[07:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: fsspec (focal-proposed/primary) [0.6.1-0.1]
[07:34] <LocutusOfBorg> ^^ this one overrides python-fsspec, with the Debian updated package
[07:34] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, ^^
[08:05] <handsome_feng[m]> LocutusOfBorg, thanks!
[08:48] <rbalint> sil2100, i've a few related fixes for eoan, could you please accept them in your sru cycle?  pam, update-notifier, ubuntu-release-upgrader, base-files, update-motd, ubuntu-meta
[09:21] <RikMills> morning. seed changes in git/bzr are not propogating to https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/seeds/
[09:24] <RikMills> for example, changes made over the weekend in ubuntu.focal/wsl and kubuntu.focal/
[09:24]  * RikMills is never sure quite who to ping on these things
[09:25] <apw> there are few who know how that is all plumbed in that is for sure
[09:27] <apw> RikMills, ok interesting it looks to have hung at the same time i had a hang in my tooling (which also talks to launchpad)
[09:31] <apw> RikMills, is that any better
[09:34] <RikMills> apw: not yet. not sure if the update is trigger on a seed git/bzr change, or just a cron type thing to be honest
[09:34] <apw> RikMills, the ubuntu.focal/wsl file seems to have changed today
[09:34] <apw> (now)
[09:35] <apw> wsl 2019-12-09 09:30 728
[09:35] <RikMills> yeah, just did right on my next refresh
[09:35] <RikMills> kubuntu is still lagging, bit will give it a little time
[09:36] <apw> RikMills, i'd say the sync is complete, so if it is not in sync now it isn't going to get more so
[09:37] <sil2100> rbalint: will see if I get to those
[09:38] <RikMills> apw: :(
[09:46] <RikMills> apw: I made another small change (added back a comment I was going to put back anyway), and it updated then :)
[09:46] <RikMills> thank you
[09:52] <apw> RikMills, no that updated because i updated it by hand
[09:53] <RikMills> oh :/
[09:57] <apw> RikMills, still debugging it
[10:03] <apw> not sure who added the cowboy to archive-reports, but it is catching something and reporting it in mail
[10:36] <apw> RikMills, ok with some debugging added it seems it was a lost bzr lock; yay for seeds still in bzr; should be updating more normally now.
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fsspec [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.6.1-0.1]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pbcore [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.7.1+git20191121.7947eb7+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pmemkv [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[10:41] <RikMills> apw: thank you!
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fsspec [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.6.1-0.1] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nexus [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.4.3-2] (no packageset)
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jsonld-java [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.13.0-2] (no packageset)
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nexus [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.4.3-2] (no packageset)
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nexus [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.4.3-2] (no packageset)
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nexus [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.4.3-2] (no packageset)
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nexus [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.4.3-2] (no packageset)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fsspec [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.6.1-0.1]
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nexus [amd64] (focal-proposed) [4.4.3-2]
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nexus [armhf] (focal-proposed) [4.4.3-2]
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nexus [s390x] (focal-proposed) [4.4.3-2]
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jsonld-java [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.13.0-2]
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nexus [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [4.4.3-2]
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nexus [arm64] (focal-proposed) [4.4.3-2]
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hinge [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.5.0-5] (no packageset)
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hinge [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.5.0-5] (no packageset)
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hinge [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.5.0-5] (no packageset)
[11:27] <tjaalton> xorg-server is blocked on libdmx1 not being available for i386, so should it be added to the whitelist?
[11:28] <tjaalton> or drop xdmx-tools from i386?
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: thrift [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.13.0-2] (no packageset)
[11:30] <doko> I would be in favor of adding it, instead of adding deltas for such things to the packages
[11:31] <tjaalton> right
[11:31] <doko> vorlon: I don't see why libhsail-rt-9-dev is uninstallable ...
[11:32] <sil2100> seb128: hey! Since I see oSoMoN is not online, I have a question regarding the thunderbird upload to eoan, maybe you know: the previous update went into -security, should this one be targetting -security as well?
[11:33] <sil2100> seb128: I mean, the bug number mentions some upgrade issues, so this seems like something that would be useful for people fetching/upgrading thunderbird from -security as well?
