/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/01/09/#ubuntu-devel.txt

rlaagerI've prepared an SRU. The procedure says that you need to make sure it's fixed in the development release (which it is) and that the bug status is Fix Released. So I changed it to that. But then later, it says to use In Progress. Apparently I could change it to Fix Released, but now can't change it back to In Progress.00:41
rlaagerI also can't add distro-version-specific tasks. Can someone set this to In Progress and/or add a Bionic task that's In Progress: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icingaweb2/+bug/176989000:41
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1769890 in icingaweb2 (Ubuntu) "Icingaweb2 does not work with PHP 7.2" [Undecided,Fix released]00:41
cjwatsonrlaager: I've added a bionic task, which you should be able to manipulate00:43
cjwatson(I just did the minimal thing and left it with the default status of New)00:43
rlaagercjwatson: Thanks, done. I think we're in the desired state now... i.e. waiting for my debdiff to be reviewed by ubuntu-sponsors.00:43
cjwatsonrlaager: You might want to assign that task to yourself too00:44
cjwatsonand possibly note that the thing in your last comment is done :)00:44
rlaagerI hid the comment.00:45
cjwatsonack00:45
tjaaltonxnox: you filed RM on dogtag without any discussion?05:12
tjaaltonxnox: the reason why it's not in testing or stable is because openjdk-8 will never migrate. and it works just fine with current nss, and supports tls 1.3 via jss05:18
tarzeauis there some ubuntu-devel people that are also dd who would be interested getting some interesting software into 20.04 LTS? (i've got breseq, cadabra2, coreboot(-utils), memtestcl, mimalloc, mlv-app, octopus, redasm, shotcut, speed-dreams, tiatracker, zytrax, hpx) waiting for review+sponsoring07:03
JackFrostThat's more than a couple! :)07:08
tarzeaui got a few more like fricas and protrekkr, but i doubt anyone is interested in those, but yes, it's a bunch07:09
tarzeaupick one :)07:09
tarzeaui also have a working fontmatrix qt5 version, but the d/copyright sucks because of CC licenses and jquery embedded (lintian stuff)08:18
seb128pitti, hey Martin, happy new year! do you think you could backport https://github.com/martinpitt/python-dbusmock/commit/bd51d910 to Debian? I saw there is probably another problem but it sounds like that commit would be required in any case?08:48
jamespagedoko: yep - RM radosgw-agent09:07
pittiseb128: bonjour, et bonne année !09:13
pittiseb128: yes, I was planning to just do a new upstream release and upload that09:13
seb128vorlon, hey, do you understand why half of the desktop world if failing on i386 due to installability issues today?09:13
pittiseb128: unfortunately my sid schroot has been broken since yesterday, the gnupg upload seems to have messed up something -- there's no gnupg in the archive right now09:13
seb128pitti, ah ok, good to read, I wanted to merge the n-m update for focal, I'm going to wait for that update, good luck with gnupg missing!09:18
pittiseb128: but mbiebl found more errors with unstable's NM, I don't think that commit is enough09:18
seb128pitti, I read that bug but you said that it work on fedora, maybe it does work also on Ubuntu :-)09:19
* pitti grabs the test result dice and rolls it09:19
seb128but yeah, the other issue is going to need to be looked at/resolved eventually09:19
seb128the known one/git commit is needed for sure in any case09:19
pittiright09:20
sunweaverHi all! Has anyone in the Ubuntu world seen the upstream developer(s) of the onboard on-screen keyboard, recently?10:06
sunweaverI am the Debian maintainer of onboard and I pinged them via mail some weeks ago and haven't received an answer, yet.10:06
sunweaverIs there anyone around that has a clue about the maintenance status of Onboard?10:07
seb128sunweaver, upstream or the Ubuntu package?10:15
JackFrostYou missed:[05:06:32] < sunweaver> Hi all! Has anyone in the Ubuntu world seen the upstream developer(s) of the onboard on-screen keyboard, recently?10:18
JackFrost[05:06:58] < sunweaver> I am the Debian maintainer of onboard and I pinged them via mail some weeks ago and haven't received an answer, yet.10:18
seb128k, I don't then, sorry10:28
sunweaverseb128: thanks.10:29
sunweaverI just cherry-pick rbalint's fixes on onboard in Ubuntu over to Debian.10:29
sunweaverBut we might become read to remove it from the archives.10:30
sunweaverunless someone else steps up as upstream maintainer.10:30
enycsunweaver: i wonder in the bigger-picture of things about  importance of accesibility features in general11:31
