[00:20] <vorlon> orly
[00:22] <vorlon> bdmurray: I checked the package contents and it's definitely changed. you installed the 'mount' binary package?
[00:51] <bdmurray> vorlon: no, I did now and it works
[09:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-5.4 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1001.2]
[09:20] <LocutusOfBorg> hello vorlon, can we please do something for llvm-toolchain-9?
[09:20] <LocutusOfBorg>     * i386: python-lldb
[09:20] <LocutusOfBorg> also, llvm-defaults needs a little decruft on s390x
[09:20] <LocutusOfBorg> old binaries left on s390x: lld (from 0.49~exp2)
[09:21] <LocutusOfBorg> and llvm-toolchainb-7 should be probably moved to universe
[09:21] <LocutusOfBorg> "reverse-depends -r focal -b src:llvm-toolchain-7 -c main" returns 0
[09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xen (disco-proposed/main) [4.9.2-0ubuntu2 => 4.9.2-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server, virt)
[09:26] <smb> apw, tjaalton, Re-upload done ^
[09:29] <tjaalton> thanks
[09:30] <tjaalton> LocutusOfBorg: do you know why openjdk-14 tests fail pretty much everywhere?
[09:30] <tjaalton> or what could be done about them
[09:40] <LocutusOfBorg> tjaalton, I have never touched openjdk :)
[09:41] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, pytest is not installable...
[09:42] <tjaalton> LocutusOfBorg: I see you restarted the tests for a package, thought you knew
[09:48] <LocutusOfBorg>  python-py : Depends: python:any (< 2.8)
[09:48] <LocutusOfBorg>              Depends: python:any (>= 2.7~)
[09:48] <LocutusOfBorg> tjaalton, I did restart all the failed stuff of the past 12 hours, they mostly all failed because of kernel version mismatch
[09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected xen [source] (disco-proposed) [4.9.2-0ubuntu4]
[09:54] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, are you really sure about your python-defaults upload? we have ~800 test regressions caused by it, only in the last 12h
[09:59] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: yes, when else do you want to fix that?
[10:01] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: are you looking at python-py?
[10:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xen (disco-proposed/main) [4.9.2-0ubuntu2 => 4.9.2-0ubuntu5] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server, virt)
[10:21] <santa_> RikMills: thanks :)
[10:24] <LocutusOfBorg> so you want to fix hundreds of python2 packages to use python2 explictly?
[10:25] <LocutusOfBorg> reverse-depends -r focal -b python |wc -l
[10:25] <LocutusOfBorg> 579
[10:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xen [source] (disco-proposed) [4.9.2-0ubuntu5]
[10:34] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: if you have concerns, you should raise them on the ML. the plan to do the removal was announced, and we don't have Debian's comfort to stretch such a thing for 18 months. you know that
[10:35] <LocutusOfBorg> so is it something agreeded with Debian too?
[10:36] <doko> you appear not to read Debian emails or the py2removal reports
[10:36] <doko> it's mentioned in every issue
[10:37] <LocutusOfBorg> me, my python-foobar is now python3 mostly everywhere, so yes, I probably forgot about the email
[10:37]  * LocutusOfBorg refresh his memory
[10:38] <LocutusOfBorg> true, thanks!
[10:38] <LocutusOfBorg> so we will have to patch ~500 python packages for focal
[10:39] <doko> yes
[10:39] <doko> if we keep them, and don't remove them
[10:39] <LocutusOfBorg> ack thanks, I'll try to recover the missing unread email
[10:39] <LocutusOfBorg> but in any case, we will sync them again for buster or whatever is called next debian stable
[10:40] <LocutusOfBorg> I'll probably fix what steps on my toes, like boost or whatever, but I can't do ~500 uploads in the archive :)
[10:41] <doko> I know
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-gogottrpc [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20190828.92c8520-2] (no packageset)
[11:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-gogottrpc [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.0~git20190828.92c8520-2]
[12:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: pillow-python2 (focal-proposed/primary) [6.2.1-3~build1]
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pillow-python2 [source] (focal-proposed) [6.2.1-3~build1]
[12:57] <doko> apw, xnox, sforshee: do you know why this is ppc64el specific? https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/ppc64el/d/dpdk/20200107_094944_3ccdc@/log.gz
[12:59] <cpaelzer> doko: the module and package that is failing there will completely go away
[13:00] <cpaelzer> but the new sync/upload would be blocked by texlive-latex-extra
[13:00] <cpaelzer> I have tested it ina PPA as jamespage needs to build the new openswitch against it
[13:01] <cpaelzer> and as I said in #ubuntu-devel texlive-latex-extra is good now, but it depends on texlive-pictures which depends on python2
[13:02] <doko> I uploaded texlive-base.
