[01:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-40.44] (core, kernel)
[01:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-173.203] (core, kernel)
[01:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-40.44] (core, kernel)
[01:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-40.44] (core, kernel)
[02:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-173.203]
[02:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-40.44]
[02:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-40.44]
[02:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-40.44]
[06:35] <Eickmeyer> AAs: lv2vst has been sitting in source NEW for almost a month. Can we get some traction on this?
[08:32] <locutus_> vorlon, autopkgtest for ocfs2-tools/unknown: s390x: Regression
[08:32] <locutus_> can you please do the magic? its NBS
[08:35] <RAOF> Eickmeyer: I can look at that tomorrow, if no one gets to it sooner.
[09:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1010.11] (core, kernel)
[09:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1029.31~18.04.1] (kernel)
[09:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1067.72] (kernel)
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-1010.11]
[09:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1029.31~18.04.1]
[09:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1067.72]
[09:35] <sil2100> tjaalton: hey! Thanks for the verification of the hwe stack - I'll release those into -updates today
[09:35] <tjaalton> sil2100: niice
[09:35] <sil2100> tjaalton: one question: before releasing, you want to verify if LP: #1845149 is good or do you think the hwe testing was good enough?
[09:37] <tjaalton> ah.. well that has been in eoan and focal for some time now, so there's no reason it wouldn't work in bionic too
[09:48] <tjaalton> but since the hwe stack works, it's essentially verified
[09:49] <mfo> sil2100, hey Lukasz!  would you have a chance to check/release util-linux on eoan-proposed?  it's clear of autopkgtests errors on update_excuses.   and also please util-linux/focal-proposed, which only has cmake-extras autopkgtest regressions (unrelated), and I see nothing about it on update_output.txt.      I have fixes pending to be uploaded (the changes in F) to E/B.    Thanks in advance!
[09:59] <sil2100> mfo: hey! Sure thing, will get to those as soon as possible
[09:59] <mfo> sil2100, awesome. thank you very much!
[10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7-cross (bionic-proposed/main) [21ubuntu0.3 => 21ubuntu0.4] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7-cross-ports (bionic-proposed/universe) [17ubuntu0.3 => 17ubuntu0.4] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7-cross [sync] (bionic-proposed) [21ubuntu0.4]
[10:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7-cross-ports [sync] (bionic-proposed) [17ubuntu0.4]
[10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: casper (bionic-proposed/main) [1.394 => 1.394.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[10:48] <xnox> bdmurray:  sil2100: if you can review ^ casper upload that would be nice. It's for .4 point release.
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-5.4 [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.4.0-1002.4] (no packageset)
[11:16] <sil2100> xnox: sure thing! On it!
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: muse [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.0.2+ds1-2] (no packageset)
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: muse [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.0.2+ds1-2] (no packageset)
[11:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-5.4 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1002.4]
[11:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: muse [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.0.2+ds1-2] (no packageset)
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: muse [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.0.2+ds1-2] (no packageset)
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: muse [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.0.2+ds1-2] (no packageset)
[11:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted muse [amd64] (focal-proposed) [3.0.2+ds1-2]
[11:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted muse [armhf] (focal-proposed) [3.0.2+ds1-2]
[11:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted muse [s390x] (focal-proposed) [3.0.2+ds1-2]
[11:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted muse [arm64] (focal-proposed) [3.0.2+ds1-2]
[11:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted muse [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [3.0.2+ds1-2]
[12:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted casper [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.394.1]
[14:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: backport-iwlwifi-dkms (eoan-proposed/universe) [7906-0ubuntu3 => 7906-0ubuntu4] (no packageset)
[14:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: backport-iwlwifi-dkms (bionic-proposed/universe) [7906-0ubuntu3~18.04.1 => 7906-0ubuntu4~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[14:25] <ginggs> would someone 'force-badtest python-pyepsg/0.3.2-2' it's regressed in release
[14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plplot [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.15.0+dfsg-10+gnat8+1] (no packageset)
[14:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plplot [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.15.0+dfsg-10+gnat8+1] (no packageset)
[14:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plplot [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.15.0+dfsg-10+gnat8+1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plplot [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.15.0+dfsg-10+gnat8+1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:56] <xnox> doko:  can you please remove license-reconcile from Ubuntu please? https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/license-reconcile/+bug/1859994
[14:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plplot [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.15.0+dfsg-10+gnat8+1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plplot [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.15.0+dfsg-10+gnat8+1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plplot [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.15.0+dfsg-10+gnat8+1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glib2.0 [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.62.3-2~ubuntu19.10.1]
[15:52] <locutus_> please accept plplot
[15:52] <locutus_> it should fix testsuite
[15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed fonts-roboto-slab from i386-whitelist in focal
[15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed ubuntu-drivers-common from i386-whitelist in focal
[16:02] <Eickmeyer[m]> RAOF: Thank you. :)
[16:08] <vorlon> Laney: lol I tried to cowboy the change for britney2 for a test run, and the automation code clobbered it in the git checkout, sigh
[16:14] <Laney> vorlon: indeed /o\
[16:14] <Laney> stg-snakefruit would be quite a nice thing
[16:31] <blackboxsw_> sil2100: if there is a chance today, would you be able to glance at the proposed cloud-init SRU into xenial, bionic and eoan per https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1859725
[16:33] <sil2100> blackboxsw_: sure thing, will get to it after the meeting o/
[16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: util-linux (eoan-proposed/main) [2.34-0.1ubuntu2.1 => 2.34-0.1ubuntu2.2] (core)
[16:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: util-linux (bionic-proposed/main) [2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.4 => 2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.5] (core)
[16:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: util-linux (xenial-proposed/main) [2.27.1-6ubuntu3.9 => 2.27.1-6ubuntu3.10] (core)
[17:00] <doko> vorlon: for https://launchpadlibrarian.net/460285560/buildlog_ubuntu-focal-i386.pillow_7.0.0-3_BUILDING.txt.gz does the python3-pycparser dependency need to be annotated with :any?
