| RAOF | blackboxsw:Me is actually mid-morning. Let's get some cloud-init happening! | 00:20 |
|---|---|---|
| blackboxsw | schweet RAOF | 00:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibm-java80 (xenial-proposed/partner) [8.0.5.40-0ubuntu1 => 8.0.6.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 00:29 | |
| * RAOF grins at `safeyaml` | 00:39 | |
| RAOF | blackboxsw: It would be nice to explicitly mention that the Debian patch dropped was dropped because it's in the new upstream release, rather than me trawling through the long upstream changelog ;) | 00:45 |
| blackboxsw | Ahh excellent, yes, will amend that in the descr, and of future SRUs | 00:46 |
| blackboxsw | RAOF: should that be the debian/changelog text that says that | 00:46 |
| blackboxsw | ? | 00:46 |
| blackboxsw | we can fixup our tooling to emit that | 00:46 |
| RAOF | Yeah, ideally. | 00:47 |
| blackboxsw | ok will do | 00:47 |
| blackboxsw | will ammend that for all subsequent SRUs | 00:47 |
| RAOF | Changelogs for SRUs are kinda annoying, in that they have two distinct audiences. | 00:47 |
| RAOF | Developers working on the package, and users working out whether to upgrade the package :) | 00:47 |
| blackboxsw | RAOF: which debian/changelog entry text are we talking about changing? | 00:48 |
| blackboxsw | I'm trying to find an unclear one that doesn't already say dropped due to upstream inclusion | 00:49 |
| RAOF | Oh! Xenial's. | 00:49 |
| blackboxsw | ok moving to xenial to check | 00:49 |
| blackboxsw | there I see * refresh patches: | 00:49 |
| blackboxsw | + debian/patches/ec2-classic-dont-reapply-networking.patch | 00:49 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [19.3-41-gc4735dd3-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] | 00:49 | |
| blackboxsw | and previous SRUs had * drop the following cherry-picks now included: | 00:50 |
| blackboxsw | + cpick-1d5e9aef-azure-Add-apply_network_config-option-to-disable | 00:50 |
| blackboxsw | ohhhh - drop cherry picks included in upstream/master commit 7d5d34f3 | 00:50 |
| RAOF | Hm. | 00:51 |
| blackboxsw | I see, sorry about that. I think this was a one off case RAOF, I'll make sure we adhere to our typical cherry pick dropping (we have tooling that does that and write the appropriate debian/changelog and I think that wasn't used on xenial | 00:51 |
| RAOF | It also appears to be missing from bionic. | 00:52 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [19.3-41-gc4735dd3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] | 00:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (disco-proposed) [19.3-41-gc4735dd3-0ubuntu1~19.04.1] | 00:55 | |
| blackboxsw | RAOF: that patch wasn't needed bionic I believe. and this SRU should sync both xenial and bionic to be equivalent | 00:55 |
| RAOF | Hm. It's actually been dropped from all series, and not mentioned explicitly. | 00:56 |
| blackboxsw | hrm, ok I need to figure out why that's happened | 00:57 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (eoan-proposed) [19.3-41-gc4735dd3-0ubuntu1~19.10.1] | 00:57 | |
| blackboxsw | thanks for this | 00:57 |
| RAOF | You might want to see if there's something about that patch which your current tooling fails to pick up. | 00:57 |
| blackboxsw | yep I think in all cases it was a git cherry-pick manually run instead of our tooling 'cherry-pick' | 00:58 |
| blackboxsw | which would have added the appropriate debian/changelog entry | 00:58 |
| blackboxsw | ok I'll talk to our team tomorrow to make sure that's not repeated | 00:58 |
| blackboxsw | #newguys ;) | 00:58 |
| RAOF | :)( | 00:58 |
| blackboxsw | not so new, just newer to our team :) | 00:59 |
| blackboxsw | and had different tooling on their team.\ | 00:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hypopg [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.1.3-1] | 05:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hypopg [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.1.3-1] | 05:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hypopg [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.1.3-1] | 05:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hypopg [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.1.3-1] | 05:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hypopg [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.1.3-1] | 05:39 | |
| === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| cpaelzer | bdmurray: open-vm-tools has only went to -updates for Eoan | 06:03 |
