| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mdadm (bionic-proposed/main) [4.1~rc1-3~ubuntu18.04.3 => 4.1~rc1-3~ubuntu18.04.4] (core) | 00:00 | |
| xnox | cascardo: i'm making dkms upload into focal, and hopefully it will make the virtualbox dkms test go green. | 00:21 |
|---|---|---|
| xnox | cascardo: imho it should be ok if one installs dkms module, and kernel shims them already, and all is good. | 00:21 |
| xnox | cascardo: however it seems like our kernel only ships like 3 out of 4 virtualbox modules. Why no ship video too? | 00:22 |
| RikMills | vorlon: could you remove the armhf/arm64 julia binaries from -release please? LP: #1856531 | 00:31 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1856531 in libgit2 (Ubuntu) "Please RM julia arm64 and armhf binaries" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1856531 | 00:31 |
| RikMills | removed in debian | 00:31 |
| xnox | cascardo: apw: promote-to-release: Pending -- ready to cop | 01:32 |
| xnox | y | 01:32 |
| xnox | https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/1856701 | 01:32 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1856701 in Kernel SRU Workflow "focal/linux: 5.4.0-9.12 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] | 01:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librcsb-core-wrapper [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.005-8] (no packageset) | 05:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librcsb-core-wrapper [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.005-8] (no packageset) | 05:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librcsb-core-wrapper [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.005-8] (no packageset) | 05:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librcsb-core-wrapper [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.005-8] (no packageset) | 05:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librcsb-core-wrapper [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.005-8] (no packageset) | 05:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librcsb-core-wrapper [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.005-7] | 06:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librcsb-core-wrapper [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.005-8] | 06:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librcsb-core-wrapper [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.005-8] | 06:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librcsb-core-wrapper [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.005-8] | 06:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librcsb-core-wrapper [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.005-7] | 06:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librcsb-core-wrapper [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.005-8] | 06:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librcsb-core-wrapper [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.005-8] | 06:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librcsb-core-wrapper [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.005-7] | 06:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librcsb-core-wrapper [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.005-7] | 06:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librcsb-core-wrapper [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.005-7] | 06:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbbam [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.0.6+dfsg-2] | 06:03 | |
| RikMills | libgit2 migrating. thanks! | 07:39 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, hello, cmake was not a bad upload | 08:46 |
| LocutusOfBorg | it was just needing the fixed qtbase-opensource-src from Debian... | 08:46 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I reuploaded it :) | 08:46 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (it should fix pango sadness, e.g. linphone and ettercap and other pango using cmake projects | 08:46 |
| LocutusOfBorg | apw, Laney autopkgtest for libapache2-mod-auth-openidc/unknown: s390x: Regression ♻ | 10:43 |
| LocutusOfBorg | can you please hint it? it is NBS from source, not sure why it gets in that state | 10:43 |
| LocutusOfBorg | same for autopkgtest for debos/unknown: arm64: Regression ♻ , armhf: Always failed, i386: Regression ♻ , ppc64el: Always failed, s390x: Always failed | 10:44 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: fair enough; it was blocking other builds at the time on armhf and you weren't around to consult | 14:18 |
| === QuosqueTandem is now known as hggdh | ||
| RikMills | vorlon: your abi-compliance-checker oom-exec-helper.patch seems to have some bade perl? | 15:36 |
| RikMills | £"Can't "next" outside a loop block at /usr/bin/abi-compliance-checker line 10171." | 15:36 |
| RikMills | https://perldoc.perl.org/functions/do.html | 15:37 |
| RikMills | "do BLOCK does not count as a loop, so the loop control statements next, last, or redo cannot be used to leave or restart the block. See perlsyn for alternative strategies." | 15:38 |
| vorlon | RikMills: oh? was it bad perl when I wrote it? | 17:03 |
| vorlon | do does not count as a loop despite having a while at the end, great | 17:05 |
| vorlon | not sure why I used a do {} while(1) instead of while(1) {} anyway :) | 17:06 |
| RikMills | vorlon: not sure. my perl is limited to what help pages google can land me on. lol | 17:10 |
| vorlon | :) | 17:10 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libunibreak to i386-whitelist in focal | 21:34 | |
| === msalvatore_ is now known as msalvatore | ||
| locutus_ | vorlon, thanks for doing it, I understand what happened, I wasn't complaining, just reporting that the upload was "good" but I fell asleep before the autosync was kicking :D | 22:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: guava-mini [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.1.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed lbfgsb from i386-whitelist in focal | 23:49 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!