mwhudsonvorlon: do you (or any other core dev) feel like reviewing https://code.launchpad.net/~mwhudson/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/376544 ?00:17
vorlonmwhudson: done00:51
vicamohi, need sponsor for https://launchpad.net/~vicamo/+archive/ubuntu/ppa-1855891 to focal-proposed, which re-add reprotest to Focal07:04
vicamoalso need to SRU Eoan package in https://launchpad.net/~vicamo/+archive/ubuntu/ppa-1855825 for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backport-iwlwifi-dkms/+bug/185582507:08
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1855825 in backport-iwlwifi-dkms (Ubuntu Eoan) "When connecting to wifi with the proposed linux-oem kernel , the system hangs" [Undecided,In progress]07:08
vicamoAnd https://launchpad.net/~vicamo/+archive/ubuntu/ppa-1856024 for bug 1856024 that introduces backport-iwlwifi-dkms to Bionic (already in Eoan/Focal)07:09
ubottubug 1856024 in backport-iwlwifi-dkms (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Need backport-iwlwifi-dkms in Bionic" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185602407:09
seb128vicamo, hey, that reprotest/focal change, if you add actual diff you need to use an ubuntu<n> version, not a build<n>08:19
vicamoseb128: hi, there is no actual diff because there was an no-change-rebuild upload previously by Matthias Klose08:25
vicamohe bumped version in debian/changelog, but not in setup.py, and this caused build failure08:25
seb128vicamo, so why do you need an upload?08:25
vicamoseb128: so that upload was not successful and there is no installable candidate even in focal-proposed08:26
seb128vicamo, you edited setup.py?08:28
seb128vicamo, so08:28
vicamoseb128: ye08:28
vicamoseb128: yes08:28
seb1281- that's a change :p08:28
vicamook, let me update the version to ubuntu108:28
seb1282- why is that needed?08:28
seb1280.7.10 built in Debian without that version update08:28
seb128ah, that's because it's a native package and the version need to match the changelog one?08:29
seb128vicamo, don't worry, I can update the version, but yeah in that case build1 seems fine08:30
seb128vicamo, I will sponsor it08:30
vicamoseb128: ok , thank you08:30
vicamoseb128: but I'd still want to know what's the prefered version in this case. Can't find reprotest in the focal queue yet08:33
seb128vicamo, build1 seems fine, we don't have actual diff we want to preserver from a debian sync08:33
seb128vicamo, uploaded08:34
vicamoseb128: but the one I uploaded is "0.7.10build1.1"?08:35
vicamoseb128: will check some time later, doesn't appear right away08:35
seb128vicamo, that looks fine08:35
seb128vicamo, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/reprotest/0.7.10build1.108:36
vicamoseb128: ha, thank you08:36
rbalintdoko, can i cherry-pick https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=0bc3450e220a4fb29f931ada84b546ce8993e85e to focal or could you please do that to fix LP: #1843479?11:59
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1843479 in gzip (Ubuntu) "gzip in Ubuntu Eoan results in Exec format error on WSL1" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/184347911:59
rbalintdoko, i'm also ready to handle the sru11:59
dokorbalint: sure, could you merge -6 as well?12:50
coreycbtjaalton: hi, would you be able to take a look at horizon again in the unapproved queue for disco? the last upload was missing an orig tarball.13:13
tjaaltoncoreycb: ok13:13
coreycbtjaalton: thanks13:13
rbalintdoko, ok, will do it13:34
=== ricab is now known as ricab|lunch
vicamohi, need sponsor for SRU Eoan package in https://launchpad.net/~vicamo/+archive/ubuntu/ppa-1855825 for bug 1855825, which will hang systems with iwlwifi DKMS once eoan-proposed kernel is out13:46
ubottubug 1855825 in backport-iwlwifi-dkms (Ubuntu Eoan) "When connecting to wifi with the proposed linux-oem kernel , the system hangs" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185582513:46
seb128vicamo, if a kernel SRU needs to go in lock step with that update you should probably comment saying so / set verification-failed on the kernel until that one is ready as well to avoid publishing a regression to updates14:46
seb128vicamo, did you talk to the kernel team about it?14:46
seb128apw, ^ unsure who is the right person to make aware of that on the kernel side?14:47
=== ricab|lunch is now known as ricab
vicamoseb128: it's kind of complicated. Eoan kernel is out, so this is now a real problem and has seen public bug reported.15:02
vicamoseb128: We're planning to land Eoan's version to Bionic in bug 1856024, so OEM platforms can retire those unofficial DKMS packages.15:02
ubottubug 1856024 in backport-iwlwifi-dkms (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Need backport-iwlwifi-dkms in Bionic" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185602415:02
seb128vicamo, sounds like you should make the kernel team aware still15:02
seb128and maybe try to talk to the SRU team to fast track a fix15:03
