[00:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [s390x] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-26.28] (core, kernel)
[00:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-26.28] (core, kernel)
[00:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-26.28] (core, kernel)
[00:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-26.28] (core, kernel)
[00:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (eoan-proposed/main) [1.2.10-1ubuntu3 => 1.2.10-1ubuntu4] (core)
[00:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1 => 1.2.10-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.2] (desktop-core)
[01:06] <doko> gcc-9 (9.2.1-21ubuntu1 to 9.2.1-22ubuntu1)
[01:06] <doko> Maintainer: Ubuntu Core developers
[01:06] <doko> 2 days old
[01:06] <doko> gccbrig-9/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: hsail-tools
[01:06] <doko> Not considered
[01:06] <doko> vorlon: please could you restore this binary?
[05:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pbcopper [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nitime [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.8.1-1] (no packageset)
[07:58] <sil2100> tjaalton: hey o/ So it seems we still have livefs build failures due to the whole fwupdate/fwupd thing on bionic
[07:59] <sil2100> tjaalton: example log: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/456184835/buildlog_ubuntu_bionic_amd64_ubuntu_BUILDING.txt.gz
[08:15] <tjaalton> sil2100: ah, dang
[08:16] <tjaalton> sil2100: while I look into that, could you check xserver hwe sync from eoan for the point-release ;)
[08:20] <tjaalton> sil2100: looks like the flafour metapackages depend on fwupdate-signed
[08:20] <tjaalton> like ubuntu-desktop
[08:25] <tjaalton> sorry, recommend
[08:25] <tjaalton> but the new fwupdate conflicts with it, since it should install fwupd-signed instead
[08:31] <tjaalton> so, need to modify fwupdate as the option 1 in comment #48 in bug 1820768
[08:31] <ubot5> bug 1820768 in OEM Priority Project "[SRU] support new cab and new docking firmware upgrade in fwupd 1.2.10" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1820768
[08:32] <tjaalton> add fwupdate-signed there as a transitional package
[08:34] <sil2100> tjaalton: thanks! And looking at xserver in a moment ;)
[08:34] <tjaalton> thanks :)
[08:48] <tjaalton> ok I have fwupdate ready
[08:49] <tjaalton> last checks and then upload..
[08:51] <sil2100> Thanks! I need to jump out for a few minutes in a moment, but I'll be back shortly and take care of both
[08:52] <tjaalton> uploaded
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupdate (bionic-proposed/main) [12-7~ubuntu18.04.1 => 12-7~ubuntu18.04.2] (core)
=== andrewc is now known as Guest35220
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-26.28]
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-26.28]
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-26.28]
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-26.28]
[09:32] <sil2100> tjaalton: do you think the preinst changes are safe to include here for the fwupdate SRU? Since I see Mario mentioned he didn't yet push it to unstable?
[09:33] <tjaalton> sil2100: we already clean up /var, this will clean up the EFI dir too
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupdate [source] (bionic-proposed) [12-7~ubuntu18.04.2]
[09:37] <tjaalton> sil2100: now monitor the new queue ;)
[09:38] <Laney> tjaalton: you're fixing the iso build failures here?
[09:38] <Laney> if so, good, I just decided to look at that too :-)
[09:38] <tjaalton> Laney: yeah, fallout from the fwupd/fwupdate sru
[09:39] <Laney> indeed
[09:42] <sil2100> Laney: yeah, hopefully should be good now
[09:42] <sil2100> tjaalton: yeah ;)
[09:43] <sil2100> tjaalton: btw. huh, lots of deletions in the xserver SRU! But I guess it's all part of the backport
[09:43] <sil2100> 166 files changed, 757 insertions(+), 364767 deletions(-)
[09:43] <tjaalton> sil2100: that's automake cleanups
[09:43] <sil2100> ;)
[09:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.408.56 => 2.408.57] (desktop-core)
[09:43] <tjaalton> Makefile.in
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.525.35 => 2.525.36] (desktop-core)
[09:45] <tjaalton> oh actually
[09:45] <tjaalton> it's due to the snapshot tarball being built from git
[09:45] <tjaalton> versus the upstream tarball of 1.20.4
[09:46] <tjaalton> oh, and that it's a native package now.. sigh
[09:46] <tjaalton> sil2100: you can reject if you want an orig.tar.gz instead of a native pkg, not that it changes the diff a bit
[09:46] <tjaalton> or the build
[09:46] <tjaalton> I'll sru 1.20.6 separately
[09:46] <tjaalton> once it's actually in focal..
