-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [s390x] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-26.28] (core, kernel)00:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-26.28] (core, kernel)00:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-26.28] (core, kernel)00:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-26.28] (core, kernel)00:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (eoan-proposed/main) [1.2.10-1ubuntu3 => 1.2.10-1ubuntu4] (core)00:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1 => 1.2.10-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.2] (desktop-core)00:46
dokogcc-9 (9.2.1-21ubuntu1 to 9.2.1-22ubuntu1)01:06
dokoMaintainer: Ubuntu Core developers01:06
doko2 days old01:06
dokogccbrig-9/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: hsail-tools01:06
dokoNot considered01:06
dokovorlon: please could you restore this binary?01:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pbcopper [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)05:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nitime [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.8.1-1] (no packageset)05:19
sil2100tjaalton: hey o/ So it seems we still have livefs build failures due to the whole fwupdate/fwupd thing on bionic07:58
sil2100tjaalton: example log: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/456184835/buildlog_ubuntu_bionic_amd64_ubuntu_BUILDING.txt.gz07:59
tjaaltonsil2100: ah, dang08:15
tjaaltonsil2100: while I look into that, could you check xserver hwe sync from eoan for the point-release ;)08:16
tjaaltonsil2100: looks like the flafour metapackages depend on fwupdate-signed08:20
tjaaltonlike ubuntu-desktop08:20
tjaaltonsorry, recommend08:25
tjaaltonbut the new fwupdate conflicts with it, since it should install fwupd-signed instead08:25
tjaaltonso, need to modify fwupdate as the option 1 in comment #48 in bug 182076808:31
ubot5bug 1820768 in OEM Priority Project "[SRU] support new cab and new docking firmware upgrade in fwupd 1.2.10" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/182076808:31
tjaaltonadd fwupdate-signed there as a transitional package08:32
sil2100tjaalton: thanks! And looking at xserver in a moment ;)08:34
tjaaltonthanks :)08:34
tjaaltonok I have fwupdate ready08:48
tjaaltonlast checks and then upload..08:49
sil2100Thanks! I need to jump out for a few minutes in a moment, but I'll be back shortly and take care of both08:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupdate (bionic-proposed/main) [12-7~ubuntu18.04.1 => 12-7~ubuntu18.04.2] (core)08:54
=== andrewc is now known as Guest35220
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-26.28]09:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-26.28]09:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-26.28]09:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-26.28]09:23
sil2100tjaalton: do you think the preinst changes are safe to include here for the fwupdate SRU? Since I see Mario mentioned he didn't yet push it to unstable?09:32
tjaaltonsil2100: we already clean up /var, this will clean up the EFI dir too09:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupdate [source] (bionic-proposed) [12-7~ubuntu18.04.2]09:36
tjaaltonsil2100: now monitor the new queue ;)09:37
Laneytjaalton: you're fixing the iso build failures here?09:38
Laneyif so, good, I just decided to look at that too :-)09:38
tjaaltonLaney: yeah, fallout from the fwupd/fwupdate sru09:38
sil2100Laney: yeah, hopefully should be good now09:42
sil2100tjaalton: yeah ;)09:42
sil2100tjaalton: btw. huh, lots of deletions in the xserver SRU! But I guess it's all part of the backport09:43
sil2100166 files changed, 757 insertions(+), 364767 deletions(-)09:43
tjaaltonsil2100: that's automake cleanups09:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.408.56 => 2.408.57] (desktop-core)09:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.525.35 => 2.525.36] (desktop-core)09:44
tjaaltonoh actually09:45
tjaaltonit's due to the snapshot tarball being built from git09:45
tjaaltonversus the upstream tarball of 1.20.409:45
tjaaltonoh, and that it's a native package now.. sigh09:46
tjaaltonsil2100: you can reject if you want an orig.tar.gz instead of a native pkg, not that it changes the diff a bit09:46
tjaaltonor the build09:46
tjaaltonI'll sru 1.20.6 separately09:46
tjaaltononce it's actually in focal..09:46
sil2100tjaalton: hm, could you re-upload then? Since that would then fit what's in eoan and previously been in bionic09:48
sil2100The diff is fine since yeah09:48
tjaaltonsil2100: uploaded, rejected the old one09:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected xorg-server-hwe-18.04 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:1.20.5+git20191008-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]09:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server-hwe-18.04 (bionic-proposed/main) [2:1.20.4-1ubuntu3~18.04.2 => 2:1.20.5+git20191008-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (no packageset)09:53