seb128vicamo, also make sure there is bionic kernel SRU landing regressing user, block as verification-failed15:03
vicamoseb128: however, for OEM platforms, we have released fix through the old way, and that will be before OEM kernel is released15:04
vicamoso, my bad, after checked again, eoan-proposed kernel has been released, and there is no gating problem any more15:05
coreycbcpaelzer: I have most of the oslo autopkgtests fixed but looks like the kombu dependency (MIR) on python-importlib-metadata is causing a backup15:05
seb128vicamo, so what's needed now?15:05
vicamoseb128: to land Eoan SRU in bug 1855825 as soon as possible, so Eoan users suffers less15:06
ubottubug 1855825 in backport-iwlwifi-dkms (Ubuntu Eoan) "When connecting to wifi with the proposed linux-oem kernel , the system hangs" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185582515:06
seb128vicamo, you need to talk to the kernel team and SRU teams for that15:07
seb128try on #ubuntu-release also15:07
seb128bdmurray, ^ can you help with that? seems like a kernel SRU in 19.10 regressed XPS users15:07
vicamoseb128: I will have to go offline for an hr or so in 10 minutes to catch the last train. My apologies in advance.15:12
seb128vicamo, no worry, I'm sponsoring you 19.10 SRU but you need an SRU member to help getting it accepted then15:17
coreycbdoko: subscribed openstack packagers to the packages for bug 185139315:17
ubottubug 1851393 in python-zipp (Ubuntu) "[MIR] python-importlib-metadata (required by kombu)" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185139315:17
seb128sil2100, bdmurray, vorlon, ^  backport-iwlwifi-dkms in 19.10 SRU queue fixes a pretty important issue for XPS users follow a kernel SRU, might be worth fast tracking if possible15:18
vicamoseb128: yes, that's what I need. I got a team member who can review this, but need another person to upload :)15:19
apwseb128, ack15:21
bdmurrayapw: so are you handling this issue?15:29
apwbdmurray, oh no i was just admiting i needed to be warned about it15:30
apwbdmurray, those kernels are not going out till the new year i believe15:30
rbasakShould this new kernel be declaring a Breaks on backport-iwlwifi-dkms then?15:31
rbasakThough I know it's a bit weird with kernels because an installed kernel isn't necessarily the one that is running.15:31
apwrbasak, though the kernel out there already needed it15:32
apwif i am reading this right15:33
rbasakI thought it was just the one in proposed?15:33
rbasakAnyway, I'd best not add another cook to the broth.15:33
apwoh yeah it is out in eoan15:33
rbasakI just thought I'd mention Breaks in case that needs considering.15:33
apwrbasak, yeah too late for eoan, maybe not for bionic15:33
rbasakThere might still be some value for Eoan - for users who upgrade infrequently, or do an install and upgrade in the future.15:34
rbasak(to add a Breaks in the next update)15:34
danboidAfter months of pain, trial and error etc I've finally got openstack deployed via a juju charm bundle15:37
danboidAs as result, I've got a few corrections and suggestions for the docs here https://jaas.ai/openstack-base15:37
danboidWhere do I submit my suggestions?15:37
danboidDo I submit them as a bug report against the charm?15:38
danboidIt's OK! A bug report has been requested by one of the charm devs15:40
rbalintdoko, i'm doing a test-rebuild of merged binutils, then will upload in ~2 hours16:03
rbasakbryce: FWIW, to view previous inline comments in an MP on LP, use the dropdown box just underneath where it says "Preview Diff"17:14
rafaeldtinocorbasak: there is a MR from bryce to autofs18:03
rafaeldtinocorbasak: i can't upload it (no rights), and he is off today18:03
rafaeldtinocowould u mind pushing and uploading it ?18:04
rafaeldtinocoactually its not from him, its from ahasenac_k but he is also off18:04
rafaeldtinocoits already approved  but we didnt want to wait until EOY to push it18:04
rbasakrafaeldtinoco: link please? It's not listed at https://code.launchpad.net/~canonical-server/+activereviews18:45
rbasakrafaeldtinoco: no core devs in our team will be around next week?18:46
rafaeldtinocorbasak: not sure i mean its not urgent or anything18:46
rafaeldtinocorbasak: https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+git/autofs/+merge/37672218:47
rafaeldtinocobryce: will be around next week also18:48
rafaeldtinocobryce: ^ for when you're back then18:48
bryceokie doke19:48
rbasakrafaeldtinoco, bryce: I don't mind doing it next week either, but given it's not urgent I'm EOD now :)20:50
rafaeldtinocorbasak: yes yes ignore me20:50
rafaeldtinocorbasak: have a nice weekend o/20:50
* gQuigs can't if these are real test failures or not - I'm guessing no, but would love a confirmation22:53
gQuigspython-ldap   Regression in autopkgtest for barbican (armhf): test log22:54
gQuigsRegression in autopkgtest for salt (s390x): test log22:54
* gQuigs can't press the magic retry button22:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!