| === BenderRodriguez is now known as RobertMuellerDid | ||
| === RobertMuellerDid is now known as BenderRodriguez | ||
| danboid | Is Ubuntu Server 20.04 going to support installing to ZFS RAID-Z2? | 08:49 |
|---|---|---|
| doko | https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20191220-focal-focal.html | 09:02 |
| doko | ginggs, tumbleweed: some more unexpected py2-removals | 09:03 |
| cjwatson | brlin: glibc's libraries specifically support being executed for various reasons - you can execute that particular one and get things like feature information | 09:42 |
| brlin | cjwatson: Thanks for the info. | 09:43 |
| === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| cpaelzer | jamespage: hiho, about openvsiwtch I wanted to ask how we should order uploads | 10:29 |
| cpaelzer | as we discussed in december DPDK 19.11 needs OVS 2.13 | 10:29 |
| jamespage | cpaelzer: morning | 10:29 |
| cpaelzer | and happy new year! | 10:30 |
| cpaelzer | you said you'd be ok to carve a 2.13 from git into focal | 10:30 |
| cpaelzer | which would allow me to get DPDK 19.11 in as-is | 10:30 |
| cpaelzer | and we can later on move to 2.13 final once available | 10:30 |
| cpaelzer | I was now wondering how we'd want to order things | 10:30 |
| cpaelzer | should I get DPDK 19.11 into focal-proposed first | 10:30 |
| jamespage | cpaelzer: right I remember | 10:31 |
| jamespage | I can work on that today/this week | 10:31 |
| cpaelzer | or would you prefer trying to build the new OVS against the former 18.11 first | 10:31 |
| jamespage | let me generate a new snapshot | 10:31 |
| cpaelzer | ok, thanks for looking into it jamespage | 10:32 |
| cpaelzer | once from your testing you know if you prefer OVS or DPDK to hit focal-proposed first let me know | 10:32 |
| jamespage | I suspect I'll have to deal with the OVN/OVS splitout at the same time | 10:32 |
| cpaelzer | ok, so you'll need some more time than "update & upload" with it anyway | 10:33 |
| cpaelzer | jamespage: I'll leave it with you then and you let me know when you want the new DODK synced then ok? | 10:33 |
| jamespage | yep fine with me | 10:33 |
| cpaelzer | rather DPDK | 10:33 |
| cpaelzer | great thank you jamespage | 10:33 |
| jamespage | cpaelzer: might need the DPDK upload first - can you drop a 19.11 release into https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3694/+packages for me? | 11:05 |
| cpaelzer | yes jamespage | 11:05 |
| jamespage | ta | 11:05 |
| cpaelzer | jamespage: uploaded - last build was ~3 weeks ago, lets see if it still works fine | 11:11 |
| jamespage | cpaelzer: needs a new dep - libbpf-dev | 11:14 |
| cpaelzer | oh yeah the kernel team still didn't get that one resolved | 11:14 |
| cpaelzer | :-/ | 11:14 |
| cpaelzer | easily done ... | 11:14 |
| cpaelzer | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1836708 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1826410 if you are interested | 11:15 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1836708 in linux (Ubuntu Focal) "Please package libbpf (which is done out of the kernel src) in Debian [for 19.10]" [High,Triaged] | 11:15 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1836708 in linux (Ubuntu Focal) "duplicate for #1826410 Please package libbpf (which is done out of the kernel src) in Debian [for 19.10]" [High,Triaged] | 11:15 |
| ginggs | i just uploaded https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file/1:5.37-6ubuntu1 to prevent autosync of 1:5.38-2 | 11:20 |
| ginggs | see debian bug #948269 | 11:20 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 948269 in file "file: misdetection of shared libraries as statically linked - breaks dh_shlibdeps" [Grave,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/948269 | 11:20 |
| cpaelzer | jamespage: new version uploaded | 11:25 |
| jamespage | ta | 11:25 |
| cpaelzer | jamespage: IIRC there was something else that we needed to disable but I fail to remember which exactly | 11:25 |
| cpaelzer | but if it FTBFS again it should be another easy one | 11:25 |
| * cpaelzer checks his stale branches to remember | 11:26 | |
| cpaelzer | jamespage: it failed again sorry, I'm rather sure to have something working shortly ... | 11:32 |
| cpaelzer | the one now is more interesting, reported around texlive-latex-extra but not showing up in a sbuild focal-proposed build of today | 11:37 |