sil2100tjaalton: thanks!09:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server-hwe-18.04 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:1.20.5+git20191008-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]10:01
rbalintsil2100, could you please look at gzip in eoan?11:07
rbalintsil2100, it is almost only a rebuild and lifting the aging requirement could fix eoan on wsl before the holidays11:09
rbalintsil2100, the same rebuild took place in focal last week and we did not see any issue11:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mdp [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [3.5-1.1] (no packageset)11:13
sil2100rbalint: ah, right, remember that one, let me take a quick look again11:13
sil2100rbalint: hm, but that also requires releasing binutils, right?11:14
rbalintsil2100, no, binutils can stay in proposed, since it is a build-time change only11:15
rbalintsil2100, a theoretical security update would break gzip again, but it is unlikely to happen11:16
sil2100rbalint: actually, was the binutils SRU built in a -security PPA?11:35
sil2100Looks like it didn't11:36
sil2100rbalint: so regardless of whether binutils is in -proposed or not, any security update of gzip would revert this fix11:36
rbalintsil2100, ah, no, good point11:36
sil2100rbalint: I think we need to get binutils re-built against -security only and re-uploaded11:36
rbalintsil2100, yes, agreed, could you please drop it from proposed?11:37
rbalintsil2100, binutils11:37
sil2100Let's leave it there but mark on the bug that this needs a re-build11:38
sil2100rbalint: that being said, I'm thinking of just releasing gzip as is in this case11:38
sil2100Worst case we'll get the fix reverted, which we can follow up with another rebuild11:39
rbalintsil2100, thanks for the gzip case11:39
rbalintsil2100, i think it is better to drop binutils to avoid new packages built using it11:40
rbalintsil2100, the sru doc says that binutils needs to be rebuilt in a reliable ppa with only -securty and release enabled11:41
rbalintsil2100, what makes the ppa reliable, i.e. can i do it?11:41
sil2100rbalint: yeah, guess Steve missed that11:41
rbalintsil2100, maybe in bileto?11:41
sil2100rbalint: many of us use Bileto, just be sure to switch the PPA to only use -security11:42
sil2100I modified Bileto not to change the deps by itself11:42
* apw hates on bileto11:42
rbalintapw why?11:42
apwbecause it makes things which are hard to review; standard whine11:42
sil2100So once you create a PPA and switch the deps, those should not be changed ever again11:42
sil2100apw: yeah, in this case it would be hard to review anyway, since this particular case needs to be a bin-sync ;)11:43
rbalintapw, i see this point11:43
rbalintapw, maybe usd-importer could grow something to import all sources from a ppa11:44
apwwe "just" need copies to generate diffs too11:44
Laneyget Trevinho to follow up on https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu-archive-tools/sru-review-bileto-support/+merge/364193 and merge it!11:54
sil2100rbalint: once you have the binaries built, please sync them to Ubuntu and I can approve those11:55
tjaaltonsil2100: did the image build pass now?11:56
rbalintsil2100, i'm building them in ppa:ci-train-ppa-service/3876 , thanks!11:58
sil2100tjaalton: no, still failing, it looks like something still depends on the old fwupd and pulls in libfwup1 instead of libfwup2?12:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-calculator (bionic-proposed/main) [1:3.28.2-1~ubuntu18.04.2 => 1:3.28.2-1~ubuntu18.04.3] (ubuntu-desktop)12:07
Trevinhosil2100, hey, may I ask you a quick SRU review for gnome-calculator in bionic?12:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.525.36]12:12
Trevinhoas we had a regression upload in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/175682612:12
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1756826 in nautilus (Ubuntu Bionic) "hangs when remote search provider performs expensive operation" [High,In progress]12:12
Trevinhothis fixes it so we can unblock the whole set12:12
sil2100Trevinho: ACK!12:15
Trevinhosil2100, thanks12:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.57]12:16
TrevinhoI've also wrote a clarification on bug, as per sé the other updates can be released while calculator retained, how can we handle this situation when a verification-done applies to some packages of a set but not to all and when a failing one doesn't affect the oters?12:16
tjaaltonsil2100: weird, it's only rdeps are old fwupdate and fwupd.. maybe it needs a dummy pkg as well?12:16
tjaaltonearlier in the log it says 'removing libfwup1'.. wonder where that came from12:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-74.83~16.04.1] (kernel)12:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-74.83~16.04.1] (kernel)12:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-calculator [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.28.2-1~ubuntu18.04.3]12:36
