rlaager | I've prepared an SRU. The procedure says that you need to make sure it's fixed in the development release (which it is) and that the bug status is Fix Released. So I changed it to that. But then later, it says to use In Progress. Apparently I could change it to Fix Released, but now can't change it back to In Progress. | 00:41 |
---|---|---|
rlaager | I also can't add distro-version-specific tasks. Can someone set this to In Progress and/or add a Bionic task that's In Progress: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icingaweb2/+bug/1769890 | 00:41 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1769890 in icingaweb2 (Ubuntu) "Icingaweb2 does not work with PHP 7.2" [Undecided,Fix released] | 00:41 |
cjwatson | rlaager: I've added a bionic task, which you should be able to manipulate | 00:43 |
cjwatson | (I just did the minimal thing and left it with the default status of New) | 00:43 |
rlaager | cjwatson: Thanks, done. I think we're in the desired state now... i.e. waiting for my debdiff to be reviewed by ubuntu-sponsors. | 00:43 |
cjwatson | rlaager: You might want to assign that task to yourself too | 00:44 |
cjwatson | and possibly note that the thing in your last comment is done :) | 00:44 |
rlaager | I hid the comment. | 00:45 |
cjwatson | ack | 00:45 |
tjaalton | xnox: you filed RM on dogtag without any discussion? | 05:12 |
tjaalton | xnox: the reason why it's not in testing or stable is because openjdk-8 will never migrate. and it works just fine with current nss, and supports tls 1.3 via jss | 05:18 |
tarzeau | is there some ubuntu-devel people that are also dd who would be interested getting some interesting software into 20.04 LTS? (i've got breseq, cadabra2, coreboot(-utils), memtestcl, mimalloc, mlv-app, octopus, redasm, shotcut, speed-dreams, tiatracker, zytrax, hpx) waiting for review+sponsoring | 07:03 |
JackFrost | That's more than a couple! :) | 07:08 |
tarzeau | i got a few more like fricas and protrekkr, but i doubt anyone is interested in those, but yes, it's a bunch | 07:09 |
tarzeau | pick one :) | 07:09 |
tarzeau | i also have a working fontmatrix qt5 version, but the d/copyright sucks because of CC licenses and jquery embedded (lintian stuff) | 08:18 |
seb128 | pitti, hey Martin, happy new year! do you think you could backport https://github.com/martinpitt/python-dbusmock/commit/bd51d910 to Debian? I saw there is probably another problem but it sounds like that commit would be required in any case? | 08:48 |
jamespage | doko: yep - RM radosgw-agent | 09:07 |
pitti | seb128: bonjour, et bonne année ! | 09:13 |
pitti | seb128: yes, I was planning to just do a new upstream release and upload that | 09:13 |
seb128 | vorlon, hey, do you understand why half of the desktop world if failing on i386 due to installability issues today? | 09:13 |
pitti | seb128: unfortunately my sid schroot has been broken since yesterday, the gnupg upload seems to have messed up something -- there's no gnupg in the archive right now | 09:13 |
seb128 | pitti, ah ok, good to read, I wanted to merge the n-m update for focal, I'm going to wait for that update, good luck with gnupg missing! | 09:18 |
pitti | seb128: but mbiebl found more errors with unstable's NM, I don't think that commit is enough | 09:18 |
seb128 | pitti, I read that bug but you said that it work on fedora, maybe it does work also on Ubuntu :-) | 09:19 |
* pitti grabs the test result dice and rolls it | 09:19 | |
seb128 | but yeah, the other issue is going to need to be looked at/resolved eventually | 09:19 |
seb128 | the known one/git commit is needed for sure in any case | 09:19 |
pitti | right | 09:20 |
sunweaver | Hi all! Has anyone in the Ubuntu world seen the upstream developer(s) of the onboard on-screen keyboard, recently? | 10:06 |
sunweaver | I am the Debian maintainer of onboard and I pinged them via mail some weeks ago and haven't received an answer, yet. | 10:06 |
sunweaver | Is there anyone around that has a clue about the maintenance status of Onboard? | 10:07 |
