/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/01/14/#ubuntu-meeting.txt

didrocksdoko: cpaelzer: FYI, I won't be available for the MIR team meeting today. Nothing already unoticed to raise12:25
cpaelzerok didrocks12:28
cpaelzerpre meeting ping for awareness jamespage doko sarnold13:57
cpaelzerdidrocks: (excused)13:57
jamespageo/13:57
cpaelzercyphermox: (technically still a member right?)13:57
cpaelzerjamespage: did I miss someone in above ping?13:59
jamespagejoeubuntu maybe14:00
joeubuntuI'm here.14:00
cpaelzerdoko: are you here?14:01
cpaelzerI know jamespage and I have some things with us to decide and I'd want to avoid this seems like cross-acking each others stuff14:02
cpaelzerwell joeubuntu can be the nay-sayer then if needed :-)14:02
joeubuntuI'll try my best :)14:02
cpaelzerI've also sent doko a query as ping14:03
cpaelzerlets get started as is and hope he joins us later thne14:03
jamespagecontext - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ovn/+bug/185960114:03
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1859601 in ovn (Ubuntu) "[MIR] ovn (binary only)" [Undecided,New]14:03
cpaelzer#startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status14:03
meetingologyMeeting started Tue Jan 14 14:03:39 2020 UTC.  The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.14:03
meetingologyAvailable commands: action commands idea info link nick14:03
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | <wxl> be nice | Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status Meeting | Current topic:
cpaelzercan you repeat for the log jamespage?14:03
jamespage#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ovn/+bug/185960114:03
jamespagecontext is that we've split the ovn source package out of the openvswitch package (already in main).14:04
cpaelzeras I said this morning, you already have my ack jamespage14:04
jamespagethe objective for 20.04 is to make OVN the default SDN for OpenStack on Ubuntu14:05
cpaelzeras its source was in main before it has had reviews and such already14:05
jamespageso I've seeded the required binaries into one of the server supported seeds14:05
cpaelzerjoeubuntu: you need to be the third vote to decide, do you agree that in such a case we can fast-path ack it to be promoted?14:06
joeubuntu+114:06
cpaelzerjamespage: ok I'm setting the bug state14:07
jamespageta14:07
joeubuntufor the reasons cpaelzer and jamespage  laid out.14:07
cpaelzerjamespage: only it is listed as "unsubscribed"14:07
cpaelzerjamespage: could you do the pkg-subscription for openstack team whie I change state14:07
jamespageI sorted that out this morning - might not have refreshed yet14:07
cpaelzerah ok thanks14:07
cpaelzerjamespage: the update is done, you just need to get an AAs attention as usual14:08
cpaelzerother cases for discussion from you jamespage?14:09
jamespageta - no rush I'll chase one down if it does not happne14:09
jamespageno - I think ceph-iscsi and nfs-ganesha are both with joeubuntu and the security team for review14:09
cpaelzerok then topic switch - I have an own bug(s) to discuss14:09
* jamespage listens14:09
cpaelzerhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/+bug/1819761 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/runc/+bug/181733614:10
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1819761 in containerd (Ubuntu) "[MIR] containerd" [Undecided,New]14:10
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1817336 in runc (Ubuntu) "[MIR] runc" [Undecided,New]14:10
cpaelzerlast discussed on the engineering sprint14:10
cpaelzerlet me summarize the background14:10
cpaelzer1. plenty of golang dependencies14:10
cpaelzer2. comes with the deps vendorized14:10
cpaelzer3. we were tasked to anaylze the dependencies if some of them are packaged14:10
cpaelzer4. this is a special case as runc/containerd will NOT stay at their version, they will get regular bumps to new major versions14:11
cpaelzerlike we did with docker.io in the past14:11
jamespageand so their dependencies will change over time as well right14:11
jamespage?14:11
cpaelzeryes jamespage, they will update14:11
cyphermoxcpaelzer: no, technically not a member anymore14:11
cpaelzercyphermox: :-/ but still o/14:12
cpaelzertherefore the decision in Paris was that we'd want dependencies that have extra packages alrady in main (e.g. due to LXD work in the past) to use these packages14:12
cyphermoxcpaelzer: MIR is Canonical-specific, AFAIK; since I'm not Canonical anymore, I wouldn't necessarily be representing the best interests, but I'll be happy to give you my opinion on software when asked :)14:12
cpaelzerif on a bump the vendored dependencies are needed on a newer level we'd swicth from package to vendored dependency14:13
cpaelzerwhile the other vendored dependencies (since they'd move anyway and have no initial better review-path) can stay vendored14:13
cpaelzernow the analysis is complete and was added to the bugs14:13
cpaelzerTL;DR: none of the dependencies are in main already14:13
jamespageconcern - both juju and lxd are no longer shipped in the archive so are they archive maintainers for the packages that have been split out14:14
jamespage?14:14
jamespagethey/there14:14