[09:48] <sil2100> tjaalton: hm, could you re-upload then? Since that would then fit what's in eoan and previously been in bionic
[09:48] <sil2100> The diff is fine since yeah
[09:49] <tjaalton> yes
[09:53] <tjaalton> sil2100: uploaded, rejected the old one
[09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected xorg-server-hwe-18.04 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:1.20.5+git20191008-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server-hwe-18.04 (bionic-proposed/main) [2:1.20.4-1ubuntu3~18.04.2 => 2:1.20.5+git20191008-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[09:54] <sil2100> tjaalton: thanks!
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server-hwe-18.04 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:1.20.5+git20191008-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[10:01] <tjaalton> \o/
[11:07] <rbalint> sil2100, could you please look at gzip in eoan?
[11:09] <rbalint> sil2100, it is almost only a rebuild and lifting the aging requirement could fix eoan on wsl before the holidays
[11:10] <rbalint> sil2100, the same rebuild took place in focal last week and we did not see any issue
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mdp [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [3.5-1.1] (no packageset)
[11:13] <sil2100> rbalint: ah, right, remember that one, let me take a quick look again
[11:14] <sil2100> rbalint: hm, but that also requires releasing binutils, right?
[11:15] <rbalint> sil2100, no, binutils can stay in proposed, since it is a build-time change only
[11:16] <rbalint> sil2100, a theoretical security update would break gzip again, but it is unlikely to happen
[11:35] <sil2100> rbalint: actually, was the binutils SRU built in a -security PPA?
[11:36] <sil2100> Looks like it didn't
[11:36] <sil2100> rbalint: so regardless of whether binutils is in -proposed or not, any security update of gzip would revert this fix
[11:36] <rbalint> sil2100, ah, no, good point
[11:36] <sil2100> rbalint: I think we need to get binutils re-built against -security only and re-uploaded
[11:37] <rbalint> sil2100, yes, agreed, could you please drop it from proposed?
[11:37] <rbalint> sil2100, binutils
[11:38] <sil2100> Let's leave it there but mark on the bug that this needs a re-build
[11:38] <sil2100> rbalint: that being said, I'm thinking of just releasing gzip as is in this case
[11:39] <sil2100> Worst case we'll get the fix reverted, which we can follow up with another rebuild
[11:39] <rbalint> sil2100, thanks for the gzip case
[11:40] <rbalint> sil2100, i think it is better to drop binutils to avoid new packages built using it
[11:41] <rbalint> sil2100, the sru doc says that binutils needs to be rebuilt in a reliable ppa with only -securty and release enabled
[11:41] <rbalint> sil2100, what makes the ppa reliable, i.e. can i do it?
[11:41] <sil2100> rbalint: yeah, guess Steve missed that
[11:41] <rbalint> sil2100, maybe in bileto?
[11:42] <sil2100> rbalint: many of us use Bileto, just be sure to switch the PPA to only use -security
[11:42] <sil2100> I modified Bileto not to change the deps by itself
[11:42]  * apw hates on bileto
[11:42] <rbalint> apw why?
[11:42] <apw> because it makes things which are hard to review; standard whine
[11:42] <sil2100> So once you create a PPA and switch the deps, those should not be changed ever again
[11:43] <sil2100> apw: yeah, in this case it would be hard to review anyway, since this particular case needs to be a bin-sync ;)
[11:43] <rbalint> apw, i see this point
[11:44] <rbalint> apw, maybe usd-importer could grow something to import all sources from a ppa
[11:44] <apw> we "just" need copies to generate diffs too
[11:54] <Laney> get Trevinho to follow up on https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu-archive-tools/sru-review-bileto-support/+merge/364193 and merge it!
[11:55] <sil2100> rbalint: once you have the binaries built, please sync them to Ubuntu and I can approve those
[11:56] <tjaalton> sil2100: did the image build pass now?
[11:58] <rbalint> sil2100, i'm building them in ppa:ci-train-ppa-service/3876 , thanks!
[12:00] <sil2100> tjaalton: no, still failing, it looks like something still depends on the old fwupd and pulls in libfwup1 instead of libfwup2?
[12:00] <sil2100> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/456378284/buildlog_ubuntu_bionic_amd64_ubuntu_BUILDING.txt.gz
[12:03] <tjaalton> ahah
[12:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-calculator (bionic-proposed/main) [1:3.28.2-1~ubuntu18.04.2 => 1:3.28.2-1~ubuntu18.04.3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[12:12] <Trevinho> sil2100, hey, may I ask you a quick SRU review for gnome-calculator in bionic?
[12:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.525.36]
[12:12] <Trevinho> as we had a regression upload in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1756826
[12:12] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1756826 in nautilus (Ubuntu Bionic) "hangs when remote search provider performs expensive operation" [High,In progress]
[12:12] <Trevinho> this fixes it so we can unblock the whole set
[12:15] <sil2100> Trevinho: ACK!