seb128 | sunweaver, upstream or the Ubuntu package? | 10:15 |
JackFrost | You missed:[05:06:32] < sunweaver> Hi all! Has anyone in the Ubuntu world seen the upstream developer(s) of the onboard on-screen keyboard, recently? | 10:18 |
JackFrost | [05:06:58] < sunweaver> I am the Debian maintainer of onboard and I pinged them via mail some weeks ago and haven't received an answer, yet. | 10:18 |
seb128 | k, I don't then, sorry | 10:28 |
sunweaver | seb128: thanks. | 10:29 |
sunweaver | I just cherry-pick rbalint's fixes on onboard in Ubuntu over to Debian. | 10:29 |
sunweaver | But we might become read to remove it from the archives. | 10:30 |
sunweaver | unless someone else steps up as upstream maintainer. | 10:30 |
enyc | sunweaver: i wonder in the bigger-picture of things about importance of accesibility features in general | 11:31 |
xnox | tjaalton: merged new nss doesn't seem to work with it at all, as it requires tls v1.2 minimum. If it doesn't have a champion in Debian, it must have one in Ubuntu, as it is in universe. Is kernel-team going to subscribe to it and fix autopkgtests? | 11:32 |
enyc | sunweaver: have noticed dragon input system, colour changing tools, magnifiers, screen readers, and so-on ... just not-so-available for gnu/linux/ubuntu/etc | 11:32 |
xnox | tjaalton: and are we keeping openjdk-8 in focal? i guess we are, in that case someone or me needs to check what's going on with current nss then. | 11:33 |
xnox | cjwatson: does openssh have any magic tests around 2020 date. Seems like it started to fail since new year http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/openssh/focal/amd64 https://ci.debian.net/packages/o/openssh/unstable/amd64/ debian timings w.r.t. new year are a lot closer. I am not sure if i am reading regress errors right, but it fails tests to do with expiration of things. | 11:35 |
tjaalton | xnox: dogtag-pki autopkgtests pass fine on debian, so it's not nss to blame then? | 11:35 |
cjwatson | regress/cert-hostkey.sh:test_one "cert not yet valid" failure "-h -V20200101:20300101" | 11:35 |
cjwatson | regress/cert-userkey.sh:test_one "cert not yet valid" failure "-n ${USER} -V20200101:20300101" | 11:35 |
enyc | cjwatson: o dear =) should this not use a hardcoded test 'date in future' at all, rather calculate something at time of build? | 11:37 |
cjwatson | https://anongit.mindrot.org/openssh.git/commit/?id=ff31f15773ee173502eec4d7861ec56f26bba381 | 11:37 |
xnox | tjaalton: debian doesn't set tlsv1.2 min in nss; but we do. | 11:37 |
cjwatson | enyc: no doubt, but I'll just cherry-pick the upstream change. Take it up with upstream | 11:37 |
enyc | I wonder at what point trying to colcucate over 2038 etc. will fail ;p | 11:38 |
enyc | unix time 32-bit and all that =) | 11:38 |
xnox | cjwatson: i like that they make it still 1st of Jan. I'll ask them to move it at least to Jan 14th because holidays. | 11:38 |
tjaalton | xnox: so there were autopkgtests showing that it failed? have they been removed now as well? | 11:38 |
cjwatson | Not on 64-bit systems it isn't, and people are working on the 32-bit case | 11:38 |
xnox | tjaalton: should be still there => one sec. | 11:39 |
xnox | cjwatson: thank you for pointing it out! | 11:39 |
xnox | tjaalton: fails to initialize https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/amd64/d/dogtag-pki/20200108_202654_c8684@/log.gz ? | 11:41 |
tjaalton | so after ~5h it got removed, nice | 11:41 |
tjaalton | CA worked, so ipa server still works too | 11:42 |
tjaalton | /usr/lib/python3.7/getpass.py:91: GetPassWarning: Can not control echo on the terminal. | 11:42 |
tjaalton | I don't think it's related to nss but maybe something else | 11:43 |
xnox | tjaalton: there are other errors about something else deprecated in the logs about passwords / pin. | 11:43 |
xnox | tjaalton: if the autopkgtest is fixed in debian, we can sync both of them back in, and readd them. | 11:43 |
cjwatson | xnox: thanks for noticing, since I hadn't yet; fix uploaded to unstable | 11:43 |