| Laney | ginggs: nice one | 11:38 |
| Laney | fun place for a bug | 11:38 |
| jamespage | fnordahl: hey - did you pickup any information at OVN/OVS con about alignment of versioning between OVS and OVN | 11:43 |
| jamespage | the OVN build requires a build OVS source tree to compile/test | 11:43 |
| jamespage | and I'm just considering the best way todo that | 11:44 |
| jamespage | thinking about and openvswitch-src:all package that provides the OVS source code in distro, that the OVN build can use to build itself | 11:44 |
| jamespage | but I don't understand the versioning just yet | 11:44 |
| fnordahl | jamespage: they are planning on a year+month release naming for OVN with a three month release cadence, the first probably being 20.03. There was also talk about supporting building OVN against multiple versions of OVS and making it pussible to build against a -dev type package instead of a whole source tree. | 12:40 |
| fnordahl | jamespage: I'll try to get a pulse on how it's progressing | 12:42 |
| === ricab is now known as ricab|lunch | ||
| danboid | Hi didrocks! Does the 20.04 installer have any more ZFS options yet eg RAID Z2? | 14:20 |
| didrocks | danboid: hey! No, it has a slightly different partitionning scheme, but nothing like this nor planned to. We will work more on the automated snapshots, rollbacks side of thing for this cycle + command line options | 14:21 |
| danboid | didrocks, So are you saying that 20.04 (server) will still only support using one whole disk for ZFS installs? | 14:22 |
| didrocks | danboid: I don't think the server will have the ZFS option yet, we only added it as experimental on the ubiquity (desktop) installer for now | 14:23 |
| danboid | Oh that's a shame. I was expecting ZFS support in Ubuntu server 20.04 | 14:24 |
| didrocks | post-install, people can add mirrors (manually) for now though, I think RAID Z2 is the same but haven't tried | 14:24 |
| didrocks | better to have thing strongly tested before pushing experimental things that are not tested. And this is even more true for a LTS | 14:24 |
| danboid | Sounds like proxmox ve gets another year or two ruling the Linux ZFS roost then | 14:26 |
| cpaelzer | coreycb: I saw you update 1770295 have you seen reproduce this issue? | 14:27 |
| coreycb | cpaelzer: no, I haven't. I was mainly just keeping the cloud archive triage in line with the ubuntu triage. | 14:28 |
| cpaelzer | ok, I ahve asked if "openstack people have seen or reproduced that" on the bug in comment #5 | 14:29 |
| cpaelzer | coreycb: if you have the minute to do so even a "no we haven't" documented on the bug would be useful | 14:30 |
| cpaelzer | as it would confirm my "this is odd, prio low" triage | 14:30 |
| ahasenack | roaksoax: hi, good morning/afternoon. Just saw this commit to debian's bind9 package fly past: https://salsa.debian.org/dns-team/bind9/commit/e6e079c0fa9689aff6eb373ddd997adf3e22e849 | 14:32 |
| ahasenack | they removed the apport hook which has you as the author, because it's gpl | 14:32 |
| ahasenack | roaksoax: I'm wondering how it could be relicensed. If it was writte while you were working for canonical, then we could change the copyright I think, but if it was done on your spare time, then it's different | 14:33 |
| cpaelzer | rafaeldtinoco: if you give the ipxe change a review and if possible a test and chime in on the debian MR that would be great | 14:34 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ok | 14:34 |
| cpaelzer | I wanted to take the change (if it was proven to be ok) for us on this cycles merge if debian hasn't done so in time | 14:34 |
| cpaelzer | so whatever the outcome is updating both MRs is probably a good thing (jsut copy and paste will do) | 14:35 |
| rafaeldtinoco | makes sense | 14:35 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ok | 14:35 |
| rafaeldtinoco | tks | 14:35 |
| cpaelzer | your ping on the debain MR might revive that | 14:35 |
| cpaelzer | and the one on our side helps me to trust the change on the qemu merge | 14:35 |
| cpaelzer | on that topci, I know that the maintainer hasn't seen my Mrs so I'll ping him | 14:35 |
| ahasenack | cpaelzer: hm, I think the python transition might have bitten me just now | 14:49 |
| ahasenack | haproxy won't build anymore | 14:49 |
| ahasenack | sbuild-build-depends-haproxy-dummy : Depends: python but it is not going to be installed | 14:50 |
