mwhudson | vorlon: do you (or any other core dev) feel like reviewing https://code.launchpad.net/~mwhudson/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/376544 ? | 00:17 |
---|---|---|
vorlon | mwhudson: done | 00:51 |
vicamo | hi, need sponsor for https://launchpad.net/~vicamo/+archive/ubuntu/ppa-1855891 to focal-proposed, which re-add reprotest to Focal | 07:04 |
vicamo | also need to SRU Eoan package in https://launchpad.net/~vicamo/+archive/ubuntu/ppa-1855825 for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backport-iwlwifi-dkms/+bug/1855825 | 07:08 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1855825 in backport-iwlwifi-dkms (Ubuntu Eoan) "When connecting to wifi with the proposed linux-oem kernel , the system hangs" [Undecided,In progress] | 07:08 |
vicamo | And https://launchpad.net/~vicamo/+archive/ubuntu/ppa-1856024 for bug 1856024 that introduces backport-iwlwifi-dkms to Bionic (already in Eoan/Focal) | 07:09 |
ubottu | bug 1856024 in backport-iwlwifi-dkms (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Need backport-iwlwifi-dkms in Bionic" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1856024 | 07:09 |
seb128 | vicamo, hey, that reprotest/focal change, if you add actual diff you need to use an ubuntu<n> version, not a build<n> | 08:19 |
vicamo | seb128: hi, there is no actual diff because there was an no-change-rebuild upload previously by Matthias Klose | 08:25 |
vicamo | he bumped version in debian/changelog, but not in setup.py, and this caused build failure | 08:25 |
seb128 | vicamo, so why do you need an upload? | 08:25 |
vicamo | seb128: so that upload was not successful and there is no installable candidate even in focal-proposed | 08:26 |
seb128 | vicamo, you edited setup.py? | 08:28 |
seb128 | vicamo, so | 08:28 |
vicamo | seb128: ye | 08:28 |
vicamo | seb128: yes | 08:28 |
seb128 | 1- that's a change :p | 08:28 |
vicamo | ok, let me update the version to ubuntu1 | 08:28 |
seb128 | 2- why is that needed? | 08:28 |
seb128 | 0.7.10 built in Debian without that version update | 08:28 |
seb128 | ah, that's because it's a native package and the version need to match the changelog one? | 08:29 |
seb128 | vicamo, don't worry, I can update the version, but yeah in that case build1 seems fine | 08:30 |
seb128 | vicamo, I will sponsor it | 08:30 |
vicamo | seb128: ok , thank you | 08:30 |
vicamo | seb128: but I'd still want to know what's the prefered version in this case. Can't find reprotest in the focal queue yet | 08:33 |
seb128 | vicamo, build1 seems fine, we don't have actual diff we want to preserver from a debian sync | 08:33 |
seb128 | vicamo, uploaded | 08:34 |
vicamo | seb128: but the one I uploaded is "0.7.10build1.1"? | 08:35 |
vicamo | seb128: will check some time later, doesn't appear right away | 08:35 |
seb128 | vicamo, that looks fine | 08:35 |
seb128 | vicamo, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/reprotest/0.7.10build1.1 | 08:36 |
vicamo | seb128: ha, thank you | 08:36 |
rbalint | doko, can i cherry-pick https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=0bc3450e220a4fb29f931ada84b546ce8993e85e to focal or could you please do that to fix LP: #1843479? | 11:59 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1843479 in gzip (Ubuntu) "gzip in Ubuntu Eoan results in Exec format error on WSL1" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1843479 | 11:59 |
rbalint | doko, i'm also ready to handle the sru | 11:59 |
doko | rbalint: sure, could you merge -6 as well? | 12:50 |
coreycb | tjaalton: hi, would you be able to take a look at horizon again in the unapproved queue for disco? the last upload was missing an orig tarball. | 13:13 |
tjaalton | coreycb: ok | 13:13 |
coreycb | tjaalton: thanks | 13:13 |
rbalint | doko, ok, will do it | 13:34 |
=== ricab is now known as ricab|lunch | ||
vicamo | hi, need sponsor for SRU Eoan package in https://launchpad.net/~vicamo/+archive/ubuntu/ppa-1855825 for bug 1855825, which will hang systems with iwlwifi DKMS once eoan-proposed kernel is out | 13:46 |
ubottu | bug 1855825 in backport-iwlwifi-dkms (Ubuntu Eoan) "When connecting to wifi with the proposed linux-oem kernel , the system hangs" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1855825 | 13:46 |
seb128 | vicamo, if a kernel SRU needs to go in lock step with that update you should probably comment saying so / set verification-failed on the kernel until that one is ready as well to avoid publishing a regression to updates | 14:46 |
seb128 | vicamo, did you talk to the kernel team about it? | 14:46 |
seb128 | apw, ^ unsure who is the right person to make aware of that on the kernel side? | 14:47 |
=== ricab|lunch is now known as ricab | ||
vicamo | seb128: it's kind of complicated. Eoan kernel is out, so this is now a real problem and has seen public bug reported. | 15:02 |
vicamo | seb128: We're planning to land Eoan's version to Bionic in bug 1856024, so OEM platforms can retire those unofficial DKMS packages. | 15:02 |
ubottu | bug 1856024 in backport-iwlwifi-dkms (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Need backport-iwlwifi-dkms in Bionic" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1856024 | 15:02 |
seb128 | vicamo, sounds like you should make the kernel team aware still | 15:02 |
seb128 | and maybe try to talk to the SRU team to fast track a fix | 15:03 |
