[00:04] vorlon: could you please remove the kimagemapeditor ppc64el and s390x binaries from release? KDE gave it a new hard build depend on QtWebEngine, so it can not longer build on those [00:04] also, apologies that I forgot to put that in the changelog :( [00:10] RikMills: this would appear to make kdewebdev uninstallable on those architectures, can you fix that first? [00:14] vorlon: looking.... [00:26] vorlon: meta-kde tweaked and uploaded [00:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: paraview [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.7.0-3] (no packageset) === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc [01:21] ddstreet: yeah, given the description I supposed it could fix it, whish there was a better way to reproduce it though, I generated the certs, added the commands to tomcat's server.xml (in /etc) but it starts just fine and even lists openssl 1.1.1 (I wonder if it is using the dynamic lib for any reason) [01:21] I did a quick look at the libtcnative-1.a and rebuild it on bionic, but haven't seem anything different in symbols and such [01:25] tdaitx thanks! [02:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (eoan-proposed/main) [1.49-0ubuntu1 => 1.49-0ubuntu1.19.10.0] (desktop-core) [02:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (disco-proposed/main) [1.49-0ubuntu0.19.04.0 => 1.49-0ubuntu0.19.04.1] (desktop-core) [02:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (bionic-proposed/main) [1.49-0ubuntu0.18.04.0 => 1.49-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [02:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (xenial-proposed/main) [1.49-0ubuntu0.16.04.0 => 1.49-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset) === handsome_feng[m] is now known as handsome_feng [04:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: paraview [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.7.0-3] (no packageset) [05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-sequoia-sqv [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.12.0-1] (no packageset) [08:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: reprotest [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.10build1.1] (no packageset) [09:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stress-ng [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.10.07-1ubuntu3] [09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stress-ng [source] (disco-proposed) [0.09.57-0ubuntu5] [09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stress-ng [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.09.25-1ubuntu6] [09:38] can thunderbird be deleted from the eoan unapproved queue, please? [09:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected thunderbird [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:68.2.2+build1-0ubuntu0.19.10.1] [09:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stress-ng [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.05.23-1ubuntu3] [09:39] oSoMoN: done [09:44] thanks [09:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-ldap [source] (eoan-proposed) [3.1.0-2ubuntu1.1] [09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-ldap [source] (disco-proposed) [3.1.0-2ubuntu0.1] [09:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-ldap [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.0-1ubuntu0.1] [09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (eoan-proposed) [2:20.0.1-0ubuntu1] [09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted swift [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.23.1-0ubuntu0.19.10.1] [10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.49-0ubuntu1.19.10.0] [10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (disco-proposed) [1.49-0ubuntu0.19.04.1] [10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.49-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] [10:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.49-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] [10:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-fwaas [source] (disco-proposed) [1:14.0.0-0ubuntu1.2] [10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (disco-proposed) [3:15.1.1-0ubuntu1] [10:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (disco-proposed) [2:14.0.3-0ubuntu1] [10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-lbaas [source] (disco-proposed) [2:14.0.1-0ubuntu1] [10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted octavia [source] (disco-proposed) [4.1.0-0ubuntu1] [10:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceph [source] (disco-proposed) [13.2.7-0ubuntu0.19.04.1] [10:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected xen [source] (disco-proposed) [4.9.2-0ubuntu4] [10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted thunar [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.15-0ubuntu1.18.04.1] [10:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted designate-dashboard [source] (bionic-proposed) [6.0.0-0ubuntu1.2] [10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sysdig [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.24.1-1ubuntu3~18.04.1] [10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tomcat-native [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.21-1~18.04.1build1] [10:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unicode-data [source] (xenial-proposed) [8.0-3ubuntu0.16.04.1] [10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pbcommand [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.1.1+git20191122.ec024c3-1] [10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted reprotest [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.7.10build1.1] [10:47] vorlon: i wonder if i can somehow extra-exclude notification-daemon on i386 [10:48] vorlon: i don't think Extra-Exclude: sugar is working [10:53] * xnox tries desktop-minimal !notification-daemon === andrewc is now known as Guest25157 [10:58] So the omnidb failure triggered by psycopg2, it's on i386, we removed omnidb there, hence the failure [11:00] python-apt/i386 too [11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu15 => 2.04-1ubuntu15] (core) [11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chromium-browser (eoan-proposed/universe) [77.0.3865.120-0ubuntu1.19.10.1 => 79.0.3945.79-0ubuntu0.19.