/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2019/12/12/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 101 entries have been added or removed06:03
cpaelzervorlon: I'm not disappointed, but want to make sure: this is just i386 removal or would you want/need something changed in DPDK for this?06:43
vorloncpaelzer: just i386 removal07:17
=== andrewc is now known as Guest19848
rbalintsil2100, could you please accept wslu srus?08:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-8.11]08:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-8.11]08:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-8.11]08:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-8.11]08:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: landscape-client (eoan-proposed/main) [18.01-0ubuntu9 => 18.01-0ubuntu9.1] (ubuntu-server)09:01
seb128hey there09:20
seb128SRU team, we would like https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/1:8.0-0ubuntu3.11 to be pulled out of xenial-updates due to bug #185605409:20
ubot5bug 1856054 in pulseaudio (Ubuntu) "pulseaudio now depends on libsnapd-glib1 which recommends snapd" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185605409:20
seb128rbasak, tjaalton, sil2100, ^ can one of you help with that?09:21
seb128popey, ^ fyi09:21
tjaaltonxenial-updates?09:21
seb128yes09:22
seb128it builds with libsnapd-glib now09:22
tjaaltonI don't think we have power to do that09:22
tjaaltonthe bug mentions bionic09:22
rbasakYeah I was about to say09:22
seb128right, but that impacts xenial as well09:22
rbasakNeed an AA to pull it09:22
rbasakSRU team can only accept something on top I believe09:23
seb128I'm AA and can delete09:23
seb128so should I just go ahead and delete from updates?09:23
seb128unsure what's the process there09:23
rbasak+1 wearing my SRU hat to treat it as a regression and in principle pull it09:23
seb128rbasak, tjaalton, the problem is that libsnapd-glib which got added as a depends is a small glue lib, but it Recommends snapd09:23
rbasakAs I assume it was an unintended consequence?09:24
seb128rbasak, tjaalton, it's less an issue on bionic since we do install snapd by default there09:24
seb128indeed09:24
tjaaltonok09:24
seb128people who did the SRU didn't take into account that not everyone is using snapd09:24
seb128especially not on xenial09:24
tjaaltonwas just going to ask why it's an issue because it's not clear from the bug09:24
tjaaltonlol ;)09:24
seb128it basically means any xenial user having pulseaudio is going to have snapd pulled in09:25
seb128which is probably going to annoy a lot of people09:25
rbasakseb128: I think you should delete it from updates assuming it hasn't been there very long09:25
tjaaltonyes, go for ti09:25
tjaaltonit09:25
seb128rbasak, tjaalton, thanks09:25
rbasakseb128: but we need to upload a replacement soon to avoid confusion with people having an unpublished version installed09:25
seb128I wonder if we should delete from bionic as well?09:25
seb128right09:25
sil2100seb128: +1 from me as well, the procedures are generally: remove the version from -updates, and copy-package the previous version so that it's re-published, and then quickly look for a revert/fix09:25
seb128or restore that one once we have fixed snapd-glib to lower the Recommends to a Suggests09:26
rbasakIf the effect is the same, then we should do the same thing on all affected supported releases09:26
seb128well, bionic has snapd installed by default on Ubuntu Desktop at least09:26
seb128but it's still going to pull snapd for e.g xubuntu users who might not want it09:26
rbasakThere are also a contingent of users who deliberately remove snapd on installation09:26
RikMillsshould that lib really be recommending?09:27
rbasakI wouldn't say that we "support" that, but if we reinstante snapd as an unintended consequence, rather than a deliberate choice, then I think that's something we should accept as a regression and pull it for the benefit of that contingent too.09:27
LaneyThat's probably the fix, but in the interim it's correct to remove the SRUs09:27
seb128k, SRU deleted from now, I'm going to republish the old one to updates09:35
seb128the new one is in proposed09:36
seb128we need to fix snapd-glib to lower the recommends to a suggest then we can restore the pulseaudio one09:36
seb128thanks rbasak tjaalton sil210009:36
seb128popey, ^09:36
popeyNice one, thanks.09:37
seb128popey, thx for pointing it out!09:37
popeynp09:41
