[00:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-ldap (bionic-proposed/main) [3.0.0-1 => 3.0.0-1ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[00:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-ldap (disco-proposed/main) [3.1.0-2build1 => 3.1.0-2ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-server)
[00:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-ldap (eoan-proposed/main) [3.1.0-2build1 => 3.1.0-2ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-server)
[01:26] <ginggs> libassuan's autopkgtest seems to have regressed in -release on amd64, the test uses wine
[01:26] <ginggs> /usr/bin/i686-w64-mingw32-ld: /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/lib/libgpg-error.a: error adding symbols: file format not recognized
[05:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libprelude to i386-whitelist in focal
[06:45] <vorlon> xnox: so if you want a puzzle, why is libprelude not being picked up in the seed
[07:08] <tjaalton> could someone decide what to do with libdmx & i386?
[07:13] <vorlon> tjaalton: what do you mean?  it's removed on i386
[07:14] <vorlon> oh, xdmx-tools is looking for it
[07:14] <tjaalton> vorlon: which blocks xorg-server from migrating.. right
[07:14] <vorlon> tjaalton: so, we should skip building xdmx-tools on i386; see the recent carla upload for an example Ubuntu-specific exclusion
[07:14] <tjaalton> ok, thanks
[07:16] <tjaalton> ah, well.. since there's a delta anyway, it could be simply done in d/control too
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wslu (xenial-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu2~16.04.1 => 2.3.2-0ubuntu2~16.04.2] (no packageset)
[08:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wslu (bionic-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu2~18.04.1 => 2.3.2-0ubuntu2~18.04.2] (no packageset)
[08:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wslu (disco-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu2~19.04.1 => 2.3.2-0ubuntu2~19.04.2] (core)
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wslu (bionic-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu2~18.04.1 => 2.3.2-0ubuntu2~19.10.2] (no packageset)
[08:16] <rbalint> rbasak, ^ please revert that latter two ^
[08:17] <rbalint> rbasak, i mean reject the last one
[08:18] <rbalint> rbasak, and please accept the rest for the revert, please see the conversation with RAOF on the details
[08:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wslu (eoan-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu2~19.10.1 => 2.3.2-0ubuntu2~19.10.2] (core)
[08:46] <rbasak> rbalint: o/ sorry, I'm not clear on which to reject
[08:46] <rbasak> rbalint: everything except the last uploads of wslu to the Xenial and DIsco queues?
[08:48] <rbalint> rbasak, please reject the bionic-proposed/main 2.3.2-0ubuntu2~19.10.2 ,  which had wrong target
[08:49] <rbalint> rbasak, the rest seems ok
[08:50] <rbasak> ack
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected wslu [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu2~19.10.2]
[09:02] <Laney> vorlon: there's a db-update-current-versions script (or similarly named)
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-1008.9]
[09:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-25.27~18.04.1]
[09:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-25.27~18.04.1]
[09:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-25.27~18.04.1]
[09:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1008.9~18.04.1]
[10:47] <tjaalton> vorlon: actually, what's needed from xorg-server on i386? maybe it can be dropped completely..
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (disco-proposed/main) [13.2.6-0ubuntu0.19.04.4 => 13.2.7-0ubuntu0.19.04.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sunpinyin [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.0.0~rc1+ds1-3] (input-methods, ubuntu-budgie, ubuntukylin)
[12:41]  * xnox wonders if xorg should be in B-D-I.... tjaalton vorlon
[12:42] <tjaalton> xnox: what's B-D-I?
[12:43] <xnox> Build-Depends-Indep => meaning non-arch specific build-dependencies
[12:44] <xnox> i.e. if xorg is only used to run tests under like whatever that fake command to give X was, then it doesn't need to be an :i386 one, it could be an :amd64 one
[12:44] <xnox> meaning it and all of its build-dependencies are not needed in the i386 archive
[12:44] <xnox> or like change the dep to :any, meaning i don't care which arch xorg is installed
[12:46] <tjaalton> ok, so if tests are run on amd64, then i386 doesn't need anything from src:xorg-server (see above)
[12:46] <tjaalton> because missing build-depends there means it would need to be configured differently than everything else
[12:46] <tjaalton> and it'd become a mess
[13:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysdig (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.19.1-1ubuntu1.1 => 0.24.1-1ubuntu3~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[13:53] <xnox> hmmm
[13:54] <xnox> tjaalton:  so it looks like a few things want x11-common which is arch:all
[13:54] <xnox> and like two things want xserver-xorg
[13:54] <xnox> and i'm not sure why that is in
[13:55] <xnox> ah and keyboards-rg is arch:all too
[13:56] <xnox> vorlon:  i think we can kill xorg on i386
[13:56] <xnox> but not sure
[13:57] <tjaalton> I'd like to kill xorg-server
[13:57] <tjaalton> wouldn't mind killing both
[14:26] <tjaalton> klebers: what should I put in kernel-series? add 'linux-oem-5.4', or modify existing linux-oem?
[14:26] <tjaalton> uh
[14:26] <tjaalton> wrong channel :)
[14:26] <klebers> :D
[14:59] <rbalint> rbasak, do you think we can do the wslu reverts today?
[15:13] <rbasak> rbalint: sorry, I got stuck down a rabbit hole. Looking now.