cpaelzeryes they are still14:14
jamespageI suspect the LXD team where probably doing some of them14:14
cpaelzeras usual with a MIR who brought it in owns it14:14
cpaelzerbut they might have dropped to universe since then14:14
jamespageare they also in Debian?14:15
cpaelzermost, but not all are packaged in Debian/Ubuntu14:15
jamespagejust considering that if they are Ubuntu only and end up with no reverse depends they might pop up on a potential to remove list14:15
jamespageTBH I struggle to hate vendoring - on the one side I appreciate that its not the distro model and muddies the view of the world14:16
jamespageon the other hand - its what upstream have tested with...14:16
jamespagethat said we've taken a similar approach in ceph14:16
joeubuntuas long as we can  easily track the versions in the vendored code I am not against it.14:16
jamespage(and that's not go)14:16
cpaelzerjamespage: joeubuntu: what I'd want from you know is considering the above; the Paris discussion if you remember; and the bugs; then with me discuss/ack that we'll go forward on this case with the MIR and security review keeping dependencies vendored14:16
cpaelzerkanashiro: ^^ if you want to chime in as well14:17
joeubuntuI think we should proceed as planned in Paris .14:17
cpaelzerkanashiro: ahasenack were the ones working on prepping the MIRs and the package14:17
cpaelzerjoeubuntu: ok, that would mean since nothing is in main we keep all vendored then14:17
jamespagetbh I think that's the reality of where the packages would be in 6-9 months anyway14:18
jamespageso at least if we've reviewed whats vendored we have a know good startline...14:18
dokosorry, typing too much ...14:18
joeubuntuWe've got the ability to track it on our end, so I'm cool with it.14:18
cpaelzerok, I'd MIR ack the bugs then and "all that is left" is the security review then (a lot I know)14:19
cpaelzerit already is assigned to security and on their trello14:19
cpaelzerdoko: anything to add since you are now with us?14:19
cpaelzerwe can give you a few min to inhale all the backlog here :-)14:19
joeubuntuAs an update we are down to 9 MIRs from a high of 14 in December.14:20
dokonot from my side14:20
kanashirodo you mean a way to track the diff of vendorized deps between versions in both packages?14:20
cpaelzerkanashiro: joeubuntu and all of seucrity will need to track if containerd has dependency A at version 1.2.314:21
joeubuntukanashiro , if that is for me, we have the ability to track the version of vendorized code in all vendored packages14:21
cpaelzerin case 1.2.3 becomes known to be affected to know that we also need to change the package that vendorized it14:22
joeubuntuI can't recall the details of how... but the tools exist.14:22
cpaelzerkanashiro: have you added the result of the package anylasis to both bugs already runc and containerd?14:22
cpaelzeranylasis->analysis14:22
kanashirocpaelzer, I just need to add a comment to containerd bug, but I have it in my notes14:23
ahasenacknote we will have potentially two versions of vendor code in the archive: the package in universe, and the vendored code inside runc/containerd14:23
cpaelzerI only see it on the runc bug14:23
cpaelzerkanashiro: ok please add it there14:23
kanashirorunc ibug is ok14:23
cpaelzerahasenack: yeah but that (two versions) is the natural consequence of vendorizing14:23
ahasenackyep14:23
cpaelzerok I conclude that we are ok and will update the bug then14:23
cpaelzerlets go on with the tail end of the "normal" MIR meeting14:24
* kanashiro is copying and pasting his notes regarding containerd now14:24
cpaelzer#topic Review of previous action items14:24
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | <wxl> be nice | Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status Meeting | Current topic: Review of previous action items
cpaelzerI'm not aware of recent action items14:24
cpaelzeranything for you others?14:24
cpaelzerok - I take that as a no, then ...14:25
cpaelzer#topic New MIRs14:25
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | <wxl> be nice | Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status Meeting | Current topic: New MIRs
cpaelzer#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir14:25
cpaelzerthere is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gamemode/+bug/185383014:25
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1853830 in gamemode (Ubuntu) "[MIR] gamemode" [Undecided,New]14:25
cpaelzerfrom the Desktop team or Wimpress14:25
cpaelzeranyone having extra context on that one?14:26
cpaelzerdidrocks: I know you are not here - but you'll read thids ping. Could you clarify if this is up for review or waiting on anything else?14:27
cpaelzerIt is there quite some time for not being mentioned before, therefore a pre-check by someone close to desktop could be useful14:27
cpaelzernext list14:27
cpaelzer#topic Incomplete bugs / questions14:28
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | <wxl> be nice | Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status Meeting | Current topic: Incomplete bugs / questions
cpaelzer#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir14:28
cpaelzerhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usbguard/+bug/181654814:29
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1816548 in usbguard (Ubuntu) "[MIR] usbguard" [Undecided,Incomplete]14:29
cpaelzerjoeubuntu: did you (=security) and any desktop member get further on this one?14:29
cpaelzerlast was an update by jdstrand missing still some fixes14:29
cpaelzerseb128 isn't here, didrocks could you ask internally if Desktop wants to re-emphasize or drop the efforts on usbguard?14:30
joeubuntucpaelzer It is still in progress by jdstrand14:31
cpaelzershould it move from incomplete to new then?14:31
cpaelzeras incomplete indicates waiting on the reporter14:31
joeubuntuLet me check with jdstrand when he comes back.14:32
cpaelzerok, you have the powers to set tat state then if he agrees14:32
joeubuntuyup14:32
cpaelzerthe last I see worth for discussion is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjpeg2/+bug/71106114:32
ubottuLaunchpad bug 711061 in openjpeg2 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] openjpeg2" [High,Incomplete]14:33
cpaelzerhad security review a) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjpeg2/+bug/711061/comments/6214:33
cpaelzerwhich let doko set it to incomplete14:33
cpaelzerthen a lot of things happened14:33
cpaelzerand we got https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjpeg2/+bug/711061/comments/7114:33
cpaelzerwhich is security review (b)14:33
cpaelzerdoko: joeubuntu: Is that ready for promotion now?14:34
cpaelzeras (b) was an ack14:34
joeubuntuYes it was acked. promote14:34
cpaelzerdoko: or are you waiting on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjpeg2/+bug/711061/comments/70 ?14:34
ubottuLaunchpad bug 711061 in openjpeg2 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] openjpeg2" [High,Incomplete]14:34
joeubuntucpaelzer hold on,14:35
cpaelzerholing ... :-)14:35
cpaelzer+d14:35
joeubuntuI  may be wrong...14:36
cpaelzerI also don't see desktop-packages subscribed14:36
joeubuntuI thought it was done, let me check with the team and get back via email.14:37
cpaelzerjoeubuntu: you could check with the team and then do a small update on the bug maybe?14:37
cpaelzerdirectly on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjpeg2/+bug/71106114:37
ubottuLaunchpad bug 711061 in openjpeg2 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] openjpeg2" [High,Incomplete]14:37
joeubuntuwill do14:37
cpaelzerthanks14:38
cpaelzerso I guess we unblcoked all we heard about14:38
cpaelzer#topic Any other business?14:38
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | <wxl> be nice | Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status Meeting | Current topic: Any other business?
cpaelzerwe had the two big discussion in the beginning14:38
cpaelzeranything else?14:38
cpaelzer... no?14:39
cpaelzer314:39
cpaelzer214:39
cpaelzer114:39
cpaelzerthan ks everyone14:39
cpaelzertoday was a rather big one, so thanks-twice!14:39
cpaelzer#endmeeting14:39
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | <wxl> be nice
meetingologyMeeting ended Tue Jan 14 14:39:27 2020 UTC.14:39
meetingologyMinutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2020/ubuntu-meeting.2020-01-14-14.03.moin.txt14:39
Laneyeee sorry14:40
Laneycpaelzer: can I flag https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-smc-gayathri/+bug/1858620 to the team pls?14:40
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1858620 in fonts-smc-gayathri (Ubuntu) "[MIR] fonts-smc-gayathri" [Undecided,New]14:40
Laneyshould be easy hopefully, but blocking fonts-smc in proposed14:40
cpaelzeryou won't be in the log, but people are still here14:41
cpaelzerI'm rather heads down on stuff that needs to be done before I need to get the capetown plane14:42
cpaelzerjamespage: I assume it isn't different for you?14:42
cpaelzerLaney: I can take a look somewhen next week as the sprint allows14:42
cpaelzerLaney: is it more urgent than that?14:42
cpaelzerchances for a fonts-package are we might need no security-review14:43
cpaelzerbut no promise14:43
cpaelzerI've seen fonts packages that contained dameons!14:43
cpaelzeror even daemons14:43
Laneycpaelzer: not super urgent, but is currently blocking so wanted to flag it to the mir team14:44
cpaelzerok Laney I'll assign myself then14:45
cpaelzerI'll have some breaks on the sprint where a review might just fit very well14:45
cpaelzerlike dumping all my bad mood into areject :-P14:45
Laney:)))14:45
jamespagelol14:46
cpaelzerI realized that sounds wrong, I' usually fine except being compacted too much by airplane seats14:47
didrockscpaelzer: I asked last time. Will redo today14:48
cpaelzersorry didrocks14:48
didrocksnw ;)14:48
cpaelzerit will keep coming up unless you mark it invalid if no one answers you :-)14:48
didrocksheh. I should definitively do that :p14:48
didrockssame for gamemode14:49
cpaelzeryep14:49
cpaelzerbugs are like zombies, properly resurrect or burn them14:49
cpaelzernobody wants the in-between-states14:49
didrocksindeed!14:49
didrockscpaelzer: I'll handle gamemode. usbguard will be set as incomplete in a moment until a definitive decision is taken14:54

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!