[00:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssh (disco-proposed/main) [1:7.9p1-10 => 1:7.9p1-10ubuntu0.1] (core)
[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssh (bionic-proposed/main) [1:7.6p1-4ubuntu0.3 => 1:7.6p1-4ubuntu0.4] (core)
[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssh (xenial-proposed/main) [1:7.2p2-4ubuntu2.8 => 1:7.2p2-4ubuntu2.9] (core)
[01:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sight [amd64] (focal-proposed) [19.0.0-4]
[01:16] <cjwatson> https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/ppc64el/d/dpdk/20200109_220544_e842a@/log.gz says:
[01:16] <cjwatson>  dpdk-igb-uio-dkms : Depends: libdpdk-dev (= 19.11-2ubuntu1) but 18.11.5-1 is to be installed
[01:17] <cjwatson> but this looks weird because those are both in -proposed for the architecture being tested and are both from the source package being tested
[01:18] <cjwatson> oh I guess it's due to the maintainer script failures above maybe?
[01:18] <cjwatson> ah, and I see people discussing that earlier too
[05:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-fastmap [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-fastmap [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-scitrack [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.1.8.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-fastmap [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-fastmap [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-fastmap [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed xorg from i386-whitelist in focal
[06:22] <cpaelzer> cjwatson: dpdk-rte-kni-dkms is no more built in the new source
[06:22] <cpaelzer> maybe that triggered some of the confusion in those tests?
[06:26] <cpaelzer> the new debian/tests/control and debian/tests/test-dkms no more reference the old package
[06:33] <cpaelzer> there also is my arm64 build hanging since 14h (see #ubuntu-devel) - maybe that stops publishing (actually needs to pass new queue as well) the new version
[08:57] <jibel> is anyone fixing daily images?
[08:57] <jibel> Laney, xnox ^
[09:03] <Laney> jibel: We were looking into the problem with the Ubuntu daily, hoping tjaalton is going to get the OEM 5.4 kernel out of -proposed today ...
[09:03] <Laney> as for the flavours, I haven't looked yet, do you want a hand?
[09:08] <jibel> Laney, yeah I didn't look at all at the flavours. I thought you were. It could be due to the removal of transitional signed kernel packages in linux-meta 5.4.0.8.9 but didn't look further.
[09:08] <jibel> Laney, can you have a look?
[09:09] <Laney> did it start with 5.4 migrating?
[09:10] <jibel> yes, last successful build of lubuntu for example has 5.3
[09:10] <Laney> mmm
[09:14] <jibel> just filed bug 1859146 to track the issue
[09:21] <Laney> wonder what we're supposed to do
[09:22]  * Laney invokes sforshee or apw for advice
[09:27] <tjaalton> Laney: well, assuming the autopkgtest failure which isn't happy about python->python2 is fatal, it won't get out of testing today
[09:27] <tjaalton> but needs a rebase with master
[09:29] <Laney> is it fatal?
[09:30] <tjaalton> I don't know
[09:30] <tjaalton> but I guess it won't automatically move forward
[09:31] <Laney> I guess we should just take this stuff out of livecd-rootfs
[09:33] <tjaalton> systemd test seems to fail
[09:34] <tjaalton> hasn't been run on master yet
[09:34] <tjaalton> so don't have a reference if it's broken too or not
[09:34] <tjaalton> but yes, take oem-5.4 out from the livecd
[09:34] <tjaalton> for now
[09:38] <apw> Laney, linux-signed-* packages have been transitional to linux-image-* for, i want to say, years.  whatever points at -signed- should now point at -image-
[09:38] <Laney> apw: yeah, just want confirmation that we should drop it really
[09:38] <Laney> https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/GQ4zpwGHqk/
[09:39] <Laney> xnox: ^- also want to review?
[09:39] <Laney> apw: looks like you finally dropped the old transitional packages with 5.4 which broke this :-)
[09:41] <Laney> but there is still a reference to linux-signed-image-generic in ubuntu-core:system-image https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/tree/live-build/auto/build#n609 - should I fix that up too?