[11:33] <seb128> sil2100, hey, I don't know sorry. Olivier was not feeling well this morning but he might be back online later, other maybe try to chec with chrisccoulson he might know
[11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: thrift [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.13.0-2] (no packageset)
[11:35] <sil2100> seb128: ok, will do, thanks o/
[11:36] <seb128> yw!
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: thrift [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.13.0-2] (no packageset)
[11:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1050.53] (no packageset)
[11:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1050.53]
[11:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: thunar (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.15-0ubuntu1 => 1.6.15-0ubuntu1.18.04.1] (mythbuntu, xubuntu)
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: thrift [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.13.0-2] (no packageset)
[12:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: thrift [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.13.0-2] (no packageset)
[12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hinge [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.5.0-5]
[12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hinge [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.5.0-5]
[12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted thrift [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.13.0-2]
[12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted thrift [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.13.0-2]
[12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hinge [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.5.0-5]
[12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted thrift [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.13.0-2]
[12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted thrift [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.13.0-2]
[12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted thrift [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.13.0-2]
[12:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: pyfftw (focal-proposed/primary) [0.11.1-3ubuntu2]
[12:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyfftw [source] (focal-proposed) [0.11.1-3ubuntu2]
[13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyfftw [s390x] (focal-proposed/none) [0.11.1-3ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyfftw [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.1-3ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyfftw [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.11.1-3ubuntu2]
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyfftw [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.11.1-3ubuntu2]
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyfftw [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.1-3ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[15:20] <sil2100> rbalint: hey, so looking at update-motd - the bug is missing a test case and regression potential
[15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyfftw [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.11.1-3ubuntu2]
[15:38] <sil2100> rbalint: hm, the update-notifier SRU has a lot of unrelated changes regarding the Makefile's etc. being generated by an older automake (was by 1.16.1 and 1.15.1), this makes it quite hard to review
[15:40] <rbalint> sil2100, yes, this is a consequence of having the obsolete prebuild directive, should i rebuild the source to cut those changes off?
[15:41] <rbalint> sil2100, looking at update-motd
[15:47] <sil2100> rbalint: yeah, if you could, since this way the diff is unnecessarily bloated
[15:47] <rbalint> sil2100, i've finished the update-motd sru template
[15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (eoan-proposed/main) [3.192.26 => 3.192.26.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[15:53] <sil2100> rbalint: hm, for u-r-u, the demotion list is very suspicious - I had that once already, but Steve and Adam told me that usually after release the demotion lists should not be modified
[15:53] <sil2100> rbalint: so last time I had an update like that, Steve reverted the changes with the next upload
[15:55] <sil2100> rbalint: I rejected it for now, we'd need this re-uploaded without the demoted.cfg changes etc.
[15:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:19.10.15.4]
[15:55] <sil2100> rbalint: looking at update-motd again, thanks o/
[15:56] <sil2100> rbalint: (you can see almost the same demotions changes in my upload http://launchpadlibrarian.net/446106940/ubuntu-release-upgrader_1%3A19.10.13_1%3A19.10.14.diff.gz and as said, .15 reverted those back to the state it's in now)
[15:56] <rbalint> sil2100, re: demotion changes: makes sense
[15:56] <sil2100> I think the tooling is just a bit stupid there
[15:58] <vorlon> doko: ah, libhsail-rt-9-dev isn't uninstallable.  so it's something else
[15:59] <doko> it's gccbrig-N, so added hsail-tools to the whitelist
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-motd [source] (eoan-proposed) [3.6-0ubuntu1.19.10.0]
[16:01] <doko> vorlon: and all the dbg packages are removed in focal
[16:02] <vorlon> doko: why are you adding hsail-tools to the whitelist?
[16:03] <doko> vorlon: why do you want to modify packages to fit the whitelist?
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: update-motd [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [3.6-0ubuntu1.19.10.0] (core)
[16:03] <vorlon> because we want to reduce what we have to support on i386.  Do you want to debug i386+hsail-specific problems?
