| oSoMoN | good morning desktoppers | 06:06 |
|---|---|---|
| duflu | Morning oSoMoN | 06:07 |
| oSoMoN | hey duflu | 06:30 |
| jibel | hi oSoMoN, duflu and everyone | 06:32 |
| duflu | jamesh, is that problematic version 7.5 (reverted from updates to proposed) going to get released again in 7.6? | 06:34 |
| duflu | The code hasn't changed | 06:34 |
| duflu | https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-audio-dev/pulseaudio/log/?h=ubuntu-bionic | 06:34 |
| duflu | Morning jibel | 06:34 |
| jamesh | duflu: it will migrate back to updates with the new snapd-glib | 06:34 |
| duflu | jamesh, good then :) | 06:34 |
| jamesh | no need for a new release | 06:34 |
| duflu | I was worried about having to rewrite the history of 7.6 before it goes out | 06:35 |
| jamesh | I don't think anyone has discovered any problems with the policy module: it was just the dependency issue with libsnapd-glib1 pulling in snapd | 06:36 |
| duflu | 👍 | 06:44 |
| oSoMoN | salut jibel | 07:11 |
| oSoMoN | hey jamesh | 07:11 |
| marcustomlinson | duflu: did you determine that libreoffice was actually at fault here? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1856702 | 07:32 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1856702 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) "LibreOffice window behind Firefox was flickering when Firefox asked me for a passsword to access the CUPS logs." [Undecided,New] | 07:32 |
| marcustomlinson | sounded more like a general rendering issue than specifically libreoffice. curious if you knew something more about it | 07:35 |
| duflu | marcustomlinson, no just most likely LO if other apps are unaffected | 07:45 |
| duflu | Back later... | 07:45 |
| marcustomlinson | morning desktoppers | 08:38 |
| duflu | Oh hi marcustomlinson :) | 08:40 |
| marcustomlinson | I'm really awake now ;) | 08:40 |
| duflu | marcustomlinson, I tidied up bug 1856702 for you. | 08:55 |
| ubot5 | bug 1856702 in mutter (Ubuntu) "LibreOffice window behind Firefox was flickering when Firefox asked me for a passsword to access the CUPS logs." [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1856702 | 08:55 |
| marcustomlinson | oh excellent thanks! | 08:55 |
| Laney | o/ | 09:02 |
| duflu | \o | 09:09 |
| oSoMoN | good morning marcustomlinson, Laney | 10:03 |
| popey | Good morning | 10:32 |
| popey | if gnome-shell is consuming 3.0g RES in top, should I be concerned? | 10:33 |
| popey | I mean, i have 32GB RAM, but this seems excessive | 10:33 |
| duflu | Morning popey, yes gigabytes is a concern but only if it is RES or RSS | 10:38 |
| duflu | We have bug 1856516 about that just this week | 10:38 |
| ubot5 | bug 1856516 in gnome-shell (Ubuntu) "Excessive memory usage in Wayland session" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1856516 | 10:38 |
| popey | last time this happened you asked me to gather vmm data | 10:38 |
| popey | https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/HKWmz7gKhx/ | 10:38 |
| popey | I'm on x | 10:39 |
| popey | i have a cronjob I just started which gathers the data you asked for in another bug report | 10:39 |
| duflu | popey that history shows the RSS at 3.2GB the whole time. Thanks, but I am not sure we need more info other than that proof of a bug. Maybe just ensure you don't have any non-Ubuntu extensions | 10:40 |
| popey | is there a way to list my active extensions easily? | 10:40 |
| duflu | I'm not sure if you want an *accurate* list. I rely on the automatic attachments to peoples' bug reports | 10:41 |
| duflu | popey, also they have to be uninstalled. Anything installed but inactive can still hurt | 10:41 |
| duflu | Because bugs | 10:42 |
| popey | hm, okay. I don't actually think I have any, but i cant be 100% certain | 10:42 |
| popey | indeed | 10:42 |
