=== BenderRodriguez is now known as RobertMuellerDid === RobertMuellerDid is now known as BenderRodriguez [08:49] Is Ubuntu Server 20.04 going to support installing to ZFS RAID-Z2? [09:02] https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20191220-focal-focal.html [09:03] ginggs, tumbleweed: some more unexpected py2-removals [09:42] brlin: glibc's libraries specifically support being executed for various reasons - you can execute that particular one and get things like feature information [09:43] cjwatson: Thanks for the info. === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer [10:29] jamespage: hiho, about openvsiwtch I wanted to ask how we should order uploads [10:29] as we discussed in december DPDK 19.11 needs OVS 2.13 [10:29] cpaelzer: morning [10:30] and happy new year! [10:30] you said you'd be ok to carve a 2.13 from git into focal [10:30] which would allow me to get DPDK 19.11 in as-is [10:30] and we can later on move to 2.13 final once available [10:30] I was now wondering how we'd want to order things [10:30] should I get DPDK 19.11 into focal-proposed first [10:31] cpaelzer: right I remember [10:31] I can work on that today/this week [10:31] or would you prefer trying to build the new OVS against the former 18.11 first [10:31] let me generate a new snapshot [10:32] ok, thanks for looking into it jamespage [10:32] once from your testing you know if you prefer OVS or DPDK to hit focal-proposed first let me know [10:32] I suspect I'll have to deal with the OVN/OVS splitout at the same time [10:33] ok, so you'll need some more time than "update & upload" with it anyway [10:33] jamespage: I'll leave it with you then and you let me know when you want the new DODK synced then ok? [10:33] yep fine with me [10:33] rather DPDK [10:33] great thank you jamespage [11:05] cpaelzer: might need the DPDK upload first - can you drop a 19.11 release into https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3694/+packages for me? [11:05] yes jamespage [11:05] ta [11:11] jamespage: uploaded - last build was ~3 weeks ago, lets see if it still works fine [11:14] cpaelzer: needs a new dep - libbpf-dev [11:14] oh yeah the kernel team still didn't get that one resolved [11:14] :-/ [11:14] easily done ... [11:15] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1836708 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1826410 if you are interested [11:15] Launchpad bug 1836708 in linux (Ubuntu Focal) "Please package libbpf (which is done out of the kernel src) in Debian [for 19.10]" [High,Triaged] [11:15] Launchpad bug 1836708 in linux (Ubuntu Focal) "duplicate for #1826410 Please package libbpf (which is done out of the kernel src) in Debian [for 19.10]" [High,Triaged] [11:20] i just uploaded https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file/1:5.37-6ubuntu1 to prevent autosync of 1:5.38-2 [11:20] see debian bug #948269 [11:20] Debian bug 948269 in file "file: misdetection of shared libraries as statically linked - breaks dh_shlibdeps" [Grave,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/948269 [11:25] jamespage: new version uploaded [11:25] ta [11:25] jamespage: IIRC there was something else that we needed to disable but I fail to remember which exactly [11:25] but if it FTBFS again it should be another easy one [11:26] * cpaelzer checks his stale branches to remember [11:32] jamespage: it failed again sorry, I'm rather sure to have something working shortly ... [11:37] the one now is more interesting, reported around texlive-latex-extra but not showing up in a sbuild focal-proposed build of today [11:38] ginggs: nice one [11:38] fun place for a bug [11:43] fnordahl: hey - did you pickup any information at OVN/OVS con about alignment of versioning between OVS and OVN [11:43] the OVN build requires a build OVS source tree to compile/test [11:44] and I'm just considering the best way todo that [11:44] thinking about and openvswitch-src:all package that provides the OVS source code in distro, that the OVN build can use to build itself [11:44] but I don't understand the versioning just yet [12:40] jamespage: they are planning on a year+month release naming for OVN with a three month release cadence, the first probably being 20.03. There was also talk about supporting building OVN against multiple versions of OVS and making it pussible to build against a -dev type package instead of a whole source tree. [12:42] jamespage: I'll try to get a pulse on how it's progressing === ricab is now known as ricab|lunch [14:20] Hi didrocks! Does the 20.04 installer have any more ZFS options yet eg RAID Z2? [14:21] danboid: hey! No, it has a slightly different partitionning scheme, but nothing like this nor planned to. We will work more on the automated snapshots, rollbacks side of thing for this cycle + command line options [14:22] didrocks, So are you saying that 20.04 (server) will still only support using one whole disk for ZFS installs? [14:23] danboid: I don't think the server will have the ZFS option yet, we only added it as experimental on the ubiquity (desktop) installer for now [14:24] Oh that's a shame. I was expecting ZFS support in Ubuntu server 20.04 [14:24] post-install, people can add mirrors (manually) for now though, I think RAID Z2 is the same but haven't tried [14:24] better to have thing strongly tested before pushing experimental things that are not tested. And this is even more true for a LTS [14:26] Sounds like proxmox ve gets another year or two ruling