popeysomeone lobbed an angry youtube video my way. i will thank them :)09:41
Laneyhahah09:42
Laneysincerely, outraged of youtube09:42
popey"sincerely". This is a new alternate universe youtube I would quite like.09:43
RikMillspopey: the video by 'Learn Linux'?09:49
popeyyes09:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (xenial-updates/main) [1:8.0-0ubuntu3.11 => 1:8.0-0ubuntu3.10] (core) (sync)09:50
RikMillsok, I commented with the bug link09:50
popeyas did i09:50
RikMills:D09:50
seb128rbasak, tjaalton, ^ I copied back the previous version but it hit unapproved, should I just accept it from there?09:58
tjaaltonfine by me09:59
rbasak+109:59
seb128thx10:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zinnia [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.06-5ubuntu1] (input-methods)10:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (bionic-updates/main) [1:11.1-1ubuntu7.5 => 1:11.1-1ubuntu7.4] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) (sync)10:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zinnia [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.06-5ubuntu1] (input-methods)10:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zinnia [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.06-5ubuntu1] (input-methods)10:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zinnia [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.06-5ubuntu1] (input-methods)10:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zinnia [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.06-5ubuntu1] (input-methods)10:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pulseaudio [sync] (bionic-updates) [1:11.1-1ubuntu7.4]10:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pulseaudio [sync] (xenial-updates) [1:8.0-0ubuntu3.10]10:02
rbasaksil2100: I'm just reviewing open-vm-tools in the SRU queues now - carry over from yesterday10:20
sil2100rbasak: thanks for the heads up, I didn't start my SRU shift yet if anything anyway10:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-vm-tools [source] (eoan-proposed) [2:11.0.1-2ubuntu0.19.10.2]10:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-vm-tools [source] (disco-proposed) [2:11.0.1-2ubuntu0.19.04.2]10:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-vm-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:11.0.1-2ubuntu0.18.04.2]10:44
cpaelzerthanks rbasak10:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zinnia [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.06-5ubuntu1]11:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zinnia [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.06-5ubuntu1]11:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zinnia [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.06-5ubuntu1]11:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zinnia [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.06-5ubuntu1]11:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zinnia [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.06-5ubuntu1]11:07
cjwatsonI fixed https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu.focal/ to run on amd64 as of the last run; that was the clear intent of the code vorlon wrote in update-germinate, but there was a bug that meant it was still running for i38612:10
cjwatson(Similarly the other *.focal other than i386.focal)12:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: valgrind (bionic-proposed/main) [1:3.13.0-2ubuntu2.1 => 1:3.13.0-2ubuntu2.2] (ubuntu-desktop)13:02
slashdsil2100, could you please accept this 'valgrind' ^ upload if your time permit today ? Thanks in advance13:33
rbalintsil2100, could you also please check landscape-client for eoan?13:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (bionic-proposed/main) [1.173.13 => 1.173.14] (core, kernel)14:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (disco-proposed/main) [1.178.6 => 1.178.7] (core, kernel)14:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (eoan-proposed/main) [1.183.2 => 1.183.3] (core, kernel)14:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xen (disco-proposed/main) [4.9.2-0ubuntu2 => 4.9.2-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server, virt)14:17
slashdrbalint: as an fyi simpoir and I are currently working at bumping lds-client on eoan to 19.1214:28
slashddoes your fix included in 19.12 release ?14:29
slashdrbalint, would you be okay if we add your fix on top of 19.12 (If not already there ?) instead ?14:32