[17:02] <vorlon> doko: we won't cross-install amd64 packages in builds, so no
[17:03] <vorlon> doko: if the build-dep is missing, we need to restore it
[17:03] <doko> can you do?
[17:04] <vorlon> but python3-pycparser/i386 does exist in the archive (it's arch: all)
[17:04] <vorlon> which piece is actually missing?
[17:05] <vorlon> python-cffi is built on i386 in -proposed
[17:05] <vorlon> pycparser is only arch: all
[17:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected flash-kernel [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.98ubuntu5.3~18.04.1]
[17:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected u-boot [source] (bionic-proposed) [2019.07+dfsg-1ubuntu3~18.04.1]
[17:06] <vorlon> doko: is it possible python-cffi was just out of date on i386 at the time and the build needs retried?
[17:07] <doko> maybe
[17:14] <locutus_> please accept plplot..
[17:15] <locutus_> in the meanwhile I'll prepare ocaml transition on bileto
[17:15] <doko> locutus_: are you working on the llvm-8 autopkg tests?
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware-raspi2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.20190819-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (eoan-proposed) [19.4-33-gbb4131a2-0ubuntu1~19.10.1]
[18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [19.4-33-gbb4131a2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [19.4-33-gbb4131a2-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plplot [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.15.0+dfsg-10+gnat8+1]
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plplot [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.15.0+dfsg-10+gnat8+1ubuntu1]
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plplot [armhf] (focal-proposed) [5.15.0+dfsg-10+gnat8+1ubuntu1]
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plplot [s390x] (focal-proposed) [5.15.0+dfsg-10+gnat8+1ubuntu1]
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plplot [s390x] (focal-proposed) [5.15.0+dfsg-10+gnat8+1]
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plplot [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [5.15.0+dfsg-10+gnat8+1ubuntu1]
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plplot [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.15.0+dfsg-10+gnat8+1ubuntu1]
[19:21] <blackboxsw> thanks sil2100 !
[22:37] <xnox> vorlon:  can you please badtest ruby-defaults on i386 ? it makes no sence to test native:i386 toolchain in a cross-arch environment.
[22:38] <xnox> vorlon:  it tries to installs things that nuke things needed by the host
[22:38] <xnox> vorlon:  then ruby2.5 can migrate.
[22:38] <xnox> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#ruby2.5
[22:38] <xnox> or please advise what you'd want me to do to them.
[22:39] <xnox> similarly cmake:i386 => we only do native builds on :i386, and do not care about running cmake:i386 on amd64 host, expecting it to find :i386 things, despite like installing :host toolchain
[22:40] <xnox> llvm-toolchain-8:i386 imho is also in the same bucket, we only have it for native i386 on i386, and the autopkgtest tests native builds, not cross builds from amd64 to i386.
[22:40] <vorlon> xnox: llvm-toolchain-8 was failing autopkgtests on all archs which was why I hadn't hinted it away; is that resolved now?
[22:41] <xnox> vorlon:  i see it passing on everything, but :i386, where testsuite is uninstallable.
[22:41] <xnox> vorlon:  i am talking about the one in release pocket
[22:41] <xnox> vorlon:  the one in proposed indeed is failing everywhere.
[22:41] <doko> I' fixing llvm-8 now
[22:41] <xnox> ie. to migrate cmake
[22:41] <xnox> doko:  that works too, but i don't think will resolve the :i386 issue.
[22:42]  * vorlon doesn't understand why there isn't an existing hint for ruby-defaults/i386, must have been a late addition to the packagest?
[22:43] <xnox> vorlon:  it's a good question why ruby2.5 is in. And if both should be in-sync. I.e. it doesn't make sence to have interpret in without the matching defaults package.