xnoxtjaalton:  merged new nss doesn't seem to work with it at all, as it requires tls v1.2 minimum. If it doesn't have a champion in Debian, it must have one in Ubuntu, as it is in universe. Is kernel-team going to subscribe to it and fix autopkgtests?11:32
enycsunweaver: have noticed  dragon input system,  colour changing tools,  magnifiers,  screen readers,  and so-on ...  just not-so-available for gnu/linux/ubuntu/etc11:32
xnoxtjaalton:  and are we keeping openjdk-8 in focal? i guess we are, in that case someone or me needs to check what's going on with current nss then.11:33
xnoxcjwatson:  does openssh have any magic tests around 2020 date. Seems like it started to fail since new year http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/openssh/focal/amd64 https://ci.debian.net/packages/o/openssh/unstable/amd64/ debian timings w.r.t. new year are a lot closer. I am not sure if i am reading regress errors right, but it fails tests to do with expiration of things.11:35
tjaaltonxnox: dogtag-pki autopkgtests pass fine on debian, so it's not nss to blame then?11:35
cjwatsonregress/cert-hostkey.sh:test_one "cert not yet valid"   failure "-h -V20200101:20300101"11:35
cjwatsonregress/cert-userkey.sh:test_one "cert not yet valid"   failure "-n ${USER} -V20200101:20300101"11:35
enyccjwatson: o dear =)  should this not use a hardcoded test 'date in future' at all, rather calculate something at time of build?11:37
cjwatsonhttps://anongit.mindrot.org/openssh.git/commit/?id=ff31f15773ee173502eec4d7861ec56f26bba38111:37
xnoxtjaalton:  debian doesn't set tlsv1.2 min in nss; but we do.11:37
cjwatsonenyc: no doubt, but I'll just cherry-pick the upstream change.  Take it up with upstream11:37
enycI wonder at what point trying to colcucate over 2038 etc. will fail ;p11:38
enycunix time 32-bit and all that =)11:38
xnoxcjwatson:  i like that they make it still 1st of Jan. I'll ask them to move it at least to Jan 14th because holidays.11:38
tjaaltonxnox: so there were autopkgtests showing that it failed? have they been removed now as well?11:38
cjwatsonNot on 64-bit systems it isn't, and people are working on the 32-bit case11:38
xnoxtjaalton:  should be still there => one sec.11:39
xnoxcjwatson:  thank you for pointing it out!11:39
xnoxtjaalton:  fails to initialize https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/amd64/d/dogtag-pki/20200108_202654_c8684@/log.gz ?11:41
tjaaltonso after ~5h it got removed, nice11:41
tjaaltonCA worked, so ipa server still works too11:42
tjaalton/usr/lib/python3.7/getpass.py:91: GetPassWarning: Can not control echo on the terminal.11:42
tjaaltonI don't think it's related to nss but maybe something else11:43
xnoxtjaalton:  there are other errors about something else deprecated in the logs about passwords / pin.11:43
xnoxtjaalton:  if the autopkgtest is fixed in debian, we can sync both of them back in, and readd them.11:43
cjwatsonxnox: thanks for noticing, since I hadn't yet; fix uploaded to unstable11:43
tjaaltonxnox: well I can drop the uninstall test..11:44
tjaaltonit's pretty pointless anyway11:44
xnoxtjaalton:  it's just there is nobody to gate it (no gating in debian, and no owner in ubuntu)11:44
xnoxtjaalton:  true.11:44
xnoxtjaalton:  propose it to debian, and sync from there?11:44
tjaaltonI'm the maintainer there11:44
xnoxcjwatson:  i wonder if we need to SRU it across all the releases & ESM now too =/11:45
xnoxtjaalton:  oh, ok =)11:45
xnoxdid not realize / check that, sorry.11:45
tjaaltonnp, this did prompt me to ask the fedora jdk maintainer about their plans, and jdk11 might finally make it on their schedule..11:46
cjwatsonxnox: Can ride along with any other fix that's required I imagine11:46
tjaaltonwhich in turn means it's a priority to port everything over11:46
ahasenackcpaelzer: this is weird: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/CKJYg6wqXs/13:02
ahasenackcpaelzer: line 3 creates the local/usr.sbin.slapd local override13:03
ahasenackthen line 4 loads it, all is fine13:03
ahasenacktest runs, succeeds13:03
ahasenackthen at the end I remove the override 4013:03
ahasenackbut apparmor_parser -r fails weirdly13:03
ahasenack-T and -W are to handle the cache, which I thought was the problem13:03
ahasenackahhhh13:05
ahasenackfound it13:05
ahasenackthanks :)13:05
jamespagecpaelzer: I'm ready to go on openvswitch and ovn updates post 19.11 dpdk upload13:08
jamespagewill need some archive-admin time for the split out and new source package for ovn13:09
cpaelzerjamespage: I ahve a call about DPDK in 1.5h after that I intend to upload13:09
cpaelzerjamespage: will hit new queue as well13:09
