[06:15] <mborzecki> morning
[07:11] <mup> PR snapcraft#2862 closed: python plugin: remove bzr workaround <Created by sergiusens> <Closed by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2862>
[07:30] <zyga> good morning!
[07:30] <zyga> mborzecki: I'll switch gears for a few hours to reset my focus away from setgid
[07:31] <zyga> mborzecki: I pushed the branch that has the selinux denial, I have one more idea to explore but if all else fails I'll ask you for a moment to come up with more ideas
[07:33] <zyga> quick morning coffee and I'll be around shortly
[07:33] <mborzecki> zyga: hey
[07:33] <zyga> I slept terribly last night
[07:34] <mborzecki> btw. core20 spread tests seem to be failing
[07:34] <zyga> mborzecki: there's a thread about core20 being in the stable channel being wrong, perhaps that changed just now and it is affecting tests?
[07:34]  * zyga checks
[07:34] <mborzecki> zyga: btw. after going through tickets in RHBZ yday evening pushed this: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7978
[07:34] <mup> PR #7978: data/selinux, test/main/selinux-clean: update the test to cover more scenarios <Created by bboozzoo> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7978>
[07:34] <zyga> oh interesting
[07:35] <zyga> I wonder if your improvement to selinux-clean test shows some more stuff in my PR
[07:35] <mborzecki> zyga: we're clearly not covering some usage patterns, got some fixes for this already, but need to read on some things a bit more
[07:35] <zyga> mborzecki: I think the better approach would be to do it in each test
[07:35] <zyga> like we do with apparmor denials
[07:35] <zyga> mborzecki: it will never be complete on its own, as a standalone test
[07:35] <zyga> mborzecki: we can keep it as a quick selinux smoke test
[07:35] <zyga> mborzecki: not sure if we are ready for such a switch though
[07:36] <mborzecki> zyga: yeah, that'd be nice, but last time i tried it it was a bumpy ride in spread tests
[07:36] <zyga> yeah, I think we are in agreement, it's a long term plan
[07:36] <zyga> good to see more tests
[08:03] <zyga> good morning Chipaca, mvo :)
[08:06] <mvo> hey zyga and pstolowski ! good morning
[08:06] <zyga> hey pawel!
[08:06] <pstolowski> morning!
[08:15] <mborzecki> mvo: pstolowski: Chipaca: morning guys
[08:15] <mvo> hey mborzecki
[08:15] <mvo> and hey Chipaca
[08:15]  * Chipaca waves
[08:22] <Chipaca> today's going to be weird: somebody in the forum just admitted to being wrong
[08:22] <Chipaca> i should get breakfast before it escalates
[08:29] <mvo> hrm, hrm, looks like uc20 breaks all the tests, I wonder what happend
[08:48] <mvo> xnox: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Mtzr52HJp2/ - if only I can upload to the core20 ppa :(
[08:51] <mvo> xnox: also, should I backport https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/14409/files to 244 in focal ? so that going forward we don't need to have our own version of systemd in the ppa?
[08:51] <mup> PR systemd/systemd#14409: some smaller modernizations to the shutdown loop <good-to-merge/waiting-for-ci 👍> <shutdown> <Created by poettering> <Merged by keszybz> <https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/14409>
[08:55] <mvo> juliank: hey, do you think you could upload https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Mtzr52HJp2/ to ppa:canonical-foundations/ubuntu-image ? xnox seems to be not around yet and this is currently breaking our CI - I don't have the required permissions :/
[08:58] <juliank> ack
[08:58] <mvo> juliank: \o/ you rock!
[09:02] <juliank> mvo: uploaded
[09:04] <mvo> juliank: thank you!
[09:08] <mvo> xnox: juliank was kind enough to upload the fix to the ppa:caonical-foundations/ubuntu-image ppa, I prepare a proper upload with the pr14409
[09:27] <zyga> pstolowski: are you getting any issues with mail today?
[09:29] <mvo> zyga: my issue with mail is that I get too much (SCNR)
[09:30] <zyga> mvo: I got logged out today
[09:30] <zyga> mvo: and cannot log back in, google redirects me to sso, I log in and then google gives a 400 something page
[09:30] <zyga> mvo: so no email today
[09:30] <mvo> zyga: uh, fun. so it's google with the 400 or our sso?
