| === StevenK_ is now known as StevenK | ||
| jibel | doko, updated autopilot-gtk is in proposed and should fix the dependency on python-testtools and python-fixtures | 05:48 |
|---|---|---|
| alkisg | Hi, where would I file a bug report for the chromium *debian* package to be available in universe for 20.04? Sure, there's the chromium-browser snapd alternative, but is there any reason to block that debian package from reaching ubuntu users? | 06:32 |
| alkisg | Ah ok there's already one for it: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium/+bug/1855594 | 06:38 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1855594 in chromium (Ubuntu) "Sync chromium 78.0.3904.108-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] | 06:38 |
| === ricab is now known as ricab|lunch | ||
| jibel | bdmurray, I filed bug 1856862 for the broken upgrades to 20.04 | 15:37 |
| ubottu | bug 1856862 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "automated upgrade tests with AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'section' in in DistUpgradeCache.py line 942 in tryMarkObsoleteForRemoval" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1856862 | 15:37 |
| bdmurray | jibel: Thanks. Did you sort out the automated upgrade issue we were looking at a bit ago? | 15:38 |
| jibel | bdmurray, no I just started to look into it this week. At first sight it's weird to see snap packages in the list of remove_candidates, but I haven't look at the code yet. | 15:40 |
| === ricab|lunch is now known as ricab | ||
| jibel | bdmurray, it happens when the default snaps are not installed. I added a test case. | 18:14 |
| bdmurray | jibel: which it? | 18:15 |
| jibel | bdmurray, the crash from bug 1856862 | 18:16 |
| ubottu | bug 1856862 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "Upgrade to focal fails with AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'section' in in DistUpgradeCache.py line 942 when default snap packages are not installed" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1856862 | 18:16 |
| bdmurray | jibel: got it, thanks! | 18:16 |
| coreycb | is anyone else having package build issues in LP? | 19:47 |
| coreycb | https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/bjgpNIhV/ | 19:47 |
| coreycb | looks like that's being worked on | 20:33 |
| cjwatson | Yeah trying to get that reverted now | 20:34 |
| cjwatson | And I'll retry failed builds in a bit | 20:34 |
| cjwatson | Reverted on production, and I'm in the process of bulk-retrying failures from the relevant time period | 21:02 |
| cjwatson | Sorry for the inconvenience | 21:02 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!