| cpaelzer | bdmurray: the block-proposed that I added was for Bionic and Disco | 06:03 |
| cpaelzer | I thought that should work for those two, or is the tag non-functional as soon as it was released for one series? | 06:04 |
| cpaelzer | apw: vorlon: seb128: is one of you around to set the phasing of open-vm-tools 2:11.0.1-2ubuntu0.19.10.1 in Eoan back to 0% | 06:07 |
| cpaelzer | currently at 70% | 06:08 |
| cpaelzer | reasons https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/1844834/comments/19 https://github.com/vmware/open-vm-tools/issues/390 | 06:08 |
| gitbot | vmware issue 390 in open-vm-tools "Crash in HostinfoLsbRemoveQuotes" [Open] | 06:08 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1844834 in open-vm-tools (Ubuntu Disco) "open-vm-tools 11.0.0 released" [Undecided,Fix committed] | 06:08 |
| === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| apw | cpaelzer, the tools say it is at 0% | 09:39 |
| cpaelzer | apw: hmm, yeah it says it now | 09:41 |
| cpaelzer | was saying 70% this morning | 09:41 |
| cpaelzer | Ah here, I got a mail about 2h ago | 09:41 |
| cpaelzer | maybe some AA already responded but didn't ping | 09:41 |
| apw | perhaps, not sure who is awake but ok | 09:42 |
| rbalint | hi, rbasak please take a look at wslu in your sru cycle | 10:07 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi3 [Eoan 19.10.1] has been updated (20191203) | 10:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi3 [Eoan 19.10.1] has been updated (20191203) | 10:13 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | sforshee, of course testing is appreciated :) | 10:25 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mdeslaur, can clamav go in sync now? | 10:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I mean, the patch is in stable releases, it is not needed anymore, right? | 10:50 |
| LocutusOfBorg | any AA, please move golang-1.12-race-detector-runtime to universe and golang-1.13-race-detector-runtime to main, thanks | 10:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1027.28] (core, kernel) | 12:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-171.200] (core, kernel) | 12:15 | |
| === ogra_ is now known as ogra | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1027.28] | 12:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-171.200] | 12:45 | |
| sforshee | LocutusOfBorg: virtualbox-guest-dkms 6.0.14-dfsg-4 builds fine with 5.4, thanks! | 12:51 |
| ahasenack | hello, could an archive admin please take a look at the haproxy i386 failure in https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#haproxy ? | 12:54 |
| ahasenack | is this a case where the i386 package has to be removed, as per vorlon's email to ubuntu-devel a few days ago? | 12:54 |
| jdstrand | vorlon: thanks! | 12:57 |
| ahasenack | for my case, neutron-metadata-agent exists for i386, but it wants haproxy, which wasn't built for i386 | 13:07 |
| === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| cpaelzer | apw: seb128: doko: pinging AAs for a removal as described in bug 1853003 | 14:15 |
| ubot5 | bug 1853003 in ibmasm-utils (Ubuntu) "[20.04] Please remove ibmasm-utils package from the Archive" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1853003 | 14:15 |
| seb128 | cpaelzer, apw, doko, done now | 14:26 |
| cpaelzer | thank you | 14:27 |
| seb128 | cpaelzer, can you get it removed from https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/seeds/platform.focal/supported-misc-servers , I overlooked that before removing it :-/ | 14:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1051.54] (kernel) | 14:27 | |
| cpaelzer | yes I'll open an MP for that, just a sec | 14:27 |
| seb128 | thx | 14:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1009.14] (core, kernel) | 14:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1009.14] | 14:29 | |
| cpaelzer | seb128: https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu-seeds/+git/platform/+merge/376334 | 14:30 |
| cpaelzer | arr merge target might mismatch | 14:31 |
| seb128 | cpaelzer, wrong... right | 14:31 |
| cpaelzer | looks much saner https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu-seeds/+git/platform/+merge/376335 | 14:32 |