jdstrandsil2100: hey do you know who did this: 03:50 -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (xenial-updates/main) [1:8.0-0ubuntu3.11 => 1:8.0-0ubuntu3.10] (core) (sync)14:34
jdstrandsil2100: and this: 04:01 -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (bionic-updates/main) [1:11.1-1ubuntu7.5 => 1:11.1-1ubuntu7.4] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) (sync)14:35
sil2100jdstrand: hey! I think it was seb128, an emergency update pull as it was causing some regressions for users14:35
sil2100Pulling in snapd via a recommends chain I guess14:35
jdstrandsil2100: notice, whoever did that downgraded pulseaudio from an accepted SRU14:35
jdstrandhttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+publishinghistory14:35
sil2100jdstrand: yes, it's an intentional downgrade14:36
jdstrandwhat was the issue?14:36
jdstrandthis broke snapd tests (cc mborzecki)14:36
jdstrandok, I see backscroll14:37
sil2100jdstrand: I think they're working on pushing a new, fixed version14:38
jdstrandseb128: are you using a new bug to track the pulseaudio issue or are you going to move https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1781428 back to Fix Committed? It is currently Fix Released, which is wrong with the revert14:46
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1781428 in pulseaudio (Ubuntu Bionic) "please enable snap mediation support" [Medium,Fix released]14:46
jdstrandseb128: also, when do you expect the updated pulseaudio to land? I'm guessing this is a new full SRU cycle so not until after the new year?14:49
seb128jdstrand, hey, @bug should be set back to fix commited indeed14:52
seb128jdstrand, I think we just need to make snapd-glib lower its recommends to a suggest, that can probably be done today/tomorrow and might not need a full week staging since it's just a packaging change, but that's up to the SRU team to decide14:53
seb128it should be fine to aim for after the w.e moving back to updates imho, but again it's a SRU team call14:54
jdstrandseb128: ok, I'll adjust the bug and make a comment. is there a snapd-glib bug?14:58
seb128jdstrand, bug #185605414:59
ubot5bug 1856054 in pulseaudio (Ubuntu) "pulseaudio now depends on libsnapd-glib1 which recommends snapd" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185605414:59
seb128kenvandine seems to be on it15:00
kenvandineseb128: yeah, jamesh is going to talk to robert then prepare an upload15:02
seb128kenvandine, jdstrand, I opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd-glib/+bug/1856196 for the SRU with testcase, etc. Going to be easier than conflicting problems on the same reports15:04
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1856196 in snapd-glib (Ubuntu) "Lower the snapd recommends to a suggests" [Undecided,New]15:04
kenvandineseb128: thanks15:04
seb128kenvandine, it's a simple s/Recommends/Suggests afaik, you could probably just do that change and upload today if we want to aim at getting the SRU back in before holidays15:04
jdstrandseb128: sure the snapd-glib bug being separate is fine. fyi, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1781428/comments/2115:05
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1781428 in pulseaudio (Ubuntu Bionic) "please enable snap mediation support" [Medium,Fix committed]15:05
tjaaltonvorlon: could i386 builds use the nocheck profile? that would get rid of the build-depends on xvfb (and xauth)15:06
seb128jdstrand, ack, it's a bit unfortunate that the test can't adapt/check the capability. Does it mean the tests need to hardcode the environment they are used on? e.g they will fail on other distributions?15:11
jdstrandseb128: the test is specifically meant to catch if the mediation patches are dropped in Ubuntu15:13
jdstrandseb128: they are working as designed15:13
jdstrandthe test is run on other distros (but could if other distros picked up the patch)15:14
jdstrandstepping into a meeting15:14
seb128jdstrand, k, it seems a bit unfortunate that the test is another component and not in pulseaudio then :/15:14
jdstrandseb128: there are all kinds of functional tests in snapd15:15
jdstrandanyway...15:15
seb128jdstrand, right, thanks for the headsup and enjoy the meeting!15:15
jdstrandthanks!15:16
tjaaltonvorlon: there are 28 packages that build-depend on xvfb, and four of them don't support nocheck atm, but a fixed libglvnd is in experimental and I fixed libxkbcommon in git. it leaves apport and qtwebsockets-opensource-src to fix15:19
