[00:04] <RikMills> vorlon: could you please remove the kimagemapeditor ppc64el and s390x binaries from release? KDE gave it a new hard build depend on QtWebEngine, so it can not longer build on those
[00:04] <RikMills> also, apologies that I forgot to put that in the changelog :(
[00:10] <vorlon> RikMills: this would appear to make kdewebdev uninstallable on those architectures, can you fix that first?
[00:14] <RikMills> vorlon: looking....
[00:26] <RikMills> vorlon: meta-kde tweaked and uploaded
[00:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: paraview [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.7.0-3] (no packageset)
[01:21] <tdaitx> ddstreet: yeah, given the description I supposed it could fix it, whish there was a better way to reproduce it though, I generated the certs, added the commands to tomcat's server.xml (in /etc) but it starts just fine and even lists openssl 1.1.1 (I wonder if it is using the dynamic lib for any reason)
[01:21] <tdaitx> I did a quick look at the libtcnative-1.a and rebuild it on bionic, but haven't seem anything different in symbols and such
[01:25] <ddstreet> tdaitx thanks!
[02:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (eoan-proposed/main) [1.49-0ubuntu1 => 1.49-0ubuntu1.19.10.0] (desktop-core)
[02:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (disco-proposed/main) [1.49-0ubuntu0.19.04.0 => 1.49-0ubuntu0.19.04.1] (desktop-core)
[02:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (bionic-proposed/main) [1.49-0ubuntu0.18.04.0 => 1.49-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[02:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (xenial-proposed/main) [1.49-0ubuntu0.16.04.0 => 1.49-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset)
[04:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: paraview [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.7.0-3] (no packageset)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-sequoia-sqv [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.12.0-1] (no packageset)
[08:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: reprotest [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.10build1.1] (no packageset)
[09:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stress-ng [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.10.07-1ubuntu3]
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stress-ng [source] (disco-proposed) [0.09.57-0ubuntu5]
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stress-ng [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.09.25-1ubuntu6]
[09:38] <oSoMoN> can thunderbird be deleted from the eoan unapproved queue, please?
[09:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected thunderbird [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:68.2.2+build1-0ubuntu0.19.10.1]
[09:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stress-ng [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.05.23-1ubuntu3]
[09:39] <tjaalton> oSoMoN: done
[09:44] <oSoMoN> thanks
[09:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-ldap [source] (eoan-proposed) [3.1.0-2ubuntu1.1]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-ldap [source] (disco-proposed) [3.1.0-2ubuntu0.1]
[09:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-ldap [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.0-1ubuntu0.1]
[09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (eoan-proposed) [2:20.0.1-0ubuntu1]
[09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted swift [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.23.1-0ubuntu0.19.10.1]
[10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.49-0ubuntu1.19.10.0]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (disco-proposed) [1.49-0ubuntu0.19.04.1]
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.49-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[10:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.49-0ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[10:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-fwaas [source] (disco-proposed) [1:14.0.0-0ubuntu1.2]
[10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (disco-proposed) [3:15.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[10:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (disco-proposed) [2:14.0.3-0ubuntu1]
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-lbaas [source] (disco-proposed) [2:14.0.1-0ubuntu1]
[10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted octavia [source] (disco-proposed) [4.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceph [source] (disco-proposed) [13.2.7-0ubuntu0.19.04.1]
[10:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected xen [source] (disco-proposed) [4.9.2-0ubuntu4]
[10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted thunar [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.15-0ubuntu1.18.04.1]
[10:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted designate-dashboard [source] (bionic-proposed) [6.0.0-0ubuntu1.2]
[10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sysdig [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.24.1-1ubuntu3~18.04.1]
[10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tomcat-native [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.21-1~18.04.1build1]
[10:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unicode-data [source] (xenial-proposed) [8.0-3ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pbcommand [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.1.1+git20191122.ec024c3-1]
[10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted reprotest [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.7.10build1.1]
[10:47] <xnox> vorlon:  i wonder if i can somehow extra-exclude notification-daemon on i386
[10:48] <xnox> vorlon:  i don't think Extra-Exclude: sugar is working
[10:53]  * xnox tries desktop-minimal !notification-daemon
[10:58] <juliank> So the omnidb failure triggered by psycopg2, it's on i386, we removed omnidb there, hence the failure
[11:00] <juliank> python-apt/i386 too
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu15 => 2.04-1ubuntu15] (core)
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chromium-browser (eoan-proposed/universe) [77.0.3865.120-0ubuntu1.19.10.1 => 79.0.3945.79-0ubuntu0.19.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu15 => 2.04-1ubuntu15] (core)
[12:06] <xnox> hm
[12:06] <xnox> vorlon:  /running currently shows that nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 is running test for 24m on ppc64le
[12:06] <xnox> even though it doesn't exist there
[12:06] <xnox> but hey it is compiling things
[12:06] <xnox> for focal
[12:07]  * xnox ponders were those results get stored given that overview page does not show it
[12:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1066.71] (kernel)
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1066.71]
[12:42] <juliank> xnox: are you sure? journalctl -e ADT_PACKAGE=nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 --no-pager ADT_ARCH=ppc64el on the worker is empty
[12:42] <juliank> or something triggered by it?
