SpecialK|Canon | I need to bail on the standup later today because of a store meeting in ZA, sorry | 11:22 |
---|---|---|
SpecialK|Canon | My main contributions: 1) I'm writing up OCI versioning notes for tomorrow 2) File your expenses from last week please | 11:22 |
cjwatson | Waiting for replacement phone to finish downloading a gazillion things over wet string before I do expenses :) | 11:35 |
SpecialK|Canon | zoom zoom zoom! | 12:04 |
pappacena | Tom is in vacation, and Ioana will take the day... there will be only me and colin at the standup today, then? | 12:32 |
SpecialK|Canon | pappacena: relatedly, you have two swap days! | 12:33 |
SpecialK|Canon | cjwatson: LP db/model structure as described in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SheiqNbiiQu376XPWHEccLUupzpT_HPbADRtqp_boUY/edit#heading=h.wtrqreyakykt - how accurate is that now? | 12:33 |
pappacena | kristian, I'm thinking about taking Thursday and Friday... | 12:36 |
cjwatson | SpecialK|Canon: I've updated it a little | 12:37 |
SpecialK|Canon | cjwatson: fab, thank you! | 12:47 |
SpecialK|Canon | pappacena: excellent | 12:48 |
SpecialK|Canon | cjwatson: do we have a concrete decision on the OCIPS/OCIR linkage? | 12:49 |
cjwatson | SpecialK|Canon: I thought it was clear we weren't linking those at least until we had some practical experience with how people use bugs with OCI projects | 12:51 |
SpecialK|Canon | cjwatson: sorry, I've fallen into the trap of conflating the two kinds of series again | 12:52 |
cjwatson | Adding a recipe name to OCIRecipe allows us to have more than one recipe per project, which we can use for building for multiple channels | 12:52 |
cjwatson | I updated my DB patch for that this morning (https://git.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/launchpad/commit/?id=35651746e6218615c1f4259b64f0f0e6c7cbe3ab) | 12:53 |
cjwatson | Fairly sure that's in line with my discussions with William last week | 12:53 |
SpecialK|Canon | I think I entirely agree with you, I'm just finding all the places where it's important to be specific lest confusion occur, by walking into them again and getting confused - at least my edits should clarify this | 12:55 |
SpecialK|Canon | (Thanks!) | 12:56 |
cjwatson | Yep | 12:59 |
SpecialK|Canon | I've created a new doc that we all have edit rights to at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vFuBS6ekm14udGFm4H6bHpuWT163kLUBavRM-uj5Aio/edit# and I'm merging in the predecessor with notes from last week | 12:59 |
SpecialK|Canon | Anyone happen to know why setting font to "Ubuntu Mono" occasionally makes GDocs treat it like a header in the TOC on the left? | 13:02 |
cjwatson | Afraid not. Last time I hit that I think I worked around it by indenting or making paragraphs longer or something | 13:02 |
cjwatson | ultra-short standup :) | 14:04 |
pappacena | hahaha! Yes! | 14:05 |
cjwatson | probably just as well, I wasn't sure my network was going to hold up with phone + lxd downloading all the things | 14:05 |
* cjwatson considers Built-Using some more | 15:15 | |
cjwatson | I think we probably need to track source name and version separately in the DB rather than using a SourcePackageRelease FK, because in general we don't have a particularly good way to know which SPR a given parsed relationship line refers to - things could get very confusing when PPAs are involved | 15:16 |
cjwatson | Hmm, OTOH we do want to check that the SPR exists at upload time | 15:38 |
cjwatson | So maybe this looks slightly like the multiple-archive stuff in DSCFile._getFileByName? | 15:41 |
cjwatson | Or maybe something involving expand_dependencies | 16:25 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!