[22:43] <vorlon> xnox: my analysis of the ruby-defaults autopkgtest log doesn't support your conclusion that it's a nonsense test
[22:44] <vorlon> I want to know why these packages aren't cross-installable before I badtest it
[22:44] <xnox> vorlon:  that it installed ruby-dev:i386, and cannot find .pc file, becuase it is using pkg-config from the host arch and looking for amd64 .pc file?
[22:44] <xnox> that's what is worng.
[22:44] <xnox> pkg-config --cflags --libs ruby => looks for ruby-dev:amd64
[22:44] <vorlon> xnox: and that test should be fixed by invoking pkg-config correctly
[22:44] <xnox> Setting up ruby-dev:i386 (1:2.5.2) ...
[22:44] <vorlon> as i686-linux-pc-gnu-pkg-config or whatever it is
[22:45] <vorlon> but the other two tests are failing with uninstallabilities
[22:45] <xnox> vorlon:  the test is written to test native arch...... do i have any indication in the environment that this is a cross autopkgtest?
[22:45] <vorlon> you do
[22:45] <xnox> coach me =)
[22:45] <vorlon> DEB_HOST_* variables
[22:45] <xnox> ok
[22:45] <xnox> that's nice.
[22:45] <xnox> i can fix up the -dev test then.
[22:46] <xnox> vorlon:  how do you create the amd64/i386 cross autopkgtest envrionemtn? cause i've only created native arch autopkgtests VM before. Is there docs about it somewhere?
[22:46] <vorlon> Broken builddeps:/tmp/autopkgtest.esUVt5/1-autopkgtest-satdep.dsc:i386 Depends on ruby:i386:any < none @un H >
[22:46] <vorlon> ... ok so apparently I have a bug in the autopkgtest code
[22:46] <vorlon> should either be ruby:i386 or ruby:any, not both ;)
[22:47] <xnox> hahahhahhaha
[22:47] <xnox> vorlon:  it identifies as both
[22:47] <vorlon> xnox: did my mails to ubuntu-devel not cover this?  I ought to have
[22:48] <vorlon> xnox: all you need is an amd64 env with the foreign-arch enabled in dpkg, and to use the autopkgtest from git+ssh://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest/+git/development with -a i386
[22:49] <xnox> vorlon:  why is that autopkgtest not in the archive?!
[22:49] <xnox> vorlon:  your i386 emails were tl;dr
[22:52] <xnox> ok, will play with this later. good night.
[22:52] <doko> what are you playing now?
[22:53] <doko> vorlon: do you know about any changes about kernels for buildds for the last two weeks?
[22:55] <vorlon> doko: I do not
[22:55] <vorlon> if the kernel has changed, isn't that reported in the build log?
[22:57] <doko> should I run a log analyzer to get that information?
[22:58] <vorlon> doko: I don't know, but I also don't know why you're asking me given that I'm not a buildd admin
[23:02] <Eickmeyer[m]> RAOF: Any traction on lv2vst?
[23:02] <vorlon> hah ok, the ruby:i386:amd64 is not my bug, but maybe apt's
[23:02] <vorlon> ruby:i386:any that is
[23:04] <vorlon> xnox: but anyway, this is ruby:i386 depends ruby2.5:i386 depends libruby2.5:i386 depends rake:all depends ruby:amd64 lol
[23:04] <vorlon> rake should Depends: ruby:any
[23:04] <vorlon> (ruby is Multi-Arch: allowed)
[23:05] <RAOF> <Eickmeyer[m] "RAOF: Any traction on lv2vst?"> Eickmeyer: just about to start!
[23:05] <Eickmeyer[m]> <RAOF "Eickmeyer: just about to start!"> In the words of McDonalds, "I'm lovin' it."
[23:12] <vorlon> xnox: rake uploaded with that change, but also ruby-defaults badtested per the current state
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mdadm (eoan-proposed/main) [4.1-2ubuntu3.1 => 4.1-2ubuntu3.2] (core)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mdadm (bionic-proposed/main) [4.1~rc1-3~ubuntu18.04.3 => 4.1~rc1-3~ubuntu18.04.4] (core)
[23:23] <ddstreet> vorlon if you have just a quick minute, could you reject the older mdadm uploads for B/E?  I just re-uploaded corrected versions
[23:24] <vorlon> ddstreet: done
[23:24] <ddstreet> thanks!
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mdadm [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.1~rc1-3~ubuntu18.04.4]
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mdadm [source] (eoan-proposed) [4.1-2ubuntu3.2]
[23:26] <vorlon> Broken builddeps:/tmp/autopkgtest.ZdtVZL/1-autopkgtest-satdep.dsc:i386 Depends on debhelper-compat:i386 < none @un H > (= 12)
[23:26] <vorlon> sigh
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (bionic-proposed/main) [237-3ubuntu10.33 => 237-3ubuntu10.34] (core)
[23:55] <xnox> vorlon:  arm64 autopkgtest VMs appear to crash in fire
[23:56] <xnox> vorlon:  so cmake:i386 is similar it has "Depends on cmake:i386:any" in the log