[12:43] <juliank> because yes, I see ppc64el stuff trigerred by that
[12:43] <juliank> lammps, petsc
[12:43] <juliank> and more
[12:46] <juliank> https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/SqwCdh8Y84/
[12:48] <juliank> some arch:all package build by nvidia that those depend on?
[13:10] <xnox> juliank:  nope, there are none
[13:10] <juliank> fun
[13:10] <xnox> juliank:  maybe those things "recoomend" nvidia, and even if it doesn't exist, it gets triggered?
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: horizon (disco-proposed/main) [3:15.1.1-0ubuntu1 => 3:15.1.1-0ubuntu1.1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[13:10] <juliank> maybe, idk
[13:11] <juliank> britney is the one figuring out what to test, I think? it should know better
[13:22] <Laney> someone figuring out if there's a problem, then debugging and/or writing a testcase and/or fixing that would be nice :-)
[13:22] <Laney> or bringing britney out of the stone ages, perhaps debian fixed it years ago ...
[13:22] <Laney> s/ages/age/
[13:27] <juliank> is britney is one of those ocaml monsters?
[13:28] <Laney> no, it's a python application
[13:28] <juliank> ah
[13:28] <juliank> that's decent
[13:28] <Laney> we've just got ourselves a bit ol' fork from what Debian had several years ago
[13:32] <ogra> it is still based on the bald britney though ...
[13:35] <xnox> ogra:  that's uncalled for.
[13:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-desktop3 (eoan-proposed/main) [3.34.1-1ubuntu1 => 3.34.2-2ubuntu1~19.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:43] <oSoMoN> can someone please reject chromium-browser from the eoan unapproved queue? on second thought, the fix for bug #1853574 shouldn't be SRUed (I commented on the bug to explain why)
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected chromium-browser [source] (eoan-proposed) [79.0.3945.79-0ubuntu0.19.10.1]
[14:48] <seb128> oSoMoN, ^
[15:00] <oSoMoN> cheers
[15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: backport-iwlwifi-dkms (eoan-proposed/universe) [7906-0ubuntu2~19.10.1 => 7906-0ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[16:31] <RikMills> vorlon: I believe the kimagemapeditor ppc64el and s390x binaries are now safely removable
[16:33] <RikMills> pulseaudio-qt i386 also need adding to the badtest I think, or existing hint bumped
[16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted backport-iwlwifi-dkms [source] (eoan-proposed) [7906-0ubuntu3]
[16:55] <vorlon> RikMills: pulseaudio-qt/i386 is already badtested for all versions
[16:56] <vorlon> xnox: yes, the extra-exclude doesn't work for this, I forgot how it does work; it basically negates an Extra-Include
[16:59] <RikMills> vorlon: oh. I was looking at a old browser window I forgot I had open on a spare virtual desktop. sorry!
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (eoan-proposed/main) [0.8.1-1ubuntu14.2 => 0.8.1-1ubuntu14.3] (core)
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (bionic-proposed/main) [0.7.5-1ubuntu16.6 => 0.7.5-1ubuntu16.7] (core)
[17:36] <vorlon> RikMills: kimagemapeditor/{ppc64el,s390x} removed
[17:39] <RikMills> thank you!
[17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (disco-proposed/main) [0.7.12-1ubuntu5 => 0.7.12-1ubuntu5.1] (core)
[20:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1]
[20:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.9-0ubuntu2 => 1.2.10-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1] (desktop-core)
[20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.9-0ubuntu2 => 1.2.10-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1] (desktop-core)
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1]
[20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1] (desktop-core)
[20:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1] (desktop-core)
[20:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1] (desktop-core)
[20:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1] (desktop-core)
[21:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupdate [source] (bionic-proposed) [12-7~ubuntu18.04.1]
[21:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: binutils (eoan-proposed/main) [2.33-2ubuntu1 => 2.33-2ubuntu1.1] (core)
[21:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gzip (eoan-proposed/main) [1.10-0ubuntu3 => 1.10-0ubuntu3.1] (core)
[21:40] <rbalint> vorlon, could you please accept gzip and binutils later today? ^
[21:41] <rbalint> vorlon, they are in focal-proposed right now, and those are the last bits to make eoan working on wsl
[21:43] <rbalint> vorlon, if we can get it in eoan-proposed today, they can get to release before christmas (with lifting the aging requirement by one day for gzip only)
[21:44] <rbalint> vorlon, binutils does not have to migrate first
[21:50] <vorlon> rbalint: s/accept/review/
[21:54] <infinity> rbalint: The changelog only mentions it's a rebuild with the new binutils, but debian/rules also twiddles LDFLAGS.  Intended-but-undocumented, or debugging cruft that slipped in?
[21:54] <infinity> rbalint: (for gzip, that is)
[22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-desktop3 [source] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.2-2ubuntu1~19.10.1]
[23:17] <cyphermox> please let util-linux through from -proposed; openjdk-13 tests have always been neutral/erroring out on arm64, and ocfs2-tools is no longer built for s390x
[23:18] <rafaeldtinoco> yep I have a RM for ocfs2-tools s390x
[23:23] <RikMills> vorlon: silx/0.11.0+dfsg-2 looks regressed in -release I think? could that be badtested to let pyqt5 through?
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-sequoia-sqv [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.12.0-2] (no packageset)