=== StevenK_ is now known as StevenK [05:48] doko, updated autopilot-gtk is in proposed and should fix the dependency on python-testtools and python-fixtures [06:32] Hi, where would I file a bug report for the chromium *debian* package to be available in universe for 20.04? Sure, there's the chromium-browser snapd alternative, but is there any reason to block that debian package from reaching ubuntu users? [06:38] Ah ok there's already one for it: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium/+bug/1855594 [06:38] Launchpad bug 1855594 in chromium (Ubuntu) "Sync chromium 78.0.3904.108-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] === ricab is now known as ricab|lunch [15:37] bdmurray, I filed bug 1856862 for the broken upgrades to 20.04 [15:37] bug 1856862 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "automated upgrade tests with AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'section' in in DistUpgradeCache.py line 942 in tryMarkObsoleteForRemoval" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1856862 [15:38] jibel: Thanks. Did you sort out the automated upgrade issue we were looking at a bit ago? [15:40] bdmurray, no I just started to look into it this week. At first sight it's weird to see snap packages in the list of remove_candidates, but I haven't look at the code yet. === ricab|lunch is now known as ricab [18:14] bdmurray, it happens when the default snaps are not installed. I added a test case. [18:15] jibel: which it? [18:16] bdmurray, the crash from bug 1856862 [18:16] bug 1856862 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "Upgrade to focal fails with AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'section' in in DistUpgradeCache.py line 942 when default snap packages are not installed" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1856862 [18:16] jibel: got it, thanks! [19:47] is anyone else having package build issues in LP? [19:47] https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/bjgpNIhV/ [20:33] looks like that's being worked on [20:34] Yeah trying to get that reverted now [20:34] And I'll retry failed builds in a bit [21:02] Reverted on production, and I'm in the process of bulk-retrying failures from the relevant time period [21:02] Sorry for the inconvenience