[03:24] <OvenWerks> Would missing data have anything to do with AMD governor? Anyway. Hope you find it all
[03:25] <OvenWerks> Eickmeyer: Is it reasonable to expect a user to hit the enter/return as part of entering a new name for a pulse bridge?
[03:37]  * OvenWerks thinks he will assume so
[03:50] <Eickmeyer> OvenWerks: Yes, absolutely.
[03:50] <OvenWerks> makes things easier
[03:50] <Eickmeyer> And no, looks like a good chunk of the data is gone. The good news is that everything git-wise was pushed, so we're good.
[05:53] <OvenWerks> I seem to have found the trick... pulse bridging works much better...
[05:53] <OvenWerks> prolly means I need to do the same for the rest of the jack stuff.
[05:54] <OvenWerks> The trick... with a combo box is that when it is updated or refilled it emits a signal even if it is set sensitive = False
[05:55] <Eickmeyer> Oh! Cool!
[05:57] <OvenWerks> So the user changes it and we save it ... refilling the widget which emits signal again and goes in circles... so I set a flag with a timed loop that does the update and while that flag is set signals are ignored... but that means everything gets up dated and there is a delay.
[05:58] <OvenWerks> so instead, I set the widgets I want to deal with to sensitive: False and just check that instead of my flag. It means I just change what has to be changed and there is no delay.
[05:59] <OvenWerks> pending publish
[06:00] <OvenWerks> I have had Carla crash a few times.
[06:00] <Eickmeyer> Oh cool! I'm guessing that cuts the checks it does and lowers the CPU usage.
[06:00] <Eickmeyer> Yeah, new version of Carla is around the corner. Filipe is working hard.
[06:00] <OvenWerks> Maybe not much...
[06:02] <OvenWerks> .7 while jack is running but 3.3 peaks when stopped.
[06:03] <OvenWerks> bounces back and forth in top from .7 to 3.3 or so
[06:03] <Eickmeyer> Interesting. Makes sense, but 3.3 still seems a little high, but I guess it doesn't matter if Jack isn't running since one probably won't be using that interface much if at all.
[06:04] <OvenWerks> xfce task manager shows "0"
[06:04] <OvenWerks> also shows total cpu as 3-4%
[06:05] <Eickmeyer> I'd play around with it, but as stated earlier, that installation went belly-up.
[06:05] <OvenWerks> no worries.
[06:12] <OvenWerks> wonko: I have probably done what you wanted to do already :P
[06:12] <OvenWerks> wonko: feel free to do more though