=== tds1 is now known as tds
[12:58] <meena> installing py36-capy to test some stuff…
[12:58] <meena> (on freebsd, that is)
[13:11] <meena> calling dhcp_discover() https://gist.githubusercontent.com/igalic/70f74fd6c8648f3708d1f9f9ffb758f8/raw/70fc31cb9fa8fe8bce290eb1698779c8b7f12a7a/scapy%2520console
[13:11] <meena> and it returns the IP i already have.
[13:12] <meena> so, that's pretty cool for a start.
[13:32] <meena> also, it probably already does the picking of the default interface…
[13:33] <meena> but, to be sure that it works on interfaces which are… uhm… disconnected? down? unconfigured? unplumbed? i should add another interface and check…
[14:06] <meena> setting an 169.** address, i can issue a dhcp_request('em1') and receive a valid answer
[14:06] <meena> in order for this to work, all i had to do was set `conf.checkIPaddr = False`
[14:07] <meena> buttttt: i'm seeing that vagrant at least wants DHCP to be syncronous, and now i wonder how to achieve that… or, if it's necessary.
[14:09] <meena> well, i feel i was productive enough for today… for something i'm not getting paid to do…
[14:09]  * meena gets back to earning the big €€€€€€
[15:58] <Goneri> The NetBSD and the OpenBSD PRs are ready for review, Feedback are welcome :-)
[16:15] <meena> Goneri: same for my last PR btw.
[16:16] <meena> Goneri: https://github.com/canonical/cloud-init/pull/161
[19:36] <blackboxsw> rharper: Odd_Bloke are there any cloud-init specific branches in review that we would want to block starting a cloud-init SRU?
[20:11] <blackboxsw> Odd_Bloke: https://github.com/canonical/cloud-init/pull/131 looks approved (was stale and I just updated from master) anything blocking landing this approved PR?
[20:12] <Odd_Bloke> blackboxsw: Nope, just didn't get back to it once CI had finished.
[20:12] <blackboxsw> roger, will merge it once ci approves thanks Odd_Bloke
[20:12] <Odd_Bloke> (Another argument for some sort of landing bot, FWIW.)
[20:12] <blackboxsw> yeah totally .
[20:13] <blackboxsw> and then I'll upload to focal and start cutting PRs for cloud-init SRU review
[20:30] <Odd_Bloke> blackboxsw: I happened to switch back to that tab, so it's landed now.
[20:30] <blackboxsw> +1 thanks Odd_Bloke
[20:59] <blackboxsw> ok just reviewed https://github.com/canonical/cloud-init/pull/148 looks good, but need a minor change & unit test
[20:59] <blackboxsw> and the CLA signed :/
[21:11] <blackboxsw> community-notice: cloud-init Ubuntu SRU of version 19.4.33  will be starting this week. Target will be to publish updated cloud-init into Xenial, Bionic, Disco and Eoan.
[21:13] <powersj> no disco
[21:13] <powersj> blackboxsw, disco is EOL next Thursday
[21:14] <blackboxsw> schweet!
[21:14] <blackboxsw> community-notice: cloud-init Ubuntu SRU of version 19.4.33  will be starting this week. Target will be to publish updated cloud-init into Xenial, Bionic and Eoan.
[21:14] <blackboxsw> :)
[21:14] <powersj> \o/ thx
[21:14] <blackboxsw> powersj: I was going to reflect that to the mailing list too (and mention the upstream 20.1 release date) sound good ?
[21:15] <powersj> yep! did you see my proposed date for 20.1?
[21:15] <blackboxsw> sending the SRU mail would be to alert people interesting in case they want to test
[21:15] <blackboxsw> yeah saw your proposed date to us in email I like it
[21:15] <powersj> So that was the feature freeze date
[21:15] <powersj> feb 27, so for the cutting 20.1 I was going to propose Feb 18
[21:16] <powersj> blackboxsw, ^
=== blackboxsw changed the topic of #cloud-init to: cloud-init pull-requests https://git.io/JeVed | Meeting minutes: https://goo.gl/mrHdaj | Next status meeting January 21 17:15 UTC | 19.4 (Dec 17) | 20.1 DROP py2.7 (Feb 18) | https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+filebug
[21:17] <blackboxsw> works for me. we had said we'd try Jan 2020. But, alas... Feb 18 is close enough
[21:17] <blackboxsw> and we don't have much time left in Jan anyway w/ an SRU
[21:17] <blackboxsw> and travel etc.
[21:32] <meena> what's disco? did i miss the community meeting?
[21:32] <meena> powersj: where do i submit docs bugs?
[21:35] <powersj> meena, same place as other bugs :) Launchpad please and if you tag it docs that would be helpful as well
[21:35] <powersj> disco is in reference to Ubuntu 19.04 (Disco). The release is EOL next week so need to SRU to it.
[21:41] <meena> powersj: right. https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1859720
[21:41] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1859720 in cloud-init "Document how to override vendor-data" [Undecided,New]
[21:42] <powersj> meena, thank you!
[21:42] <meena> powersj: ah, yeah, i've been using Elementary… which uses LTS underneath.
[21:42] <meena> anyway, i'd really love if someone who's a core contributor could say something on the ML about robjo's mail, which i very much agree with.
[21:45] <meena> blackboxsw: you could probably directly commit this https://github.com/canonical/cloud-init/pull/148#issuecomment-574370976 to donnydavis' fork/patch thingie.
[22:00] <meena> Goneri: apparently, you get a warning if the ${NAME_enable} is unset.
[22:01] <meena> according to some people in #bsdports
[22:01] <meena> who aren't quite sure
[22:01] <meena> anyway, bed now
[22:01] <Goneri> ahah, good night :-)
[22:20] <blackboxsw> meena: right, I wanted to give donny the right of exclusion on the unit test. but right I could push that in anyway and if donny doesn't like it, it could be removed.
[22:20] <blackboxsw> minor SRU testing doc pushed https://github.com/canonical/cloud-init/pull/167
[22:48] <blackboxsw> and SRU PRs are up for Ubuntu xenial bionic and eoan so I can queue those bits for -proposed testing