urgodfather | hello, im banging my head in on configuring a remote dedicated server new nic. i only have kvm access and maint. mode will not work. i can confirm that there is in fact a netplan yaml but i cannot for the life of me get it to initialize on boot. it was incorrect, so i have updated with the correct info using bash from the kernel. would anyone be | 01:09 |
---|---|---|
urgodfather | willing help me nudge this along? | 01:09 |
compdoc | this looks interesting: http://www.yamllint.com/ | 01:19 |
compdoc | has the interface name changed? | 01:20 |
urgodfather | yes | 01:23 |
urgodfather | i think (?) | 01:24 |
urgodfather | lol | 01:24 |
urgodfather | not to mention its a german keyboard in kvm | 01:24 |
sarnold | warum sie haben es kaputtmachen? | 01:25 |
compdoc | maybe: sudo netplan try | 01:28 |
urgodfather | from kernel? | 01:28 |
Wally | I'm looking at the logs for Ubuntu, whenever I attempt to login with an AD user it spits out "Jan 22 13:28:45 ubuntu systemd-resolved[539]: Server returned error NXDOMAIN, mitigating potential DNS violation DVE-2018-0001, retrying transaction with reduced feature level UDP." I'm pretty sure this is why tis not working, any ideas would be appreciated | 02:29 |
Wally | Pretty sure it's a DNS issue -_- | 02:31 |
sarnold | Wally: this discussion may help you understand it better https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/8608 | 02:32 |
Wally | ah | 02:34 |
zxvff | Hi all. I am having a difficult time migrating a server to a new ubuntu instance. it's an ubuntu server but apache2 is running from /etc/apache-sp. How do I update my systemd script to use the /etc/apache-sp locatio instead of /etc/apache2? | 05:27 |
zxvff | I can't find the location of the init script that runs the command to start apache | 05:27 |
=== paride6 is now known as paride | ||
lordievader | Good morning | 07:24 |
lordievader | zxvff: You want an systemd override (systemctl edit apache2.service), else your edit will be overwritten on the next update. That said, why not migrate your apache-sp to /etc/apache2? | 07:25 |
samba35 | i have setup basic bridge with ovs-vsctl add br and ovs-vsctl add-port to my nic | 07:33 |
samba35 | and i have guest on kvm ,now how do i assing ip address to guest from host | 07:34 |
lordievader | DHCP? | 07:54 |
samba35 | yes try but its now working | 07:55 |
samba35 | or i am doing some thing wrong | 07:55 |
lordievader | Firewall dropping the requests/answers? | 07:56 |
samba35 | no firewall no appliation firewall | 07:58 |
lordievader | Start tcpdumping then | 07:59 |
samba35 | ok | 07:59 |
samba35 | sorry but i have very little or equal to no idea on how to read output | 07:59 |
lordievader | What you are looking for is if the server sees the dhcp request (and answers it), and on the client to see if the answer is being received. | 08:01 |
samba35 | ok | 08:02 |
samba35 | let me give try | 08:02 |
samba35 | will also refresh packages | 08:03 |
samba35 | brb | 08:04 |
weedmic | If anyone needs to know how to manipulate both icon size and precise placement of icons in plasma5 kde, let me know. I have it all figured out now. | 10:05 |
lotuspsychje | weedmic: hows that related to ubuntu server please? | 10:06 |
weedmic | some use de = plasma | 10:06 |
lotuspsychje | but its not a server specific question | 10:07 |
lotuspsychje | weedmic: could try #plasma ? | 10:13 |
lordievader | More suited for #kubuntu | 10:53 |
coreycb | sahid: re: networkx ussuri backport, yes it seems more and more packages are needing 2.x. I've been trying to patch packages back to 1.x in ca-patches but it's getting more likely that we need to backport networkx | 13:19 |
coreycb | sahid: I started trying to but it gets very involved | 13:19 |
bipul | I'm looking for a help regarding X forwarding on ssh inside Ubuntu server. | 13:21 |
sahid | coreycb: i was considering doing a revert of dc6495cfa1c8e1dc95bad554a55f0b4e8e360abe | 13:23 |
coreycb | sahid: in taskflow? | 13:23 |
sahid | yes | 13:23 |
sahid | i mean condiring prepare a patch for ca-patches that to revert it | 13:24 |
coreycb | sahid: let's do that for now and carry it in ca-patches | 13:25 |
coreycb | sahid: horizon's uploaded, thank you | 14:03 |
sahid | coreycb: ack | 14:04 |
coreycb | sahid: looks like we'll also need a ca-patch to six.patch to s/python2/python in d/control | 14:33 |
jayjo | is it possible to set up EITHER a yubikey or Google Authenticator two-factor auth for ssh on ubuntu, but not both? | 16:16 |
jayjo | Similar to how on google (for example) you can register multiple second factors in case one becomes unavailable, but you don't have to use each of them on each login | 16:16 |
pragmaticenigma | jayjo: This thread seems to be close to achieving what you're looking for... it might start you down the right path? https://serverfault.com/a/222655 | 16:39 |
pragmaticenigma | I haven't heard of the ability to choose one or the other on login... you'd have to have some way to prompt the user which they're choosing | 16:40 |
lordcirth_ | jayjo, I'm pretty sure in PAM you could set it to prompt for both, but only require one to pass. That's pretty clunky though. | 16:48 |
pragmaticenigma | lordcirth_: How would PAM be able to identify which one is being used though? | 16:49 |
lordcirth_ | pragmaticenigma, it prompts for one, and then the other, and in one you just press enter and submit emptystring | 16:49 |
lordcirth_ | And it ORs then | 16:50 |
pragmaticenigma | ah, simple solution :-) | 16:50 |
lordcirth_ | Very kludgy | 16:50 |
pragmaticenigma | At the moment, I haven't seen anything better. Except to ask users on setup which they prefer and setup the user to only use that option | 16:50 |
lordcirth_ | It *might* be possible to present one text prompt, and run it past both methods | 16:56 |
lordcirth_ | For example, Yubikey auth works if you type your password, then your yubikey, or yubikey -> newline -> password | 16:57 |
=== PaulePan1er is now known as PaulePanter | ||
jayjo | If I were to allow users to decide which one they prefer, would there be any way to bypass the 'preferred' one if it became misplaced? | 17:27 |
jayjo | Thanks for the resources, definitely on the right track | 17:27 |
pragmaticenigma | I'm sure anything is possible | 17:42 |
jayjo | I found this feature just searching through ubuntu docs: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SSO/FAQs/2FA | 18:56 |
jayjo | is this for ubuntu in general or just for login.ubuntu.com ? It does mention "You can add multiple 2fa devices to your account; the system will auto-detect which one you use at each login. We recommend having at least two devices associated with your account so you will have a backup in case the main device fails or locks you out. It's also required to have a "printable backup codes" device in case | 18:57 |
jayjo | all your electronic devices become unavailable. | 18:57 |
sarnold | jayjo: all the services that use the canonical-supplied 2fa mechanism (which isn't entirely the same as all canonical services that have logins, I think I've seen third-party projects integrating with the login.ubuntu.com single-signon before..) | 18:59 |
teward | jayjo: anything that uses login.u.c and its SSO system is bound to that | 20:44 |
teward | some third party services utilize it as well, but that ONLY applies to login.u.c and the SSO system that goes with it | 20:44 |
teward | those statements don't apply to other SSO systems/providers which don't integrate with Canonical's SSO. | 20:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!