tjaalton | xnox: well I can drop the uninstall test.. | 11:44 |
tjaalton | it's pretty pointless anyway | 11:44 |
xnox | tjaalton: it's just there is nobody to gate it (no gating in debian, and no owner in ubuntu) | 11:44 |
xnox | tjaalton: true. | 11:44 |
xnox | tjaalton: propose it to debian, and sync from there? | 11:44 |
tjaalton | I'm the maintainer there | 11:44 |
xnox | cjwatson: i wonder if we need to SRU it across all the releases & ESM now too =/ | 11:45 |
xnox | tjaalton: oh, ok =) | 11:45 |
xnox | did not realize / check that, sorry. | 11:45 |
tjaalton | np, this did prompt me to ask the fedora jdk maintainer about their plans, and jdk11 might finally make it on their schedule.. | 11:46 |
cjwatson | xnox: Can ride along with any other fix that's required I imagine | 11:46 |
tjaalton | which in turn means it's a priority to port everything over | 11:46 |
ahasenack | cpaelzer: this is weird: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/CKJYg6wqXs/ | 13:02 |
ahasenack | cpaelzer: line 3 creates the local/usr.sbin.slapd local override | 13:03 |
ahasenack | then line 4 loads it, all is fine | 13:03 |
ahasenack | test runs, succeeds | 13:03 |
ahasenack | then at the end I remove the override 40 | 13:03 |
ahasenack | but apparmor_parser -r fails weirdly | 13:03 |
ahasenack | -T and -W are to handle the cache, which I thought was the problem | 13:03 |
ahasenack | ahhhh | 13:05 |
ahasenack | found it | 13:05 |
ahasenack | thanks :) | 13:05 |
jamespage | cpaelzer: I'm ready to go on openvswitch and ovn updates post 19.11 dpdk upload | 13:08 |
jamespage | will need some archive-admin time for the split out and new source package for ovn | 13:09 |
cpaelzer | jamespage: I ahve a call about DPDK in 1.5h after that I intend to upload | 13:09 |
cpaelzer | jamespage: will hit new queue as well | 13:09 |
jamespage | great | 13:09 |
cpaelzer | so you have some time to sort out AA needs :-) | 13:09 |
cpaelzer | I'll keep you posted on it | 13:09 |
seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, hey there, what do you think about splitting the remmina-gnome-session entry in a different deb (which we would install by default)? | 13:25 |
seb128 | Laney, ^ | 13:25 |
Laney | I just asked mfv about that in #debian-gnome | 13:26 |
Laney | :> | 13:26 |
seb128 | ah, for some reason I though locusofborg was also maintaining it in debian | 13:26 |
Laney | maybe LocutusOfBorg will want to do the work anyway ;-) | 13:27 |
Laney | also I think you mean "would *not* install by default"! | 13:28 |
seb128 | shrug, I need to stop doing those thinkos, indeed | 13:29 |
seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, bug #1851007 also I think is still not resolved which makes the session not working | 13:30 |
ubottu | bug 1851007 in remmina (Ubuntu) "Login option 'GNOME + Remmina' not working" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1851007 | 13:30 |
LocutusOfBorg | I would like to avoid doing debian work for remmina :p | 13:36 |
seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, sorry, for some reason I though you were maintaining it there :) | 13:37 |
LocutusOfBorg | no problem :) | 13:38 |
LocutusOfBorg | I just do the merges, because both upstream and Debian are italian, and they ask directly to me! | 13:38 |
=== ricab is now known as ricab|lunch | ||
Laney | heh | 13:40 |
ahasenack | xnox: hi, I have an MP up for krb5 to switch it to use py3 | 13:48 |
ahasenack | https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+git/krb5/+merge/377326 | 13:48 |
ahasenack | I just missed to link it with the bug :/ | 13:48 |
RikMills | is anyone looking at merging pulseaudio? that has the equaliser ported with patches to python3 I think? | 13:53 |
RikMills | doko ^ ? | 13:53 |
seb128 | RikMills, pulseaudio is maintained by the desktop team, don't bother doko with it :) | 13:54 |
RikMills | seb128: right | 13:54 |
seb128 | RikMills, is there a concrete problem with it as of today? | 13:55 |