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop) [11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu15 => 2.04-1ubuntu15] (core) [12:06] hm [12:06] vorlon: /running currently shows that nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 is running test for 24m on ppc64le [12:06] even though it doesn't exist there [12:06] but hey it is compiling things [12:06] for focal [12:07] * xnox ponders were those results get stored given that overview page does not show it [12:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1066.71] (kernel) [12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1066.71] [12:42] xnox: are you sure? journalctl -e ADT_PACKAGE=nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 --no-pager ADT_ARCH=ppc64el on the worker is empty [12:42] or something triggered by it? [12:43] because yes, I see ppc64el stuff trigerred by that [12:43] lammps, petsc [12:43] and more [12:46] https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/SqwCdh8Y84/ [12:48] some arch:all package build by nvidia that those depend on? [13:10] juliank: nope, there are none [13:10] fun [13:10] juliank: maybe those things "recoomend" nvidia, and even if it doesn't exist, it gets triggered? [13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: horizon (disco-proposed/main) [3:15.1.1-0ubuntu1 => 3:15.1.1-0ubuntu1.1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [13:10] maybe, idk [13:11] britney is the one figuring out what to test, I think? it should know better [13:22] someone figuring out if there's a problem, then debugging and/or writing a testcase and/or fixing that would be nice :-) [13:22] or bringing britney out of the stone ages, perhaps debian fixed it years ago ... [13:22] s/ages/age/ [13:27] is britney is one of those ocaml monsters? [13:28] no, it's a python application [13:28] ah [13:28] that's decent [13:28] we've just got ourselves a bit ol' fork from what Debian had several years ago [13:32] it is still based on the bald britney though ... [13:35] ogra: that's uncalled for. [13:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-desktop3 (eoan-proposed/main) [3.34.1-1ubuntu1 => 3.34.2-2ubuntu1~19.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop) [14:43] can someone please reject chromium-browser from the eoan unapproved queue? on second thought, the fix for bug #1853574 shouldn't be SRUed (I commented on the bug to explain why) [14:43] bug 1853574 in chromium-browser (Ubuntu) "Syntax error in /usr/bin/chromium-browser when xdg-settings get default-web-browser is empty" [Low,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1853574 [14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected chromium-browser [source] (eoan-proposed) [79.0.3945.79-0ubuntu0.19.10.1] [14:48] oSoMoN, ^ [15:00] cheers [15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: backport-iwlwifi-dkms (eoan-proposed/universe) [7906-0ubuntu2~19.10.1 => 7906-0ubuntu3] (no packageset) [16:31] vorlon: I believe the kimagemapeditor ppc64el and s390x binaries are now safely removable [16:33] pulseaudio-qt i386 also need adding to the badtest I think, or existing hint bumped [16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted backport-iwlwifi-dkms [source] (eoan-proposed) [7906-0ubuntu3] [16:55] RikMills: pulseaudio-qt/i386 is already badtested for all versions [16:56] xnox: yes, the extra-exclude doesn't work for this, I forgot how it does work; it basically negates an Extra-Include [16:59] vorlon: oh. I was looking at a old browser window I forgot I had open on a spare virtual desktop. sorry! [17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (eoan-proposed/main) [0.8.1-1ubuntu14.2 => 0.8.1-1ubuntu14.3] (core) [17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (bionic-proposed/main) [0.7.5-1ubuntu16.6 => 0.7.5-1ubuntu16.7] (core) [17:36] RikMills: kimagemapeditor/{ppc64el,s390x} removed [17:39] thank you! [17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (disco-proposed/main) [0.7.12-1ubuntu5 => 0.7.12-1ubuntu5.1] (core) [20:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1] [20:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.9-0ubuntu2 => 1.2.10-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1] (desktop-core) [20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1] [20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.9-0ubuntu2 => 1.2.10-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1] (desktop-core) [20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1] [20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1] (desktop-core) [20:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1] (desktop-core) [20:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1] (desktop-core) [20:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1] (desktop-core) [21:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupdate [source] (bionic-proposed) [12-7~ubuntu18.04.1] [21:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: binutils (eoan-proposed/main) [2.33-2ubuntu1 => 2.33-2ubuntu1.1] (core) [21:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gzip (eoan-proposed/main) [1.10-0ubuntu3 => 1.10-0ubuntu3.1] (core) [21:40] vorlon, could you please accept gzip and binutils later today? ^ [21:41] vorlon, they are in focal-proposed right now, and those are the last bits to make eoan working on wsl [21:43] vorlon, if we can get it in eoan-proposed today, they can get to release before christmas (with lifting the aging requirement by one day for gzip only) [21:44] vorlon, binutils does not have to migrate first [21:50] rbalint: s/accept/review/ [21:54] rbalint: The changelog only mentions it's a rebuild with the new binutils, but debian/rules also twiddles LDFLAGS. Intended-but-undocumented, or debugging cruft that slipped in? [21:54] rbalint: (for gzip, that is) [22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-desktop3 [source] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.2-2ubuntu1~19.10.1] [23:17] please let util-linux through from -proposed; openjdk-13 tests have always been neutral/erroring out on arm64, and ocfs2-tools is no longer built for s390x [23:18] yep I have a RM for ocfs2-tools s390x [23:23] vorlon: silx/0.11.0+dfsg-2 looks regressed in -release I think? could that be badtested to let pyqt5 through? [23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-sequoia-sqv [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.12.0-2] (no packageset)