seb128 | vicamo, also make sure there is bionic kernel SRU landing regressing user, block as verification-failed | 15:03 |
vicamo | seb128: however, for OEM platforms, we have released fix through the old way, and that will be before OEM kernel is released | 15:04 |
vicamo | so, my bad, after checked again, eoan-proposed kernel has been released, and there is no gating problem any more | 15:05 |
coreycb | cpaelzer: I have most of the oslo autopkgtests fixed but looks like the kombu dependency (MIR) on python-importlib-metadata is causing a backup | 15:05 |
seb128 | vicamo, so what's needed now? | 15:05 |
vicamo | seb128: to land Eoan SRU in bug 1855825 as soon as possible, so Eoan users suffers less | 15:06 |
ubottu | bug 1855825 in backport-iwlwifi-dkms (Ubuntu Eoan) "When connecting to wifi with the proposed linux-oem kernel , the system hangs" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1855825 | 15:06 |
seb128 | vicamo, you need to talk to the kernel team and SRU teams for that | 15:07 |
seb128 | try on #ubuntu-release also | 15:07 |
seb128 | bdmurray, ^ can you help with that? seems like a kernel SRU in 19.10 regressed XPS users | 15:07 |
vicamo | seb128: I will have to go offline for an hr or so in 10 minutes to catch the last train. My apologies in advance. | 15:12 |
seb128 | vicamo, no worry, I'm sponsoring you 19.10 SRU but you need an SRU member to help getting it accepted then | 15:17 |
coreycb | doko: subscribed openstack packagers to the packages for bug 1851393 | 15:17 |
ubottu | bug 1851393 in python-zipp (Ubuntu) "[MIR] python-importlib-metadata (required by kombu)" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1851393 | 15:17 |
seb128 | sil2100, bdmurray, vorlon, ^ backport-iwlwifi-dkms in 19.10 SRU queue fixes a pretty important issue for XPS users follow a kernel SRU, might be worth fast tracking if possible | 15:18 |
vicamo | seb128: yes, that's what I need. I got a team member who can review this, but need another person to upload :) | 15:19 |
apw | seb128, ack | 15:21 |
bdmurray | apw: so are you handling this issue? | 15:29 |
apw | bdmurray, oh no i was just admiting i needed to be warned about it | 15:30 |
apw | bdmurray, those kernels are not going out till the new year i believe | 15:30 |
rbasak | Should this new kernel be declaring a Breaks on backport-iwlwifi-dkms then? | 15:31 |
rbasak | Though I know it's a bit weird with kernels because an installed kernel isn't necessarily the one that is running. | 15:31 |
apw | rbasak, though the kernel out there already needed it | 15:32 |
apw | if i am reading this right | 15:33 |
rbasak | I thought it was just the one in proposed? | 15:33 |
rbasak | Anyway, I'd best not add another cook to the broth. | 15:33 |
apw | oh yeah it is out in eoan | 15:33 |
rbasak | I just thought I'd mention Breaks in case that needs considering. | 15:33 |
apw | rbasak, yeah too late for eoan, maybe not for bionic | 15:33 |
rbasak | There might still be some value for Eoan - for users who upgrade infrequently, or do an install and upgrade in the future. | 15:34 |
rbasak | (to add a Breaks in the next update) | 15:34 |
danboid | After months of pain, trial and error etc I've finally got openstack deployed via a juju charm bundle | 15:37 |
danboid | As as result, I've got a few corrections and suggestions for the docs here https://jaas.ai/openstack-base | 15:37 |
danboid | Where do I submit my suggestions? | 15:37 |
danboid | Do I submit them as a bug report against the charm? | 15:38 |
danboid | It's OK! A bug report has been requested by one of the charm devs | 15:40 |
rbalint | doko, i'm doing a test-rebuild of merged binutils, then will upload in ~2 hours | 16:03 |
rbasak | bryce: FWIW, to view previous inline comments in an MP on LP, use the dropdown box just underneath where it says "Preview Diff" | 17:14 |
rafaeldtinoco | rbasak: there is a MR from bryce to autofs | 18:03 |
rafaeldtinoco | rbasak: i can't upload it (no rights), and he is off today | 18:03 |
rafaeldtinoco | would u mind pushing and uploading it ? | 18:04 |
rafaeldtinoco | actually its not from him, its from ahasenac_k but he is also off | 18:04 |
rafaeldtinoco | =) | 18:04 |
rafaeldtinoco | its already approved but we didnt want to wait until EOY to push it | 18:04 |
rbasak | rafaeldtinoco: link please? It's not listed at https://code.launchpad.net/~canonical-server/+activereviews | 18:45 |
rbasak | rafaeldtinoco: no core devs in our team will be around next week? | 18:46 |
rafaeldtinoco | rbasak: not sure i mean its not urgent or anything | 18:46 |
rafaeldtinoco | rbasak: https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+git/autofs/+merge/376722 | 18:47 |
rafaeldtinoco | bryce: will be around next week also | 18:48 |
rafaeldtinoco | bryce: ^ for when you're back then | 18:48 |
bryce | okie doke | 19:48 |
rbasak | rafaeldtinoco, bryce: I don't mind doing it next week either, but given it's not urgent I'm EOD now :) | 20:50 |
rafaeldtinoco | rbasak: yes yes ignore me | 20:50 |
rafaeldtinoco | rbasak: have a nice weekend o/ | 20:50 |
* gQuigs can't if these are real test failures or not - I'm guessing no, but would love a confirmation | 22:53 | |
gQuigs | python-ldap Regression in autopkgtest for barbican (armhf): test log | 22:54 |
gQuigs | python-ldap | 22:54 |
gQuigs | Regression in autopkgtest for salt (s390x): test log | 22:54 |
* gQuigs can't press the magic retry button | 22:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!