rbasakseb128: "That's only a depends change, snapd isn't going to be pulled in when installing the library anymore but that's wanted" -> are you sure that there's nothing relying on that?15:20
rbasakFor example, is there another path to get snapd installed by default where it gets installed by default?15:20
seb128kenvandine, ^ to check with robert I guess?15:22
seb128rbasak, xenial didn't even have that libary, it got added as a SRU, but yeah we should check that gnome-software (which is the only user of the lib there afaik) doesn pull snapd if/when needed15:22
kenvandineyeah, that's why i'd rather have robert in the loop15:23
kenvandineseb128: and i think neon uses snapd-glib as well15:24
kenvandinefor discover15:25
seb128kenvandine, doesn't seem to on xenial according to rdepends on my xenial system15:25
seb128but that might be an issue on bionic15:25
kenvandineyeah15:25
seb128anyway we should review how snapd gets pulled in15:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted valgrind [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.13.0-2ubuntu2.2]15:29
rbalintslashd, re: landscape-client no, the fix is not in 19.12, i cherry-picked it to focal15:56
rbalintslashd, i'd like to get this fix out before christmas, do you have a similar time-frame?15:58
slashdrbalint, I can upload 19.12 next week15:58
slashdincluding your fix15:58
slashdsimpoir, ^15:58
rbalintslashd, this sounds like getting it to release next year 6 Jan, the earliest16:00
slashdrbalint, more or less yeah, if you need it before that, feel free to pursue with your upload16:01
rbalintslashd, this is a small fix, maybe it could go out after like 5-6 days, then the 19.12 backport can enter -proposed next wednesday/thursday16:03
slashdrbalint, lgtm16:19
rbalintnow we just have to find someone to accept the small fix today sil2100 ;-)16:25
sil2100Which small fix? ;)16:26
sil2100I'm reviewing wslu for now16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wslu [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu2~19.10.3]16:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wslu [source] (disco-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu2~19.04.3]16:41
seb128can somewhat tell britney to ignore virtualbox/amd64 which is blocking libvncserver to migrate? it's a kernel/virtualbox issue, not due to the vnclib16:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wslu [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu2~18.04.3]16:43
rbalintsil2100, the landscape-client one in eoan16:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted landscape-client [source] (eoan-proposed) [18.01-0ubuntu9.1]16:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wslu [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu2~16.04.3]16:58
sforsheevorlon, LocutusOfBorg: where are we at on getting virtualbox 6.0.14-dfsg-4 to migrate for focal? We have a 5.4 kernel in -proposed now17:07
LocutusOfBorgsforshee, one single test failure18:29
LocutusOfBorgsforshee, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kopanocore18:37
LocutusOfBorgpython3 /usr/sbin/kopano-search --help --> works18:38
LocutusOfBorg /usr/sbin/kopano-search --help --> doesn't work18:38
LocutusOfBorgthis is the reason for the test failure18:38
LocutusOfBorg[pid  3172] openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sbin/ldconfig", O_RDONLY) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)18:38
LocutusOfBorgand this is what actually happens with strace18:38
LocutusOfBorgso, I don't know why python3 behaves in such way, if launched with the ./ or python3 interpreter18:39
LocutusOfBorgof course, under sbuild it fails, under pbuilder it works -.-'18:42
LocutusOfBorgunless somebody has a better idea, I don't have anything more to do for debugging18:43
vorlontjaalton: nocheck> that would not generally be correct, no18:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tomcat-native (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.21-1~18.04.1 => 1.2.21-1~18.04.1build1] (no packageset)19:06
ddstreettdaitx you're the java guy, right?  can you review this upload to make sure i got the facts right?  it's a simple no-change rebuild, but i don't have experience with tomcat or static JNI libs so would be good to confirm the explanation of why the rebuild is needed is correct19:10
ddstreetby 'this upload' i meant tomcat-native ^19:10
ddstreetfrom lp #185407219:10