the Linux ZFS roost then [14:27] coreycb: I saw you update 1770295 have you seen reproduce this issue? [14:28] cpaelzer: no, I haven't. I was mainly just keeping the cloud archive triage in line with the ubuntu triage. [14:29] ok, I ahve asked if "openstack people have seen or reproduced that" on the bug in comment #5 [14:30] coreycb: if you have the minute to do so even a "no we haven't" documented on the bug would be useful [14:30] as it would confirm my "this is odd, prio low" triage [14:32] roaksoax: hi, good morning/afternoon. Just saw this commit to debian's bind9 package fly past: https://salsa.debian.org/dns-team/bind9/commit/e6e079c0fa9689aff6eb373ddd997adf3e22e849 [14:32] they removed the apport hook which has you as the author, because it's gpl [14:33] roaksoax: I'm wondering how it could be relicensed. If it was writte while you were working for canonical, then we could change the copyright I think, but if it was done on your spare time, then it's different [14:34] rafaeldtinoco: if you give the ipxe change a review and if possible a test and chime in on the debian MR that would be great [14:34] ok [14:34] I wanted to take the change (if it was proven to be ok) for us on this cycles merge if debian hasn't done so in time [14:35] so whatever the outcome is updating both MRs is probably a good thing (jsut copy and paste will do) [14:35] makes sense [14:35] ok [14:35] tks [14:35] your ping on the debain MR might revive that [14:35] and the one on our side helps me to trust the change on the qemu merge [14:35] on that topci, I know that the maintainer hasn't seen my Mrs so I'll ping him [14:49] cpaelzer: hm, I think the python transition might have bitten me just now [14:49] haproxy won't build anymore [14:50] sbuild-build-depends-haproxy-dummy : Depends: python but it is not going to be installed [14:50] Depends: python-mako but it is not going to be installed [14:54] yeah, "python" is uninstallable === ricab|lunch is now known as ricab [15:10] ahasenack: yes doko sent a mail a few hours ago [15:11] s/python/python2/g [15:14] jamespage: I forgot to ping you - you have dpdk - 19.11-2~ubuntu1~ppa3 in your PPA [15:15] ahasenack: please fix, or I'll look at that specific one as a priority [15:15] it was blocked by the python2->3 transition and for now I worked around that by disabling docs as that was the only tihng it was needed for [15:16] doko: while being at the topic, let me ask for a python2/3 best practise [15:16] doko: texlive-latex-extra has a Dependency line containing this "python, python3" [15:16] which makes it fail to install [15:16] => https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/mynQxT2Hh2/ [15:17] the debian maintainer said that it's not completely ported, so that should be python2, python3 instead [15:17] yeah I have read https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=938656 [15:17] Debian bug 938656 in src:texlive-extra "texlive-extra: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye" [Normal,Open] [15:17] doko: so "python2, python3" is what you'd expect to be in this Dependency line then? [15:17] yes [15:18] thank you [15:18] and make sure that you have the python2 shebangs as well [15:19] not sure I'll do a change, but I'll take a look and ping the bug for sure to keep it alive [15:19] chances are the shebang changes would have to be an all the reverse-deps of texlive-extra [15:21] cpaelzer: ta [15:21] just working on some OVN bits in the OVS package for the split out [15:44] rafaeldtinoco: 1809682 1733889 came up on triage as "not touched for 180 days" [15:44] rafaeldtinoco: are those two ok with you or do we need to do anything from a team perspective? [15:56] cpaelzer: checking [15:59] cpaelzer: they're part of the cleanup phase after merges are finished. I got them.. hopefully I can start cleaning up and documenting this week, after all HA merges are finished (at least this 1st phase) [16:22] ahasenack: howdy! I have no claim over the license, feel free to relicensed if needed [16:26] roaksoax: can I email you at that address in the header? Is that still you? [16:28] ahasenack: that should still be me indeed [16:34] juliank: any idea why that fails now? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/459395331/buildlog_ubuntu-focal-s390x.protobuf_3.6.1.3-2ubuntu2_BUILDING.txt.gz [16:35] heh, what's protobuf doing with apt-file? [16:35] doko: oh, that's ruby gem2deb [16:36] cpaelzer: texlive-extra uploaded [16:37] I'm not sure what's going on but this seems like a bug in gem2deb or dh_ruby< [16:47] 3xit [18:11] hi. where is the place for hwe bugs? [18:22] deadrom: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+filebug I believe [18:22] deadrom: or do you mean "hardware" bugs? [18:22] the link I pasted is for bugs against the hwe (hardware enablement) kernel [18:22] HardWare Enablement [18:22] why couldn't I get there myself? I went in circles in Launchpad [18:23] told all sorts of how to report a bug, but never actually how [18:57] deadrom: usually recommended to use apport to file a bug, apport (generally) will be able to get it to the right package given what you have installed [22:18] coreycb: please could you have a look at networkx/python-networkx? currently creates a lot of componet mismatches, and you're the last uploader, sorry ;p [22:42] doko: sure I'll take a look [23:14] heyyy is there a problem is 18.04.3-74 because I just updated and now my computer freezes. If I go to 18.04.3-72 everything works again.