| ahasenack | Depends: python-mako but it is not going to be installed | 14:50 |
| ahasenack | yeah, "python" is uninstallable | 14:54 |
| === ricab|lunch is now known as ricab | ||
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: yes doko sent a mail a few hours ago | 15:10 |
| doko | s/python/python2/g | 15:11 |
| cpaelzer | jamespage: I forgot to ping you - you have dpdk - 19.11-2~ubuntu1~ppa3 in your PPA | 15:14 |
| doko | ahasenack: please fix, or I'll look at that specific one as a priority | 15:15 |
| cpaelzer | it was blocked by the python2->3 transition and for now I worked around that by disabling docs as that was the only tihng it was needed for | 15:15 |
| cpaelzer | doko: while being at the topic, let me ask for a python2/3 best practise | 15:16 |
| cpaelzer | doko: texlive-latex-extra has a Dependency line containing this "python, python3" | 15:16 |
| cpaelzer | which makes it fail to install | 15:16 |
| cpaelzer | => https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/mynQxT2Hh2/ | 15:16 |
| doko | the debian maintainer said that it's not completely ported, so that should be python2, python3 instead | 15:17 |
| cpaelzer | yeah I have read https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=938656 | 15:17 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 938656 in src:texlive-extra "texlive-extra: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye" [Normal,Open] | 15:17 |
| cpaelzer | doko: so "python2, python3" is what you'd expect to be in this Dependency line then? | 15:17 |
| doko | yes | 15:17 |
| cpaelzer | thank you | 15:18 |
| doko | and make sure that you have the python2 shebangs as well | 15:18 |
| cpaelzer | not sure I'll do a change, but I'll take a look and ping the bug for sure to keep it alive | 15:19 |
| cpaelzer | chances are the shebang changes would have to be an all the reverse-deps of texlive-extra | 15:19 |
| jamespage | cpaelzer: ta | 15:21 |
| jamespage | just working on some OVN bits in the OVS package for the split out | 15:21 |
| cpaelzer | rafaeldtinoco: 1809682 1733889 came up on triage as "not touched for 180 days" | 15:44 |
| cpaelzer | rafaeldtinoco: are those two ok with you or do we need to do anything from a team perspective? | 15:44 |
| rafaeldtinoco | cpaelzer: checking | 15:56 |
| rafaeldtinoco | cpaelzer: they're part of the cleanup phase after merges are finished. I got them.. hopefully I can start cleaning up and documenting this week, after all HA merges are finished (at least this 1st phase) | 15:59 |
| roaksoax | ahasenack: howdy! I have no claim over the license, feel free to relicensed if needed | 16:22 |
| ahasenack | roaksoax: can I email you at that address in the header? Is that still you? | 16:26 |
| roaksoax | ahasenack: that should still be me indeed | 16:28 |
| doko | juliank: any idea why that fails now? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/459395331/buildlog_ubuntu-focal-s390x.protobuf_3.6.1.3-2ubuntu2_BUILDING.txt.gz | 16:34 |
| juliank | heh, what's protobuf doing with apt-file? | 16:35 |
| juliank | doko: oh, that's ruby gem2deb | 16:35 |
| doko | cpaelzer: texlive-extra uploaded | 16:36 |
| juliank | I'm not sure what's going on but this seems like a bug in gem2deb or dh_ruby< | 16:37 |
| roaksoax | 3xit | 16:47 |
| deadrom | hi. where is the place for hwe bugs? | 18:11 |
| ahasenack | deadrom: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+filebug I believe | 18:22 |
| ahasenack | deadrom: or do you mean "hardware" bugs? | 18:22 |
| ahasenack | the link I pasted is for bugs against the hwe (hardware enablement) kernel | 18:22 |
| deadrom | HardWare Enablement | 18:22 |
| deadrom | why couldn't I get there myself? I went in circles in Launchpad | 18:22 |
| deadrom | told all sorts of how to report a bug, but never actually how | 18:23 |
| gQuigs | deadrom: usually recommended to use apport to file a bug, apport (generally) will be able to get it to the right package given what you have installed | 18:57 |
| doko | coreycb: please could you have a look at networkx/python-networkx? currently creates a lot of componet mismatches, and you're the last uploader, sorry ;p | 22:18 |
| coreycb | doko: sure I'll take a look | 22:42 |
| rafajafar | heyyy is there a problem is 18.04.3-74 because I just updated and now my computer freezes. If I go to 18.04.3-72 everything works again. | 23:14 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!