seb128 | we will merge that/get an update before ff for sure, but I do an upload sooner rather than later if there is need for the change to land in focal now | 13:55 |
RikMills | seb128: new pyqt5 synced that autosynced from debian dropped the Python2 dbus.mainloop.pyqt5 packages that the equaliser currently depends on, so pyqt5 will not migrate until pulseaudio is merged | 13:57 |
seb128 | RikMills, k, sounds lIke a good reason, let me merge that change, and thanks for the ping! | 13:58 |
RikMills | not urgent, but would be nice to fix | 13:58 |
RikMills | thanks! :) | 13:58 |
LocutusOfBorg | seb128, what about asking debian to bump epoch so MoM does some little job on it? | 13:58 |
seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, you can ask them if you feel like, I personally don't use that service for pulseaudio since we have git packaging | 13:59 |
LocutusOfBorg | I did a debdiff between debian and ubuntu | 14:00 |
LocutusOfBorg | there is something that should probably go away, like upstart stuff | 14:01 |
LocutusOfBorg | MoM does a good job in that | 14:01 |
LocutusOfBorg | but yeah, a git diff does it even better | 14:01 |
seb128 | thanks for pointing it out, I will have a look at the delta we can drop while I'm at it | 14:01 |
LocutusOfBorg | while I asked you to do, I remembered that pidgin has the same issue, and it is collaborate maintenance in Debian | 14:02 |
LocutusOfBorg | so I'll just commit the bump epoch there :p | 14:02 |
seb128 | :) | 14:02 |
LocutusOfBorg | they acked it a while ago, but they forgot to commit | 14:03 |
doko | RikMills: yep, just wanted to get that installable again. Could you do the merge? | 14:06 |
doko | seb128: ^^^ | 14:06 |
seb128 | doko, yes, I'm on it | 14:07 |
seb128 | doko, feel free to ping about any desktop owner source that needs merged/fixing, we are happy to help | 14:08 |
xnox | ahasenack: nice! | 14:25 |
xnox | ahasenack: does it work? =) | 14:25 |
ahasenack | xnox: sure | 14:33 |
xnox | tjaalton: why would we keep openjdk-8 if like only three things are left that depend on it | 14:56 |
xnox | tjaalton: actually they all have alternatives | 14:57 |
tjaalton | doko: ^ | 14:57 |
xnox | doko: vorlon: please remove openjdk-8 from focal https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-8/+bug/1859037 | 15:01 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1859037 in openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) "RM: openjdk-8 obsolete, unused in the archive" [Undecided,Triaged] | 15:01 |
doko | xnox, vorlon: please no. we said will will keep it until the support for 16.04 LTS ends | 15:02 |
doko | so maybe what we might want to do is to ship it only in -updates | 15:03 |
=== ricab|lunch is now known as ricab | ||
xnox | doko: which support? until 2026 then? | 15:19 |
xnox | doko: in that case i'd love to drop alternative depends, such that nothing has alternative depends on openjdk8 in the archive. | 15:20 |
doko | xnox: apparently, yes. as long as we need to update the package, that's ok | 15:20 |
xnox | doko: ack. | 15:20 |
doko | xnox: could you have a look at the z3 ftbfs on s390x? | 15:20 |
doko | seb128: we need to coordinate the pygtk2 removal with jbicha. I'd like to avoid rebuilding all that old stuff ... | 15:50 |
seb128 | doko, yes, do we have a bug report to track that atm? | 15:51 |
seb128 | doko, also feel free to give us a list of desktop things to fix, you don't have to fix everything yourself | 15:52 |
xnox | doko: urgh that is ugly | 15:52 |
doko | seb128: I don't have such a list, but you could scan python-defaults in output_notest | 15:56 |
seb128 | doko, k, well in any case when you hit a desktop package that you want to see fixed feel free to ping | 15:59 |
vorlon | seb128: half of the world> which half? link to some log? | 16:13 |
seb128 | vorlon, https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages | 16:15 |
seb128 | https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/i386/c/clutter-1.0/20200108_155337_4f951@/log.gz | 16:15 |
seb128 | https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/i386/f/firefox/20200108_211625_61bf5@/log.gz | 16:15 |