[09:44] <Laney> if so, just s/-signed//?
[09:49] <apw> Laney, yeah that indeed; the contents of l-s-i-g moved to l-i-g ... now you install l-i-<flavour> to get the preferred form signed/unsigned
[09:51] <Laney> okey
[09:51] <Laney> https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/NhNKhM7GqR/ that's what I've got atm
[10:05] <apw> Laney, looks entirely sane
[10:06] <locutus__> vorlon, if possible NBS cleanup the numpy subpackage from boost-defaults? (on i386)
[10:07] <locutus__> libboost-numpy-dev [i386]
[10:09] <Laney> apw: merci pour le reviewez
[10:09]  * Laney is just running the autopkgtests before uploading
[10:09]  * apw hands Laney and official ack
[10:09] <apw> s/offical/formal
[10:10]  * Laney sticks it up on the wall
[10:10] <Laney> a beautiful baby ack
[10:10] <apw> they cry at night i am afraid
[10:10]  * Laney shouldn't have used both of those images
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openkim-models [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [20190331-4] (no packageset)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openkim-models [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [20190331-4] (no packageset)
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openkim-models [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [20190331-4] (no packageset)
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openkim-models [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [20190331-4] (no packageset)
[11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ceph [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [14.2.5-3ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ceph [amd64] (focal-proposed) [14.2.5-3ubuntu1]
[11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openkim-models [arm64] (focal-proposed) [20190331-4]
[11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openkim-models [s390x] (focal-proposed) [20190331-4]
[11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-fastmap [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-fastmap [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-fastmap [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openkim-models [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20190331-4]
[11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-scitrack [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.1.8.1-1]
[11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-fastmap [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openkim-models [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [20190331-4]
[11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-fastmap [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[11:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ovn (focal-proposed/primary) [2.12.90~git20200107.c80e014d4-0ubuntu1]
[12:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openvswitch [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [2.12.90~git20200107.af683565b-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[12:12] <Laney> jibel: uploaded it, should be able to check cd builds once this moves out to focal
[12:14] <RikMills> nice :)
[12:28] <locutus__> vorlon, hinting seqan2 and libgdf on i386 would be appreciated
[12:28] <locutus__> and boost migrate ^^
[12:29] <locutus__> oh and flightcrew on i386 too
[12:45] <jibel> Laney, great, thank you
[13:04] <jamespage> doko: I've uploaded openvswitch and ovn (NEW source) - ovn was part of the openvswitch source tree so the binary packages are pretty much a straight split out with the addition of a ovn-doc package
[13:05] <jamespage> doko: ovn uses the new openvswitch-source package as part of its build process
[13:08] <locutus__> infinity, FYI, garmin-plugin seems installable on my machine https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/garmin-plugin/0.3.23-4ubuntu1
[13:08] <locutus__> so I syncd it
[13:08] <locutus__> probably some apt changes made it smarter, or firefox got fixed in the meanwhile?
[13:08] <locutus__> tested on bionic and focal, installation seems ok
[13:08] <locutus__> plugin goes in firefox plugin directory+
[13:13] <ginggs> locutus__: does it work?
[13:13] <infinity> locutus__: You missed the point.  The build-dep made it NOT build on arches that don't have firefox.
[13:14] <infinity> locutus__: Your sync will have created an uninst binary on s390x.
[13:17] <ginggs> but that thing should just be removed https://adiesner.github.io/GarminPlugin/
[13:17] <ginggs> "The plugin stopped working in Chrome 35+, and Firefox will follow sometime in the future. The support for the plugin interface NPAPI has been dropped"
[13:17] <infinity> Oh, if it's an NPAPI plugin, removing it entirely and blacklisting it is also entirely valid.
[13:20] <infinity> ginggs: Care to file a removal bug with justification and I'll action it?
[13:20] <ginggs> infinity: ok
[13:20] <infinity> ginggs: Actually, don't bother.
[13:20] <infinity> ginggs: There's already a Debian RC bug I can reference.
