me as contributor to the gnome-3-34 snaps sdk and platform
[13:56] <kenvandine>   marcustomlinson done
[14:00] <marcustomlinson> Thanks!
[16:47] <hellsworth> good (late) morning desktopers :)
[16:47] <marcustomlinson> morning hellsworth
[16:47] <oSoMoN> good morning hellsworth
[16:47] <hellsworth> hi all o/