ubot5Launchpad bug 1854072 in tomcat-native (Ubuntu Bionic) "tomcat-native needs recompile to use TLSv1.3 from openssl 1.1" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185407219:10
vorlonlocutus_: soooo kopanocore 8.7.0-5 introduces changes related to apparmor profiles, isn't this probably a regression caused by that?19:11
vorlonlocutus_: or possibly 8.7.0-419:12
tjaaltonvorlon: then I don't see other way than adding libdmx and libxres so xorg-server can build20:15
vorlontjaalton: that's probably the parsimonious solution right now20:18
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, you are a genius, this explains why calling with python3 works20:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.183.3]21:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (disco-proposed) [1.178.7]21:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.173.14]21:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (eoan-proposed/main) [2:20.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:20.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)21:36
dokovorlon: binutils now ftbfs on i386, same as the autopkg test. I don't like investiing time on "fixing" this in the toolchain, so please could you restore the cross compiler packages?21:46
vorlondoko: link to this build failure?22:01
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: what I don't know is why intrigieri didn't run into this in Debian22:01
vorlondoko: because the autopkgtest failure is due to failing to resolve dependencies on python3* cross-architecture, so that's not going to be the same in a ftbfs in launchpad22:03
dokohttps://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/ubuntu/toolchain/+build/1824132822:09
vorlondoko: so I see gcc-9-cross* still in the archive, which package are you missing?22:12
vorlonand gcc-defaults is certainly in the archive22:13
vorlondoko: so it's quite possible that something needs changing in the archive, but it's not obvious to me what that is, can you dig into it and let me know?22:14
dokovorlon: as I said, it's the missing cross compilers22:18
vorlonwhat cross compilers are missing?22:24
vorlonI just told you gcc-9-cross* are still in the archive22:24
vorlon"the cross compilers" is not a package name I can fix22:24
doko sbuild-build-depends-binutils-dummy : Depends: g++-aarch64-linux-gnu but it is not going to be installed22:27
doko                                       Depends: g++-arm-linux-gnueabi but it is not going to be installed22:27
doko[...]22:28
vorlon$ rmadison -s focal -a i386 g++-aarch64-linux-gnu22:28
vorlon g++-aarch64-linux-gnu | 4:9.2.1-3.1ubuntu1 | focal | i38622:28
vorlon$22:28
vorlonyour move.22:28
dokoapparently the binutils 2.33.1-5 built, so what changed after that?22:29
dokoanyway, afk now22:30
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, apparmor is not installed in debian autopkgtests?22:36
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: but somebody should have been testing while preparing the changes to the apparmor profile22:36
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: anyway, I found the answer, it's because /usr/sbin/ldconfig is a wrapper *script* in Ubuntu and not in Debian22:37
vorlonso it needs r permission on ldconfig because it's a script, and an additional x permission on ldconfig.real22:38
LocutusOfBorg  /{,usr/}sbin/ldconfig.real rx, ?22:40
vorlonPixr rather22:46
vorlon(to retain the other semantics)22:46
vorlonand I merged it all on one line with ldconfig22:46
vorlonseb128: heh I just beat you to doing https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/britney/gtk-version-updated/+merge/37673422:53
seb128vorlon, yeah, I saw, I deleted my mp when I saw the conflict markers on the generated diff :)22:53
seb128vorlon, can you review https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/britney/distroinfo-i386-badtest/+merge/376689 ?22:54
vorlonseb128: was next on my list - done (but I moved the hint up with the rest of the ones related to python modules)22:55
seb128vorlon, k, thanks!22:55
vorlonhmm you know this one might be fixable22:56
vorlonbecause the python module is arch: all22:56
vorlonthough really a better solution is to make it skippable when doing cross-testing22:57
vorlonso I'll leave it for now22:57
seb128k23:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pbcommand [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.1.1+git20191122.ec024c3-1] (no packageset)23:23

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!