-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 101 entries have been added or removed | 06:03 | |
cpaelzer | vorlon: I'm not disappointed, but want to make sure: this is just i386 removal or would you want/need something changed in DPDK for this? | 06:43 |
---|---|---|
vorlon | cpaelzer: just i386 removal | 07:17 |
=== andrewc is now known as Guest19848 | ||
rbalint | sil2100, could you please accept wslu srus? | 08:26 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-8.11] | 08:53 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-8.11] | 08:53 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-8.11] | 08:53 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-8.11] | 08:53 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: landscape-client (eoan-proposed/main) [18.01-0ubuntu9 => 18.01-0ubuntu9.1] (ubuntu-server) | 09:01 | |
seb128 | hey there | 09:20 |
seb128 | SRU team, we would like https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/1:8.0-0ubuntu3.11 to be pulled out of xenial-updates due to bug #1856054 | 09:20 |
ubot5 | bug 1856054 in pulseaudio (Ubuntu) "pulseaudio now depends on libsnapd-glib1 which recommends snapd" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1856054 | 09:20 |
seb128 | rbasak, tjaalton, sil2100, ^ can one of you help with that? | 09:21 |
seb128 | popey, ^ fyi | 09:21 |
tjaalton | xenial-updates? | 09:21 |
seb128 | yes | 09:22 |
seb128 | it builds with libsnapd-glib now | 09:22 |
tjaalton | I don't think we have power to do that | 09:22 |
tjaalton | the bug mentions bionic | 09:22 |
rbasak | Yeah I was about to say | 09:22 |
seb128 | right, but that impacts xenial as well | 09:22 |
rbasak | Need an AA to pull it | 09:22 |
rbasak | SRU team can only accept something on top I believe | 09:23 |
seb128 | I'm AA and can delete | 09:23 |
seb128 | so should I just go ahead and delete from updates? | 09:23 |
seb128 | unsure what's the process there | 09:23 |
rbasak | +1 wearing my SRU hat to treat it as a regression and in principle pull it | 09:23 |
seb128 | rbasak, tjaalton, the problem is that libsnapd-glib which got added as a depends is a small glue lib, but it Recommends snapd | 09:23 |
rbasak | As I assume it was an unintended consequence? | 09:24 |
seb128 | rbasak, tjaalton, it's less an issue on bionic since we do install snapd by default there | 09:24 |
seb128 | indeed | 09:24 |
tjaalton | ok | 09:24 |
seb128 | people who did the SRU didn't take into account that not everyone is using snapd | 09:24 |
seb128 | especially not on xenial | 09:24 |
tjaalton | was just going to ask why it's an issue because it's not clear from the bug | 09:24 |
tjaalton | lol ;) | 09:24 |
seb128 | it basically means any xenial user having pulseaudio is going to have snapd pulled in | 09:25 |
seb128 | which is probably going to annoy a lot of people | 09:25 |
rbasak | seb128: I think you should delete it from updates assuming it hasn't been there very long | 09:25 |
tjaalton | yes, go for ti | 09:25 |
tjaalton | it | 09:25 |
seb128 | rbasak, tjaalton, thanks | 09:25 |
rbasak | seb128: but we need to upload a replacement soon to avoid confusion with people having an unpublished version installed | 09:25 |
seb128 | I wonder if we should delete from bionic as well? | 09:25 |
seb128 | right | 09:25 |
sil2100 | seb128: +1 from me as well, the procedures are generally: remove the version from -updates, and copy-package the previous version so that it's re-published, and then quickly look for a revert/fix | 09:25 |
seb128 | or restore that one once we have fixed snapd-glib to lower the Recommends to a Suggests | 09:26 |
rbasak | If the effect is the same, then we should do the same thing on all affected supported releases | 09:26 |
seb128 | well, bionic has snapd installed by default on Ubuntu Desktop at least | 09:26 |
seb128 | but it's still going to pull snapd for e.g xubuntu users who might not want it | 09:26 |
rbasak | There are also a contingent of users who deliberately remove snapd on installation | 09:26 |
RikMills | should that lib really be recommending? | 09:27 |
rbasak | I wouldn't say that we "support" that, but if we reinstante snapd as an unintended consequence, rather than a deliberate choice, then I think that's something we should accept as a regression and pull it for the benefit of that contingent too. | 09:27 |
Laney | That's probably the fix, but in the interim it's correct to remove the SRUs | 09:27 |
seb128 | k, SRU deleted from now, I'm going to republish the old one to updates | 09:35 |
seb128 | the new one is in proposed | 09:36 |
seb128 | we need to fix snapd-glib to lower the recommends to a suggest then we can restore the pulseaudio one | 09:36 |
seb128 | thanks rbasak tjaalton sil2100 | 09:36 |
seb128 | popey, ^ | 09:36 |
popey | Nice one, thanks. | 09:37 |
