[07:18] <RikMills> santa_: apologies. launchpad/builder were broken most of yesterday, so I gave up trying to get anything done
[08:32] <crydotsnake-M> Hello all!. I have a question.. i really want to Help improving Kubuntu, but i dont really find a starting Point.. could you give me some Tipps?. 
[12:37] <mparillo> (1) Help out with the #kubuntu channel. (2) Install the daily ISO (http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/daily-live/current/) use it and report anything unusual here. You may be asked to create a bug report on Kubuntu (Launchpad.net) or KDE (bugs.kde.org). (3) Hang here and look for a call for testers and volunteer. (4) If you have particular talents in coding, system administration, documentation, translations, etc, announce 
[12:37] <mparillo> them here and maybe somebody needs a bit of help
[13:14] <BluesKaj> Howdy all
[13:23] <crydotsnake-M> Thank you ! mparillo 
[13:24] <crydotsnake-M> How can i edit pages on community.kde.org?
[14:29] <mparillo> I think you need a KDE Identity
[14:29] <mparillo> Login with Phabricator
[14:30] <mparillo> Target URL for me: https://phabricator.kde.org/oauthserver/auth/?scopes%5B0%5D=whoami&scopes%5B1%5D=offline_access&state=a050fbac809f7cf3cac472f2b7be3372&scope=whoami&response_type=code&approval_prompt=auto&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.kde.org%2FSpecial%3APhabricatorLogin%2Fcallback&client_id=PHID-OASC-tndrk63hnqw4rq3y4zjm
[14:31] <mparillo> Probably different for you, so look for the Login with Phabricator in the right hand navigation.
[14:34] <RikMills> so many things are broken for building in the archive!
[14:34]  * RikMills give up for a while
[15:47] <santa_> good afternoon
[15:47] <santa_> RikMills: ok, no problem, can we see a few easy things now?
[15:47] <RikMills> santa_: sure
[15:48] <santa_> ok, FYI I have fixed yesterday one of my servers for the i386 drop
[15:49] <santa_> I'm going to fix the other one now and start with test rebuilds wo would be nice to get everything right in git repos
[15:49] <santa_> s/wo/so/
[15:51] <santa_> RikMills: ok, so first of all it would be nice to get the plasma .4 in the _archive branches
[15:51] <santa_> I'm here @ .3
[15:52] <RikMills> I thought I pushed. maybe just to the staging.....
[15:52] <santa_> yeah, the staging is right
[15:52] <santa_> the _staging branch I mean
[15:52] <santa_> but not _archive
[15:53] <RikMills> pushing
[15:54] <santa_> ok, another one: kimageformats, no-change rebuild made by you
[15:54] <santa_> and I think they were a few apps not in sync, let me check...
[15:56] <santa_> hmm you already did marble
[15:56] <RikMills> yesw
[15:56] <RikMills> yes
[15:57] <santa_> ok I will fix area51 now so I will start fresh with test rebuilds, I plan to build the _staging branches @ groomlake and the _archive branches @ area51
[15:58] <RikMills> be warned that there is breakage in focal proposed for building some things
[15:58] <santa_> oh, how is that?
[16:00] <RikMills> gdk-pixbuf had a binary deleted
[16:00] <RikMills> make a mice chain of things from that to vlc to phonon backend to knotificationconfig-dev to maybe other things fail to install
[16:01] <RikMills> mice chain?
[16:01] <RikMills> nice chain!
[16:01] <RikMills> made the ktp-* things you wanted uploaded FTBFS
[16:02] <santa_> hmm
[16:02] <santa_> ok, well let's see how that affects the rebuilds
[16:03] <RikMills> a lot should be ok. just saying
[16:04] <santa_> the kimeageformats tag is missing
[16:04] <RikMills> kdeconnect 1.4 is out :)
[16:04] <santa_> aha
[16:05] <RikMills> was a scripted rebuild without the tooling, so no automatic tag
[16:05] <santa_> oh, ok
[16:19] <crydotsnake-M> Thanks mparillo 
[17:08] <santa_> RikMills: ok, more stuff, KA
[17:09] <santa_> I would like to fix that fix to not use float
[17:10] <RikMills> go ahead
[17:10] <santa_> wrt branch managing I plan to fix this in the 2.3 branch, make a new alpha package from there, merge 2.3 into master and then release 2.3 with whatever we have in master
[17:12] <santa_> * and then release 2.3 beta 1 with whatever we have in master
[17:12] <RikMills> ok :)
[18:36] <santa_> RikMills: changes pushed to 2.3 I haven't tested the 100% of things which could be tested but it seems it could work
[18:38] <santa_> RikMills: so could you do a quick test? if it works for you I will proceed with the package, then I will merge into master to prepare 2.3-beta1
[18:38] <santa_> (which I would like to test doing fw 5.65)
[18:39] <RikMills> doing
[18:43] <RikMills> santa_: seem to switch dir depending on version ok here on a VERY quick test
[18:44] <santa_> RikMills: ack
[18:44] <RikMills> if an issue crops up can fix as we go, but dowloading tars and gbp seems ok
[18:44] <santa_> ok, I will proceed with the package then
[19:31] <santa_> RikMills: hmm, what happenned exactly with gdk-pixbuf?
[19:34] <RikMills> santa_: vorlon deleted one of the binaries on all arches to break a circular build dependency for something
[19:36] <RikMills> santa_: that got left overnight USA time, breaking lots of other things
[19:36] <RikMills> then a short while ago, he copied the binaries back
[19:39] <santa_> RikMills: what's the name of the removed binary?
[19:40] <RikMills> santa_: it was libgdk-pixbuf2.0-common 2.40.0+dfsg-1ubuntu1
[19:45] <RikMills> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/armhf/libgdk-pixbuf2.0-common
[19:46] <RikMills> Deleted 14 hours ago by Steve Langasek
[19:46] <RikMills> Hack around gdk-pixbuf circular build-dep
[19:46] <RikMills> Published 2 hours ago
[19:46] <RikMills> same history for all arches
[19:51] <santa_> RikMills: thanks for the info, so I guess as soon as my mirror gets the package the builds are going to be ok
[19:53] <RikMills> hopefully
[20:02] <santa_> ok, so package published and everything merged into master
[20:02] <santa_> tomorrow or so I plan to do a few changes in master and test them doing the 5.65 release
[20:03] <santa_> specifically the branch checking removal
[20:07] <RikMills> might have to temporarily drop the libgit2 build dep for ktexteditor in a weeks time. the libgit2 soname transition seems to not be going anywhere in proposed at the moment
[20:07] <santa_> aha
[20:09] <RikMills> or maybe drop it in staging and test the consequences? I did that in my ppa, and could not see much impact of say kate
[20:10] <santa_> probably it's not the most important feature there
[20:10] <RikMills> indeed
[20:10] <santa_> just don't forget to add it back ;)
[20:11] <RikMills> that is the thing!