| popey | I'll file a dummy bug in ubuntu-bug against gnome-shell and throw it away, that'll gather it? | 10:42 |
| duflu | popey, yes I was just about to ask for that. It's more valid than "dummy" :) | 10:42 |
| popey | hah | 10:43 |
| popey | ok, while I do that, check this out. another bug I dunno if it has been filed... | 10:43 |
| popey | https://youtu.be/869e9YwW0vw | 10:43 |
| duflu | Whoa, youtube within youtube. Yeah I am looking at stutters/freezes again now | 10:44 |
| duflu | Unless strace or something in the journalctl -f shows a possible cause then I am not sure what to suggest right now | 10:45 |
| popey | ok | 10:45 |
| duflu | IO% is an interesting angle though | 10:46 |
| duflu | Got to run | 10:51 |
| JanC | gnome-shell always keeps growing the longer you run it, unfortunately | 11:19 |
| popey | I tend to be averse to rebooting, I suspend my laptop all the time and leave it running all day and night often. | 11:22 |
| popey | Which I don't think is unreasonable behaviour :) | 11:22 |
| JanC | you can always try restarting gnome-shell, that should get you some memory back | 11:23 |
| popey | Good point. | 11:23 |
| JanC | gnome-shell is at 4.7 GiB here now, so I guess I should restart it too... :P | 11:26 |
| JanC | (desktop that is running pretty much 24/7) | 11:27 |
| JanC | with an uptime of a couple of weeks... | 11:28 |
| popey | do you have a bunch of extensions out of interest? | 11:28 |
| JanC | I have some, but I tested for a couple weeks 1 or 2 releases ago where I only had the default ones, and it had the same issues | 11:30 |
| JanC | compiz also had similar issues, of course... | 11:31 |
| RikMills | I seem to recall a bug about ubiquity detecting hardware stage hanging for a long while with 100% CPU? Does anyway have a link? | 12:00 |
| hellsworth | good morning desktopers | 16:03 |
| oSoMoN | good morning hellsworth | 16:21 |
| hellsworth | hi! | 16:21 |
| hellsworth | i hope your day is going well :) | 16:21 |
| oSoMoN | hellsworth, it is, thanks! how are you? | 16:39 |
| hellsworth | oh i'm great thanks! | 16:43 |
| marcustomlinson | jdstrand: hey, I'm new to this sort of issue, is there something I need to do for this? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1849680 | 17:44 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1849680 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) "audit spam in dmesg (libreoffice)" [Undecided,New] | 17:44 |
| jdstrand | marcustomlinson: I've not looked at the packaging much before just now, but it looks like debian/rules references dh_apparmor and there is setup via sysui/desktop/share/apparmor.sh. the basic process would be to patch to add accesses to the profiles. best practice would be to attach that to the bug and a member of the security team can review it | 17:52 |
| marcustomlinson | okidokes | 17:54 |
| marcustomlinson | thanks | 17:54 |
| jdstrand | marcustomlinson: if you need help with the rules, that's fine too | 17:55 |
| jdstrand | marcustomlinson: /sys/fs/cgroup/{,**} r, would be one | 17:55 |
| jdstrand | marcustomlinson: using the dri-common abstraction would be another | 17:56 |
| jdstrand | marcustomlinson: using the mesa abstraction for the mesa_shader_cache write is probably fine | 17:58 |
| jdstrand | marcustomlinson: you can test that the profile compiles with 'apparmor_parser -QTK profile' (no root needed) and can load into the kernel with 'apparmor_parser -r profile' (you probably knew that :) | 17:59 |
| jdstrand | marcustomlinson: @{PROC]/@{pid}/cgroup r, | 18:00 |
| jdstrand | marcustomlinson: @{PROC]/@{pid}/mountinfo r, | 18:00 |
| jdstrand | marcustomlinson: I think that all together that'll get rid of a lot of noise | 18:00 |
| marcustomlinson | jdstrand: that helps a lot thanks! | 18:09 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!