jamespagegreat13:09
cpaelzerso you have some time to sort out AA needs :-)13:09
cpaelzerI'll keep you posted on it13:09
seb128LocutusOfBorg, hey there, what do you think about splitting the remmina-gnome-session entry in a different deb (which we would install by default)?13:25
seb128Laney, ^13:25
LaneyI just asked mfv about that in #debian-gnome13:26
Laney:>13:26
seb128ah, for some reason I though locusofborg was also maintaining it in debian13:26
Laneymaybe LocutusOfBorg will want to do the work anyway ;-)13:27
Laneyalso I think you mean "would *not* install by default"!13:28
seb128shrug, I need to stop doing those thinkos, indeed13:29
seb128LocutusOfBorg, bug #1851007 also I think is still not resolved which makes the session not working13:30
ubottubug 1851007 in remmina (Ubuntu) "Login option 'GNOME + Remmina' not working" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185100713:30
LocutusOfBorgI would like to avoid doing debian work for remmina :p13:36
seb128LocutusOfBorg, sorry, for some reason I though you were maintaining it there :)13:37
LocutusOfBorgno problem :)13:38
LocutusOfBorgI just do the merges, because both upstream and Debian are italian, and they ask directly to me!13:38
=== ricab is now known as ricab|lunch
Laneyheh13:40
ahasenackxnox: hi, I have an MP up for krb5 to switch it to use py313:48
ahasenackhttps://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+git/krb5/+merge/37732613:48
ahasenackI just missed to link it with the bug :/13:48
RikMillsis anyone looking at merging pulseaudio? that has the equaliser ported with patches to python3 I think?13:53
RikMillsdoko ^ ?13:53
seb128RikMills, pulseaudio is maintained by the desktop team, don't bother doko with it :)13:54
RikMillsseb128: right13:54
seb128RikMills, is there a concrete problem with it as of today?13:55
seb128we will merge that/get an update before ff for sure, but I do an upload sooner rather than later if there is need for the change to land in focal now13:55
RikMillsseb128: new pyqt5 synced that autosynced from debian dropped the Python2 dbus.mainloop.pyqt5 packages that the equaliser currently depends on, so pyqt5 will not migrate until pulseaudio is merged13:57
seb128RikMills, k, sounds lIke a good reason, let me merge that change, and thanks for the ping!13:58
RikMillsnot urgent, but would be nice to fix13:58
RikMillsthanks! :)13:58
LocutusOfBorgseb128, what about asking debian to bump epoch so MoM does some little job on it?13:58
seb128LocutusOfBorg, you can ask them if you feel like, I personally don't use that service for pulseaudio since we have git packaging13:59
LocutusOfBorgI did a debdiff between debian and ubuntu14:00
LocutusOfBorgthere is something that should probably go away, like upstart stuff14:01
LocutusOfBorgMoM does a good job in that14:01
LocutusOfBorgbut yeah, a git diff does it even better14:01
seb128thanks for pointing it out, I will have a look at the delta we can drop while I'm at it14:01
LocutusOfBorgwhile I asked you to do, I remembered that pidgin has the same issue, and it is collaborate maintenance in Debian14:02
LocutusOfBorgso I'll just commit the bump epoch there :p14:02
seb128:)14:02
LocutusOfBorgthey acked it a while ago, but they forgot to commit14:03
dokoRikMills: yep, just wanted to get that installable again. Could you do the merge?14:06
dokoseb128: ^^^14:06
seb128doko, yes, I'm on it14:07
seb128doko, feel free to ping about any desktop owner source that needs merged/fixing, we are happy to help14:08
xnoxahasenack:  nice!14:25
xnoxahasenack:  does it work? =)14:25
ahasenackxnox: sure14:33
xnoxtjaalton:  why would we keep openjdk-8 if like only three things are left that depend on it14:56
xnoxtjaalton:  actually they all have alternatives14:57
tjaaltondoko: ^14:57
xnoxdoko:  vorlon: please remove openjdk-8 from focal https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-8/+bug/185903715:01
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1859037 in openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) "RM: openjdk-8 obsolete, unused in the archive" [Undecided,Triaged]15:01
dokoxnox, vorlon: please no. we said will will keep it until the support for 16.04 LTS ends15:02
dokoso maybe what we might want to do is to ship it only in -updates15:03
=== ricab|lunch is now known as ricab
xnoxdoko:  which support? until 2026 then?15:19
xnoxdoko:  in that case i'd love to drop alternative depends, such that nothing has alternative depends on openjdk8 in the archive.15:20
dokoxnox: apparently, yes. as long as we need to update the package, that's ok15:20
xnoxdoko:  ack.15:20
dokoxnox: could you have a look at the z3 ftbfs on s390x?15:20