seb128 | popey, thx for pointing it out! | 09:37 |
popey | np | 09:41 |
popey | someone lobbed an angry youtube video my way. i will thank them :) | 09:41 |
Laney | hahah | 09:42 |
Laney | sincerely, outraged of youtube | 09:42 |
popey | "sincerely". This is a new alternate universe youtube I would quite like. | 09:43 |
RikMills | popey: the video by 'Learn Linux'? | 09:49 |
popey | yes | 09:49 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (xenial-updates/main) [1:8.0-0ubuntu3.11 => 1:8.0-0ubuntu3.10] (core) (sync) | 09:50 | |
RikMills | ok, I commented with the bug link | 09:50 |
popey | as did i | 09:50 |
RikMills | :D | 09:50 |
seb128 | rbasak, tjaalton, ^ I copied back the previous version but it hit unapproved, should I just accept it from there? | 09:58 |
tjaalton | fine by me | 09:59 |
rbasak | +1 | 09:59 |
seb128 | thx | 10:00 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zinnia [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.06-5ubuntu1] (input-methods) | 10:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (bionic-updates/main) [1:11.1-1ubuntu7.5 => 1:11.1-1ubuntu7.4] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) (sync) | 10:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zinnia [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.06-5ubuntu1] (input-methods) | 10:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zinnia [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.06-5ubuntu1] (input-methods) | 10:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zinnia [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.06-5ubuntu1] (input-methods) | 10:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zinnia [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.06-5ubuntu1] (input-methods) | 10:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pulseaudio [sync] (bionic-updates) [1:11.1-1ubuntu7.4] | 10:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pulseaudio [sync] (xenial-updates) [1:8.0-0ubuntu3.10] | 10:02 | |
rbasak | sil2100: I'm just reviewing open-vm-tools in the SRU queues now - carry over from yesterday | 10:20 |
sil2100 | rbasak: thanks for the heads up, I didn't start my SRU shift yet if anything anyway | 10:32 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-vm-tools [source] (eoan-proposed) [2:11.0.1-2ubuntu0.19.10.2] | 10:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-vm-tools [source] (disco-proposed) [2:11.0.1-2ubuntu0.19.04.2] | 10:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-vm-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:11.0.1-2ubuntu0.18.04.2] | 10:44 | |
cpaelzer | thanks rbasak | 10:45 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zinnia [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.06-5ubuntu1] | 11:07 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zinnia [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.06-5ubuntu1] | 11:07 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zinnia [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.06-5ubuntu1] | 11:07 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zinnia [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.06-5ubuntu1] | 11:07 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zinnia [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.06-5ubuntu1] | 11:07 | |
cjwatson | I fixed https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu.focal/ to run on amd64 as of the last run; that was the clear intent of the code vorlon wrote in update-germinate, but there was a bug that meant it was still running for i386 | 12:10 |
cjwatson | (Similarly the other *.focal other than i386.focal) | 12:10 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: valgrind (bionic-proposed/main) [1:3.13.0-2ubuntu2.1 => 1:3.13.0-2ubuntu2.2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 13:02 | |
slashd | sil2100, could you please accept this 'valgrind' ^ upload if your time permit today ? Thanks in advance | 13:33 |
rbalint | sil2100, could you also please check landscape-client for eoan? | 13:49 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (bionic-proposed/main) [1.173.13 => 1.173.14] (core, kernel) | 14:13 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (disco-proposed/main) [1.178.6 => 1.178.7] (core, kernel) | 14:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (eoan-proposed/main) [1.183.2 => 1.183.3] (core, kernel) | 14:16 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xen (disco-proposed/main) [4.9.2-0ubuntu2 => 4.9.2-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server, virt) | 14:17 | |
slashd | rbalint: as an fyi simpoir and I are currently working at bumping lds-client on eoan to 19.12 | 14:28 |
slashd | does your fix included in 19.12 release ? | 14:29 |
slashd | rbalint, would you be okay if we add your fix on top of 19.12 (If not already there ?) instead ? | 14:32 |