TrevinhoLaney, I've addressed https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu-archive-tools/sru-review-bileto-support/+merge/364193 thanks for remiding me :)12:40
Laneyapw: merge that shizzle!12:42
apwTrevinho, looks like it now has conflicts ... i assume it needs a rebase12:43
Trevinhoapw, ok fixed12:48
Trevinhogiven there are no syncs, I had to fake few things to test it, so I hope it works as it was12:48
Trevinhosyncs in queue I mean12:48
rbalintsil2100, I've also finished verifying wslu for all releases, could you please take a look?13:10
rbalintsil2100, also could you please merge https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/376990 for sytemd? it is optimistic because assumes that armhf will pass :-)13:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-74.83~16.04.1]13:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-74.83~16.04.1]13:42
sil2100rbalint: quite convenient with those screenshots for verification!13:56
rbalintsil2100, sarcasm? :-)13:57
sil2100rbalint: no, actually it is really quite convenient ;)13:58
sil2100It shows that the tests have been actually ran, and in this particular case it's good to have those 4 windows next to each other, 1-per series13:59
sil2100tjaalton: are you still looking into the fwupd-related failure?14:15
=== andrewc is now known as Guest19451
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-26.28~18.04.1] (kernel)14:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-26.28~18.04.1] (kernel)14:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-26.28~18.04.1] (kernel)14:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-26.28~18.04.1]14:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-26.28~18.04.1]14:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-26.28~18.04.1]14:29
sforsheevorlon: you had said a couple of weeks ago that you were going to work through the issues blocking virtualbox in focal-proposed from migrating. What's the status on that?14:50
sforsheethe only thing blocking the kernel in focal-proposed is that the virtualbox in -release is not compatible with 5.414:50
xnoxLaney:  sil2100: do you think you can review https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-archive-tools/unbreak-nusakan/+merge/376993 and land it on nusakan?15:13
tjaaltonsil2100: well, what I wrote above might be what's needed.. vorlon, probably needs you to double-check if libfwup1 needs to be transitional..15:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-74.84] (core, kernel)15:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-74.84] (core, kernel)15:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-74.84]15:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-74.84]15:43
Laneyxnox: I can't merge things for lp:ubuntu-archive-tools, you want an archive admin I'm afraid16:00
Laneydoes look ok though16:01
xnoxLaney:  can you cowboy to nusakan? =)16:01
Laneymaybe we can try a bit harder to get it merged first16:02
Laneyapw: fancy reviewing that branch from xnox please ^-?16:02
xnoxmaybe doko can ?16:07
Laneyeveryone's on the christmas brandy already16:07
dokoxnox: no, leaving after the meeting, and traveling tomorrow16:10
xnoxLaney:  i think all other archive admins are past EOD => End of Decade16:16
xnoxLaney:  or i guess we can change cdimage to like run under python3 =) or like quickly dist-upgrade it to focal16:17
cjwatsonI see somebody's landed it, so I can deploy it16:18
cjwatsonOh, somebody already did16:19
LaneyAh great, thanks to the silent reviewer16:20
xnoxwho is end of decade16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: lv2vst (focal-proposed/primary) [20190930-0ubuntu1]16:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1028.29] (core, kernel)16:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1011.12] (core, kernel)16:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-1011.12]17:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1028.29]17:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libglvnd [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.0-4] (core, i386-whitelist)17:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libglvnd [i386] (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.0-4] (core, i386-whitelist)17:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libglvnd [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.0-4] (core, i386-whitelist)17:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libglvnd [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.0-4] (core, i386-whitelist)17:04
apwLaney, did you get sorted, i was afk17:06
Laneyyep, the Secret Archive Admin took care of it17:06
apwsaa shhh17:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libglvnd [armhf] (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.0-4] (core, i386-whitelist)17:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libglvnd [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.0-4] (core, i386-whitelist)17:17