[09:31] <mvo> zyga: fwiw, my mail seems to be ok
[09:31] <zyga> google
[09:42] <pstolowski> zyga: yep (if you mean mac os mail & auth prompts)
[09:42] <zyga> pstolowski: yeah, that
[09:42] <zyga> pstolowski: I tried logging in again but I get 400 from google
[09:44] <pstolowski> zyga: yeah something broke, i though it was fine after 3 attempts some time ago (it stopped prompting me), but i cannot send email
[09:44] <zyga> pstolowski: yeah, I'll wait till EOD and report it
[09:44] <zyga> pstolowski: I heard there are some issues in the DC
[09:46] <Chipaca> sliced chillies omelette + itchy eyes == half hour of pain :-(
[09:46] <zyga> uh?
[09:46] <zyga> "just add nails" they said
[09:47] <Chipaca> zyga: to the DC?
[09:47] <zyga> Chipaca: to the omelette ;)
[09:48] <Chipaca> zyga: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-KzGKoLHXk but more boring
[10:02] <mvo> fwiw, the uc20 tests should be good again, the updated core20 hit edge
[10:12] <pstolowski> zyga: nb, (unsurprisingly) same problem on IOS
[10:24] <mup> PR snapcraft#2860 closed: backport fixes for 3.9 <Created by cjp256> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2860>
=== seb128_ is now known as seb128
[10:40] <sdhd-sascha> hi, in which branch is `snapctl` with option `user-open` ?
[10:41] <pedronis> mborzecki: mvo: Ian's PRs need 2nd reviews, they are also red, is that the uc20 issue that now is fixed? do they need a master merge?
[10:43] <mvo> pedronis: the uc20 issue is fixed, a new core20 hit the store ~30min ago
[10:43] <mvo> pedronis: so a retry should be enough
[10:45] <sdhd-sascha> i get `error: error running snapctl: Unknown command `user-open'`
[10:46] <sdhd-sascha> i found it ;-)
[10:58] <mup> PR snapd#7975 closed: release: 2.43 <Created by mvo5> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7975>
[11:02]  * zyga -> afk
[11:02] <mup> PR snapd#7973 closed: boot: split MakeBootable implementations into their own file <Simple 😃> <UC20> <Created by anonymouse64> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7973>
[11:21] <zyga> re
[11:43] <mborzecki> pstolowski: can you take a look at the lastest batch of selinux updates https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7978 ?
[11:43] <mup> PR #7978: data/selinux, test/main/selinux-clean: update the test to cover more scenarios <Created by bboozzoo> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7978>
[11:43] <pstolowski> mborzecki: sure
[11:43] <mborzecki> hope i got it right
[11:44] <mborzecki> it'd be great to have some useful documentation on selinux :/
[12:08] <mup> PR snapd#7865 closed: travis-ci: add go import path <Created by sd-hd> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7865>
[12:15] <mborzecki> ijohnson: pushed a little fix to #7976
[12:15] <mup> PR #7976: boot: split MakeBootable tests into their own file <Simple 😃> <UC20> <Created by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7976>
[12:15] <mborzecki> mvo: can you take another look ^^
[12:21] <mvo> mborzecki: sure thing
[12:22] <sdhd-sascha> can someone stop travis for 7845 ? i don't think that other builds has to wait for this change ?
[12:22] <sdhd-sascha> it's need to be fixed in upstream systemd pkgconf first ...
[12:25] <zyga> sdhd-sascha: sure
[12:26] <zyga> done
[12:26] <sdhd-sascha> zyga: maybe set "blocked" label or something. So nobody look for it, and waste time ?
[12:26] <sdhd-sascha> thank you :-)
[12:28] <pedronis> mborzecki: I made a comment about your changes in 7976
[12:29] <mborzecki> pedronis: heh, good idea, i'll update it
[12:29] <mborzecki> pedronis: thanks!
[12:31] <pedronis> mborzecki: also maybe we don't need all the AddCleanup Force(nil) in the force* methods, not sure
[12:32] <pedronis> because we have one in the base suite
[12:41] <mup> PR snapd#7982 opened: o/snapstate, wrappers: enable services on start <Complex> <⛔ Blocked> <Created by stolowski> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7982>
[12:45] <cachio> mborzecki, hey
[12:45] <cachio> I am reviewing this issue that you reported
[12:45] <cachio> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1857022
[12:45] <mup> Bug #1857022: gtk3-nocsd preloads a setuid library <gtk3-nocsd (Ubuntu):New> <snapd (Ubuntu):New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1857022>
[12:46] <cachio> which is the importance of this on in your opinion?