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wslu [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu2~16.04.2]
[15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wslu [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu2~18.04.2]
[15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wslu [source] (disco-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu2~19.04.2]
[15:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wslu [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu2~19.10.2]
[16:18] <rbalint> rbasak, so how this goes with the reverts, should i verify the regression bug or it gets released since it is matching the version before the regressing one
[16:18] <rbalint> rbasak, the verification instructions in the regression bug are for the proper fix, not the revert
[16:19] <rbasak> rbalint: I don't think there is any specific rule here, so whatever we think is reasonable.
[16:19] <rbasak> rbalint: as we're trying to fix the regression, maybe we should verify that the regression is actually resolved in proposed before publishing?
[16:20] <rbasak> rbalint: and I usually prefer to have a confirmation that the rebuilt package actually works
[16:21] <rbalint> rbasak, ack, that's fair
[16:21] <rbalint> rbasak, will do the testing a bit later
[16:22] <rbasak> Thanks!
[16:23] <rbalint> sil2100, i see no binaries for update-motd on eoan/update_excuses.html possibly because show-motd is new binary, could you please accept it to the archive?
[16:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: open-vm-tools (disco-proposed/main) [2:11.0.1-2ubuntu0.19.04.1 => 2:11.0.1-2ubuntu0.19.04.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[16:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: open-vm-tools (eoan-proposed/main) [2:11.0.1-2ubuntu0.19.10.1 => 2:11.0.1-2ubuntu0.19.10.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[16:30] <sil2100> rbalint: ah, indeed, looking
[16:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: open-vm-tools (bionic-proposed/main) [2:11.0.1-2ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 2:11.0.1-2ubuntu0.18.04.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted update-motd [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [3.6-0ubuntu1.19.10.0]
[16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted update-motd [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [3.6-0ubuntu1.19.10.1]
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnuastro [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11-1] (no packageset)
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnuastro [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11-1] (no packageset)
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnuastro [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11-1] (no packageset)
[17:29] <rbalint> rbasak, thanks, the reverts work ok, like before, please release them
[17:30] <rbasak> rbalint: sure, but could you document what you did and found in the bug please, so others can follow too?
[17:30] <rbasak> rbalint: doesn't have to be in massive detail or anything, just a summary of what you tested and what the results were
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnuastro [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11-1] (no packageset)
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnuastro [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11-1] (no packageset)
[17:37] <rbalint> rbasak, done!
[17:40]  * rbasak released, thanks!
[17:40] <rbasak> Uh
[17:40] <rbasak> rbalint: released, thanks!
[17:42] <rbalint> rbasak, :-)
[17:49] <rbalint> vorlon, could you please merge https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/376646 ?
[17:59] <vorlon> rbalint: no, because I just hinted that elsewhere in the file in response to seb128's request (also, it's not true that this is "fixed in -proposed")
[18:04] <rbalint> vorlon, ah, thanks my copy was outdated
[18:15] <vorlon> now trying to figure out based on the shape of the fpc tests if fpc is worth keeping on i386 at all, or if it's impossible to install an actual working compiler that uses the i386 bits
[18:16] <vorlon> you do have to uninstall binutils:amd64 to install fpc-compiler:i386
[18:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-8.11] (core, kernel)
[18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-8.11] (core, kernel)
[18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-8.11] (core, kernel)
[18:42] <vorlon> xnox, tjaalton: so if you want to kill xorg* on i386, make the changes to the revdeps so it can actually be killed :)
[18:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-8.11] (core, kernel)
[18:45] <tjaalton> vorlon: yeah, I'll check those tomorrow
[18:46] <tjaalton> but.. how do I know which ones are still built for i386?
[18:47] <vorlon> tjaalton: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/i386.focal/i386+build-depends.sources
[18:47] <tjaalton> cool, thanks
[18:47] <vorlon> you'd probably want to cross-correlate between that and an archive search on reverse-build-depends, since https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/i386.focal/i386+build-depends will only report the first reverse-dependency
[18:48] <tjaalton> yeah
[19:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: util-linux (eoan-proposed/main) [2.34-0.1ubuntu2 => 2.34-0.1ubuntu2.1] (core)
[20:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wslu (bionic-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu2~18.04.2 => 2.3.2-0ubuntu2~18.04.3] (no packageset)
[20:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wslu (xenial-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu2~16.04.2 => 2.3.2-0ubuntu2~16.04.3] (no packageset)
[20:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wslu (disco-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu2~19.04.2 => 2.3.2-0ubuntu2~19.04.3] (core)
[20:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wslu (eoan-proposed/main) [2.3.2-0ubuntu2~19.10.2 => 2.3.2-0ubuntu2~19.10.3] (core)
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnuastro [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.11-1]
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnuastro [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.11-1]
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-mongo-php-adapter [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.1.11-1]
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sunpinyin [amd64] (focal-proposed) [3.0.0~rc1+ds1-3]
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnuastro [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.11-1]
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prospector [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.1.7-1]
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnuastro [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.11-1]
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnuastro [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.11-1]
[21:27] <rbalint> bdmurray, ^ please check the wlsu uploads, it would be nice to have the proper fixes accepted now after the quick reverts are done
[23:01] <vorlon> ignoring test failures from dpdk on i386
[23:01] <vorlon> you're all disappointed