seb128 | https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/i386/f/ffmpeg/20200108_172908_8962e@/log.gz | 16:15 |
seb128 | https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/i386/libs/libssh/20200108_211244_b9663@/log.gz | 16:15 |
vorlon | seb128: ok looking | 16:15 |
seb128 | https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/i386/p/poppler/20200108_201209_55428@/log.gz | 16:15 |
seb128 | vorlon, it might be they are ending up to a common lib not installable or something but unsure how to properly figure that out... | 16:16 |
seb128 | vorlon, thx | 16:16 |
vorlon | seb128: it's expected that firefox tests won't pass on i386 and it's a bug in britney that they're run | 16:16 |
seb128 | https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/i386/g/gtk+2.0/20200108_230517_cbb33@/log.gz | 16:16 |
vorlon | the others though, I've just noticed and will dig in now, thanks | 16:16 |
seb128 | thx | 16:16 |
vorlon | https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal_uninst.txt doesn't show uninstallabilities fwiw | 16:17 |
seb128 | also if you have hints on how to poke to those issues I might be able to figure things out myself instead of bothering you next time :) | 16:17 |
seb128 | oh, I didn't know about that report | 16:17 |
seb128 | nice | 16:17 |
vorlon | oh it's probably hitting the autopkgtest bug where if a library in the amd64 base system is in -proposed, the pin doesn't get set to cover both archs | 16:17 |
vorlon | but that doesn't explain why it's uninstallable on the second run with all of proposed | 16:18 |
vorlon | so I'd guess it was: couldn't cherry-pick the specific package from -proposed because of wrong pin; couldn't install from -proposed because some build was behind | 16:19 |
vorlon | I'll see if I can reproduce it now and maybe these'll just need to be retries | 16:19 |
seb128 | k, thanks | 16:31 |
rafaeldtinoco | rbasak: SO, when you're packaging mysql-server-8, did u make sure for all the build tests to pass ? just checking cause I think there are 2 of those failing currently for focal, wanted to know if you faced failing tests during build time (nocheck doesn't change attempt of running the tests). | 17:01 |
rbasak | rafaeldtinoco: it's quite common for us to see test failures. They fail the build. | 17:02 |
rbasak | (though we don't run the _entire_ test suite, just a subset) | 17:02 |
rbasak | Also more (different) tests are run during dep8 | 17:02 |
rbasak | So if it made proposed migration, I assume they were passing at the time | 17:02 |
rafaeldtinoco | rbasak: awesome. | 17:06 |
rafaeldtinoco | tks.. ill work in current failures then. | 17:06 |
rafaeldtinoco | its for the mysql-router MIR (security team asking) | 17:06 |
Skuggen | rafaeldtinoco:I think we only enforce all tests passing for i386 and amd64, for MySQL | 18:13 |
rafaeldtinoco | Skuggen: hum | 18:30 |
cpaelzer | jamespage: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/19.11-2ubuntu1 is in focal-proposed - but it will have to pass new queue after build before you can use it I guess | 18:35 |
cpaelzer | all but arm64 are built for now, we can check tomorrow in which state it is to upload dependent packages | 18:35 |
rafaeldtinoco | rbasak: CREATE EVENT e1 ON SCHEDULE AT '2020-01-01 00:00:00' DO SET @a = 1; | 21:04 |
rafaeldtinoco | lol | 21:04 |
rafaeldtinoco | we are at 2020 and the test is broken now | 21:04 |
rafaeldtinoco | omg | 21:04 |
rafaeldtinoco | i'll do a fix for those tests and do a MP for mysql-server | 21:04 |
rafaeldtinoco | fixing the FTBS | 21:04 |
rbasak | rafaeldtinoco: coordinate with Skuggen please - we should have an upstream bug for that | 21:14 |
rbasak | rafaeldtinoco: and thank you for sorting it :) | 21:15 |
rafaeldtinoco | rbasak: I think there is one already | 21:15 |
rafaeldtinoco | I'll sync with him | 21:15 |
rbasak | rafaeldtinoco: MP against the salsa branch please | 21:15 |
rafaeldtinoco | definitely! | 21:15 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!