dokoseb128: we need to coordinate the pygtk2 removal with jbicha. I'd like to avoid rebuilding all that old stuff ...15:50
seb128doko, yes, do we have a bug report to track that atm?15:51
seb128doko, also feel free to give us a list of desktop things to fix, you don't have to fix everything yourself15:52
xnoxdoko:  urgh that is ugly15:52
dokoseb128: I don't have such a list, but you could scan python-defaults in output_notest15:56
seb128doko, k, well in any case when you hit a desktop package that you want to see fixed feel free to ping15:59
vorlonseb128: half of the world> which half?  link to some log?16:13
seb128vorlon, https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages16:15
seb128https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/i386/c/clutter-1.0/20200108_155337_4f951@/log.gz16:15
seb128https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/i386/f/firefox/20200108_211625_61bf5@/log.gz16:15
seb128https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/i386/f/ffmpeg/20200108_172908_8962e@/log.gz16:15
seb128https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/i386/libs/libssh/20200108_211244_b9663@/log.gz16:15
vorlonseb128: ok looking16:15
seb128https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/i386/p/poppler/20200108_201209_55428@/log.gz16:15
seb128vorlon, it might be they are ending up to a common lib not installable or something but unsure how to properly figure that out...16:16
seb128vorlon, thx16:16
vorlonseb128: it's expected that firefox tests won't pass on i386 and it's a bug in britney that they're run16:16
seb128https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/i386/g/gtk+2.0/20200108_230517_cbb33@/log.gz16:16
vorlonthe others though, I've just noticed and will dig in now, thanks16:16
seb128thx16:16
vorlonhttps://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal_uninst.txt doesn't show uninstallabilities fwiw16:17
seb128also if you have hints on how to poke to those issues I might be able to figure things out myself instead of bothering you next time :)16:17
seb128oh, I didn't know about that report16:17
seb128nice16:17
vorlonoh it's probably hitting the autopkgtest bug where if a library in the amd64 base system is in -proposed, the pin doesn't get set to cover both archs16:17
vorlonbut that doesn't explain why it's uninstallable on the second run with all of proposed16:18
vorlonso I'd guess it was: couldn't cherry-pick the specific package from -proposed because of wrong pin; couldn't install from -proposed because some build was behind16:19
vorlonI'll see if I can reproduce it now and maybe these'll just need to be retries16:19
seb128k, thanks16:31
rafaeldtinocorbasak: SO, when you're packaging mysql-server-8, did u make sure for all the build tests to pass ? just checking cause I think there are 2 of those failing currently for focal, wanted to know if you faced failing tests during build time (nocheck doesn't change attempt of running the tests).17:01
rbasakrafaeldtinoco: it's quite common for us to see test failures. They fail the build.17:02
rbasak(though we don't run the _entire_ test suite, just a subset)17:02
rbasakAlso more (different) tests are run during dep817:02
rbasakSo if it made proposed migration, I assume they were passing at the time17:02
rafaeldtinocorbasak: awesome.17:06
rafaeldtinocotks.. ill work in current failures then.17:06
rafaeldtinocoits for the mysql-router MIR (security team asking)17:06
Skuggenrafaeldtinoco:I think we only enforce all tests passing for i386 and amd64, for MySQL18:13
rafaeldtinocoSkuggen: hum18:30
cpaelzerjamespage: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk/19.11-2ubuntu1 is in focal-proposed - but it will have to pass new queue after build before you can use it I guess18:35
cpaelzerall but arm64 are built for now, we can check tomorrow in which state it is to upload dependent packages18:35
rafaeldtinocorbasak: CREATE EVENT e1 ON SCHEDULE AT '2020-01-01 00:00:00' DO SET @a = 1;21:04
rafaeldtinocolol21:04
rafaeldtinocowe are at 2020 and the test is broken now21:04
rafaeldtinocoomg21:04
rafaeldtinocoi'll do a fix for those tests and do a MP for mysql-server21:04
rafaeldtinocofixing the FTBS21:04
rbasakrafaeldtinoco: coordinate with Skuggen please - we should have an upstream bug for that21:14
rbasakrafaeldtinoco: and thank you for sorting it :)21:15
rafaeldtinocorbasak: I think there is one already21:15
rafaeldtinocoI'll sync with him21:15
rbasakrafaeldtinoco: MP against the salsa branch please21:15
rafaeldtinocodefinitely!21:15

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!