[12:53] <mborzecki> cachio: i think you can flip it to triaged:undecided, we have try to do something smart about those preloads, but not necessarily
[12:55] <cachio> mborzecki, ok, thanks
[12:59] <ijohnson> Thanks mborzecki
[12:59] <mborzecki> ijohnson: np, hope i didn't make it worse
[13:00] <ijohnson> I dunno I have really looked I just saw your ping that you fixed it :-P
[13:00] <ijohnson> *haven't
[13:01] <pedronis> mborzecki: the changes look good to me, let's see if it gets green as well
[13:01]  * ijohnson is always happy to have mborzecki fix my things
=== ricab is now known as ricab|lunch
[13:57] <pstolowski> zyga: the email works for me now, had to re-authenticate and reconfirm permissions
[13:57] <zyga> pstolowski: cool, I'll do that
[14:00] <mup> PR snapcraft#2864 opened: meta: assume command-chain fix for prepending snapcraft-runner <Created by cjp256> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2864>
[14:45] <mup> PR snapd#7976 closed: boot: split MakeBootable tests into their own file <Simple 😃> <UC20> <Created by anonymouse64> <Merged by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7976>
[14:50] <sdhd-sascha> hmm, i just forget that /usr/ is mounted from `core` ... snapd really needs overlayfs interface.
[14:50] <sdhd-sascha> would make things so much easier.
[14:50] <sdhd-sascha> Is it possible to limit a snap to a kernel version on the host ?
[14:55] <ijohnson> sdhd-sascha: there is no limiting of a snap to a kernel version, but you can specify features with `assumes: [snapd2.43]` etc.
[14:55] <ijohnson> I don't remember the full list of features you can specify, but at least you can do snapd versions
[14:57] <sdhd-sascha> ijohnson: thank you.  :-)
[14:57] <sdhd-sascha> My final goal would be a complete desktop in snaps, without any gui-libraries on the host-system. I mean, no fonts, no libgl*, no libxkb and so on ...
[14:58] <ijohnson> good luck :-)
[15:01] <sdhd-sascha> ijohnson: it's diffcult for me alone ;-) i just test the current limits.
[15:01] <sdhd-sascha> Currently i can build a monolithic "sway desktop snap", which has a terminal inside and use the gnome-extension. But to split these into composable parts, ... hmm
=== pedronis_ is now known as pedronis
[15:09] <mup> PR snapd#7983 opened: tests: Adding more tests to core20 test suite <Created by sergiocazzolato> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7983>
[15:09] <mup> PR snapcraft#2865 opened: cli: do not report KeyboardInterrupt errors <Created by cjp256> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2865>
=== ricab|lunch is now known as ricab
[15:12]  * cachio lunch
[15:26]  * Chipaca does a git reset --hard, and does a grump
[15:30]  * Chipaca afk
=== pedronis_ is now known as pedronis
=== pedronis_ is now known as pedronis
[15:58]  * zyga back from lunch
[16:55] <mup> PR snapcraft#2863 closed: spread tests: use source-depth: 1 for plainbox tests <Created by sergiusens> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2863>
[17:08]  * zyga EODs
[17:08] <zyga> ttyl
[17:27] <jdstrand> ogra_: oh, I meant to tell you, the writable label on the external drive trick worked great. thanks!
[17:27] <jdstrand> (again)
[17:27] <zyga> hey there jdstrand
[17:27] <zyga> I'm EOD and doing some experiments before heading upstairs away from the office
[17:27] <zyga> I wanted to tell you I started reviving branches from last year to address your feedback
[17:28] <zyga> and that I should have some useful stuff for your eyes next week
[17:28] <jdstrand> zyga: I saw thanks. I'm off next week but back the next
[17:28] <jdstrand> zyga: have a nice weekend :)
[17:28] <zyga> ah, good to know
[17:28] <zyga> thank you, enjoy :)
[17:33] <Chipaca> jdstrand: 'back next' → the week the CT sprint is on?
[17:41] <jdstrand> Chipaca: I'm not in CT this time. I will be working that week though
[17:46] <mup> PR snapcraft#2866 opened: spread tests: limit adapter test to amd64 <Created by cjp256> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2866>
[17:48] <ogra> jdstrand, awesome !
[17:56] <makayabou> Hello, I want to install snaps during Debian installation but it's done in a chroot inside /target, so systemd can not be used.. I tried to create a seed.yaml in /var/lib/snapd/seed but it does not work. I put name and channel only is it enough?
[17:58] <mup> PR snapcraft#2771 closed: python plugin: first try processing setup.py without PyPI <Created by sergiusens> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2771>
[18:25] <mup> PR snapcraft#2229 closed: elf: extract build ID and presence of debug info <Created by jhenstridge> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2229>
[18:28] <mup> PR snapcraft#2865 closed: cli: do not report KeyboardInterrupt errors <Created by cjp256> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2865>
[21:49] <mup> PR snapcraft#2867 opened: elf: remove return parameters for ElfFile's _extract() <Created by cjp256> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2867>