[13:02] <cpaelzer> oh you did, thanks
[13:02] <doko> why is the dependency on python2 wrong?
[13:02] <cpaelzer> just nw?
[13:02] <doko> ?
[13:03] <cpaelzer> an hour ago it still had Depends: tex-common (>= 6.13), python, texlive-base (>= 2019.20191112), texlive-binaries (>= 2019.20190605), texlive-latex-recommended (>= 2019.20191112)
[13:04] <doko> publishing cycles are slow ...
[13:04] <cpaelzer> I can confirm that it should work now
[13:04] <cpaelzer> I'll test DPDK again, which would eventually make us get rid from the dkms issue you asked about above
[14:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-ecdsa [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.14.1-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-ecdsa [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.14.1-1ubuntu2]
[14:56] <Trevinho> SRU team can please ack gnome stuff in bionic and disco?
[14:56] <Trevinho> oh, disco already went in, so only bionic.
[15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chromium-browser (eoan-proposed/universe) [77.0.3865.120-0ubuntu1.19.10.1 => 79.0.3945.79-0ubuntu0.19.10.2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[15:36] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: lld/s390x removed from focal-proposed, which should unblock llvm-defaults, which should let llvm-toolchain-9 migrate?
[15:36] <oSoMoN> dear SRU team, please consider the above chromium-browser upload, which addresses bug #1858500
[15:50] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, I hope so
[17:12] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, wrt i386-whitelist, you should probably whitelist python3-scipy in order to unblock numpy, python3-numpy, and boost
[17:12] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: no
[17:12] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: boost needs to drop numpy on i386
[17:12] <LocutusOfBorg> why?
[17:12] <vorlon> we're not maintaining numeric packages on i386 in focal
[17:13] <LocutusOfBorg> mmm why is python-scipy whitelisted and python3-scipy not?
[17:13] <vorlon> only because I haven't forcibly pruned it yet
[17:13] <vorlon> both will drop out once boost is fixed
[17:13] <LocutusOfBorg> oh... ok
[17:13] <LocutusOfBorg> makes sense
[17:16] <LocutusOfBorg> ta
[17:33] <vorlon> doko: ah, so you did add hsail-tools to the seed already; that's sufficient, it doesn't separately need to be added to the script, which will DTRT as soon as hsail-tools binaries are in the release pocket (it seems you copied w/ binaries to focal-proposed only, I've been copying straight back to the release pocket)
[17:33] <vorlon> and I resuscitated libdwarf, so hsail-tools should reach release pocket shortly
[19:17] <LocutusOfBorg> old binaries left on i386: pcscd (from 1.8.26-1)
[19:17] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, ^^ pleeeeeeeeease :D
[19:18] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: ta, removed
[19:19] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: change forwarded to Debian?
[19:19] <vorlon> (example of an upstreamable patch: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947286)
[21:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added darts to i386-whitelist in focal
[21:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added dwarfutils to i386-whitelist in focal
[21:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gcab to i386-whitelist in focal
[21:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added hsail-tools to i386-whitelist in focal
[22:41] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks vorlon will do
[22:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [2.33.50.20200107-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[22:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1034.39] (no packageset)
[22:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2.33.50.20200107-1ubuntu1]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debian-cloud-images [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.0.2] (no packageset)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gf2x [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debian-cloud-images [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.0.2] (no packageset)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gf2x [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debian-cloud-images [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.0.2] (no packageset)
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gf2x [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gf2x [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gf2x [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debian-cloud-images [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.0.2]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debian-cloud-images [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.0.2]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gf2x [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-1]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gf2x [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-1]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debian-cloud-images [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.0.2]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gf2x [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-1]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gf2x [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-1]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gf2x [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-1]