[13:21] <ginggs> infinity: ack
[13:28] <xnox> Laney:  looks good
[13:29] <locutus__> infinity, I couldn't parse the point by looking at changelog...
[13:29] <locutus__> "Seems like ubuntu only change and needs to be carried forward as its uninstallable on my x86_64 VM)"
[13:29] <locutus__> but meh, thanks for fixing it up
[13:29] <infinity> locutus__: That wasn't my changelog entry. :P
[13:30] <infinity> locutus__: He clearly didn't understand why either.  Oh well.  It's deleted now.
[13:30] <locutus__> :)
[13:30] <locutus__> and numpy migrated yeah
[13:31] <locutus__> with some hints on i386 boost can migrate
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: q2-feature-classifier [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2019.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openvswitch [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.12.90~git20200107.af683565b-0ubuntu1]
[13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted q2-feature-classifier [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2019.4.0-1]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ovn [source] (focal-proposed) [2.12.90~git20200107.c80e014d4-0ubuntu1]
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apache2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.4.29-1ubuntu4.11 => 2.4.29-1ubuntu4.12] (ubuntu-server)
[15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-39.43] (core, kernel)
[15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-39.43] (core, kernel)
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ovn [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [2.12.90~git20200107.c80e014d4-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-39.43] (core, kernel)
[15:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ovn [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.12.90~git20200107.c80e014d4-0ubuntu1]
[15:41] <vorlon> locutus__: boost-defaults: I don't see anything NBS, did someone else get this?
[15:44] <locutus__> vorlon, not sure, probably yes
[15:44] <vorlon> locutus__: or did you mean the binaries in the release pocket, which are not actually NBS
[15:45] <locutus__> I mean, I would like to see boost1.67 migrate, and in order to do so, I had to upload boost-defaults without numpy-dev packages on i386
[15:45] <locutus__> and I need some help to hint some i386 test failures, and probably that is all
[15:46] <locutus__> (according to update_output_notest)
[15:46] <locutus__> boost1.67 is all green
[15:47] <locutus__> also python-nacl needs a kick on i386
[15:47] <locutus__> and python-datrie
[15:47] <locutus__> and pymssql
[15:49] <xnox> vorlon:
[15:49] <xnox> trying: boost1.67
[15:49] <xnox> skipped: boost1.67 (86, 94, 28)
[15:49] <xnox>     got: 38+0: a-8:a-5:a-4:i-10:p-5:s-6
[15:49] <xnox>     * i386: libboost-all-dev, libboost-numpy-dev
[15:49] <vorlon> ok
[15:49] <vorlon> so that possibly fixes when boost-defaults migrates
[15:50] <xnox> true
[15:54] <vorlon> locutus__: anyway, I've hinted away the i386 autopkgtest failures blocking boost-defaults, which appears to leave only cmake/armhf
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: casacore [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.2.1-2] (no packageset)
[15:57] <locutus__> vorlon, cmake is already retried thanks!
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted casacore [s390x] (focal-proposed) [3.2.1-2]
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: casacore [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.2.1-2] (no packageset)
[16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: casacore [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.2.1-2] (no packageset)
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-39.43]
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-39.43]
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-39.43]
[16:48] <Laney> ok livecd-rootfs migrated, trying a couple of builds
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted casacore [amd64] (focal-proposed) [3.2.1-2]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted casacore [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [3.2.1-2]
[17:03] <vorlon> doko: I fixed the libiptcdata autopkgtest, but the build regressed because now configure can't find 'python'; and debian/rules is cdbs hell which I'm not making any sense of
[17:03] <vorlon> doko: so I'm punting this for now
[17:38] <doko> vorlon: this is how I fix that: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/460008507/undertaker_1.6.1-4.2build1_1.6.1-4.2ubuntu1.diff.gz  (maybe needs a python-config script as well)
[17:52] <Trevinho> apw: is it https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu-archive-tools/sru-review-bileto-support/+merge/364193 good for merge now?
