[12:52] <sdhd-sascha> hi, 
[12:52] <sdhd-sascha> I have a bond-device and added it to a bridge. 
[12:52] <sdhd-sascha> I want to use this bridge for lxd and kvm, to expose all machines into the physical network.
[12:52] <sdhd-sascha> Should i enable stp ? Because, if i add `stp: yes` to netplan - then my network is not reachable. 
[12:52] <sdhd-sascha> (Not sure how to debug this issue. My network skills are not the best )
[12:52] <sdhd-sascha> Currently it's ubuntu 20.04 - but had the same effect before in 19.10
[13:01] <sdhd-sascha> Should i give the bond0 all mac-addresses from all physical interfaces ? (Currently don't know how to look into the arp-table of my switch)
[13:02] <sdhd-sascha> E. g. MAAS gives the bond only one mac-address from one device (not sure, if the bond-mode does control this)
[13:04] <nils_> sdhd-sascha, not sure if this is strictly kernel related. 
[13:05] <sdhd-sascha> nils_: i'm too. Whom could i ask ? 
[13:06] <sdhd-sascha> Some Ceph or Openstack people ... I look, for other channels ;-) thank you
[13:09] <nils_> the bond device is connected to a switch? 
[13:09] <nils_> It may be that enabling STP on the bridge interferes with the switch. 
[13:21] <sdhd-sascha> nils_: yes. Good hint. :-)
[13:21] <sdhd-sascha> I found #openstack. And there i get the information, that no `stp` is needed, because i didn't create loops on the host 
[13:21] <sdhd-sascha> Thank you :-)
[13:22]  * sdhd-sascha really need to refresh my network knowledge 
[15:32] <zx2c4> apw: any repo where i can follow along your dkms reworking? ive been poking around launchpad to get a handle on it but havent found much
[15:39] <apw> zx2c4, oh no, that is all local right now; the fight i have been having with the librarian and provides is over
[15:53] <zx2c4> apw: oh my...
[15:53] <zx2c4> O_o
[15:54] <zx2c4> do you mean this whole thing with linux-module-wireguard "providing" wireguard-modules, which the wireguard metapackage depends on?
[16:29] <apw> zx2c4, the support that would be used for that; but for the existing builds, nvidia and hte like
[16:31] <zx2c4> ah gotcha
[16:33] <apw> but the existing stuff was a bit of a mess to add to, and bugs in the first phase take hours to build
[16:33] <zx2c4> zoinks
[16:33] <zx2c4> well hopefully wireguard will just be "drop in"
[16:33] <zx2c4> should have a relatively sane build system compared to nvidia....
[16:47] <apw> yes, it should be easy, nvidia not so much
[16:57] <zx2c4> apw: well let me know when i can try it out / when youve got something publish pushed
[20:52] <fling> Is eoan at 5.4 now?
[20:52] <fling> Am I supposed to get shiftfs patches from eoan if I want them for 5.4?
[21:03] <fling> probably not
[21:04] <gpiccoli> fling, eoan is 5.3 - the new release (devel), called Focal, is 5.4 AFAIK
[21:07] <fling> gpiccoli: how do I clone it's repo using linus tree as base?
[21:08] <fling> git clone --reference linux focal.git
[21:08] <fling> what is the focal git repo? :P
[21:09] <sarnold> fling: https://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/ubuntu/ looks to have one
[21:09] <fling> thanks
[21:09] <gpiccoli> I've been using this one fling : git://kernel.ubuntu.com/kernel-ppa/mirror/ubuntu-focal.git
[21:12] <fling> n=5401 ; for c in $(git log fs/shiftfs.c | grep ^commit | sed s/commit\ // | tac) ; do git format-patch -1 --start-number $n $c ; n=$(($n+1)) ; done
[21:13] <fling> this is how I get shiftfs patches ^ is there a better way to filter out what I need?