[16:04] <doko> did you see any specifc i386+hsail-specific problems? no? then please keep it
[16:04] <doko> a related question came up with xorg-server, see above
[16:07] <vorlon> doko: infinity and I had talked about this here over the weekend; I don't think we should be adding things to the whitelist to satisfy binary deps of packages built from sources we need, I think we should prune the binaries
[16:08] <doko> introducing deltas for all these packages? I don't think it's worth it
[16:09] <vorlon> I'll work up an implementation that's upstreamable
[16:09] <vorlon> I agree we don't want deltas on all of them
[16:10] <doko> and I don't want to cripple the gcc-N package to c/c++ only
[16:11] <rbalint> i don't think this is worth spening time on but it is not up to me
[16:11] <doko> well, it will be time on you, if you have to merge those packages
[16:11] <vorlon> doko: the 32-bit host toolchain is *only* in the archive for purpose of building the packages in the whitelist
[16:12] <doko> you don't gain anything by this
[16:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-notifier [source] (eoan-proposed) [3.192.26.1]
[16:13] <rbalint> i mean the decision is not up to me
[16:13] <doko> well, we could bring it up to the tb
[16:27] <sil2100> rbalint: uh, is it normal that now all the automake bits are gone from update-notifier?
[16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-meta [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.440.1]
[16:34] <rbalint> sil2100, :-\ let me keep them intact
[16:37] <sil2100> I mean, I guess hm, we could remove them if they're generated during build, but for SRUs it's best if unneeded changes are at a minimum
[16:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (eoan-proposed/main) [1:19.10.15.3 => 1:19.10.15.4] (core)
[16:59] <rbalint> sil2100, ^
[16:59] <rbalint> sil2100, since I changed Makefile.am in update-notifier i need to regenerate Makefile.in, but i do it in eoan in the next upload
[17:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:19.10.15.4]
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (eoan-proposed/main) [3.192.26 => 3.192.26.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[17:16] <rbalint> sil2100, thanks, the hopefully last one ^ :-)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-nxs [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [4.4.1-2] (no packageset)
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-notifier [source] (eoan-proposed) [3.192.26.1]
[17:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (eoan-proposed) [3.192.26.1]
[19:39] <slashd> vorlon or any release team member, could you please unblock my sosreport upload in focal for i386 adt: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/sosreport/focal/i386
[19:43] <vorlon> slashd: done
[19:48] <slashd> vorlon, thanks
[19:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: designate-dashboard (bionic-proposed/universe) [6.0.0-0ubuntu1.1 => 6.0.0-0ubuntu1.2] (no packageset)
[20:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-nxs [amd64] (focal-proposed) [4.4.1-2]
[20:16] <xnox> vorlon:  pgl-ddl-deploy is triggered by autopkgtest on i386
[20:16] <xnox> i don't understand how or why, what do i do? it failed.
[20:17] <xnox> it doesn't exist on i386 at all
[20:17] <xnox> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#pgl-ddl-deploy
[20:20] <xnox> dunno https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/britney/hints-pgl-ddl-deploy/+merge/376538
[20:20] <xnox> but imho that should not have been requested, should it have?
[20:25] <vorlon> xnox: it /shouldn't/ have, but there's some bug I have not dug into with britney where it requests tests on architectures for which the binaries have recently been deleted
[20:26] <vorlon> so we have to badtest it, and then remove the badtest :P
[20:26] <xnox> fun
[20:26] <xnox> vorlon: please make it so
[20:26] <xnox> because we didn't purge the britney cache?
[20:26] <xnox> it doesn't use like real things between the runs
[20:26] <vorlon> I have no idea, I have not dug into it
[20:27] <vorlon> I know the shape of the bug based on the symptoms
[20:29] <vorlon> xnox: I'm rejecting your mp because I have a section in the file for the i386-related hints where I'm keeping them all together
[20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.208.18]
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: php-mikey179-vfsstream [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.6.7-1] (no packageset)
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: php-psr-event-dispatcher [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: php-parsedown [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.3-1] (no packageset)
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-dlt [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: php-httpful [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2.20-1] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: php-php-mongodb [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4.3-1] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: php-lorenzo-pinky [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.5-1] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: php-tijsverkoyen-css-to-inline-styles [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.2.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: starpu [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: starpu [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: starpu-contrib [amd64] (focal-proposed/multiverse) [1.3.3+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: starpu [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: starpu-contrib [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/multiverse) [1.3.3+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: starpu [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: starpu [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.3+dfsg-2] (no packageset)