vorlonsforshee: I fixed the autopkgtest failure in kopanocore that locutus_ was struggling with; but there is another autopkgtest failure in that package which I have not been looking at because I assumed he would follow through on it17:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1052.56] (kernel)17:21
locutus_vorlon, I had a look and didn't figure out what was going on17:22
locutus_I can do another test later today17:22
locutus_but I still don't understand what is missing17:22
vorlontjaalton: a library package shouldn't need to be transitional; nothing is forcing removal of libfwup1 on upgrade, is it?17:22
tjaaltonvorlon: see the build log https://launchpadlibrarian.net/456378284/buildlog_ubuntu_bionic_amd64_ubuntu_BUILDING.txt.gz17:23
tjaaltonI don't understand what's happening there.. it says "Removing: libfwup1"17:23
tjaaltonas if it was already installed?17:24
vorlonwhy does fwupdate declare a breaks on a library?17:24
tjaaltonfwupdate-signed is now transitional, that fixed an issue17:24
tjaaltonbeats me17:24
vorlonthen I think that needs to be dropped17:25
apwvorlon, it feels more like it should e a Depends: >NN if anything17:25
tjaaltonok, I'll do that..17:25
vorlonsince that will also cause problems on upgrade with update-manager, due to the requirement to remove binary packages17:25
tjaaltonshould drop the breaks on libfwup-dev too?17:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1052.56]17:31
tjaaltonsil2100, vorlon: uploaded, dropped -dev too17:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nitime [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.8.1-2] (no packageset)17:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupdate (bionic-proposed/main) [12-7~ubuntu18.04.2 => 12-7~ubuntu18.04.3] (core)17:36
EickmeyerAAs: We have a package in sourceNEW for lv2vst. This is basically a plugin wrapper that can be used to create other plugins. It's a build dep for avldrums.lv2 which is a virtual drumset that needs to be in the repos in case Hydrogen fails to release their version 1.0 (read: Qt5) version in time for focal.18:06
sil2100tjaalton: looking18:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupdate [source] (bionic-proposed) [12-7~ubuntu18.04.3]18:17
vorlonproposed-migration runs failing over the last couple of hours due to network failures (launchpad / swift)18:45
cjwatsonvorlon: not Launchpad18:50
cjwatsonthat's the PS4.5 Swift which isn't even the same Swift as the one the LP librarian uses :)18:51
vorloncjwatson: there was one failure trying to grab from launchpad codehosting18:51
vorlonnot saying it's launchpad's fault, maybe it was a proxy problem18:51
cjwatsonWhich one was that?  I looked at a couple of logs and didn't see it18:52
vorloncjwatson: 16:58:4618:52
cjwatsonOh yeah18:53
cjwatsonNot sure what that was.  Could've been an XML-RPC timeout or something ...18:53
cjwatsonOh hmm, big spike on https://lpstats.canonical.com/graphs/AppServer5XXsLpnet/nocache/18:57
cjwatsonTaken to #is internal18:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed adduser from i386-whitelist in focal20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed ca-certificates from i386-whitelist in focal20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed debconf from i386-whitelist in focal20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed debootstrap from i386-whitelist in focal20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed germinate from i386-whitelist in focal20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed humanity-icon-theme from i386-whitelist in focal20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed live-build from i386-whitelist in focal20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed policyrcd-script-zg2 from i386-whitelist in focal20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed sensible-utils from i386-whitelist in focal20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed software-properties from i386-whitelist in focal20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed tzdata from i386-whitelist in focal20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed ubuntu-keyring from i386-whitelist in focal20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed ubuntu-themes from i386-whitelist in focal20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed vmdk-stream-converter from i386-whitelist in focal20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gtkspell to i386-whitelist in focal20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added inkscape to i386-whitelist in focal20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libcdr to i386-whitelist in focal20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libvisio to i386-whitelist in focal20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libwpd to i386-whitelist in focal20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libwpg to i386-whitelist in focal20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: networkx (focal-proposed/primary) [2.4-2]21:31
=== s8321414_ is now known as s8321414

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!