[12:15] <Trevinho> sil2100, thanks
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.57]
[12:16] <Trevinho> I've also wrote a clarification on bug, as per sé the other updates can be released while calculator retained, how can we handle this situation when a verification-done applies to some packages of a set but not to all and when a failing one doesn't affect the oters?
[12:16] <tjaalton> sil2100: weird, it's only rdeps are old fwupdate and fwupd.. maybe it needs a dummy pkg as well?
[12:17] <tjaalton> earlier in the log it says 'removing libfwup1'.. wonder where that came from
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-74.83~16.04.1] (kernel)
[12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-74.83~16.04.1] (kernel)
[12:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-calculator [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.28.2-1~ubuntu18.04.3]
[12:40] <Trevinho> Laney, I've addressed https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu-archive-tools/sru-review-bileto-support/+merge/364193 thanks for remiding me :)
[12:41] <Laney> sweeeeeeeeet
[12:42] <Laney> apw: merge that shizzle!
[12:43] <apw> Trevinho, looks like it now has conflicts ... i assume it needs a rebase
[12:48] <Trevinho> apw, ok fixed
[12:48] <Trevinho> given there are no syncs, I had to fake few things to test it, so I hope it works as it was
[12:48] <Trevinho> syncs in queue I mean
[13:10] <rbalint> sil2100, I've also finished verifying wslu for all releases, could you please take a look?
[13:38] <rbalint> sil2100, also could you please merge https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/376990 for sytemd? it is optimistic because assumes that armhf will pass :-)
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-74.83~16.04.1]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-74.83~16.04.1]
[13:56] <sil2100> rbalint: quite convenient with those screenshots for verification!
[13:57] <rbalint> sil2100, sarcasm? :-)
[13:58] <sil2100> rbalint: no, actually it is really quite convenient ;)
[13:59] <sil2100> It shows that the tests have been actually ran, and in this particular case it's good to have those 4 windows next to each other, 1-per series
[14:15] <sil2100> tjaalton: are you still looking into the fwupd-related failure?
=== andrewc is now known as Guest19451
[14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-26.28~18.04.1] (kernel)
[14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-26.28~18.04.1] (kernel)
[14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-26.28~18.04.1] (kernel)
[14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-26.28~18.04.1]
[14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-26.28~18.04.1]
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-26.28~18.04.1]
[14:50] <sforshee> vorlon: you had said a couple of weeks ago that you were going to work through the issues blocking virtualbox in focal-proposed from migrating. What's the status on that?
[14:50] <sforshee> the only thing blocking the kernel in focal-proposed is that the virtualbox in -release is not compatible with 5.4
[15:13] <xnox> Laney:  sil2100: do you think you can review https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-archive-tools/unbreak-nusakan/+merge/376993 and land it on nusakan?
[15:38] <tjaalton> sil2100: well, what I wrote above might be what's needed.. vorlon, probably needs you to double-check if libfwup1 needs to be transitional..
[15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-74.84] (core, kernel)
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-74.84] (core, kernel)
[15:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-74.84]
[15:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-74.84]
[16:00] <Laney> xnox: I can't merge things for lp:ubuntu-archive-tools, you want an archive admin I'm afraid
[16:01] <Laney> does look ok though
[16:01] <xnox> Laney:  can you cowboy to nusakan? =)
[16:02] <Laney> hmm
[16:02] <Laney> maybe we can try a bit harder to get it merged first
[16:02] <Laney> apw: fancy reviewing that branch from xnox please ^-?
[16:07] <xnox> maybe doko can ?
[16:07] <Laney> everyone's on the christmas brandy already
[16:10] <doko> xnox: no, leaving after the meeting, and traveling tomorrow
[16:16] <xnox> Laney:  i think all other archive admins are past EOD => End of Decade
[16:16] <Laney> /o\
[16:17] <xnox> Laney:  or i guess we can change cdimage to like run under python3 =) or like quickly dist-upgrade it to focal
[16:18] <cjwatson> I see somebody's landed it, so I can deploy it
[16:19] <cjwatson> Oh, somebody already did
[16:20] <Laney> Ah great, thanks to the silent reviewer
[16:27] <xnox> who is end of decade
[16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: lv2vst (focal-proposed/primary) [20190930-0ubuntu1]
[16:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1028.29] (core, kernel)
[16:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1011.12] (core, kernel)
[17:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-1011.12]
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1028.29]
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libglvnd [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.0-4] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libglvnd [i386] (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.0-4] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libglvnd [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.0-4] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libglvnd [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.0-4] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:06] <apw> Laney, did you get sorted, i was afk
[17:06] <Laney> yep, the Secret Archive Admin took care of it
[17:07] <apw> saa shhh
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libglvnd [armhf] (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.0-4] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libglvnd [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.0-4] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:20] <vorlon> sforshee: I fixed the autopkgtest failure in kopanocore that locutus_ was struggling with; but there is another autopkgtest failure in that package which I have not been looking at because I assumed he would follow through on it
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1052.56] (kernel)
[17:22] <locutus_> vorlon, I had a look and didn't figure out what was going on
[17:22] <locutus_> I can do another test later today
[17:22] <locutus_> but I still don't understand what is missing
[17:22] <vorlon> tjaalton: a library package shouldn't need to be transitional; nothing is forcing removal of libfwup1 on upgrade, is it?