jdstrand | sil2100: hey do you know who did this: 03:50 -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (xenial-updates/main) [1:8.0-0ubuntu3.11 => 1:8.0-0ubuntu3.10] (core) (sync) | 14:34 |
jdstrand | sil2100: and this: 04:01 -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (bionic-updates/main) [1:11.1-1ubuntu7.5 => 1:11.1-1ubuntu7.4] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) (sync) | 14:35 |
sil2100 | jdstrand: hey! I think it was seb128, an emergency update pull as it was causing some regressions for users | 14:35 |
sil2100 | Pulling in snapd via a recommends chain I guess | 14:35 |
jdstrand | sil2100: notice, whoever did that downgraded pulseaudio from an accepted SRU | 14:35 |
jdstrand | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+publishinghistory | 14:35 |
sil2100 | jdstrand: yes, it's an intentional downgrade | 14:36 |
jdstrand | what was the issue? | 14:36 |
jdstrand | this broke snapd tests (cc mborzecki) | 14:36 |
jdstrand | ok, I see backscroll | 14:37 |
sil2100 | jdstrand: I think they're working on pushing a new, fixed version | 14:38 |
jdstrand | seb128: are you using a new bug to track the pulseaudio issue or are you going to move https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1781428 back to Fix Committed? It is currently Fix Released, which is wrong with the revert | 14:46 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1781428 in pulseaudio (Ubuntu Bionic) "please enable snap mediation support" [Medium,Fix released] | 14:46 |
jdstrand | seb128: also, when do you expect the updated pulseaudio to land? I'm guessing this is a new full SRU cycle so not until after the new year? | 14:49 |
seb128 | jdstrand, hey, @bug should be set back to fix commited indeed | 14:52 |
seb128 | jdstrand, I think we just need to make snapd-glib lower its recommends to a suggest, that can probably be done today/tomorrow and might not need a full week staging since it's just a packaging change, but that's up to the SRU team to decide | 14:53 |
seb128 | it should be fine to aim for after the w.e moving back to updates imho, but again it's a SRU team call | 14:54 |
jdstrand | seb128: ok, I'll adjust the bug and make a comment. is there a snapd-glib bug? | 14:58 |
seb128 | jdstrand, bug #1856054 | 14:59 |
ubot5 | bug 1856054 in pulseaudio (Ubuntu) "pulseaudio now depends on libsnapd-glib1 which recommends snapd" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1856054 | 14:59 |
seb128 | kenvandine seems to be on it | 15:00 |
kenvandine | seb128: yeah, jamesh is going to talk to robert then prepare an upload | 15:02 |
seb128 | kenvandine, jdstrand, I opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd-glib/+bug/1856196 for the SRU with testcase, etc. Going to be easier than conflicting problems on the same reports | 15:04 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1856196 in snapd-glib (Ubuntu) "Lower the snapd recommends to a suggests" [Undecided,New] | 15:04 |
kenvandine | seb128: thanks | 15:04 |
seb128 | kenvandine, it's a simple s/Recommends/Suggests afaik, you could probably just do that change and upload today if we want to aim at getting the SRU back in before holidays | 15:04 |
jdstrand | seb128: sure the snapd-glib bug being separate is fine. fyi, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1781428/comments/21 | 15:05 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1781428 in pulseaudio (Ubuntu Bionic) "please enable snap mediation support" [Medium,Fix committed] | 15:05 |
tjaalton | vorlon: could i386 builds use the nocheck profile? that would get rid of the build-depends on xvfb (and xauth) | 15:06 |
seb128 | jdstrand, ack, it's a bit unfortunate that the test can't adapt/check the capability. Does it mean the tests need to hardcode the environment they are used on? e.g they will fail on other distributions? | 15:11 |
jdstrand | seb128: the test is specifically meant to catch if the mediation patches are dropped in Ubuntu | 15:13 |
jdstrand | seb128: they are working as designed | 15:13 |
jdstrand | the test is run on other distros (but could if other distros picked up the patch) | 15:14 |
jdstrand | stepping into a meeting | 15:14 |
seb128 | jdstrand, k, it seems a bit unfortunate that the test is another component and not in pulseaudio then :/ | 15:14 |
jdstrand | seb128: there are all kinds of functional tests in snapd | 15:15 |
jdstrand | anyway... | 15:15 |
seb128 | jdstrand, right, thanks for the headsup and enjoy the meeting! | 15:15 |
jdstrand | thanks! | 15:16 |
tjaalton | vorlon: there are 28 packages that build-depend on xvfb, and four of them don't support nocheck atm, but a fixed libglvnd is in experimental and I fixed libxkbcommon in git. it leaves apport and qtwebsockets-opensource-src to fix | 15:19 |
