[11:49] Qt 5.14 is out [11:51] https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-5.14-has-released [11:56] I think we ignore it for 20.04? [12:11] @mitya57 [I think we ignore it for 20.04?], Do you think 5.14 would be supportable for a LTS? All we know is 5.14.1 is scheduled for 'Jan 2020' [12:12] I am fine with it. I thought you said 5.12 is preferred for KDE/Plasma? [12:15] @mitya57 [I am fine with it. I thought you said 5.12 is preferred for KDE/Plasma?], No, not prefered upstream. … The benefit of 5.12 would be matureness and LTS status. … Downside is maybe not much more maintenance, and limited ability to backport plasma/kde things, as they will soon start to use features from Qt newer than 5.12 [12:15] Ok. Then let's update to 5.14. I won't have time until Jan 2020 anyway, so I propose to skip .0 and update to 5.14.1 when it's released. [12:17] Well, lets decide it is a posibility, and re-evaluate then. Hopefully there will have been distros taking the leap by then to test it out, and a more detailed proposed schedule [12:17] @tsimonq2 Do you have an opinion? [12:45] 5.15 has to be a LTS. Maybe early release of 5.15 and then an upgrade? [12:45] We can't upgrade in stable releases. [12:45] As even minor releases break private ABI. [13:35] Yeah, 5.15 is way too late [13:36] As usual [13:38] @RikMills [@tsimonq2 Do you have an opinion?], I would rather we stay on 5.12 and backport fixes as needed. [14:49] @tsimonq2 [I would rather we stay on 5.12 and backport fixes as needed.], Is that a hard no, or still open to the possibility? [14:54] @RikMills [Is that a hard no/veto, or still open to the possibility?], Still open to the possibility [14:55] @tsimonq2 [Still open to the possibility], Ok, we do not have enought info IMO right now, so lets see what we think in the new year, when things may be clearer. [15:03] @RikMills [Ok, we do not have enought info IMO right now, so lets see what we think in the …], Okay