| vorlon | ahasenack: the haproxy i386 binaries were removed; the triggering of the test for the non-existent haproxy binaries is the annoying britney behavior. I've added a round of badtest hints | 15:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-stdlib-extensions (bionic-proposed/main) [2.7.16-2~18.04 => 2.7.17-1~18.04] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 15:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python2.7 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.7.15-4ubuntu4~18.04.2 => 2.7.17-1~18.04] (core) | 15:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: swift (eoan-proposed/main) [2.23.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.23.1-0ubuntu0.19.10.1] (openstack) | 15:52 | |
| ahasenack | vorlon: thanks | 16:28 |
| RikMills | imagemagick needs a no change rebuild against libopenexr24 to get nearer to completing that transition. could any core-dev lurking be kind enough to oblige? | 16:43 |
| ahasenack | vorlon: neutron also needs a badtest for i386? https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#haproxy | 17:38 |
| ahasenack | neutron-metadata-agent : Depends: haproxy but it is not installable | 17:38 |
| ahasenack | or should neutron stop being built for i386 | 17:39 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ldb [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [2:2.0.7-4] (core, i386-whitelist) | 18:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ldb [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [2:2.0.7-4] (core, i386-whitelist) | 18:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ldb [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [2:2.0.7-4] (core, i386-whitelist) | 18:32 | |
| ahasenack | hi archive admins, the new binary above is a soname change: libldb1 -> libldb2 | 18:33 |
| ahasenack | could someone let it through please? | 18:33 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ldb [i386] (focal-proposed/main) [2:2.0.7-4] (core, i386-whitelist) | 18:33 | |
| ahasenack | although it's still building for arm | 18:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ldb [armhf] (focal-proposed/main) [2:2.0.7-4] (core, i386-whitelist) | 18:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ldb [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [2:2.0.7-4] (core, i386-whitelist) | 18:37 | |
| ahasenack | ok, all built now | 18:39 |
| cjwatson | This sort of new-on-import-from-Debian is semi-automatic, but done anyway | 18:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ldb [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2:2.0.7-4] | 18:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ldb [armhf] (focal-proposed) [2:2.0.7-4] | 18:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ldb [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [2:2.0.7-4] | 18:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ldb [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2:2.0.7-4] | 18:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ldb [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2:2.0.7-4] | 18:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ldb [i386] (focal-proposed) [2:2.0.7-4] | 18:42 | |
| ahasenack | thanks! | 18:45 |
| ahasenack | I have two other uploads that need this ldb version, so this speeds that up | 18:45 |
| === andrewc_ is now known as andrewc-dinner | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-73.82~16.04.1] (kernel) | 19:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-73.82~16.04.1] (kernel) | 19:58 | |
| kanashiro | smartmontools is not a candidate to migrate from proposed because of a missing build on i386, could someone please help me with that? | 20:46 |
| vorlon | kanashiro: I was just working my way through the proposed-migration list down to that one; the i386 binaries will be removed shortly | 21:06 |
| kanashiro | thanks vorlon | 21:07 |
| vorlon | kanashiro: mm. the revdep tree of this package is deep (I just hit qemu), this may wind up waiting until I do the mass i386 binary removals | 21:20 |
| kanashiro | vorlon, ok | 21:25 |
| vorlon | actually the qemu revdeps weren't so bad, almost done pruning | 21:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mdadm (bionic-proposed/main) [4.1~rc1-3~ubuntu18.04.2 => 4.1~rc1-3~ubuntu18.04.3] (core) | 21:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mdadm (eoan-proposed/main) [4.1-2ubuntu3 => 4.1-2ubuntu3.1] (core) | 21:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mdadm (disco-proposed/main) [4.1-1ubuntu1 => 4.1-1ubuntu1.1] (core) | 21:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1051.54] | 21:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-73.82~16.04.1] | 21:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-73.82~16.04.1] | 21:32 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!