rbasak | seb128: "That's only a depends change, snapd isn't going to be pulled in when installing the library anymore but that's wanted" -> are you sure that there's nothing relying on that? | 15:20 |
rbasak | For example, is there another path to get snapd installed by default where it gets installed by default? | 15:20 |
seb128 | kenvandine, ^ to check with robert I guess? | 15:22 |
seb128 | rbasak, xenial didn't even have that libary, it got added as a SRU, but yeah we should check that gnome-software (which is the only user of the lib there afaik) doesn pull snapd if/when needed | 15:22 |
kenvandine | yeah, that's why i'd rather have robert in the loop | 15:23 |
kenvandine | seb128: and i think neon uses snapd-glib as well | 15:24 |
kenvandine | for discover | 15:25 |
seb128 | kenvandine, doesn't seem to on xenial according to rdepends on my xenial system | 15:25 |
seb128 | but that might be an issue on bionic | 15:25 |
kenvandine | yeah | 15:25 |
seb128 | anyway we should review how snapd gets pulled in | 15:25 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted valgrind [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.13.0-2ubuntu2.2] | 15:29 | |
rbalint | slashd, re: landscape-client no, the fix is not in 19.12, i cherry-picked it to focal | 15:56 |
rbalint | slashd, i'd like to get this fix out before christmas, do you have a similar time-frame? | 15:58 |
slashd | rbalint, I can upload 19.12 next week | 15:58 |
slashd | including your fix | 15:58 |
slashd | simpoir, ^ | 15:58 |
rbalint | slashd, this sounds like getting it to release next year 6 Jan, the earliest | 16:00 |
slashd | rbalint, more or less yeah, if you need it before that, feel free to pursue with your upload | 16:01 |
rbalint | slashd, this is a small fix, maybe it could go out after like 5-6 days, then the 19.12 backport can enter -proposed next wednesday/thursday | 16:03 |
slashd | rbalint, lgtm | 16:19 |
rbalint | now we just have to find someone to accept the small fix today sil2100 ;-) | 16:25 |
sil2100 | Which small fix? ;) | 16:26 |
sil2100 | I'm reviewing wslu for now | 16:27 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wslu [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu2~19.10.3] | 16:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wslu [source] (disco-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu2~19.04.3] | 16:41 | |
seb128 | can somewhat tell britney to ignore virtualbox/amd64 which is blocking libvncserver to migrate? it's a kernel/virtualbox issue, not due to the vnclib | 16:43 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wslu [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu2~18.04.3] | 16:43 | |
rbalint | sil2100, the landscape-client one in eoan | 16:43 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted landscape-client [source] (eoan-proposed) [18.01-0ubuntu9.1] | 16:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wslu [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.3.2-0ubuntu2~16.04.3] | 16:58 | |
sforshee | vorlon, LocutusOfBorg: where are we at on getting virtualbox 6.0.14-dfsg-4 to migrate for focal? We have a 5.4 kernel in -proposed now | 17:07 |
LocutusOfBorg | sforshee, one single test failure | 18:29 |
LocutusOfBorg | sforshee, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kopanocore | 18:37 |
LocutusOfBorg | python3 /usr/sbin/kopano-search --help --> works | 18:38 |
LocutusOfBorg | /usr/sbin/kopano-search --help --> doesn't work | 18:38 |
LocutusOfBorg | this is the reason for the test failure | 18:38 |
LocutusOfBorg | [pid 3172] openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sbin/ldconfig", O_RDONLY) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) | 18:38 |
LocutusOfBorg | and this is what actually happens with strace | 18:38 |
LocutusOfBorg | so, I don't know why python3 behaves in such way, if launched with the ./ or python3 interpreter | 18:39 |
LocutusOfBorg | of course, under sbuild it fails, under pbuilder it works -.-' | 18:42 |
LocutusOfBorg | unless somebody has a better idea, I don't have anything more to do for debugging | 18:43 |
vorlon | tjaalton: nocheck> that would not generally be correct, no | 18:55 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tomcat-native (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.21-1~18.04.1 => 1.2.21-1~18.04.1build1] (no packageset) | 19:06 | |
ddstreet | tdaitx you're the java guy, right? can you review this upload to make sure i got the facts right? it's a simple no-change rebuild, but i don't have experience with tomcat or static JNI libs so would be good to confirm the explanation of why the rebuild is needed is correct | 19:10 |
ddstreet | by 'this upload' i meant tomcat-native ^ | 19:10 |