[17:23] <tjaalton> vorlon: see the build log https://launchpadlibrarian.net/456378284/buildlog_ubuntu_bionic_amd64_ubuntu_BUILDING.txt.gz
[17:23] <tjaalton> I don't understand what's happening there.. it says "Removing: libfwup1"
[17:24] <tjaalton> as if it was already installed?
[17:24] <vorlon> uh
[17:24] <vorlon> why does fwupdate declare a breaks on a library?
[17:24] <tjaalton> fwupdate-signed is now transitional, that fixed an issue
[17:24] <tjaalton> beats me
[17:24] <vorlon> ok
[17:25] <vorlon> then I think that needs to be dropped
[17:25] <apw> vorlon, it feels more like it should e a Depends: >NN if anything
[17:25] <tjaalton> ok, I'll do that..
[17:25] <vorlon> since that will also cause problems on upgrade with update-manager, due to the requirement to remove binary packages
[17:25] <tjaalton> should drop the breaks on libfwup-dev too?
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1052.56]
[17:35] <tjaalton> sil2100, vorlon: uploaded, dropped -dev too
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nitime [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.8.1-2] (no packageset)
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupdate (bionic-proposed/main) [12-7~ubuntu18.04.2 => 12-7~ubuntu18.04.3] (core)
[18:06] <Eickmeyer> AAs: We have a package in sourceNEW for lv2vst. This is basically a plugin wrapper that can be used to create other plugins. It's a build dep for avldrums.lv2 which is a virtual drumset that needs to be in the repos in case Hydrogen fails to release their version 1.0 (read: Qt5) version in time for focal.
[18:16] <sil2100> tjaalton: looking
[18:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupdate [source] (bionic-proposed) [12-7~ubuntu18.04.3]
[18:45] <vorlon> proposed-migration runs failing over the last couple of hours due to network failures (launchpad / swift)
[18:50] <cjwatson> vorlon: not Launchpad
[18:51] <cjwatson> that's the PS4.5 Swift which isn't even the same Swift as the one the LP librarian uses :)
[18:51] <vorlon> cjwatson: there was one failure trying to grab from launchpad codehosting
[18:51] <vorlon> not saying it's launchpad's fault, maybe it was a proxy problem
[18:52] <cjwatson> Which one was that?  I looked at a couple of logs and didn't see it
[18:52] <vorlon> cjwatson: 16:58:46
[18:53] <cjwatson> Oh yeah
[18:53] <cjwatson> Not sure what that was.  Could've been an XML-RPC timeout or something ...
[18:57] <cjwatson> Oh hmm, big spike on https://lpstats.canonical.com/graphs/AppServer5XXsLpnet/nocache/
[18:59] <cjwatson> Taken to #is internal
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed adduser from i386-whitelist in focal
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed ca-certificates from i386-whitelist in focal
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed debconf from i386-whitelist in focal
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed debootstrap from i386-whitelist in focal
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed germinate from i386-whitelist in focal
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed humanity-icon-theme from i386-whitelist in focal
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed live-build from i386-whitelist in focal
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed policyrcd-script-zg2 from i386-whitelist in focal
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed sensible-utils from i386-whitelist in focal
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed software-properties from i386-whitelist in focal
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed tzdata from i386-whitelist in focal
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed ubuntu-keyring from i386-whitelist in focal
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed ubuntu-themes from i386-whitelist in focal
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed vmdk-stream-converter from i386-whitelist in focal
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gtkspell to i386-whitelist in focal
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added inkscape to i386-whitelist in focal
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libcdr to i386-whitelist in focal
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libvisio to i386-whitelist in focal
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libwpd to i386-whitelist in focal
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libwpg to i386-whitelist in focal
[21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: networkx (focal-proposed/primary) [2.4-2]
=== s8321414_ is now known as s8321414