[02:21] <RikMills> vorlon: kconfig on the whitelist?
[02:32] <vorlon> RikMills: it is; but it seems something went wrong with said whitelist, because some of its transitive build-deps got removed
[02:33]  * vorlon works on figuring that out
[02:34] <vorlon> ah
[02:34] <vorlon> did kconfig's build-depends change after we started removals?
[02:34] <vorlon> hmm no
[02:35] <vorlon> did pkg-kde-tools's dependencies change?
[02:37] <vorlon> not that either
[02:37] <vorlon> guess I need to dig into germinate
[04:26] <RikMills> yes, I am curious why kconfig is on the list anyway
[04:27] <vorlon> RikMills: build dependency of something; germinate-output shows
[04:31] <vorlon> oh and there's the problem, lintian in -proposed grew a number of new deps
[04:31] <RikMills> got that. just puzzled as to the culprit
[04:31] <RikMills> ahhhhh
[04:31] <RikMills> some not in main IIRC
[04:32] <vorlon> so if lintian had migrated, this would've been visible to germinate
[04:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libclass-xsaccessor-perl to i386-whitelist in focal
[05:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libdigest-sha-perl to i386-whitelist in focal
[05:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added python-etcd to i386-whitelist in focal
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pyface [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [6.1.2-1] (no packageset)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: povray [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1:3.7.0.8-3] (no packageset)
[09:07] <RikMills> kconfig built!
[09:54] <RikMills> looks like changes to seeds is not getting copied to https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/seeds/
[12:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted insighttoolkit4 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [4.13.2-dfsg1-4ubuntu1]
[12:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pyface [amd64] (focal-proposed) [6.1.2-1]
[12:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted povray [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1:3.7.0.8-3]
[13:04] <RikMills> the libgdk-pixbuf2.0-common 2.40.0+dfsg-1ubuntu1 binaries say they have been deleted, while the rest of that ubuntu1 in proposed still exists?
[13:05] <RikMills> which makes ultimately libgtk-3-dev and friends uninstallable in proposed
[13:06] <RikMills> friends = all gtk3 stuff
[13:09] <RikMills> Deleted 7 hours ago by Steve Langasek
[13:09] <RikMills> Hack around gdk-pixbuf circular build-dep
[13:10] <RikMills> something else in play then :)
[13:15] <doko> vorlon: not directly, http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/b/binutils/focal/i386 might be related, so lsb-release isn't installable
[17:24] <vorlon> RikMills: because gdk-pixbuf has a circular build-dependency, and the fact that the arm builds were behind and missed building during the same publishing window made them ftbfs, and then the arm builders were badly backlogged. :P
[17:24] <vorlon> I've done the self-copy back to focal-proposed now
[17:26] <RikMills> ah, good. I didn't doubt there was a good reason. it just looked very strange at 1st!
[17:26] <vorlon> doko: the uninstallables I was asking about were all on amd64
[17:54] <vorlon> doko: could you omit the gccbrig-* packages on i386?  they build but are uninstallable because they require libhsail-rt-9-dev which we have no reason to provide
[18:07] <vorlon> RikMills: gdk-pixbuf is republished, so if there's anything you have in -proposed that ftbfs because of the uninstallability you can retry it now
[18:07] <RikMills> vorlon: thanks!
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pmemkv [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[20:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (eoan-proposed/main) [1.440 => 1.440.1] (core)
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pbcore [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.1+git20191121.7947eb7+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)