ddstreet | from lp #1854072 | 19:10 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1854072 in tomcat-native (Ubuntu Bionic) "tomcat-native needs recompile to use TLSv1.3 from openssl 1.1" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1854072 | 19:10 |
vorlon | locutus_: soooo kopanocore 8.7.0-5 introduces changes related to apparmor profiles, isn't this probably a regression caused by that? | 19:11 |
vorlon | locutus_: or possibly 8.7.0-4 | 19:12 |
tjaalton | vorlon: then I don't see other way than adding libdmx and libxres so xorg-server can build | 20:15 |
vorlon | tjaalton: that's probably the parsimonious solution right now | 20:18 |
LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, you are a genius, this explains why calling with python3 works | 20:53 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.183.3] | 21:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (disco-proposed) [1.178.7] | 21:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.173.14] | 21:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (eoan-proposed/main) [2:20.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:20.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 21:36 | |
doko | vorlon: binutils now ftbfs on i386, same as the autopkg test. I don't like investiing time on "fixing" this in the toolchain, so please could you restore the cross compiler packages? | 21:46 |
vorlon | doko: link to this build failure? | 22:01 |
vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: what I don't know is why intrigieri didn't run into this in Debian | 22:01 |
vorlon | doko: because the autopkgtest failure is due to failing to resolve dependencies on python3* cross-architecture, so that's not going to be the same in a ftbfs in launchpad | 22:03 |
doko | https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/ubuntu/toolchain/+build/18241328 | 22:09 |
vorlon | doko: so I see gcc-9-cross* still in the archive, which package are you missing? | 22:12 |
vorlon | and gcc-defaults is certainly in the archive | 22:13 |
vorlon | doko: so it's quite possible that something needs changing in the archive, but it's not obvious to me what that is, can you dig into it and let me know? | 22:14 |
doko | vorlon: as I said, it's the missing cross compilers | 22:18 |
vorlon | what cross compilers are missing? | 22:24 |
vorlon | I just told you gcc-9-cross* are still in the archive | 22:24 |
vorlon | "the cross compilers" is not a package name I can fix | 22:24 |
doko | sbuild-build-depends-binutils-dummy : Depends: g++-aarch64-linux-gnu but it is not going to be installed | 22:27 |
doko | Depends: g++-arm-linux-gnueabi but it is not going to be installed | 22:27 |
doko | [...] | 22:28 |
vorlon | $ rmadison -s focal -a i386 g++-aarch64-linux-gnu | 22:28 |
vorlon | g++-aarch64-linux-gnu | 4:9.2.1-3.1ubuntu1 | focal | i386 | 22:28 |
vorlon | $ | 22:28 |
vorlon | your move. | 22:28 |
doko | apparently the binutils 2.33.1-5 built, so what changed after that? | 22:29 |
doko | anyway, afk now | 22:30 |
LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, apparmor is not installed in debian autopkgtests? | 22:36 |
vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: but somebody should have been testing while preparing the changes to the apparmor profile | 22:36 |
vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: anyway, I found the answer, it's because /usr/sbin/ldconfig is a wrapper *script* in Ubuntu and not in Debian | 22:37 |
vorlon | so it needs r permission on ldconfig because it's a script, and an additional x permission on ldconfig.real | 22:38 |
LocutusOfBorg | /{,usr/}sbin/ldconfig.real rx, ? | 22:40 |
vorlon | Pixr rather | 22:46 |
vorlon | (to retain the other semantics) | 22:46 |
vorlon | and I merged it all on one line with ldconfig | 22:46 |
vorlon | seb128: heh I just beat you to doing https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/britney/gtk-version-updated/+merge/376734 | 22:53 |
seb128 | vorlon, yeah, I saw, I deleted my mp when I saw the conflict markers on the generated diff :) | 22:53 |
seb128 | vorlon, can you review https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/britney/distroinfo-i386-badtest/+merge/376689 ? | 22:54 |
vorlon | seb128: was next on my list - done (but I moved the hint up with the rest of the ones related to python modules) | 22:55 |
seb128 | vorlon, k, thanks! | 22:55 |
vorlon | hmm you know this one might be fixable | 22:56 |
vorlon | because the python module is arch: all | 22:56 |
vorlon | though really a better solution is to make it skippable when doing cross-testing | 22:57 |
vorlon | so I'll leave it for now | 22:57 |
seb128 | k | 23:01 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pbcommand [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.1.1+git20191122.ec024c3-1] (no packageset) | 23:23 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!