[17:53] <Trevinho> SRU team also please land packages for bug   1756826
[18:00] <vorlon> doko: hah ouch
[18:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: makedumpfile (bionic-proposed/main) [1:1.6.5-1ubuntu1~18.04.3 => 1:1.6.5-1ubuntu1~18.04.4] (core)
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: makedumpfile (eoan-proposed/main) [1:1.6.6-2ubuntu1 => 1:1.6.6-2ubuntu2] (core)
[18:20] <vorlon> doko: "remove package depending on pygtk, no rdeps
[18:20] <vorlon> doko: " - false, wmnut depended on nut
[18:23] <vorlon> doko: and the only bug filed in Debian about nut python2 was fixed in the version of the package you just deleted from -proposed, so I think I'm going to restore that and move wmnut back to -proposed
[18:26] <locutus__> vorlon, is it possible to have mercurial hint bumped on arm64 please?
[18:26] <locutus__> timeout is happening
[18:27] <vorlon> locutus__: done
[18:28] <locutus__> <3
[18:29] <locutus__> btw hints on what made llvm-toolchain-9 FTBFS in focal since two days is appreciated
[18:29] <locutus__> I see new binutils, but the same binutils is in debian
[18:29] <locutus__> we use gcc-8 and that didn't change
[18:36] <doko> vorlon: please don't. let's remove wmnut
[18:36] <vorlon> doko: why? neither of these are slated for removal in Debian
[18:37] <vorlon> and I don't even know why the nut in -proposed was removed
[18:37] <doko> vorlon: pygtk is going to be removed
[18:37] <vorlon> doko: yes, and your bug report in Debian about the pygtk dep was /closed/ by the version of the package in -proposed
[19:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.3.0-1011.12~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: doxygen [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.8.16-2] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[20:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jigit [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.22-3] (ubuntu-budgie, ubuntukylin, ubuntustudio, xubuntu)
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: doxygen [i386] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.8.16-2] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jigit [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.22-3] (ubuntu-budgie, ubuntukylin, ubuntustudio, xubuntu)
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jigit [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.22-3] (ubuntu-budgie, ubuntukylin, ubuntustudio, xubuntu)
[20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jigit [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.22-3] (ubuntu-budgie, ubuntukylin, ubuntustudio, xubuntu)
[20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: doxygen [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.8.16-2] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[20:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jigit [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.22-3] (ubuntu-budgie, ubuntukylin, ubuntustudio, xubuntu)
[20:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: doxygen [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.8.16-2] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[20:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: doxygen [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.8.16-2] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[20:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: doxygen [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.8.16-2] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[20:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted doxygen [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.8.16-2]
[20:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted doxygen [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.8.16-2]
[20:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted doxygen [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.8.16-2]
[20:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted doxygen [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.8.16-2]
[20:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted doxygen [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.8.16-2]
[20:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted doxygen [i386] (focal-proposed) [1.8.16-2]
[20:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jigit [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.22-3]
[20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jigit [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.22-3]
[20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jigit [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.22-3]
[20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jigit [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.22-3]
[20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jigit [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.22-3]
[21:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1011.12~18.04.1]
[22:59] <vorlon> doko: your "no rdeps" checks seem to be buggy.  libcec4 has 2 rdeps on s390x; sugar had 2 rdeps
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: atlas-ecmwf [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.19.0-7] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: atlas-ecmwf [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.19.0-7] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: atlas-ecmwf [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.19.0-7] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opencpn [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.0.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gecode [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [6.2.0-3] (no packageset)
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gecode [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [6.2.0-3] (no packageset)
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gecode [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [6.2.0-3] (no packageset)
[23:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: atlas-ecmwf [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.19.0-7] (no packageset)
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted atlas-ecmwf [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.19.0-7]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted atlas-ecmwf [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.19.0-7]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gecode [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [6.2.0-3]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted opencpn [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.0.0+dfsg-1]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted atlas-ecmwf [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.19.0-7]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gecode [s390x] (focal-proposed) [6.2.0-3]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gecode [amd64] (focal-proposed) [6.2.0-3]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted atlas-ecmwf [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.19.0-7]